Conference Session

Ethical Perspectives on the Grand Challenges of Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George D. Catalano, State University of New York, Binghamton

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

contemplative activities into the Page 22.1582.7course, a socio-cultural theory offered by Cole and Engstrom22 shall be used as the theoreticalframework for the study. Vygotsky conceived socio-cultural theory23 in the early 1920’s. Itemphasizes the central role of social relationships and culturally constructed artifacts inorganizing thinking. It attempts to theorize and provide methodological tools for investigatinghigher cognitive processes by which social, cultural and historical factors shape humanfunctioning. Cole and Engstrom’s model provides several dimensions along which one can studythe classroom as an activity system. They identify factors

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wayne E. Whiteman, Georgia Institute of Technology; William J. Wepfer, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jeffrey A. Donnell, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Teaching Practicum providesa competitive advantage to the mechanical engineering doctoral degree at Georgia Tech. Theconsensus opinion appears to be in retaining the current topics in the course. Considerationshould be given for adding a session(s) on obtaining research funding and preparing grantproposals. Also, since many graduates do not enter academia, more coverage could be spent onadditional topics from industry and other career paths.Bibliography1. Wankat, P.C., Oreovicz, F.S., Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993.2. Norris, Pamela M., Palmer, Sheila C., Effectiveness of the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching Intern Program,Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 87, No. 3, 1998, pg. 223-2263. Lowman, Joseph, Mastering the

Conference Session

Capstone Courses and Design Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nihad Dukhan, University of Detroit Mercy; Mark Schumack, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Technology ABET, On-Line, http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml, accessesJanuary 2011.6. Jack Zable, Guest Editorial 2007 National Capstone Design Conference, Advances in Engineering Education,Spring 2010, pp. 1.7. Carlee A. Bishop and Tommer R. Ender , Capstone Projects: Key to the Lifecycle Development of the SystemsEngineer, Proceedings, 2nd National Capstone Design Conference, Boulder, CO, June 2010, CD RAM.8. Shraddha Joshi, Joshua D. Summers, Investigating Information Loss in Collaborative Design: A Case Study withCapstone Design Project, Proceedings, 2nd National Capstone Design Conference, Boulder, CO, June 2010, CDRAM.9. Daniel A. McAdams and Julie S. Linsey [dDesign Education: A Globally Distributed Capstone EngineeringDesign Experience

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K. Hodge, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

. Minimize tunnel length by placing lines in the same tunnel. 5. Use a "Z" network (see Figure E2). 6. Avoid pipe velocities in excess of 8 ft/s. 7. The two AHUs in Concourse 4 are to be placed in parallel.Include the converged Kirchoff or Hardy-Cross solutions, and make sure your logic is explained.Accomplish a preliminary system design and provide: 1. Layout of the network; (a) actual physical layout (pipe numbers indicated) (b) “Z” arrangement for Kirchoff or Hardy-Cross usage (pipe and loop numbers indicated); Page 22.1650.12 Figure

Conference Session

Developing Young MINDS in Engineering: Part I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rafic Bachnak, Texas A&M International University; Runchang Lin, Texas A&M International University; Rohitha Goonatilake, Texas A&M International University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Problem Based Learning Approach for Freshman Engineering,” 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 18 - 21, 2000, Kansas City, MO.[5] Daryl E. Chubin, Gary S. May, and Eleanor L. Babco (2005), “Diversifying the Engineering Workforce,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 73-86.[6] C. Dym, A. Agogino,O. Eris, D. Frey, and L. Leifer, (2005), “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Page 22.1183.7 Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 103-120[7] Wayne Clough (2000), “The Future of Engineering Education,” Stay Informed! Magazine, http://gtalumni.org/Publications

Conference Session

Attracting Young Minds: Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey H. Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology, CEISMC; Anna Newsome, Georgia Institute of Technology, CEISMC; Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.8 Barker, Bradley S., J. Ansorge. “Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment” (2001) Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(3), 229-2439 Petre, Marion; B. Price. “Using Robotics to Motivate „Back Door‟ Learning” (2004) Education and Information Technologies 9:2, 147-158.10 Robinson, Mike. “Robotics-Driven Activities: Can They Improve Middle School Science Learning?” (2005) Bulletin of Science Technology & Society. 25:7311 Usselman, Marion; J. Davis, J. Rosen. (2008) Diversifying Participation in FIRST LEGO League. Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University; Ahsan Mian, Montana State University; Hunter Lloyd, Montana State University; Robb Larson, P.E., Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

5Mb/s was set on the communication link,between the control room and the robot. The following figure shows the inside of the controlroom during the competition.Figure 3. Inside of the control room during a competition (MSU students John Ritter, ChrisChing, and Jennifer Hane).In addition to the technical rules, all teams competing had to turn in a systems engineering paper,and an outreach report. Optional items could also be turned in including a presentation about thedesign process and a video showing the design progression. Each of these elements of thecompetition earned points toward an overall team score that was combined with the results of themining competition. One award was given to the team that mined the most overall amount

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa R. Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Lois Calian Trautvetter, Northwestern University; Sarah L. Codd, Montana State University; David B. Knight, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Carla M. Cortes, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

projects (Engineers without Borders, etc.) Non-engineering related community service or volunteer work Student design project(s)/competitions(s) beyond class requirementsA 1: Not active; 2: Slightly active (attend occasionally); 3: moderately active (attend regularly); 4: Highly active(participate in most activities); 5: extremely (hold a leadership post)Table 4. Curriculum emphases scales for students, faculty, and program chairs. The Cronbach’salpha indicates the internal consistency reliability. Values can range from .00 to 1.00–psychometricians consider scales greater than .70 to be acceptable. Students - Broad and Systems Perspectives (alpha=.84) Overall, how much have the courses you’ve taken in your engineering

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Dettman P.E., Western Kentucky University; Walter L. Collett, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

students”, this year’s group exhibited none of the skepticism and were eager toget started. More data will be collected at the end of this academic year and will be presented atthe conference. While some constraints do exist that must be considered, the benefits appear to Page 22.1090.6be worth the effort in creating as many reasonable opportunities for cross disciplinary projects aspossible.Bibliography 1. Fruchter, R. and Lewis, S. (2003). “Mentoring Models in Support of P5BL in Architecture/Engineering/Construction Global Teamwork”, The International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 663-671. 2. Orvis, S.M. (2009). Prestressing

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Osterwood, University of Pittsburgh; Amy E. Landis, University of Pittsburgh; Jason Douglas Monnell, University of Pittsburgh; Chris Koch, GTECH Strategies; Maureen Copeland, GTECH Strategies

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

the event.Communication is critical with the volunteer group; everyone should be clear on details such asarrival and departure time, what the volunteers should bring (water, gloves, food, etc.), what thevolunteer coordinators will provide (e.g. food or tools), what the task(s) for the day will be, andhow many volunteers are going to show. Almost as critical as the list of tasks is expectations, asthey can make or break a day. Having a crew show up really hoping to weed a site, and thenasking them pick up litter can put a damper on the day. It is important to give the volunteers aclear sense of what they will be doing, if they will be working with other groups, and any otherrelevant pieces of information.As part of having clear communication

Conference Session

New Faculty Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahesh Aggarwal, Gannon University; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

institutions recognize onlyScholarship of Discovery, teaching-based institutions have started to recognize the other areas ofscholarship as defined by the Boyer’s Model.Scholarship at Gannon University is broadly recognized by three attributes: professional,communicated and peer-reviewed. Each of these attributes may be found at different levels, suchas University, regional, national or international (recognition, review, publication, etc.).Scholarship activity may be stronger in one of the three attributes; but, the body of a colleague'sscholarship should demonstrate all three to some degree.1. Professional — demonstrably pertinent to the discipline(s) of the individual faculty member.2. Communicated — evidence that the work has been made known

Conference Session

SE Capstone Design Projects, Part I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard W. Freeman, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Richard J. Hartnett P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering

cadetreports are that the project experience thus far is realistic, relevant and exciting. Cadets arefrustrated by the communication challenges but optimistic that this will be the best capstoneexperience in the building.RICHARD W. FREEMAN has served as a lecturer in the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’sElectrical Engineering Section since 2008. Prior to joining the faculty, he taught fulltime foreight years. He also worked in the Telecommunications Industry for eight years. He earned BSand PhD degrees in Computer Engineering from Iowa State University and a MBA fromSouthern Methodist University. He is pursuing his Professional Engineering License.RONALD S. ADREZIN serves as an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Sectionat USCGA, where he has

Conference Session

Two Year-to-Four Year Transfer Topics Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia F. Mead, Norfolk State University; Gwen Lee-Thomas, Quality Measures, LLC; Abe Eftekhari, Northern Virginia Community College; Ji Hyon Mun, Thomas Nelson Community College

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

special summer internship opportunities, andproposals to the NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, VA and NASA Goddard Space Page 22.1367.7Flight Center have requested summer internship slots as well. A National Science Foundation S-
STEM grant was awarded in January 2011. This award will support fifty-three scholarshipsacross the five T-CUP partner campuses over the next four academic years. The long-term planalso includes significant institutional support from NSU, including a dedicated staff person withoffice space to manage and oversee the program long term, faculty release for program advisors(based on achievement of specific enrollment

Conference Session

Two Year-to-Four Year Transfer Topics Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cecelia M. Wigal, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga; Tim MeGhee, Chattanooga State Community College

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

that will provide highly-skilled and prepared engineering technicians for the current and future workforce needs of the greater Chattanooga economic region.” Page 22.1200.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Developing an Effective Community College Transfer Pre- Engineering ProgramAbstractMany states are actively addressing strengthening the ties between the states’ 2-year and 4-yeardegree granting institutions. The stated purpose for this activity is to define articulationagreements for A. S. degrees that aid students in completing 4-year degrees

Conference Session

WIED Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Teri Reed-Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Lorie Groll, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

within eachcohort.The cohort each year is defined as the first-time, full-time freshmen officially enrolled for the fallsemester in the College of Engineering. A student is considered retained for a year if s/he is stillenrolled in the College of Engineering in subsequent fall semesters at the time of the census(typically 21 days into the fall semester). For example, the number of first-year students stillenrolled at the time of the census of the second year would measure first year retention, and thenumber of second year students still enrolled at the time of the census of the third year wouldmeasure second year retention.The data consisted of 10 cohorts entering the university between 2000 and 2009. The number ofmen in the entering class sized

Conference Session

Recruitment & Retention of Women I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew J Miller, University of Maryland; Robert Lent, University of Maryland, College Park; Paige E Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Bevlee A. Watford, Virginia Tech; Gregory M. Wilkins, Morgan State University; Matthew M. Jezzi, University of Maryland; Kayi Hui, University of Maryland, College Park; Robert H Lim, University of Maryland, College Park; Nicole A Bryan, University of Maryland, College Park; Helena Mimi Martin, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

bepremature. Finally, the experiences of our study participants might not reflect the experiences ofracially diverse students in other engineering programs across the country.References1. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.2. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2007, .NSF 07-315.3. WEPAN (2006). Engaging America’s intellectual talent: The status of women and minorities in engineering. www.wepan.org4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil K. Chaturvedi, Old Dominion University; Kaustubh A. Dharwadkar

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

of Human Factorsand Ergonomics Society, Annual Meeting, 2007.12. Messner, J.I. et al., “Using Virtual Reality to Improve Construction Engineering Education”, Proceedings ofASEE Annual Conference, 2006.13. Bell, J.T. and Fogler, H.S., “Virtual Reality in Chemical Engineering Education”, Proceedings of the 1988ASEE North Central Section Meeting, Detroit, Michigan.14. Chaturvedi, S.K., Bawab, S., Akan, H., and Abdel-Salam, T.M., “Development of a Methodology to Visualizeand conduct a Physical Experiment as a Web-Based Virtual15. Chaturvedi, S.K. and Abdel-Salam, T., “A Web-Based Student Learning Tool for Thermodynamics ConceptsRelated to Multistaging in Compressors and Turbines”, Innovations 2008: World Innovations in EngineeringEducation and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pratibha Varma-Nelson, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis; Stephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis; Terri Tarr, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Education.3. McAlpine, L. and Harris, R. (1999). “Lessons learned: Faculty developer and engineer working as faculty development colleagues.” International Journal for Academic Development, 4(1).4. Sheppard, S. Macatangay, K., Colby, A., and Sullivan, W. (2008). Educating engineers: Designs for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.5. Fisher, D., Fairweather, J., and Amey. M. (2003). “Systemic reform in undergraduate engineering education: The role of collective responsibility.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19.6. Gillespie, K.J. and Robertson, D.L. (Eds.) (2010). A guide to faculty development (2nd edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.7. Wankat, P. (2002). The effective, efficient professor

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ed Alef, Rochester College; Soma Chakrabarti, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

23.4.5Operating Philosophy:The most efficient way to operate an effective and efficient TCEP is with teamwork. Theprinciple players on the team are: 1. Technical Community Leadership 2. University Partner(s) 3. Human Resource Management 4. Employee University Partner 1. Tailored Curriculum 2. Application-Oriented Faculty 3. Technical Graduate DegreeHuman Relations Technical Community 1. Career Path Management 1. Champion the TCEP 2. Efficiency of Operations 2. Content

Conference Session

Impacts on Engineering Education Through Collaborative Learning, Project-based, and Service-learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fanyu F. Zeng, Indiana Wesleyan University

Tagged Divisions

International

laboratory-driven Electrical Engineering 2-year curriculum for distance and at-home learning”, http://www.ee.washington.edu/faculty/soma/fipse/. 13. UC Berkeley, “Online curricula for monitored, closed-lab first-year CS courses”, http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~clancy/ucwise/ccliemd04_narrative.pdf. 14. Velankaris, Y., Brophy, S., Okutsu, M., Delaurentis, D., “TEAM-BASED NEGOTIATION OF IDEAS ON DESIGN DECISION MAKING PERFORMANCE”, AC 2010-1902, in Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, June 20-23, 2010. Page 25.275.9

Conference Session

The Designer of 2020: Innovations in Teaching Design

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James H. Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; John Aidoo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

follows: 1. Analyze a client’s objectives and formulate an engineering problem statement. 2. Develop multiple solutions to an engineering problem and determine the merits and deficiencies of each solution. 3. Recommend the most appropriate solution based on client and engineer developed criteria. 4. Develop a design for the most appropriate solution(s) to meet a client’s objectives. 5. Explain and document the solution in oral and written formats. 6. Work effectively in an engineering team by utilizing individual strengths and communication.Each team is made of 4 or 5 students and is assigned to a different project for an external clientwith a real need. On the first day of class students individually rank

Conference Session

Active and Project-based Learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isaac M. Choutapalli, University of Texas, Pan American; Robert A. Freeman, University of Texas, Pan American; Young-Gil Park, University of Texas, Pan American

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

tests, pre and post-affectsurveys, will also be administered to the students to gauge the effectiveness of challenge-basedlearning in MECE 3320.References1. Pandy, M., Petrosino, A, Austin, B. and Barr, R. “Assessing Adaptive Expertise in UndergraduateBiomechanics,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2004, pp. 211–222.2. Barr, R.E., Pandy, M.G., Petrosino, A.J., Roselli, R.J., Brophy, S., and Freeman, R.A., “Challenge-BasedInstruction: The VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules”, Advances in Engineering Education, Vol. 1, No. 1,Fall 2007, pp. 1 – 30.3. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., and Cocking, R.R., “How People Learn : Brain, Mind, Experience, and School”(Expanded Edition), National Academic Press, (2000).4. Giorgio, T.D. and

Conference Session

ABET: Reflections on Accreditation

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karl F. Meyer, U.S. Military Academy; Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University; Paul Francis Mlakar, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

, January 7, 2012.5. Meyer, K. and S. Ressler, “Let’s Get Down to Business: Preparation for ABET Under the New CE ProgramCriteria,” Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Austin, TX,June 2009.6. ABET Self Study Questionnaire, Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD., accessed Page 25.313.8at http://www.abet.org/download-self-study-templates/, January 11, 2012.7. Program Evaluator Worksheet, 2011-2012 Accreditation Cycle, ABET Inc., Baltimore, MD., accessed athttp://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Program_Evaluators/Training_Process/eac-instructions-for-completing-pev

Conference Session

Project-based and Cooperative Learning in ECE

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Adams, University of Kentucky; Jens Hannemann, University of Kentucky; Lawrence Holloway, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Education. Honolulu, HI, 2007.4. M. Haungs, J. Clements, and D. Janzen, “Improving engineering education through creativity, collaboration, and context in a first year course,” ASEE Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.5. Council on Competitiveness, Innovate America, 2005.6. K. Kazerounian and S. Foley, “Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 129, pp. 761-768, July 2007.7. N. Genco, N., K. Hölttä-Otto and C. C. Seepersad, “An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of engineering students,” ASEE Annual Meeting, Louisville, KY, 2010.8. B. Cooperrider, “The importance of divergent thinking in engineering

Conference Session

Engineering and Technological Literacy: Past and Future

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak, Hope College; John W. Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University; Kate A. Disney, Mission College; Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University; Randy Libros, Community College of Philadelphia; Mani Mina, Iowa State University; Steven R. Walk, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography 1. Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology, Greg Pearson and A. Thomas Young, editors, National Academies Press, (2002). 2. E. D. Hirsch and James S. Trefil, Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Random House, (1987). 3. Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving the Public Understanding of Engineering, Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, National Academies Press, (2008). 4. Heywood, J., “Engineering Literacy: A Component of Liberal Education” Proceeding of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2009

Conference Session

Laboratory Experiences with Thermal and Chemical Systems and Sensors

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Joseph Plotkowski, Grand Valley State University; Lihong (Heidi) Jiao, Grand Valley State University; Nael Barakat, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

," in Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Chicago, 2006.[2] T. Kaiser, A. Lingley, M. Leone, and B. Pierson, "MEMS Fabrication as a Multidisciplinary Laboratory," in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, 2007.[3] T. Hsu, MEMS & Microsystems Design and Manufacture. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2002.[4] W. Park, J. Mallon, A. Rastegar, B. Pruitt A. Barlian, "Review: Semiconductor Piezoresistance for Microsystems," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 513-52, 2009.[5] S. Bouwstra, R. Spiering V. Spiering, "On chip decoupling zone for package-stress reduction," Sensors and Actuators, vol. A.39, pp. 149-56, 1993.[6] K. Petersen, "Silicon as a Mechanical Material," Proceedings of the

Conference Session

Simulations and Visualizations

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Mark Randall, University of Southern Maine ; Mehrdaad Ghorashi P.E., University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

) 480-488.9. S. Ersoy and H. Kucuk, ―The effect of a new teaching methodology on learning performances of automotive – mechatronics students,‖ Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 310-316.10. F.P. Beer, E.R. Johnston Jr, J.T. DeWolf, and D.F. Mazurek, Statics and Mechanics of Materials, McGraw-Hill, NY (2011). Page 25.395.14

Conference Session

Innovative Uses of Technology and Techniques for Laboratory Exercises

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Y. Chiou, Drexel University; M. Eric Carr, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

-536, July 2002.8. Taylor, K. and Dalton, B., “Internet Robotics: A New Robotics Niche,” IEEE Robotics and Automation,Vol.7, No.1, pp.27-34, March 2000.9. "Bailey, S. A., Cham J., G., Cutkosky, M. R., Full, R. J., "Biomimetic Robotic Mechanisms via ShapeDeposition Manufacturing," Robotics Research: the Ninth International Symposium, John Hollerbach andDan Koditschek (Eds), Springer-Verlag, London, 2000. Page 25.396.12

Conference Session

Current Issues in Construction Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth J. Tiss AIC, CPC, State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Construction

Cognitive Learning Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Development Lev S. Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Theory of Psychological Development Albert Bandura’s Social-Cognitive Learning Bernard Weiner’s Attribution Theory Table 5 Instructional Development Models7 Type of Model Name of Model Classroom Oriented Models Gerlach and Ely Heinich, Molenda, Russell and Smalindo Newby, Stepich, Lehman

Conference Session

Curricular Innovations in College-Industry Partnerships

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kai Jin, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Stephan J. Nix, Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

/sketching, orthographic Page 25.437.4projection, and etc. So far, students have done the first phase of the project. Someinteresting topics they have selected include: portable podium design, design of a bottleopener that can work for twisting off caps and popping off caps, improving design ofvegetable slicer, and redesign school bus seats.Peer reviewing will be used to evaluate their projects. Each presentation will be evaluatedby both instructor and peer groups. By the end of the semester, each student will submit aself-evaluation and s/he will also be evaluated her/his teammates.Evaluation Plan: The evaluation plan, designed to address progress