and Exposition Year. Milwaukee, WisconsinASEE.3. Saleta, M.E., D. Tobia, and S. Gil, Experimental study of Bernoulli's equation with losses. American Journal of Physics, 2005. 73(7): p. 598-602.4. Munson, B.R., D.F. Young, and T.H. Okiishi, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics. fifth ed. 2006, New York: Wiley.5. Edwards, R., G. Recktenwald, and B. Benini. A laboratory exercise to teach the hydrostatic principle as a core concept in fluid mechanics. in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Austin, TX. June 14-17, 2009, American Society for Engineering Education. Page 15.161.14
Engineering, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.4. Beichner, R. J., Abbott, D. S., Deardorff , D. L., Allain, R. J., and Saul, J. M. (2000), “Introduction to SCALE-UP : Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics”, 2000 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, St. Louis, MO.5. Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, Second Edition, San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.6. McKeachie, W.J. (1999). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers,Tenth Edition, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.7. Martinazzi, R. (1997), “Employing the “Partnering” Concept With Student Teams”, 1997 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Milwaukee, WI.8
Sorby, S. (1999). Developing 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal,Vol 63, No 2.5 Gobert, J. (1999). Expertise in the Comprehension of Architectural Plans (Knowledge Acquistion and Inference Making)". Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design (JS Gero &B Tversky, Ed.)6 Arnheim, R. (1986). A plea for visual thinking. New Essays on the Psychology of Art. University of California Press, Berkeley,CA, (p. 135-152).7 Esparragoza, I.,(2004), Enhancing visualization skills in freshman engineering students. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting and Conference of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division,21-23 November, 2004 Williamsburg, VA.8 Potter, C. and Van der
, 2008, Session 117.3. Hartley, J., Designing Instructional Text. London: Kogan Page, 1993.4. Tufte, E. R., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd Ed. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 2001.5. Harris, R. L., Information Graphics: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.6. Davis, D.C., Beyerlein, S. W., & Davis, I.T., “Development and Use of an Engineering Profile,” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition. Portland, OR, 12-15 June, 2005. Session 3155.7. Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Inc., Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations During the 2005-2006 Accreditation Cycle
: Past, Present, and Future”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 1998.3. F.L. Huband, “Engineering Education – An Alternative Approach”, ASEE Prism, American Society for Engineering Education, January 1999.4. A. Gjengedal, “Project Based Learning in Engineering Education at Tromsoe College,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education, Taipei, Taiwan, August 14-16, 2000.5. Undergraduate Catalog 2009/2010 http://www.wku.edu/coursecatalog/6. M.E. Cambron and S. Wilson, “Introducing Design to Freshmen and Sophomores at Western Kentucky University," Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
. Page 15.584.9References1. Thornton, K. and Asta, M. (2005). Current status and outlook of computational materials science education in the US. Modeling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 13 p.53-692. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (2009). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved November 25, 2009, from http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%2011-03-09.pdf3. Reid, A. C. E., Lua, R. C., Garcia, R. E., Coffman, V. and Langer, S. A. (2009). Modeling Microstructures in OOF2. Invited Paper in the International Journal of the Materials and Product Technology, 35, p. 361- 373.4. Chawla, N., Patel, B.V., Koopman, M
academic colleagues isalso gratefully acknowledged.References 1. The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) provides a full and helpful outline of systems engineering principles at: http://www.incose.org/practice/fellowsconsensus.aspx 2. Kaplan R S & Norton D P, “The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1992, pages 71-79. 3. Wisler D C, “Engineering – what you don’t necessarily learn in school”, Proc ASME/IGTI Turbo Expo 2003, June 16-19, 2003, Atlanta, GA. 4. Robertson J, Munukutla L and Newman R, “Delivery of a common microelectronics technology curriculum at several degree levels”, Proc ASEE Annual Conference
Session 3649 Matrix Based Approach to Assessment of an Educational Program along ABET Criteria S. Verma Texas A & M University – Corpus ChristiAbstractThis paper describes a spreadsheet based matrix method to quantify the performance of aneducational program and its various courses against criteria set forth by the Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology (ABET). Inputs to the spreadsheet are: student learningoutcomes for each course, connection of these outcomes to the ABET criteria, student scores invarious classroom assessment activities
programs and to cooperate with each other. Full recognition of the importance of international affairs has also been given by both ministries. Each ministryestablishes its own division in charge of international cooperation and provides certain common programs topromote activities as mentioned earlier such as attending international conferences, holding internationalconferences in Taiwan and providing long-term or short-term visits for foreign scholars. In Year 2000’s overallinternational mobility expenditure (excluding the research project funding) in NSC, 60% of the expenditure isdevoted to these programs. The rest of the expenditure is focused on bilateral cooperation and mission orientedprograms. Establishing the relationship between
Session Number 2548 Robots and Microprocessors: Increasing Student Interest in Introductory Programming Gregory M. Dick University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownBackgroundInstruction in computer programming has been a required component of the EngineeringTechnology curriculum at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (UPJ) since itsinception in the early 1970s. In the 1970’s the programming language was FORTRANand the primary goals of the course were to give the students a firm grounding in thebasics of: problem solving algorithm development program design
Future DirectionsIn summary, requirements in general, and the authors’ project approach in particular, emphasizedifferent skills than those with which most engineers have the greatest comfort. The emphasis onunderstanding a new domain and finding requirements before doing design enables providesskills to our students which we believe will really help them in the workplace.We are very excited about the collaboration and see great potential. If this collaboration continuesto work, they may be future opportunities in the BE and SE curriculum to collaborate on otherareas (like Verification and Validation, Design Reviews) that can be pursued.8. References[1] Davis, A., Overmayer, S., et al.,“Identifying and Measuring Quality in a Software
” Table 1: Jitter topics by semester Semester Topic(s) 1 Real time oscilloscope introduction 2 Real time DSO topics: sampling, aliasing Jitter vs. wander Random vs. deterministic jitter Use DSOs in lab, if available 3 DCD vs. ISI vs. PJ, and 8B/10B encoding Infinite persistence with a DSO, and eye diagrams 4 Intro to logic analyzers: asynchronous vs. synchronous modes, inverse assembly & source code correlation, cross-triggering & time correlation, jitter analysis technologies Probing considerations (including
Literacy.Washington, DC: April 6, 2000.3. ITEA. (2000). Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA:International Technology Education Association.4. Ibid.5. Rutherford, F. J. and Ahlgren, A. (1991). Science for All Americans. Oxford University Press.6. Focus on Effectiveness: Research Based Strategies. Retrieved on December 10, 2009, fromhttp://www.netc.org/focus/strategies.7. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., and Duschl, R. (2003). “What ‘ideas aboutscience’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the ‘expert’ community.”Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 692–720.8. Ibid.9. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.10. Burghardt, David
, 2008, Farmindale State Colle - SUNY, Farm-ingdale, NY, http://www.merconline.net/wiki/index.php?title=Farmingdale_Forum_Program.3. Jack, H., (editor) Manufacturing Education Transformation Summit Proceedings, Austin, TX,June 2009, http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/ocs/index.php/smetexas2009/METS2009/sched-Conf/presentations.4. Jack, H., “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Education”, An SME Technical Paper,November 20055. Danielson, S, Georgeou, T, “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Technology Education”
, E. Advanced engineering mathematics, 9th edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2006.4 O’Neil, P. Advanced engineering mathematics, 6th edition, CL-Engineering, 2006.5 Sadiku, M. Elements of electromagnetics, 4th edition, oxford University Press, 2006.6 Teh, K. and Morgan, L. The application of Excel in teaching finite element analysis to final year engineering students, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE/AaeE (Australian Association for Engineering Education) Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, Paper # 50.7 Lau, M. A. and Kuruganty, S. P. Spreadsheet implementations for solving power-flow problems, eJournal of Spreadsheets in Education, 3(1): 27-45, August 2008. Online: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/ejsie/vol3/iss1/3
behavior of others and then imitating the behavior that produces a desired reward. For example, if the student sees others getting good grades and recognition, s/he will be motivated to copy the behavior to achieve the same results. 2. Cognitive theories According to Jean Piaget21, individuals have an innate need to organize their experiences. Page 15.890.3 They do this by fitting new experiences into existing mental structures or by modifying those structures to accommodate the new experience. The need for accommodating a new experience, either by linking it to an existing mental structure or by revising
tangible or intangible rewards. His original theories were extreme and could be interpreted to mean that human beings do not have real freedom of action, but merely respond to their environment. Albert Bandura’s theory of observational learning, also known as social learning19,20, states that people learn by observing the behavior of others and then imitating the behavior that produces a desired reward. For example, if the student sees others getting good grades and recognition, s/he will be motivated to copy the behavior to achieve the same results. 2. Cognitive theories According to Jean Piaget21, individuals have an innate need to organize their experiences
. J. Bailey and N. E. Thornton, “Interactive video: Innovative episodes for enhancing education,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, no. 1, pp. 97–108, 1992-1993.[6] S. Stoney and R. Oliver, “Can higher order thinking and cognitive engagement be enhanced with multimedia?” Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, no. 7, 1999.[7] Webct. [Online]. Available: http://www.webct.com[8] G. M. N. et al., Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.[9] A. Gavrin, K. Marrs, and R. Blake, “Just-in-time teaching JiTT: Using the web to enhance classroom learning,” Computers in education journal, no. 2, pp. 51–60, 2004.[10] R. Hake
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 15.354.9Reference[1] Low, Lesley Ann, Paula R. L. Heron, Brian C. Fabien, Per G. Reinhall, Development and Assessment of Tutorials for Introductory Engineering Dynamics, Proceedings of 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, June 2004[2] Minogue, J., M.G. Jones, B. Broadwell and T. Oppewall, The impact of haptic augmentation on middle school student’s conceptions of the animal cells, Virtual Reality, Vol. 10, Num 3-4, 2006[3] Itkowitz B., Handley J., Zhu W., OpenHaptics: Add 3D Navigation and Haptics to Graphics Application
. Page 9.631.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2004, American Society for Engineering Education FU S E - Sum m er 2 003 FIELD TR IP EV A LU A T IO N FO R M Field Trip to:____ ___________ _______ D ate: __________ ______ 1. The m ost im p ortant thing I learned from p articipating in this field trip w as:________ _ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ 2. This field trip can be im proved if_______ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___ 3. D id this field trip increase your understanding of the operations
, San Francisco, CA, 344 p.4. Wadzuk, B., Dinehart, D., Glynn, E., Gross, S. and Hampton, F. (2009) “A Methodology for Curriculum Modification to Civil Engineering Mechanics,” The Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Meeting, Austin, TX, June 2009. Available online at < http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=12240>.5. ABET, Engineering Accreditation Commission (2008) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for the 2008-2009 Accreditation Cycle. Available online at .6. Welker, A.L., Quintiliano, B., and Green, L. (2005) “Information Literacy: Skills for Life,” The Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, June 2005. Available online at .7. Welker, A.L. and Quintiliano, B. (2008
Page 15.1103.11Conference, 2006.[4] L. Oseguera, A. Locks, and I. Vega. "Increasing Latina/o Students Baccalaureate Degree Attainment: A Focuson Retention." Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol 8, no 1. January 2009[5] M. T. V. Taningco. “Latinos in STEM Professions: Understanding Challenges and Opportunities for Next Steps.A Qualitative Study Using Stakeholder Interviews,” Tomas Rivera Policy Institute. April 2008.[6] S. Caonguyen and R. Vellanoweth. “Locating the Lipid Transfer Protein (LTP) Network for DevelopmentalRegulation in Flowering Plants” SACNAS National Conference - Improving the Human Condition: Challenges forInterdisciplinary Science, October 2009.[7] M. Zhang and D. Won. "Information in Pooled and Labeled-Line Spike and
. However, feedback from graduate student TAs and Instructors involved in advancedengineering courses indicates that students perform better in teams and are more able to communicate theirconcepts after taking ENG 1430.Bibliography 1. Ambrose, S. A. (1997). Systematic design of a first-year mechanical engineering course at Carnegie Mellon. Eng. Education , 2 (86). 2. Brassard, M. (1996). The Memory Jogger Plus, GOAL/QPC. 3. Brent, R. M. (2001). New faculty an orientation to the profession. Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Conference, 31, pp. S3B/1-S3B/3. New York. 4. Byrd, J. (1995). Teaming in the design laboratory. ASEE , 84, 225±341. 5. Catalano, G. D. (1996). Adding hands-on design to an engineering curriculum
/www/usinterimproj/4. Georgia Department of Education-http://www.doe.k12.ga.us5. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Women, Minorities, and Persons withDisabilities in Science and Engineering: 2009, NSF 09-305 ( Arlington, VA; January 2009). Available fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.6. Jones, L.S. Science Education (1997) 81, 663.7. Lauer,P.A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S.B., Apthrop, H.S. , Snow, D., and Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006) Review ofEducational Research, 76, 275 .8. Zaff, J. F., Moor, K.A., Papillo, A.R., Williams (2003) S. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 599.9. National Society of Black Engineers website: http://national.nsbe.org10. George, Y.S., Neale, D.S., Horne, V.V., Malcom, S.M. (2001
Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, April1993.4 “A Multi-university, Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project in Engineering,” P. Mellodge and D. Folz, Proceedingsof the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2009, Austin, TX, American Society forEngineering Education.5 “Microwave Processing of Polymeric Coatings for Guitar Woods,” C. Hammond, C. Hill, C. Sprinkle, A. Sorensenand S. Vera, Journal of Undergraduate Materials Research, Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Vol. 4, April 2010. Page 15.99.10
Solving, New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2003.2. Bordogna, J., Fromm, E., and Ernst, E.W., “Engineering Education: Innovation through Integration,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 1, 1993, pp. 3–8.3. Everett, L., Imbrie, P.K., and Morgan, J., “Integrated Curricula: Purpose and Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 89, No. 2, 2000, pp. 167–175.4. Roedel, R.J., Green, M., Garland, J., Doak, B., McCarter, J., Evans, D.L., and Duerden, S., “Projects That Integrate Engineering, Physics, Calculus, and English in the Arizona State University Foundation Coalition Freshman Program,” Proceedings, 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie97/papers/1159.pdf
the scholarship recipients have continued to progresssatisfactorily towards completion of their electrical engineering degrees. Page 15.460.2IntroductionOur engineering program at Seattle Pacific University aims to address the increasing technicalneeds of our country (Grose, 2006, NSB 2004), including the greater Seattle community, byspecifically increasing the number of community college transfer students in our engineeringprogram, a potentially untapped resource (Anderson-Rowland et al. 2004). The National ScienceFoundation has supported this effort through a grant in its S-STEM program. The goal of thegrant, Engaging the Community to Achieve
process.In addition, for new faculty members to communicate with others having just a few years moreexperience than them may help. That group will be able to communicate their experiences andrelate to their concerns. Even faculty members recently evaluated are still mostly pragmaticabout the Process, but their successful navigation of it should provide reassurance to others.Bibliography1. S. Barnicki, C. Barnicki, O. Petersen, “A Non-Tenure Faculty Evaluation System,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI, 1997. Page 15.915.9
15.754.21Bibliography: 1. Feisel L.D. and Rosa, R.J., “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Int. Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005. 2. Etkina, E., Murthy, S., and Zou, X., “Using Introductory Labs to Engage Students in Experimental Design,” Am. J. Phys. 74 (11), American Association of Physics Teachers, November 2006. 3. http://www.cdlponline.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=whatis&pg=2 4. Hergert, D., “An Application Program That Interprets Code39 Barcode Images on an iPhone,” ASEE Mid-Eastern Conference, October 2009 Page 15.754.22