programs [17] are excluding Latinx students and impinging onstudent success.The Anti-deficit LensThe Anti-deficit Lens is a framework that focuses on removing the stigma and accountabilityfrom underserved communities and placing the onus on the larger culture [19]. Mejia et al,defines the asset-based approach in engineering to be one that acknowledges the embodiedknowledge of students of color [20]. This study uses the critical lens to understand theintegration of reflection and praxis to help students grow in the ownership of their learning andbe liberated from the constraints of the university barriers to achievement [20].CURRENT STUDYThe current study examined the impact of different teaching strategies in Statics, morespecifically, the impact
any additional performance characteristics as necessary.Note that the EI is provided as a raw score and reflects the overall negative effect ofimplementing this option on the environment. Although never explicitly stated, the EI scorerepresented any number of factors, including the pollution caused during componentmanufacture and operation, and processes and methods used to acquire and handle the rawmaterials during its fabrication. Hence, designs aimed to minimize the EI score. Students whocreated cycle configurations involving multiple pumps and/or turbines were able to select anycomponent at each particular location. For example, a reheat cycle may choose a differentturbine option for each of the expansion stages. Table 2 provides a
-informed reflective practice. Michelle's professional experience includes roles in industry and academia, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager for Accenture before serving as Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University. She has also served in administrative and teaching faculty roles at Virginia Tech and The Ohio State University.Anthony Venditto (Bell Program Facilitator)Katherine Faye Ulseth I graduated from Minnesota State University - Mankato's Iron Range Engineering Program with a B.S. in Integrated Engineering in 2013. I worked as a mechanical engineer at Magnetation (an iron ore mine) where I led millwrights' daily activities
clarifying questions. It is multidirectionalcommunication, dynamic, and evolving. In this discussion arose the question: where did thisunderstanding of ‘good communication’ come from? The Fellows then further reflected in writing on their understanding of what "goodcommunication" means in engineering and how they came to that understanding. Themes fromthe written reflections of engineering faculty were that good communication required technicalaccuracy and conciseness with an emphasis on the importance of a deep understanding of thepurpose of the communication and the audience. Communication in engineering responds to aspecific need and in a timely manner. It provides the appropriate level of information; what isneeded to understand the
. Tofurther complement their product design education, interested students can also take a seniorelective course that places a strong emphasis on design thinking.This paper describes in detail the multi-pronged approach used at South Dakota Mines’mechanical engineering undergraduate program to provide students a comprehensive educationin product design and development. The product design process selected as the commonreference is presented, the product design and development topics covered in each course of thesequence are given, and examples of key learning activities that take place in each course areprovided. Reflections from faculty teaching the courses are also shared.Faculty members from other educational institutions may find the information
education with focus on engineering design, problem-based learning, co-curricular involvement and its impact on professional formation, and the role of reflection practices in supporting engineering undergraduates as they transition from student to professional. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Validation of a Measure of Design Framing AgencyAbstractIn this research paper, we investigate the structure and validity of survey data related to students’framing agency. In order to promote increased opportunities for students to engage in and learnto frame design problems that are innovative and empathetic, there is a need for instruments thatcan provide information about
submitting a knowledge inventory and remediation plan. Students create a glossary of termsand concepts from the class and rank them by their level of understanding. Recent iterations ofthe remediation plan also include reflections on emotions and support networks.In February 2023, the project team will scale the interventions to freshman-level IntroductoryProgramming, which has 400 students and the college’s highest fail/withdrawal rate. The largesample size will enable more robust statistics to correlate exam scores, intervention rubric items,and surveys on assignment effectiveness. Piloting interventions in various environments andclasses will establish best pedagogical practices that minimize instructors’ workload and decisionfatigue. The
: (i) architectural history as a background to discuss the relationship betweenthe changes in society and the architectural developments from the first industrial revolution topost-modernism and (ii) recent technological and societal changes to reflect on the foreseeablefuture challenges. The present paper describes our experience developing and deploying thiscourse for the first time. We start by presenting the motivation behind this new course, the learningobjectives, the schedule of topics, and assessments. Following, the instructors provide lessonslearned from the course's first iteration. Finally, we conclude by making suggestions for improvingfuture iterations of the course. These suggestions can also be relevant to others considering
engagement, and academic integrity as Assistant Dean since 2014. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Preparing for Student Success in Global Competency and AwarenessEngineering student global awareness is qualitatively and quantitatively assessed in anengineering-specific preparation course through the undergraduate global engagement office at alarge land-grant university. This course was designed to introduce students to globalcompetencies, reflective practice, and foreign language for non-English speaking destinations.Data captured from several semesters indicates a positive trend of student satisfaction andincreased competencies. This data is corroborated by identifying important connections
groups from countries where travel outof the country may be difficult, mean that virtual conferences and presentations are goingto continue to happen in some capacity[4]. In the post-pandemic age, pre-recordedscientific presentations have become more commonplace, including at biomedicalengineering related conferences, including the Biomedical Engineering Society AnnualConference. Presenting virtually and preparing pre-recoded presentations requires adifferent skill set than in-person presentations, and therefore educators should considerimplementing them in the classroom to help students develop these skills early on. Additionally, pre-recorded presentations allow the student to reflect on and self-assess their presentation skills by
a number of reasons, including ensuring that academic terminology and workshopmaterials were relevant and well adapted to the local institutional context. Further, it helpedbuild capacity and expertise through authentic partnership and knowledge sharing. There wasalso parity in leadership and contribution for running the workshop exercises. Finally, agileapproaches–like on-the-fly changes to facilitation activities in response to the energy andexperiences of the faculty participants in the room, as well as post-mortem reflections at theend of each day–help the team pivot exercises.Secondly, the workshop was designed exclusively using active learning strategies. A pitfall ofworkshops on active learning strategy is that the pedagogical
adapt theirprogramming and events based on student feedback and level student engagement.Each SEL was required to attend a series of interviews with the research team and submitquarterly reflections on their experience being an SEL. Prompts for these reflections focused onwhat the SELs thought went well during the quarter as well as challenges and opportunities forimprovement. These reflections also prompted SELs to share when they felt most supported anddescribe impacts because of their experience. SELs also had the opportunity to share thoughtsand input about future programming to support community within the makerspace.In addition, the research team conducted interviews with SELs in the July 2021, at the end oftheir first year of work. These
integration of the otherdomains as well as for the skills and knowledge associated with those domains. Thus, we usedthe characteristics of engagement were comprised by Cunningham and Kelly’s (2017) epistemicpractices of engineering in this study because they are reflective of the nature of engineering,specific to the habits of mind reflected in the Framework for P12 Engineering Learning, butgeneral enough to be more likely to arise in the interviews. The three groups of stakeholderswhose views were examined in this study are not engineers and it was unlikely that theirreflections on STEM engagement would be specific enough for the Framework (2020) to be themost meaningful descriptors of their views. For example, it was unlikely that the community
and reflections for this study. Noneof the TCs were science or engineering majors, and all were specializing in one of three contentareas: Social Studies (n = 3), English Language Arts (n = 8), and Mathematics (n = 12). All theTCs were in their final semester of coursework and teaching practicum before their full-timestudent teaching semester. The TCs included 15 women and 8 men. A key goal of the course was that the preservice teachers learn to recognize and value thescience and engineering learning opportunities that are embedded within their areas of contentspecialization. During Weeks 12 and 13 of the fifteen-week course, learning aims focused oninterdisciplinary connections of engineering and technology across the middle level
research has documented the relationship between the efficacy of internships in constructionor engineering (Laxman et al. 2005 and Moore and Plugge 2008). However, little research has focusedon the relationship between the availability of paid internships and the economy. There is plenty ofresearch available on job rates and the economy in general (BLS 2020), however there is no researchpublished that reflects the relationship between internships and the economy. In the past recession, jobloss has caused some employed to return to university as non-traditional students (Barr and Turner2013). It is not yet known if that same non-traditional population will return to university while courseshave shifted to an online format. Perceptions of student
perspectives ofDEI, the team designed the research activities to isolate those factors in the questionnaire andinterviews.MethodsThe project is a sequential mixed methods study combining quantitative and qualitative aspects toexamine connections between involvement in HEP, professional formation, and views of DEI. Thequantitative aspect of this project will be a questionnaire which will guide the development of theinterviews for the qualitative aspect. Current engineering students at Lipscomb as well as alumniof the engineering program will be asked to participate in the questionnaire and interviews.Students will reflect an immediate impact on DEI from a pre/post-questionnaire due toinvolvement in HEP whereas alumni will represent the long-term
may have a difficult time adapting to highlysocial university, local community, or governmental service organizations. The authors reflect onhow their time as graduate student leaders, in student government, student organizations, andcampus committees, influenced their ability to maximize impact while efficiently balancing timespent. The authors’ service portfolios span a range of fields – as student organization advisors,committee members, or advisory board members – in diverse types of institutions (from researchuniversities to undergraduate teaching colleges) and have each balanced their personal andprofessional goals with their commitments. While not all junior faculty may have comparablegraduate student leadership backgrounds, the
allowedstudents to reflect on experimentation and interpretation of results. Future work will explorecurriculum planning and design at the departmental level to continuously improve technicalwriting for civil engineering undergraduate students from their first-year courses to their seniorcapstone design projects.IntroductionCompetent technical writing is an essential communication skill for civil engineering students toimprove in undergraduate programs. Engineering students with strong technical writing skills arecompetitive in engineering job searches and career promotion [1]. Engineering educators haverecognized the importance of technical writing for decades and various approaches have beenimplemented to redesign the writing curriculum and improve
parenthesesThe survey also included an open-ended question for both cohorts: Share your thoughts and reflections about your experiences collaborating with the faculty advisor (e.g., mentorship experience), and your overall experience conducting researchIV. RESULTSCohort 1 ResultsThe questions administered on the survey (Table 2) were intended to inquire about developingrelationships, commitment to mentorship, genuine desire for mentee to succeed, and willingnessof the faculty member to disseminate personal and academic wisdom.Table 2. Student Response Percentages: Cohort 1 Question N Yes No Prior to joining the group, did you engage in research
institutions. course DataFest[12] using on the data source and have immediate multiple datasets of variety domain expert support applications fields; availability. Temple: multiple climate datasets[13]The proposed approachTo address the above-mentioned limitations, we propose to develop data-enabled engineeringproject (DEEP) modules guided by the latest research on experiential learning theory (ELT).Experiential learning (EL) is the process of learning through experience, and is more specificallydefined as “learning through reflection on doing”[15], [16]. Kolb helped to develop the moderntheory of experiential learning, which focuses on the learning
how students iterativelyconstruct and “manipulate” theoretical objects in pursuit of scientific models with the ways theyconstruct and manipulate physical objects – particularly with respect to tinkering.The course contextIn the iteration of the course described here, students are undergraduate preservice science andengineering teachers in a UTeach replication site. The semester began with the question: ”is everycolor in the rainbow?” Students are provided with a range of materials - colored gels, printer inks, 3Figure 1: Source wavelengths (left), reflected wavelengths (red and blue), and perception (twocones, indicating magenta.flashlights, and markers; we also have the science education
thecompanyStudents are asked multiple questions corresponding to each of the seven areas above. Theiranswers to these questions show the level of intrapreneurial competencies.Intrapreneurial Motivation Scale Survey (IMSS)The IMSS includes questions designed to get at intrapreneurial motivation. This is a 12-questionset designed to get at various levels of motivation.Cohort 1It is important to note that the data reflected for Cohort 1 in this paper shows data collection forthe first components of TIP. Not all data tools were used (for example, interviews) because, atthis time, not all of the components of TIP have been experienced by the students.Students are given multiple experiences, in each course, to develop intrapreneurial dispositionsand competencies
usingWeBWorK prelab problems to support students’ learning. Specifically, our study seeks toaddress the question: What is the impact of the WeBWorK prelab problem sets on students’preparedness for lab sessions, students’ learning and students’ engagement during labsessions?(Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the course was moved entirely online and the format andthe structure of the original lab sessions implemented were affected. Although the shifts inthe format and structure may not fully reflect the usual state of the original lab sessions andthe corresponding observations, the study was carried out mostly as planned.)Utilizing Online Homework SystemsOne of the key advantages of online homework systems is that students can receiveimmediate feedback
. Unfortunately,engineering educators generally find it difficult to foster critical thinking among their students.This work-in-progress paper describes a strategy to inculcate critical thinking ability inengineering graduates. Examples are taken from two core courses in the Materials andManufacturing stream.Several critical thinking models were explored, such as Gibbs’ reflective cycle model, Facione’smodel, Kronholm model, and King and Kitchener’s model. Paul and Elder’s (P-E) model forcritical thinking was found to be more suited for engineering. P-E model provides a good basisfor the way in which engineers think, and is especially suited for CT as it targets issues such ascreativity, design development, and professional and ethical issues. Learning
development.Science Content Description of the problem that students are presented with inFocus/Grade the unitLevel ofimplementationLight and Laser Secure, Inc., designs security systems to protect valuableWaves assets, and the company is seeking help from students to design a laser security system to protect the artifacts in a traveling6th grade museum exhibit. Students investigate properties of light, including reflection, refraction, absorption, and transmission. Their solutions must protect the artifacts by having an intruder cross the laser light at least three times between entering the door and encountering the artifact using
all four courses were compared to determine if student grades reflect a differencewith the addition of a humanitarian engineering project. The goal of this study is to betterunderstand whether humanitarian engineering projects may be used to improve the motivation,retention and educational outcomes of female engineering students.IntroductionHistorically, there has been a discrepancy in engineering between the retention rates of thosestudents who identify as male versus those identifying as female, with women earning 21.9% ofall engineering bachelor’s degrees [1]. Different engineering disciplines have been moresuccessful in increasing representation of women than others, specifically in the fields ofenvironmental, biomedical, and biological
faculty in engineering educationresearch, regardless of institution type. While only a small fraction of CAREER proposals arerecommended for funding, former EEC deputy director Sue Kemnitzer frequently remindedapplicants that the process of applying for a CAREER award has value in itself. By this claim,she included the self-reflection on a faculty member’s research agenda, a plan to integrate theresearch and education activities throughout the individual’s career, and the discussions heldbetween the early career faculty member and their department chair, senior mentors, and, insome cases, deans and other constituencies. These key activities provide many opportunities forfaculty development and encouraging growth in all aspects of faculty life
toinclude the student-teacher in course planning before the semester begins, to provide guidance inpreparing and teaching a major portion of at least five classes, and to support participation in gradingand responding to student work. The student-teacher participates in all aspects of course planning,lesson planning, and student assessments with opportunities for reflective self-assessment andstructured feedback from faculty and student-teacher peers from lesson observations. Thispresentation will provide perspectives on the teaching practicum experience of a student-teacher,supervising faculty mentor, and students in a sophomore-level computational fundamentals ofbiomedical engineering design laboratory course. The student-teacher and supervising
free space and wave velocity 7 Wave Equation and Induced EMF Wave propagation in material Solutions medium 8 Wave Solutions in Visualization of magnetic Damped wave in conducting Conducting Media fields media Module 3: Transmission Line Theory 9 Wave polarization and Wave reflection due to Reflections impedance mismatch 10 Transient Response and Transmission line reflection Transient time domain Bounce Diagram
of user-centereddesign (UCD) and human-computer interaction (HCI) during the mid to late 1990s. Unlikesimple descriptions of real people, personas are fictional, “hypothetical archetypes” [1]constructed from purposeful research about product users. Personas help to communicate thegoals, values, needs, and actions of targeted users and to develop empathy and interest for usersduring early stage design. Scenarios are narrative descriptions (i.e., “stories”) of “typical andsignificant” user activities that help designers define specific product features that reflect a userfocus [2]. Today, use of both personas and scenarios are widely recognized; designers mayimplement personas and/or scenarios in the context of product usage models that enable