computer becomes the data acquisition system for the lab.BackgroundIn the fall of 2000, Lawrence Technological University (LTU) began requiring that all enteringfreshmen have a laptop computer. In each succeeding year, the next class rank (i.e. sophomoresin fall 2001) would be required to have a laptop. The laptops are a standard model leased by theunversity to the students and regularly upgraded. Student laptops that develop problems arefixed by the help desk or exchanged if the problem is too serious to fix quickly. They are pre-loaded with a standard set of software for each college. For example, all engineering laptops arepre-loaded with a high-end CAD program, programming language, equation solver, and officesoftware. Students who wish to use
AC 2004-757: AN ONLINE COURSE MANAGEMENT TOOL TO DEVELOP ANDDELIVER THE MICROELECTRONICS LABORATORY CURRICULUMLakshmi Munukutla, Arizona State University Page 9.195.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2004 Session 1526 Micr oelectr onics Labor ator y Cur r iculum Development and Deliver y Via Online Tool Lakshmi V. Munukutla, Richar d Newman, Har r y Koehnemann, and J ohn Rober tson Ar izona State Univer sity East College of Technology and Applied Sciences
full class than to have nothing to do for the last portion of theclass. Page 7.460.3 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education ” Session 1375Instructor’s Availability Outside Class HoursEvery faculty member has posted office hours, but unfortunately students might work during theoffice hours, or for some other reasons not be able to see the faculty member. Technology,through e-mail and other web-based
AC 2012-3744: AN EDUCATORS VIEW OF TRENDS IN MANUFACTUR-ING EDUCATION: LEARNING FROM THE PAST TO PLAN FOR THEFUTUREDr. Hugh Jack P. Eng...., Grand Valley State University Dr. Hugh Jack is a Professor of Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids Michigan. His specialties include automation, design projects, and internet application development.Dr. Val Hawks, Brigham Young University Val Hawks is the Director of the School of Technology at Brigham Young University and faculty mem- ber in the Manufacturing Engineering Technology program at BYU. He has a B.S. degree from Brigham Young University, a M.S. from Lehigh University, and a Ph.D. from Gonzaga University. He
particularlyrooted in the American psyche. This is the belief that people should be rewarded in tangibleways for exceptional performance. Such rewards are considered to be a normal part of our freeenterprise system. Given the extensive use of merit pay systems in industry and the fact thatmost engineering technology faculty come out of industry, such faculty at least understand theconcept of merit pay if not support it in an academic environment. Another rationale oftenexpressed is that by rewarding exceptional performance, we are required to evaluate faculty andthrough that evaluative process, recognize those who are doing an outstanding job. However,such a reward system also needs to be coupled with a post-tenure review system which willprovide a
. Education™) were invited to meet withengineers from an international, high-technology company. This team identified a needfor training technicians and designers in data acquisition. Their Engineering Councilselected HP-VEE as the standard software to simulate and then acquire data.Specifications for the program were jointly developed by the team. The curriculumdevelopers using J.I.T. Education™ concepts developed behavioral objectives andorganized them to assure that material was delivered as needed. Prerequisite informationwas separated from the course material; a math diagnostic instrument and aquestionnaire on computer literacy was developed and given prior to the course.The final course was an integrated 60-hour course, 1/2 theory and 1/2
of Health Sciences & Technology (VaNTH) [1] to develop new educational stylesand to introduce them in teaching bioengineering to undergraduate and graduate students. Themain thrust of the project is based on concepts presented by the NSF publication How PeopleLearn (HPL) [2]. The concept is to challenge the students with a set of realistic problems and Page 10.332.1give them a high level of freedom on the methods chosen by them for solving them. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAs
Session 2548 Teaching Techniques in Computer-Aided Design Jianping Yue Department of Engineering Technology & Computer Science Essex County College Newark, New JerseyAbstractThis paper discusses common concerns about and various techniques for the teaching ofComputer-Aided Design (CAD). One of the concerns raised will be related to how engineeringtechnology students can acquire the necessary CAD skills for use in their design projects. Alsodiscussed will be the relative advantages of different approaches, such as having
Paper ID #5846Portable Photovoltaic Laboratory for In-Service Teacher WorkshopsProf. Kenneth E. Dudeck, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus Kenneth Dudeck is an associate professor of Electrical Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University located in Hazleton, Pa. He has been teaching Electrical, Computer, and Electrical Technology Engineer- ing Courses for the past 25 years.Dr. Wieslaw Grebski, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus Page 23.971.1 c American Society
andlower material consumption that the sensors and actuators from decades ago, and furthermoreserve as an enabling bridge for the growing commitment to nanotechnology3. Multidisciplinaryengineering education in MEMS is therefore essential for keeping pace with the needs and trendsof modern technology.There is a need for more enriching opportunities in MEMS education, but significant barriers andconstraints limit the ways in which hands-on education is accessible to a broad learning audience.Although most engineering schools and colleges are now and may continue to be organizedprimarily under traditional “compartmentalized” disciplines, innovations in pedagogy andcollaboration help spread MEMS and other contemporary technologies to widening
., Koenig, K., Hannigan, T., “Keeping Students Engaged: An Overview of Three IntroductoryCourses in Aerospace Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville,TN, June 2003.5. Hannigan, T., Koenig, K., Austin, V., Okoro, E., “Shelving the Hardware: Developing Virtual LaboratoryExperiments”, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, June 2005.6. WebCT – web based classroom technology, http://www.webct.com7. Hannigan, T., Koenig, K., Gassaway, B., Austin, V., “Revision and Translation of Existing Programs as a Toolfor Teaching Computer Data Acquisition and Control Systems Design and Implementation”, Proceedings of the2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake
faced --providing students with workplace experiences. IVCC is located in a rural and primarilyagricultural district in north central Illinois. As a result of a limited industrial base, a limitednumber of engineering and technology jobs are available in the district, posing problems forstudents seeking internships and for the college seeking industry partnerships. Technical jobs,however, are readily available just outside of the college district; Chicago, Rockford andPeoria are all within 60 to 100 miles of the IVCC campus. By providing simulated world ofwork experience on the campus, MIMIC provided a solution to the technical programs'dilemma.In the first ten years of the MIMIC project, the entire process was completed in one semester
information—in order to create useful toolsand technologies. Consequently, engineering education has the objective of not only presenting thescientific principles, i.e., engineering science, but also of teaching students how to apply these toreal problems. It is not surprising, therefore, that hands-on laboratories have been an integral part ofthe engineering curriculum since its inception [1]. Their importance has been recognized by theAccreditation Board of Engineering Education (ABET) and its predecessors by creation of criteriarequiring adequate laboratory practice for students [2-6]. Unfortunately, during the last severaldecades, engineering laboratories have become highly complex and expensive, with multiplesimulation tools and computer
Development of an Automated Liquid Handling System for Science Lab Automation Akihiko Kumagai, Tien-I Liu, Stefan Setiadharma, Yasuhisa Komura Department of Mechanical Engineering California State University, Sacramento Sacramento, CA 95819-6031AbstractIn recent years, various automation technologies developed in engineering fields have beengaining attention from scientists and researchers to improve productivity, accuracy and quality ofwork in their science labs. This paper presents a unique case study of a private companysponsored project to develop a prototype of an automated liquid handling system
assignment. Once an instructor gains experience with theweb based presentation of the research topics, the administration and evaluation of theassignment does not tend to increase the instructor’s workload for the course.BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION[1] Karunamoorthy, S. and Olliges, R.H., “Web Technology in Engineering Education – Howand Why”, Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Conference, American Society for EngineeringEducation, 2000.[2] Javanovik, Nickolas, “Using World Wide Web Course Tools (WebCT) for Close Learning”,Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, 2000.[3] Wong, H. Kapila, V. and Tzes, A., “Mechatronics/Process Control Remote Laboratory”,Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Conference, American Society for
their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande is the PI/co-PI on NSF-funded projects focused on engineering doing and making, citizen science and engineering outreach, and ”revolutionizing” engineering education. He has also been an instructor and participant in the NSF Innovation Corps for Learning program. He re- ceived his B.S in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University.Dr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of
is adjunct faculty at Brigham Young University in the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology. She is a Coordinator for Women in Engineering and Technology (WE@BYU), teaches and advises numerous Mechanical Engineering Capstone senior design teams, teaches Global Engineering Outreach with study abroad to Peru, and researches with the Compliant Mechanisms Research Group. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Mechanical Engineering from BYU and also worked at Ford Motor Company as a manufacturing and design engineer in Automatic Transmission Operations. Terri received the Adjunct Faculty Excellence Award from Brigham Young University in 2016. She is the mother of four children and is married
is a Research Associate with The Center of Excellence for Communication Systems Technology Research (CECSTR), Electrical Engineering Department at Prairie View A&M University. He completed BS from Dhaka University with major in Physics. His MS was in Telecommunications from Oklahoma State University. His research interests are in the field of Telecom network architecture, Wireless network and Signal Processing.Veeramuthu Rajaravivarma, Central Connecticut State University Dr. V. Rajaravivarma has been a faculty member since 1988 and joined the Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT in Fall 2001. His areas of research include Computer Networks, Communications, and Signal
requirements. The interdisciplinary service learning team was able todemonstrate the feasibility of the virtual preservation concept. The project resulted in benefitsfor the students, the faculty members, and the institutions. One student summarized herexperience: “There were no textbooks or directions telling us what to do, what to measure,where to store our information or how to analyze it….The greatest part of this project: knowingwe’re making a difference.”1IntroductionA brief phone conversation between Karen Horton and Ken Wild in July 2003 started twelvestudents and two faculty members at the University of Maine (UM) on an enviable servicelearning odyssey. Horton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology(MET) at UM. Wild is
, business skills development, entrepreneurship, and organizational management.Cristian Saavedra-acuna (Profesor) Cristian Saavedra is an assistant professor at the School of Engineering at the University Andres Bello in Concepcion, Chile. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Electronics Engineering and a master’s degree in Technological Innovation and EntrepreneurshiMonica Quezada-Espinoza (PhD) Monica Quezada-Espinoza is a professor and researcher at the School of Engineering at the Universidad Andres Bello in Santiago, Chile, where currently collaborates with the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit, UNIDA (for its acronym in Spanish), as an instructor in active learning methodologies. Her research interest topics
) where she conducts interdisciplinary re- search on advanced building technologies and human interaction using immersive simulation techniques. Her current research is developing hybrid-reality simulations for interactive design and energy perfor- mance testing at the building envelope and urban scales.Dr. Sin´ead C. Mac Namara, Syracuse University Sin´ead Mac Namara is a structural engineer and Associate Professor teaching in both the School of Ar- chitecture and the College of Engineering of Syracuse University. She studied civil and structural en- gineering at Trinity College Dublin and Princeton University. Her research is concerned with structural art, shell structural design, alternate pedagogies for
Paper ID #30625Project-based Learning with Implementation of Virtual Reality for GreenEnergy Manufacturing EducationDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different engineering and technology courses at
Organized by The University of Texas at Dallas Copyright © 2017, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Table 2: Percentage of students who improved their understanding of the job duties of various engineering disciplines using an open-ended structure. Engineering Disciplines Percentage (# of students) N=49 Civil Engineer 92% (45) Survey Engineer 71% (35) Chemical Engineer 70% (34) Aerospace Engineer 63% (31) Mechanical Engineering 61% (30) Engineering Technology-Electronics
Tufts University, earning his MS and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering for his work with low-cost educational technologies and his development and use of technologies to aid usage tracking in makerspaces to examine them as interactive learning environments. He joined Northeastern in 2017. As well as teaching first-year engineering courses, he continues to design new technologies and curricula for use in his own classroom as well as for K-12 engineering education outreach. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Teaching MATLAB through Authentic Data Collection and Analysis Experiences using self
systems• Vulnerability & Survivability Systems – ship vulnerability assessments, shock• Signature & Silencing Systems – acoustics, electromagnetic and magnetic signaturesWe place interns in projects involving all the Core Equities, but certainly placement into theCore Equities is not uniform. Two factors that effect the placement of interns into the Coreequities is the amount of Basic and Applied Research performed in the area and the traininglevel needed for the individual projects in a particular area. A larger cross section of theacademic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields are representedamong the applicants. Certainly the hard sciences are mostly where we recruit for ourlaboratory. The most represented
and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Dr. Juan M Caicedo, University of South Carolina Dr. Caicedo is an associate professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina. His research interests are in structural dynamics, model updating and engi- neering education. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from the Universidad del Valle in Colombia, South America, and his M.Sc. and D.Sc. from Washington University in St. Louis. Dr. Caicedo’s teach- ing interests include the development of critical thinking in undergraduate and
which isboth rewarding and intellectually stimulating.References[1] Jones, Joseph L., Flynn, Anita M., Seiger, Bruce A., Mobile Robots: Inspiration to Implementation, A.K. Peters LTD, 1999.[2] Everette, H.R., Sensors for Mobile Robots, A.K. Peters LTD, 1999.[3] Walking Robots. http://www2.plala.or.jp/k_y_yoshino/6legs/walk_e.html[4] OOPic Programming Manual. http://www.oopic.com.[5] Precision Navigation, Inc: 5464 Skylane Blvd., Suite A Santa Rosa, CA 95403[6] Reynolds Electronics 3101 Eastridge Lane Canon City, CO. 81212. www.rentron.comBiographyCHANDRA R. SEKHAR is a member of the faculty of the Electrical Engineering Technology at PurdueUniversity Calumet. Professor Sekhar earned a Bachelor’s Degree in
– Passively collecting network data and communications without interfering with theoperations of the network.Bibliography1. Kalia M.; Garg, S.; Shorey, R., “Efficient Policies for Increasing Capacity in Bluetooth: An Indoor Pico-CellularWireless System,” Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 907-911, 2000.2. Jaap Haartsen, “ The Bluetooth Radio System,” IEEE Personal Communications, pp. 28-36, February 2000.3. Ron Schneiderman, “Bluetooth’s Slow Dawn,” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 37, no. 11, November 2000.4. Ericsson Inc., “Bluetooth Application & Training Tool Kit,” 2000.MARK YEARYMark Yeary received his B.S. (honors), M.S. and Ph.D. from the Department of Electrical Engineering at Texas A&MUniversity, College Station, Texas, in
). We found thatSEOIs represent immediate behavioral responses not adequately tied to the ABET outcomes inquestion.Results/DiscussionThe MET program outcomes identify items that are uniquely met through the capstone course.These items are stated in the syllabus with their respective assessment means.Student learning OutcomesThe student is expected to show their ability to: apply engineering analysis to project conception,definition, development and management. Use their mechanical engineering technology skills,through the design, construction, and evaluation of their project. Communicate their progressand achievements through meetings, reports, and presentations.Course Work Breakdown StructureThe main deliverable of the 1st quarter’s effort is
Session 3642 Evaluation and Outcomes Assessment During the Semester: Putting Course Learning Objectives to Work David S. Cottrell Pennsylvania State University at HarrisburgI. IntroductionIn recent years, much has been written about the requirement to perform outcomes andobjective assessments to evaluate the strengths of ABET accredited programs in allengineering disciplines including engineering management. In particular, the criteria foraccrediting engineering technology programs stipulates that programs must demonstrate thatgraduates have a commitment to quality