Maybe 12 No 10 Yes 8 6 4 2 0 al b l ch Th ro ic U e ily R og a O T Fa h io ha D t ia ia he m rn yn N at ac ed ad eu m sy l ed pt ro E te P
mathematics content ofmost careers related to STEM disciplines is overwhelming, and therefore would muchrather pursue other careers which may be related to liberal arts, management, finance etc. This issue was analyzed and various factors were considered which possibly leadto this. Some of these factors were identified to be : (a) Career related aspects. Students do not know much about careers in the STEM fields, regarding 1. what the job entails, 2. compensation, 3. types of positions, 4. whether there will be enough jobs in those fields in the future 5. are jobs in those fields difficult to do 6. where are those jobs located(b) Education related aspects
“fingers.” (a) No voltage applied (b) Voltage applied Figure 5: Deformation of EAP material with applied voltage The task of the Robotics group was to build a three-degree-of-freedom platform whichwould allow the micro-grippers to be precisely placed at a set of three-dimensional coordinatessupplied by the 3-D vision system. Students utilized Fuzzy logic to control the position andorientation of the micro robot. Fuzzy logic is a methodology used to make computers assimilateour way of thinking to solve problems11, 12. It is especially useful when a complete dynamics ofthe system can not be estimated. The development of the fuzzy logic speed control is to bebroken down into three parts
. Page 14.797.4 Table 2: ABET Criterion 3 – Program OutcomesABET EAC Criterion 3: Program Outcome10 ABET TAC Criterion 3: Program Outcomes11(a) ability to apply knowledge of a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge,mathematics, science, and engineering techniques, skills, and modern tools of their(b) ability to design and conduct disciplinesexperiments, as well as to analyze and b. an ability to apply current knowledge andinterpret data adapt to emerging applications of mathematics,(c) ability to design a system, component, or science, engineering, and technologyprocess to meet desired needs within realistic c. an
twenty two students took theMath 151 class during fall 2008. None of them earned an A, see table 3. Table 3 Outcomes in the two groups for Math 151 Outcome Group A B C Dropped Average total Performance STP Students 9(45%) 6(30%) 5(25%) None 3.2 20 non-STP Students None 4(57.14%) 1(14.29%) 2(28.57%) 2.8 7 total 27During the fall
. M. Jarc, A. B. Kimes, M. E. Pearson and M. A. Peck, "The design and control of a low-power, upper limb prosthesis," in Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, 2006, pp. 165-166.8. Cornell CMG Team, "CMG Research Project: Spring Project Report," Http://www.mae.cornell.edu/cmg/media/Spring_2006_Report.Pdf, 2006.9. Cornell CMG Team, "CMG Research Team: Final Report," Http://www.mae.cornell.edu/cmg/media/Spring2007Report.Pdf, 2007.10. D. Brown and M. A. Peck, "Scissored-Pair Control Moment Gyros: A Mechanical Constraint Saves Power," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 31, pp. 1823-1826, 2008.11. B. Wie, "Singularity Analysis and Visualization for Single-Gimbal Control Moment Gyro
addition to the interactive online curriculum. There are more similar commercial packages thatthe authors did not have an opportunity to evaluate, but the three packages give a good overviewof the “teaching assistant” type of online learning systems. Figure 1. Examples of teaching systems: (a) course management (b) online learning4The other category of online learning applications is the interactive programs. Various modulesand packages have been developed to enhance the online learning experiences via moreinteractive activities. Simulation and gaming are the main methods to achieve this goal. Puresimulation demonstrates a process or the operation of a system and may also provide data forfurther analysis. Using proper computer programs
Mechatronics Laboratories (Needs and Specifications for the additional laboratories)1. Computer Teaching Lab Item Quantity details Computer Desk (Model A) 9 Computer Desk (Model B) 9 White Board 1 Computer Screen 1 Computers 21 LCD Projector 1 Printer 1 Safety Power Extension Cord Cover 25 ft (with 2 tracks) Chairs 21 VGA Cable 25ft 1 From PC to projector Power Extension Cord 25 ft
exposure tothe students; (b) Lack of system level exposure; (c) Unnecessary emphasis on language syntax;(d) No support for adaptability; and (d) No support for life long learning.The “Breadth First” approach was considered as an option to provide a more holistic view of thediscipline. Many computer science educators have argued for this approach in which the firstcourse introduces to a broader range of topics in the CSE discipline. Creating a universalintroductory “breadth-first” course that introduces a dynamic field like CSE is a very dauntingtask. Developing a successful stand-alone breadth-first implementation, however, has proven tobe even more difficult. One option though has been to use the breadth-first model as a lead-in toa more
) mishap probability with Negligible (4) hazardseverity is also unacceptable because the hazard could be immediately mitigated with avery low cost (i.e., tool misplacement) otherwise hazard accumulation (i.e., complacency)may lead to a larger scale of damage. System safety tools implementation and regulatory compliance. This phaseprocesses the information/reports and receives the hazard probability from previousprocessing stage. The accident case of “Federal Express Flight 1478” was selected usingFTA (See Appendix A) and O&SHA for a conceptual demonstration (See Appendix B).The genuine value of this phase is to apply System Safety tools to conduct a detailedhazard-accident-incident analysis and provide counter-measures. The reports
programs to stay in an engineering degree program. So if you are getting a B or C in one of your classes, don’t start to think that you are a failure or that engineering isn’t for you or that you aren’t smart enough or that maybe you should just withdraw. It’s important to take a step back and remind yourself that you don’t have to be perfect, but you can still succeed.”DiscussionThe findings of this study reveal that the major hindrances that female students encountered inthe university related to ineffective professors and professors who did not provide a positiveclimate/environment in the engineering classrooms and/or departments. Similarly, a studyconducted by Seymour and Hewitt (1997) found that engineering students
need help deciding their educational andoccupational plans2.B. PurposeThe purpose of this pilot study was to determine what types of support school counselors need.It also involves the exploration of school counselors’ perceptions of engineering. Specifically,this study is guided by the following research questions: ≠ “What are school counselors’ perceptions of engineering?” ≠ “What is the self-reported need for and support desired by professional school counselors to aid their work with academic and career development related to students and engineering?”II. MethodThis study followed a cross-sectional survey design with quantitative and qualitativequestions15. This method allowed us to reach our intended audience in an
, 1113-1143.3. McComas, W. F. (1997). 15 myths of science: Lessens of misconceptions and misunderstandings from a science educator. Skeptic, 5, 88-95.4. Palmquist, B. C. & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice Teachers’ Views of the Nature of Science during a Postbaccalaureate Science Teaching Program, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 6, 595-615.5. Stein, S. J. & McRobbie, C. J. (1997). Students’ conceptions of science across the years of schooling, Research in Science Education, 27, 4, 611-628.6. Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, Open University Press
. To construct interview protocols, the evaluation team developed questions basedon Seidman’s6 in-depth interviewing method, the stated goals of the TLP, and events that theevaluator had observed in the classroom, lab and in learning community meetings. Interviewsvaried in length from 20 to 45 minutes. Each interview was digitally recorded and thentranscribed. (See Appendix B for the interview protocol.)Spring 2009Presently, the evaluation team is continuing to observe learning community activities, conductfocus groups with those students who were not interviewed during the fall semester, and performdata analysis. Findings will be documented in a report and formally presented during the summerof 2009.ClosureAimed at educating engineers and
engineering courses students will acquire in-depth principles of thermo-fluid sciences, mechanical systems and control, materials, mechanical design, finite element analysis and manufacturing. a. Through the aerospace specialization, students will both broaden and deepen their knowledge in aerospace materials, structures, propulsion, flight dynamics and control. b. Through the manufacturing specialization, students will broaden and deepen their knowledge manufacturing automation, systems design, strategy and simulation. 2. Graduates will acquire industry relevant experience within the academic environment through course projects, laboratory experimentation, classroom
, engineering science and mechanics, industrial engineering, and civil engineering.Of the total students’ teaching responsibilities, 8 were teaching a course, 17 were teaching a labor recitation section, and 6, who did not have any teaching responsibilities, were grading, holdingoffice hours, or holding homework/tutoring sessions.The students completed a course perception questionnaire during the final session of the course.The questionnaire focused on students’ perceptions of the course, their perceived understandingof teaching practices, the perceptions of their personal teaching, and their understanding of howpeople learn. A more complete description of the questionnaire is available in Zappe and Kapli(2008).8 Appendix B displays the items, along
program objectives; apply knowledge of four technical areas appropriate to civil engineering; conduct civil engineering experiments and analyze and interpret the resulting data; design a system, component, or process in more than one civil engineering context; explain basic concepts in management, business, public policy, and leadership; and, explain the importance of professional licensure.” b. Faculty “The program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarily design in content are qualified to teach the subject matter by virtue of professional licensure, or by education and design experience. The program must demonstrate that it is not critically dependent on one individual”.The ABET-EAC program-specific
engineering field. B. Teachers articulated characteristics which indicated students’ potential for pursuing engineering as a college major. C. Teachers felt a “responsibility” to teach engineering as a result of their new knowledge and perceptions.A. Perceptions of Engineers and Engineering FieldAll eleven teachers talked about the program in terms of bringing about positive changes in theirgeneral perception of engineering (n = 11; 38 references). While many already had favorableperceptions prior to the program, initial levels of knowledge varied greatly in accuracy. Whileinitially a few participants were aware of various engineering disciplines (particularly the“traditional” fields such as civil and electrical), others viewed
work was correctly done), and “learning” was anoverarching score that took into account the students’ ability to synthesize their knowledge andthe techniques they applied in the module to truly understand not only what they did, but why itwas important. All 9 students did well on these oral midterms and demonstrated solidunderstanding of the labs, techniques, and underlying concepts (grades ranging from B to A+).Final Written Examination: At the end of the semester, enrolled students took a three-hourwritten examination which not only covered all three modules, but also asked the students tointegrate modeling approaches from among the three scales to demonstrate their appreciation forthe challenges and possibilities associated with multi-scale
. 121-130, January 2005.2. Sloan Consortium of Institution and Organizations Committed to Quality Online Education, “Stayingthe Course: Online Education in the United States, 2008”.http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/staying_course3. B. Balamuralithars, and P. C. Woods, “Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: The SimulationLab and Remoter Lab”, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol 17, Issue 1, 2008, pp. 108-118.4. H. J. W. Spoedler, Virtual instruments and virtual environments, IEEE Instrum Meas Mag 2 (1999),14-19.5. N. Jensen, G. von Voigt, W. Nejdl and S. Olbrich, “Development of a Virtual Laboratory System ForScience Education”, Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learming, vol. 6(2
videotapes were digitized and entered into Transana (Fassnacht & Woods31; seewww.transana.org), a computer application for discourse analysis that integrates the video,transcript text and researcher codes. Classroom talk was divided into segments we called clips,and clips were coded to reflect the points of interest in the research questions listed above.Coding FrameworkThe coding framework for our qualitative/quantitative analysis delineates three differentdimensions: A. Instruction time codes subdivide each class period based on how the instructor interacts with students. B. Concepts mark engagement with “big ideas” from STEM, such as modularity in engineering, projection in mathematics, and Newton’s laws in physics. We
withMatlab and modeling software, and experience on how to conduct background research on newor previously unreported research. Additionally, because of the received grant, the students willbe able to further continue their learning while continuing the project through device fabricationand testing.VI. AcknowledgementThe team appreciates the efforts of the MURI administration at the School of Engineering andTechnology at IUPUI for their financial and technical support of this project.VII. References 1. http://www.muri.iupui.edu/ 2. C. W. Liu, W. T. Liu, M. H. Lee, W. S. Kuo, and B. C. Hsu. A Novel Photo detector Using MOS Tunneling Structures. IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, VOL. 21, NO. 6, JUNE 2000 3. S. M. Sze. Physics of Semiconductors
AC 2009-389: DEVELOPMENT OF A SOLID MODELING COURSE FORELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY (ECET)STUDENTSFredrick Nitterright, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Mr. Fred Nitterright is a lecturer in engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He received the A. A. S. in Mechanical Drafting and Design in 1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, the B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 1991 from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, and the M. S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Mr. Nitterright is a senior member of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME), and a member of the American Society for
, 60, 75-82.9. Byrne, B. M., Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N.J., 2001; p xiv, 338.10. Bollen, K. A., Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley: New York, 1989; p xiv, 514.11. Vogt, C. M., Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance in engineering programs.Journal of Engineering Education 2008, 97, (1), 27-36.12. Arbuckle, J. L. Amos 17.0, SPSS, Inc.: Crawfordville, FL, 2008.13. Van Blerkom, M. L., Academic perseverance, class attendance, and performance in the college classroom.In ERIC: 1996; Vol. ED 407618, p 11.14. Hutchison, M. A.; Follman, D. K.; Sumpter, M.; Bodner, G. M
. Hand, B. & Treagust, D. F. (1991). Student achievement and science curriculum development using constructive framework. School Science and Mathematics, 91(4), 172-176.9. Diefes-Dux, H. A., Moore, T., Follan, D., Imbrie, P. K., & Zawojewski, J. (2005). Model-Eliciting Activities: A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems (interactive session). ASEE National Conference, Portland.10. Creswell, J. & Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. CA: Sage Publications.11. Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for “research-based curricula.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(1), 35-70.12. Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education
graduation only), and the ability to add free text notes to anyrequirements. In initial versions of this interface, users were confused about where to startbuilding the requirement, so we added a clear starting point as shown in Figure 3.Figure 4 shows the interface used by staff members utilizing the system to enter requirements intoeach requirements unit. Figure 4(a) is an individual course that is used for a requirement. Asshown, it is possible to optionally enter a requisite grade or number of credit hours required foreach course. If these options are not specified, then CPAS defaults to a global setting that can bespecified per university policy. In Figure 4(b), we see several courses separated by Booleanoperators. In Figure 4(c), we
narrow and academic for industry’s needs.” “The evidence collected overseas and from the Total Technology programme in the UK, indicates that these sectors of industry would benefit from a more industrially oriented engineering doctorate. Indeed we believe that the whole of the engineering industry in the UK would benefit greatly from the introduction of such a doctorate.”b) US National Collaborative Task Force As a result of its investigations, the US National Collaborative Task Force also concludes that a new, but distinctive American approach is needed for the post baccalaureate professional education of graduate engineers in the United States that supports the American model wherein the majority of US
: Anker Publishing.2. Link, A.N., A time allocation study of university faculty. Econ. of Educ. Rev., 2008. 27(4): p. 363-374.3. Mitchell, T.R., The academic life: Realizing changes needed for business school students and faculty. Acad. Manag. Learning Educ., 2007. 6(2): p. 236-251.4. Kuhn, T., Padak, G., Is academic advising a discipline? NACADA J., 2008. 28(2): p. 2-3.5. Collins, M.A., Zinskie, C. D., Keskula, D. R., Thompson, A. L., Institutional responsibilities and workload of faculty in baccalaureate dental hygiene programs. J. Dental Educ., 2007. 71(11): p. 1403-1413.6. McCormick, C.B., Barnes, B. J., Getting started in academia: A guide for educational psychologists. Educ. Psych. Rev., 2008
. L., Institutional responsibilities and workload of faculty in baccalaureate dental hygiene programs. J. Dental Educ., 2007. 71(11): p. 1403-1413.6. McCormick, C.B., Barnes, B. J., Getting started in academia: A guide for educational psychologists. Educ. Psych. Rev., 2008. 20(1): p. 5-18.7. Balogun, J.A., Sloan, P. E., Gemain, m., Core values and evaluation processes associated with academic tenure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2007. 104(3): p. 1107-1115.8. Lerstrom, A.C., Advising Jay: A case study using a situational leadership approach. NACADA J., 2008. 28(2): p. 21-27.9. Huggett, K.D., Advising in Undergraduate Honors Programs: A Learner-Centered Approach. NACADA J., 2004. 24(1&2
DelVecchio, TatsianaSokal, and Katie Ross.A V-mixing laboratory experience has been designed. Students will study the effect of mixingtime and loading configuration in a statistical design of experiments program. Students will beexposed to experimental design strategies. The experiments and data analysis will be conductedover multiple class periods. A 5 L constant frequency V-mixer was purchased. It will be used forlaboratory experiences in courses, Engineering Clinic projects and research. Figures 1a and bshow the mixer and the loading operation for a mixing experiment. Page 14.514.5Figures 1 (a) 5 L V-mixer (b) Loading mixer for