institutions towards the adoption of computer-based exams [1, 2, 5, 6]. Studies like those by Lappalainen et al. [1], who found improvedoutcomes by beginning with paper-based exams and continue with computer-based exams, andGrissom et al. [4], who reported higher success in writing recursive solutions through computer-based exams, underscore this trend. Deloatch et al. [15] further highlighted a preference forcomputer-based exams, citing perceived improvements in quality, speed, and anxiety reduction.Computer-based exams present both opportunities and challenges, particularly in terms oftechnical stability and academic integrity.. For example, Rajala et al. [2] developed anexamination platform for Java programming, integrating multiple-choice
scientific research abilities, which are critical for their respective future careers.Engineering education is no exception to this academic requirement [1]. The employability ofengineering students today depends on more than just using their technical abilities; in order toeven secure part-time employment and progress in their careers, they also require complementaryprofessional abilities or soft skills [2], [3], [4]. These professional skills include the capacity forinitiative, teamwork, communication, planning and organization, and commercial acumen [5], [6],[7]. Professionals believe that communication skills are one of the most important skills requiredfor employability [8].Writing and more specifically academic writing and communication is an
ability in sighted populations.IntroductionSpatial ability has been defined as an intelligence related to the ability to mentally transform,retain, and generate visual images [1], [2]. Activities that require spatial ability includenavigation, mental rotation, and perception of objects. In this paper we define spatial ability as aquantification of a measurement of spatial thinking.Students who have high spatial ability have demonstrated higher levels of success in academiacompared to their peers, especially in areas of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) [3]–[5]. A longitudinal study that tracked students with high spatial performance alsofound that spatial ability has implications for professionals working in STEM fields [6
culturally relevant approaches could make adifference in the academic performance and future of the minoritized student college population.IntroductionEducational experiences in rigorous engineering programs are deeply influential on a student’slived experience and future in terms of identity, sense of purpose, and professional opportunities.Students experience engineering programs in several ways; one is to reward those who can scoregood enough grades in prescribed coursework thus proceeding in the program and the other wayreflects those who experience programs that support creative and innovative problem-solving.The author in [1] described the issues engineering programs face concerning the retention andgraduation of at-risk engineering students
departments have always praised him for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. He has been involved in numerous professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published 100+ journal papers and conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability.Kathryn Bedette AIA, Kennesaw State UniversityGiovanni Loreto, Kennesaw State University Giovanni Loreto is an Assistant Professor in the College of Architecture and Construction Management at the
Static Stability Through Concept MappingIntroductionConceptual understanding is a crucial part of the development of engineering educationcurricula. As defined by Streveler et al., an “individual’s conceptual understanding of a topic isthe collection of his or her concepts, beliefs, and mental models” [1, p. 83]. For engineeringstudents, conceptual understanding is critical in developing engineering expertise. This expertisewill be used by practitioners who must adapt their knowledge and apply it to different contextsand to ill-structured, real-world problems [2]. Being able to understand the relationship betweendifferent engineering ideas is a skill that students must develop to be successful practicingprofessionals. Research has shown that
. A binary logistic regression wasapplied to assess the significance of sustainability knowledge in relation to the students’educational level. The results exhibit statistically significant differences between sustainabilityknowledge scores and the semester enrolled in the program.Higher educational levels are associated with a higher likelihood of obtaining a better overallsustainability knowledge score. The probability of achieving higher overall sustainabilityknowledge scores is approximately 20% as industrial engineering students advance in theprogram. In addition, in the logistic regression model, confidence intervals can be calculated forthe odds, where it is seen that the influence of the educational level can range from 1% to 43%.This
, we would update thiswith our fuller list of audio narratives to date and make the focus of the paper more on the audionarratives, engaging faculty, and offering guidance and food for thought to researchers. We willalso explore iPad and other digital ways of presenting the interactivity so that those withoutsmart phones at the session can engage as well. Figure 1: Example poster from 2022 NSFExample audio narrative:This is an example audio narrative created for the project. A video like this would be pulled upwhen participants scan the QR code.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuzMpJ30zg4&list=PLGtUPyPaSQBb1oiZzdtYybIlP-DNi8E0F&ab_channel=AudioforInclusion Figure 2: Example YouTube Clip
versions of the course were retention ofstudent success elements from UNIV 1201 and the inclusion of a collaborative designexperience.The primary goals of developing the GEEN 1201 course was to support freshmen andsophomore students in their transition to upper-level studies through development of knowledgeand skills. The desired impacts for the course were to: (1) provide a general introduction to keyskills so students have a platform on which to build as they enter discipline specific courses, (2)provide a guided experience related to design projects that are often part of upper level courses,(3) initiate patterns relevant to teamwork as engineering practice commonly involvescollaborative processes, and (4) reinforce commitment among engineering
andappreciated the instant feedback and the chance to improve their scores.Background/IntroductionGrading of 3D solid models can be a time-consuming task. Baxter and Guerci usedSOLIDWORKS macros to grade 3D CAD files [1]. Kirstukas developed a file comparisonprogram in Visual Basic to evaluate Siemens NX solid model files [2]. Ault and Fraser createdan automated grading system for Creo files, which checked for the number of each feature typeand overall geometry. [3] Garland and Grigg compared human and software grading in anengineering CAD course [4] using Graderworks [5], which Dr. Garland developed. He hascontinued improving the product and has become a Certified Solution Partner forSOLIDWORKS [6]. Graderworks can compare geometric properties such as
the iterativedevelopment and verification of code on the hardware before, in a real scenario, installing thehardware on the real factory floor. The focus there would be on commissioning the hardware andprimarily troubleshooting electrical connections rather than code.KeywordsSCADA, Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC), HMI, Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL), MQTT.1. IntroductionAutomation and robotics are rapidly exploding in popularity around the world. The reasons forthis are manifold, but the ability of automation to replace repetitive tasks is crucial for bothworker well-being and the economic competitiveness of plants. The Wadsworth Dining Hall atMichigan Tech currently uses student labourers to manually wash the dishes for thousands ofstudents
, Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies, and Systems Engineering Divisions. He is also one of the organizers for MEEd held annually by ASME. He volunteers as a Program Evaluator for ABET. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Augmenting Machine Design textbooks by Integrating vendor-supplied resources.AbstractA course in Design of Machine Elements (aka Machine Design in some programs) is a requiredpart of most Mechanical Engineering curricula in the world. Textbooks for this course areusually divided into two halves: 1) development of failure theories, and 2) design, analysis, andselection of individual machine components such as bearings, flexible power elements
the ethical use of AI. Additionally, faculty hiring trends in STEMfields have brought in faculty who have access to and experience in using “toolboxes” such as AI,machine learning, data science and cybersecurity to enhance their research. Furthermore, to helpcontextualize academic research needs at comprehensive institutions, many university libraries areadding faculty positions with specific aims including data science, copyright / intellectual property;virtual / extended reality and AI / emerging technologies to support research in critical areas suchas autonomy, advanced materials, big data, cultural geography, linguistics, discovery and digitalhumanities.Aside from formulation of the algorithms behind LLM’s [1], a great deal of dialogue
data drives decision-making.The datasets used in this paper were not altered or transformed to fit the multiple linearregression model better. However, the insignificant features can become significant if a largerdataset is used, the number of features is increased or decreased, data transformation isperformed, and an AI model other than linear regression is used. However, to be aware of abalanced approach in courses that utilize AI algorithms is recommended.References[1] Kumar, V., & Minz, S. (2014). Feature selection: a literature review. SmartCR, 4(3), 211-229.[2] Li, J., Cheng, K., Wang, S., Morstatter, F., Trevino, R. P., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Featureselection: A data perspective. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 50(6), 1-45.[3
found, and those departments werenot included in the data below. The total number of departments recorded was 159.We were also interested in the experiences of the TFF in each department, including the salary,courses taught, service, research, demographics, etc. To ascertain this information, we preparedan anonymous Qualtrics survey that was emailed to all 279 identified TFF with IRB permission.A complete list of questions can be found in the Appendix and is summarized in Table 1. 2Table 1: Questions from the survey sent to TFF. Teaching and service Professional development Department and personal
approaches include exploring the connection between personal values,personal story, and principles (or personal ethics) and students’ behaviors that can affectpsychological safety on teams.IntroductionWithin this work we examine ethics as the collection of principles that we use to motivate us andhelp us make decisions and guide our interactions with those around us and work that we do.Therefore, our ethic is made up of the principles that motivate, inform, and guide our daily lives.From this standpoint, the discussion on ethics development should extend beyond why theChallenger exploded or the causes behind the Hyatt Regency Bridge failure.If we apply the four domains of Leadership Model [1], the development of a leadership ethic notonly includes
to structural properties of strength andbending moments allows them to predict, design, and optimize as best as possible. IDEA #1: THE THINNER AN OBJECT IS, THE MORE IT CAN BE BENT BEFORE FAILURE Students are tasked with developing procedures to investigate the relationship between distance from neutral that the spaghetti noodle will bend right before it breaks. Once this relationship is determined, they will then retest with a variety of noodle types (e.g., spaghetti, linguini, lasagna, manicotti) to determine the relationship between the thickness of a material and the maximum radius before breaking. This task controls the type of material so that students clearly see the impact of geometry in
foradministrators. Another interesting result is that funding is the greatest barrier faced by allinvolved in primary and secondary CER, regardless of role.Implications. Our findings provides insight into why there is minimal research studying certain 1Gransbury, Heckman, McGill, DeLyser, Rosato ASEE 2024topics and groups. To address these barriers, the CER community can focus on creating materials,workshops, and professional development initiatives to inform researchers about resources as wellas methods for mitigating these barriers.1 IntroductionThe addition of computer science (CS) into primary and secondary schools (K-12) had led to thegrowing field of K-12
design, develop, and implement intended outcomes that are intimatelyconnected to the multiple realities and worlds that faculty in engineering face (Mejia et al.,2022).In this full paper, five diverse Latiné/x 1 engineering faculty reflected upon their stories and howthey use their experiences to situate their existing in- and out-of-classroom practices for theirstudents. By sharing their stories, the authors were able to situate threads that weaved theirbackgrounds to suggest further refinements for FDPs that could include other minoritized groupsin engineering. Note that due to the narrative nature of this work, sections of the manuscript willbe written in first-person.Literature reviewGiven the limited information known about how Faculty
% improvement on students’ problem-solving skillsrelated to specific heat. 95% of the students felt that, after this new and student designedexperiment, they had a much better understanding on the topic.IntroductionThe most important goal of engineering education is to help students not only understand themathematical and physical equations of the engineering concepts but also their real-lifeapplications. To bridge the gap between the equations and the real-life applications and enhanceunderstanding of the concepts, lab experiments have been added as integral parts of manyengineering curriculums aimed at assisting students’ learning and applying engineering concepts.Lab classes are more easily to provide an active learning environment [1] because
participation and negatively affect their depth of comprehension. As the field progressesand technology advances, there is an urgent demand for pedagogical strategies that foster deeperunderstandings and encourage active engagement among students.Concept mapping was developed by Joseph D. Novak and his colleague Alberto J. Ca˜nas in the1970s at Cornell University, when Novak was seeking to understand children’s knowledge ofscience [1, 2]. The theoretical foundation of the concept map is Ausubel’s theory of meaningfullearning [3, 4]. This theory emphasizes the importance of students actively linking newinformation to their existing knowledge [5, 6]. Concept maps serve as a visual tool that alignswith this principle, fostering meaningful learning by
can have a profound effect on motivation to learn andpersist to degree completion. Undeniably, student interest can change over time and majoring insomething other than a student’s initial interest at the time of university or college matriculationshould be encouraged based on exploration and self-reflection. However, there are policies basedon capacity limits in majors and constraints such as classroom capacity and course offerings thatschools grapple with which exclude students from their interest. From literature, we know thatabout half of females interested in engineering actually enter the major they were initiallyinterested in during their first year [1]. While there is some engineering education research whichexamines entry into
asBlack, Latino/a/x, or Indigenous (BLI) necessitates changes in engineering ecologies to createmore inclusive and equitable engineering environments. Engineering ecology (i.e., interactionswithin engineering environments) has a direct impact on students’ feelings of belonging inengineering courses and in majors, and as such, is a promising space for interventions that addressequity issues in students’ experiences. Belonging is linked to retention in engineering [1], [2], [3].Similarly, a student’s identity as an engineer influences their continued interest in pursuingengineering [4], [5]. Engineering role identity has been connected to important student outcomesincluding academic success, retention, and well-being [6]. In this work, we seek to
Engineers (AIChE) – the lead society for ABETaccreditation of chemical engineering and similarly named programs – chemical engineers helppeople live longer, healthier, and more productive lives through advancements in biomedicine,including the development of diagnostic devices (i.e., for measuring illness) as well astherapeutic devices (i.e., for curing illness). In support of this professional objective, the ABETprogram criteria for training students enrolled in chemical and similarly named programs statesthat, “…Programs with biochemical, biomolecular, or similar modifiers in their titles must alsoinclude biologically based engineering applications [emphasis added] in their curriculum…”[1]. Thus, students of chemical engineering who pursue
engineering) as further subject matter for the application of systems engineering,particularly in the area of sustainable development. According to the United Nations, theSustainable Development Goals support the five pillars of people, planet, prosperity,partnerships, and peace, which are known as the 5 Ps of sustainable development. Here within,we share: 1) background on the development of the nurse+engineer, which is a newly describedV-shaped professional; 2) content of two course modules that may be used to teach partnershipbetween engineers and nurses to address the challenges of sustainable development usingsystems engineering; and 3) initial qualitative feedback from students collected throughanonymous end-of-semester surveys. Our results
academicpreparedness and performance [1]. Soria and Horgas [2] found that, post pandemic, 39% ofcollege students are experiencing clinically significant anxiety and 35% of students areexperiencing clinically significant depression. At this time, post-pandemic, the ramifications toengineering education are still being discerned.This work attempts to begin to understand in what ways engineering faculty perceive theirteaching to have changed and to what extent course policies have evolved post-pandemic. Inparticular, given rising mental health concerns, have faculty instituted pedagogies and policiesthat are more compassionate? Compassionate pedagogy has been put forth as an approach foraddressing the challenges of the pandemic with practices such as providing
, which can help inform future educational initiatives that may enhance engineering literacy among K-12 students.I ntroduction To ensure that engineering solutions are effective, inclusive, and innovative and to meet the complex challenges of the future, we need to increase the number of students studying engineering and diversify the workforce[1]. To addressthis need, there has been a call to include engineering in the K-12 curriculum to enhance engineering literacy and improve career readiness for students interested in matriculating into a post-secondary engineering program[2]. The goal of encouraging more students into engineering is challenging due to the limited knowledge
focuses on remediating wastewater with ornamental plant species. He also assists in research related to how students learn project management skills across a range of academic disciplines. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Evaluating project management skill development in engineering and agricultural curriculaAbstract Project management is the use of specific knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques todeliver something of value to people [1]. STEM programs desire to prepare their students toprovide something of value to society. Developing project management skills not only aids inthis but also translates to applications in their personal life, such as
Student’s Belonging in Two Engineering DepartmentsIntroductionThe need to be loved and belong is a fundamental human motivation. It is part of Maslow’shierarchy of needs, followed only after meeting a person’s physiological and safety needs, and isan essential requirement before esteem and self-actualization can be achieved [1, 2].A widely accepted definition of sense of belonging (SB) in higher education is presented byStrayhorn, who defines SB as “students’ perceived social support on campus, a feeling orsensation of connectedness, and the experience of mattering or feeling cared about, accepted,respected, valued by, and important to the campus community or others on campus such asfaculty, staff, and peers” [3]. Moreover
teaching evaluation process. Also, we will compare the theory principles tocurrent standards of teaching evaluation.IntroductionIn 1952 Robert J. Wherry developed the theory of rating (ToR), the theory was republished in1982 by Christopher J. Barlett with some minor editing to make the equations more readable andthe assumptions more understandable [1]. The ToR consists of 46 theorems which appear inequation form and tackles varied constructs (see appendix I for examples), most of the constructshave at least two hypotheses (corollaries) to show nuances between the constructs [1].The ToR studies ratings, also called evaluations of performance, suggests ways to minimize biasand error in ratings, sets the main guidelines for designing rating scales