understand themselves as products of, and participants in, traditions of art, ideas, and values • To enable students to respond critically and constructively to change • To develop students’ understanding of the ethical dimensions of what they say and doStudents must complete one letter-graded course in each of the eight categories in GeneralEducation where one of those courses must also engage substantially with the Study of the Past.The eight Gen Ed categories at Harvard College are: • Aesthetic and Interpretive Understanding • Culture and Belief • Empirical and Mathematical Reasoning • Ethical Reasoning • Science of Living Systems • Science of the Physical Universe • Societies of the World
engineering students often dothe opposite: they focus on social (and sometimes SJ) dimensions but exclude technical ones.With the exception of Science and Technology Studies (STS) and occasionally ProfessionalCommunication and Engineering Ethics, most HSS disciplines rarely try to bridge the social andthe technical. Combined, this dichotomy of the engineering curriculum into the technical(engineering sciences) and the social (HSS), with perhaps some occasional (yet often superficial)sociotechnical integration in engineering design, constitutes a disservice to future engineers.Engineers-to-be need to practice thinking not just technically or socially, but sociotechnically.By practicing sociotechnical thinking, engineering students can improve their
Student Outcomes to Knowledge and SkillsTo help implement the new model, we hierarchically prioritize the ABET criteria to guide thedesign of direct measures 20. The hierarchical prioritization is shown in Figure 4. Criteria 3c ofthe ABET 2000 program outcomes calls for students to demonstrate an ability to “design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability”. We view this student outcome as paramount to engineering practice andencompassing of the remaining student outcomes 21. In support of criteria 3c the remainingABET student outcomes call for a foundation of knowledge that facilitates
instrumentation lab experiment (Rhudy and Rossmann, 2015). • Our first year introduction to engineering course featuring a cornerstone design experience as well as the introduction of engineering as a sociotechnical enterprise. We teach engineering design thinking as founded on empathy & interchange with all stakeholders; we encourage students to become problem definers, not simply problem solvers (Cohen, Rossmann, and Sanford Bernhardt, 2014). • Engineering ethics infused throughout the engineering curricula in several majors; faculty members develop and include modules on ethics related to the course’s technical content. This work in one engineering department has been recognized
valuedMaintain high ethical standards Demonstrates high ethics in their interactions and fairness in their decisionsTo augment the KEEN [2] definition and give multiple perspectives on Maker characteristics, theFive Roles framework [3] is also used. It was selected due to it being constructed from behaviorsEntrepreneurs reported doing. Table 2 shows an excerpt from the Five Roles framework [3], thefull framework is shown in Appendix 2.Table 2: Five Roles Framework [3]Roles Attributes DefinitionFraming the Challenge Performance Orientated Sets high standards of(specifying highly challenging
interdisciplinary problems PS2 Interdisciplinary communication TS2 Design of computational/physical experiments PS3 Interdisciplinary collaboration TS3 Application of informatics to materials science TS4 Goal-oriented design of systems, components, PS4 Ethical behavior processes PS5 Organization/management skills TS5 Hands-on experience and practical knowledgeNote: The table is adapted from [11].Table 2. Program Learning Outcomes. Program Learning Outcomes 1. Master concepts and principles of his/her central discipline and apply this subject matter to solve problems/generate new interdisciplinary knowledge (TS1-TS5
. Finally, students will explore the ethical implications of building artificially intelligent machines.This curriculum was co-designed by Benjamin Hart of Redmond High School and LarryBencivengo of Mercer Island High School and has been pilot-tested with their students overthree years. Lessons include: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Introducing Arduinos Introducing Artificial Neural Networks Building Neural Networks with Arduino 1414 North East 42nd Street, Suite 204, Seattle, WA 98105-6271 Telephone: (206) 685-8915 URL: http://www.csne-erc.org
enterthe STEM/knowledge workforce and/or graduate school. For three years, the program recruits acohort of 10 students/year who work on a number of advanced manufacturing related projects for10 weeks in the summer starting from last week of May through first week of August. Eachstudent has to complete both research ethics and lab safety training before starting their research.All students are mentored by a professor and also a graduate student. In other words, eachstudent has a faculty and as well as a graduate student mentor. For 2018 cohort, all facultymentors were from College of Engineering. The mentors guide the students in selecting theresearch project and also throughout the progress of the research. Students participate in weeklymeetings
Session ETD 425learning tool in an engineering ethics course over a period of three semesters. The videosconsisted of nine movies: 2 were Hollywood productions, 2 movies were produced by theNational Institute for Engineering Ethics (NIEE), and 5 were documentaries. The investigatorused questionnaires to discern how well students understood the videos, the extent to which thevideos helped students relate to key concepts in the course, and comments regarding theiropinions about the videos as a learning tool. The study concluded that the students viewed thevideos an effective learning tool in engineering ethics courses and that the use of videos based ona true-story is more effective in achieving the course outcomes than showing hypothetical
was held on the Carnegie Mellon University campus on December 2ndand 3rd, 2019. The objective of the two-day AI+STEM workshop was to bring together expertsand non-experts in the fields of AI and STEM education to discuss ways that industry, academia,and government could work better together to i) explore how the field of STEM education couldpotentially benefit from AI advancements, ii) propose education and knowledge acquisitionstrategies for the 21st century job landscape that will require lifelong learning and possibly causeentire shifts in expertise (potentially as a result of the very same AI technologies that couldenhance STEM education) and iii) engage with policy and decision makers in order to ensurethat ethical guidelines are in
one Other Disciplines exam. The NCEES has guides listingknowledge areas related to each discipline and a range of the number of questions that eachknowledge area may have on the exam. We developed this review course for the Mechanicalexam, although the structure is easily applicable to the other discipline-specific or OtherDiscipline exams. The knowledge areas for the Mechanical exam include Mathematics;Probability and Statistics; Computational Tools; Ethics and Professional Practice; EngineeringEconomics; Electricity and Magnetism; Statics; Dynamics, Kinematics and Vibrations;Mechanics of Materials; Material Properties and Processing; Fluid Mechanics; Thermodynamics;Heat Transfer; Measurements, Instrumentation and Controls; and Mechanical
brainstorming sessions, theimportance of iterations in design and documenting a design1,2,3. As part of this activity, thestudents learned to create 3D models of parts and assemblies.The activity is part of two freshman courses offered during the freshman year, MECH1100 andMECH1208. These courses have evolved from lecture based to project based courses withsupporting lectures. The two courses cover topics related to mechanical engineering: engineeringdesign, engineering drawing, 3D modeling of parts and assemblies, design innovation, computertools, project management, reverse engineering, engineering ethics, mechanical components,forces on structures, fluids, and thermal energy.In the 3D design activity, students learned the important role which CAD
://research.virginia.edu/compliance/research-regulations/foreign-influence- federally-sponsored-research – Summary Guidance Document: https://research.virginia.edu/sites/vpr/files/2019- 12/UVA.ForeignInfluenceDo.Dont_.UpdatedDec2019.docx.pdf • Penn State: https://www.research.psu.edu/international_affiliations • University of California, Office of the President: https://www.ucop.edu/ethics-compliance-audit- services/compliance/research-compliance/foreign-influence.html16
Propulsion. The MechanicalEngineering Department is committed to prepare students in these options, to work efficientlyfor various industries and government.The basic criteria of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) for theengineering program’s outcome and assessment requires that graduates must havedemonstrated abilities (ABET Criteria 3, a-k1), in mathematics, science, engineering, design,data analysis, teamwork, ethics, communications, and life-long learning. In addition to ABET3(a-k) requirements, the Mechanical Engineering program at AAMU was designed to meetthe additional requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, criteria (l-s),which require that graduating students must have knowledge about
to design problems in civil, architectural and environmental engineering. • Identify the major building systems and the logic of their construction sequence. • Identify the major systems in a typical civil engineering project and the logic of their construction sequence. • Identify major environmental issues and the approaches to resolving them, and • Describe the student’s major curriculum and why it is structured as it is. • Obtain a basic understanding of professional issues, professional societies, engineering ethics and professional licensure requirements.CAEE201 Course ContentAs of this writing, CAEE201 has been offered 3 times; each has included two or three casestudies. During the first offering the two case
, cultural immersion,language development, and ethical engineering practices. Feedback provided by students,collaborating agencies and other institutions have indicated that the current program does a verygood job of preparing the students for their immersions and helping the students to becomeglobal engineers. Although there are many well established international technical opportunitiesand programs that can be easily adopted by universities, it is often difficult, due to a lack ofresources, to establish these programs at smaller universities. This paper will describe theETHOS program and discuss the mechanics and resources used to facilitate this program.Additionally, this paper will discuss plans for intercollegiate collaboration through this
23 His/her ethics and professional integrity 6 46 His/her professional experience 2 15As indicated in Table 1, most responses indicated that effective teaching methods, enthusiasm,and instructor’s confidence in his/her knowledge and views are the qualities of an excellentinstructor they had as in the past as students. Almost half of the responses indicated that otherqualities of an instructor make him/her an excellent instructor including the way he/she treatedstudents in class, his/her concern of student learning, grading system and fairness, his/her senseof humor, and his/her ethics and professional integrity. About a third of the survey
case of online visitors, Page 11.584.6there is no practical way to verify their demographic characteristics. For that reason, wemust rely on self-reporting.In either case, we must be sure that we are collecting visitor information ethically. Inaddition to seeking permission from the hosting institution, we need to be certain that weadhere to ethical standards for data collection over the internet.11,15 According to theseguidelines, it is best if no personally identifiable information, like names and addresses,are collected. For this reason we decided against having the users enter a name, eventhough it would have been useful in identifying returning
Enhancing Engineering Education through Humanitarian Ethics, which is developing a graduate curriculum in humanitarian engineering at CSM. He is author of Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking in Science and Engineering Education from Sputnik to the War against Terrorism (University Press of America 2005) and co-developer of Engineering Cultures® multimedia coursewareGary Downey, Virginia Tech GARY DOWNEY is Professor of Science and Technology Studies and affiliated faculty member in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also 2005-2006 Boeing Company Senior Fellow in Engineering Education at the U.S. National Academy of Engineering and was keynote lecturer on the
Opportunities of Service-learning (ETHOS)program at the University of Dayton (Dayton, Ohio) is founded on the belief that engineers aremore apt and capable to serve our world when they have experienced opportunities that increasetheir understanding of technology’s global linkage with values, culture, society, politics andeconomy. ETHOS seeks to provide these opportunities by means of curriculum integratedservice-learning programming. Such educational programming – classroom projects, studentorganization activities, collaborative research and international technical immersion – facilitatesholistic learning, ethical engineering practices, perspectives of technology integration andappropriate technology transfer. To appropriately measure the value
program is to provide an opportunity forstudents who are not able to spend a semester or year abroad to gain international experiencebefore they graduate. The program was delivered in the United Kingdom where both co-authorshave taught and lived. Students received one course credit (4 credit hours) for the program,"Engineering in a Global and Societal Context," which counted as a free elective or anengineering elective.This study-abroad program was designed to address a specific educational objective adopted aspart of Bucknell’s Civil Engineering program’s accreditation process: “Graduates of the CivilEngineering program will demonstrate professional responsibility and a sensitivity to a broadrange of societal concerns such as ethical
Catalog Course DescriptionMPC 497-498 Senior Design Project (2, 2): Student teams conduct major open-endedresearch and design projects. Elements of the design process including establishment ofobjectives, synthesis, analysis, and evaluation are integral parts. Real-world constraintssuch as economical and societal factors, marketability, ergonomics, safety, aesthetics,and ethics are also integral parts. Page 12.291.3497: feasibility studies performed;498: implementation, testing, and production of design. Includes guest lecturers, teampresentations, team building sessions, team meetings, and guided discussions relating todesign. The course consists of
. Page 23.527.6 • Exposure to Ethics in Medicine and the Institutional Review Board. This is a necessary element in EIM as the engineering students are involved in Medical Intervention and working with human subjects.Observation and Interviewing TechniquesTo achieve the objective of giving the engineering students a deeper understanding of the needsof various stakeholders such as the patients, clinicians and caregivers, observation andinterviewing techniques are taught at the university before the students begin their immersion inthe hospital. It is important for the students to build up a habit of observing their surrounding andthe interaction of people with systems, and be able to identify problems from the observation
faster way and in a larger community. For engineers, the decisionprocess is even more complex once the implications have serious impact not only to the targetcustomers but also to the society as a whole and to the environment. This is an aspect that showsthe necessity for engineers to search for the acquisition of an ability to respond to socialnecessities having in mind the cultural aspects when developing a project.The effects of this aspect in engineering formation implies a different approach providing thefuture engineers a notion about policy, ethics and social sciences, which are so important toprepare them to the future work market that will require the respect and promotion of society andenvironment as assets1.Most of social groups have
, voice,face, iris and other modalities). Multibiometric systems are also covered. This includesfeature fusion, classifier fusion and systems that use two or more biometric modalities.Biometric system performance and issues related to the security, ethics and privacyaspects of these systems will also be addressed.There is an acute need for biometrics education at the undergraduate and graduate levels.Institutions world-wide have an established graduate program in biometrics and offersenior level undergraduate elective courses [10][11] in the area. The University of WestVirginia offers a Bachelor of Science in Biometric Systems. The U.S. Naval Academyhas a Biometrics Research Laboratory with an aim to enhance undergraduate biometricseducation [11
hand with passion, discipline, Page 23.399.6 intensity and flexibility. 5. Ethical Actions and Integrity: Adherence to ethical standards and principles and the courage to act ethically and with integrity. 6. Trust and Loyalty: Commitment to actions that will instill trust and to the principle that loyalty to the team yields loyalty to the leader and vision. Working to empower those around you to make the people around you successful. 7. Courage: Face difficult/high-risk actions head-on. 8. Vision: Creating compelling images of the future, identifying what could and should be for new products
require students to speak in front of “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 3215their peers and faculty. For example, a student chapter seminar is scheduled for senior studentsto formally describe their AIAD experience to the younger civil engineering majors. The goal isto encourage sophomores and juniors to participate in the AIAD program.Through the ASCE Student Chapter, senior students write an essay on an ethical issue for theannual Daniel Mead Essay Competition. Faculty select the best three
other accreditation boardcriteria. In fact, it would reinforce the goals of accreditation. In fact, of the eleven criteriarequired under ABET Criterion 3, stating the requirements for engineering graduates, IPknowledge would be included in seven, including “an ability to design,” “a knowledge ofcontemporary issues,” and “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.” IPencompasses design and identifies the latest contemporary issues associated with engineering.More importantly, it is an engineer’s professional and ethical responsibility to research claimsprior to publication or use. Performing copyright searches are standard practice, but performingother IP searches should be standard as well.In an undergraduate engineering
Engineering Department at ONU.16 The former arelisted in the appendix, while the latter closely align with the eleven ABET engineeringaccreditation criteria17 (also in the appendix).The tasks and requirements described for the Baja competition, for example, represent explicitfulfillment of five of the ABET criteria (a, c, e, g, k). The design competition additionallypresents opportunities to fulfill four other criteria (b, d, f, i), such as an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility and an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.Sirinterlikci and Kerzmann cite specific ways in which all eleven criteria were satisfied in theirschool’s Baja experience.18All four of the Program Educational Objectives are clearly supported by each
single course, tointegration of leadership concepts into technical course offerings and other unique expectationsof students to take on leadership projects at their school and report on the experience. It isdifficult to see a generalized theme, but one might assume that a primary focus of the leadershipofferings is based on a belief that a graduating student can lead from any level in his/herorganization. Emphasis is placed on students exploring their own leadership abilities and theways in which they influence group outcomes: interpersonal skills, judgment, moral courage,innovation, sustainability, global collaboration and emotional intelligence appear as key topics,as does the notion of the interrelatedness of ethics and sustainability in a