science fiction novel; two award-winning books in the genre of body-mind-spirit, and numerous papers and articles.Dr. William J Davis, University of Virginia William J Davis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engineering and Society and the University of Virginia. William has degrees in literature and Science and Technology Studies, and has taught courses in English, philosophy, and sociology in universities in the USA and Mexico. His current research investigates the ethical and social implications of technology, including those related to artificial intelligence, automation, bioethics, machine ethics, and post and trans- humanism.Mr. Kent A. Wayland, University
Paper ID #19811Effective Approaches for Teaching STEM-literacy for All Majors: The Ex-ample of ResonanceDr. Maria E. Garlock, Princeton University Maria Garlock is an Associate Professor at Princeton University in the Department of Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering where she is the Director of the Architecture and Engineering Program. Her scholarship is in resilient building design and in studies of the best examples of structural designs of the present and past. She has co-authored the book Felix Candela: Engineer, Builder, Structural Artist and has recently launched a MOOC titled ”The Art of Structural Engineering
camps started.ResultsOnly two researchers received the opportunity to participate in this program, and unfortunately,this left us with an objectively small sample size. Other engineering students were spoken to in apublic setting, both former and current, on the potential benefits of the program.Both participants reported using skills learned during the program during their followingsemester at the university: Their 50 hours of coding experience was used to help sort data andconstruct graphs for classes. Their CAD experience came into play when they were able tomodel problems in an online space to assist in solving them. Their project oriented mind set gavethem an edge with planning and completing all assignments and projects on time
were two middle school units enacted in this study. One focused on the challengeof conserving, filtering, and reusing water in extreme environments, and the other challengedstudents to learn about and design multiple remote sensing technologies, and then to use thosetechnologies to explore a model “mystery moon.” Each unit consists of eight one-hour,sequenced activities. Throughout each unit, youth are introduced to engineering practices andhabits of mind through an Engineering Design Process (EDP), which they use as a guide whileworking in small groups to design a solution to an engineering challenge. The EDP begins withidentifying a problem that needs to be solved and investigating what has already been done.Next, engineers imagine different
of criticalthinking (Chinn et al. 2014). Both the broad term of critical thinking and the more niche term ofsystems thinking share similar meanings of thoughtful analysis or analytical reasoning, and callto mind King & Kitchener’s Reflective Judgement Model (King & Kitchener, 1994, 2001, 2004),a stepping stone between the cognitive development research started in the 1970s and morerecent epistemological research. This researcher argues that discovering the epistemic beliefs offaculty and the ideas being disseminated to students in their chemical engineering classroomswill prove useful in the field of chemical engineering education as well as related academicfields concerned with systems and critical thinking.TheoryResearch preceding
Paper ID #25409An Educational Framework to Promote Self-Authorship in Engineering Un-dergraduatesDr. Laura Kasson Fiss, Michigan Technological University Laura Kasson Fiss is a Research Assistant Professor in the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Techno- logical University. She holds a PhD from Indiana University in English (2013). Her work has appeared in Victorian Periodicals Review, The Lion and the Unicorn, and The Cambridge Companion to Gilbert and Sullivan. In addition to her research on Victorian humor, she conducts higher education research and scholarship on issues of inclusion, reflection, and innovation.Dr
engineers design and maintain. One might call us “the appliedcontent experts,” which is at least somewhat more complementary than “geeks.” Science andmathematics are the faithful partners in our toolbox, as comfortable in our hands as a well wornwrench. We’ve both informally and formally entered the K-12 classroom over the years, perhapsby invitation on career day or as a precursor to the local science fair. Recently, we’ve evenstarted to carve out very enticing fast-track-to-technical-career middle school and high schoolcurricula in the form of efforts such as Project Lead the Way6. But we’ve yet to become a truepartner in the mission our K-12 brethren undertake, including the demands of No Child LeftBehind.With these precursors in mind, the
-basedinstructional/simulation modules can become one the chief teaching/training tools of the decade.Project ObjectivesThe main object of this paper is to demonstrate the suitability of JAVA to develop platformindependent interactive teaching modules. The case-study selected to illustrate this conceptfocuses on technical calculations, analysis, improvement, scaling-up and development of mixingprocesses and equipment. The product enables chemical and process engineers to visualize mixingprocesses and to calculate process parameters for single- and two- phase systems, powerconsumption and circulation rates. The module is developed with two goals in mind: beinteractive to keep the students attention while demonstrating important design concepts, and beflexible
Matlab as the main programming languageBy taking a “teach-a-language” approach using Matlab, we can teach general-purpose languageskills and concepts and take advantage of its computational/graphical capabilities. This will giveus the ability to discuss more advanced engineering/mathematical problems in just a short periodof time, which cannot be accomplished with general-purpose programming languages. Weshould keep in mind that the main reason behind offering a programming course for engineeringstudents is to help them with their future scientific computational tasks. We believe that Matlabcan be used to serve this purpose. The fact that the majority of engineering jobs (excludingcomputer engineering which is not part of our discussion) do not
. 3D Master Model and Various ApplicationsStudents learn how to use one or the other application of the software during their course ofstudy in MET. Although each of the applications can be used by itself, but the real advantagesoccur when these tools are used together, allowing them to be used as integrated tools for adesign full-cycle. A few year ago, MET program started to offer Advanced Computer-Aidedwith the idea of concurrent engineering in mind. The senior-level course integrates the differentapplications into the design phase, resulting in analyzing more concepts in less time. In thesixteen-week semester, students begin with the solid modeling of 3D parts; assemble them forwell-defined mechanisms and their motion simulation; and use
1260 Engineering and the Global Marketplace: Educating “Technicians” or Problem Solvers? Saeid Y. Eidgahy – Hamid Y. Eydgahi Jefferson Community College – Lima Technical CollegeThe swift degree of change has virtually influenced every aspect of human life, global industrialand business entities, limitless communication systems, automation beyond imagination, andcompetition from all corners have challenged the world as never before. To survive competitionrequires nothing less than organizational revolution including higher education.Engineering
the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by engineers, or is demonstrative of work in specific engineering fields.i At leastone of those must be within the first four listed, below; i.e., do not only check “other”. Check allthat apply: X Use of an engineering design process that has at least one iteration/improvement Attention to specific engineering habits of mind X Attention to engineering practices (as described in the NGSS/Framework and as practiced by engineers) Attention to specific engineering careers or fields related to the lesson/activity Other (please describe below)Provide a description of how you will explicitly address these aspects of authentic engineering inyour workshop
typesand frequency of errors, various awkward sentences and other poor English components insuch submissions. Proposed changes that have come from this research include severalaspects. Page 20.2.3 The first aspect is that the Russian engineers should consider their papers as turnkey products, which will not need to be polished by editors and that will simply be rejected if English is improper. An introductory mind-changing lecture is offered with the consideration of “turnkey polishing” in the final course score. Another “mind-changing” paradigm is that an original paper written in English is MUCH better than the translation of
”) AND(assessment) AND (validation) anywhere in the article. Since there was no function to set thepublication date on the journal website, every article published since 1991 was included in thesearch results. After screening the articles with titles and abstracts, eight articles remained aspotentially relevant papers, and those articles were all published after 2000. Among those, twopapers reported newly developed instruments for ethics-related outcomes with validity evidence:Hess et al. [8]’s Civic-Minded Graduate Scale (CMG) and Rambo-Hernandez et al. [9]’s ValuingDiversity and Enacting Inclusion in Engineering Scale (VDEIE). We introduce those studies inthis paper.For the journal Science and Engineering Ethics, we searched for articles
engineering programs are added each year across the US and abroad, but anyone who hasstarted a new program knows that there are numerous “start-up” challenges to designing andlaunching a new program. The University of North Carolina (UNC) Chapel Hill, which isstarting a new undergraduate multi-disciplinary engineering major, and Franklin W. Olin Collegeof Engineering (Olin), which has “drive change in engineering education” as part of its mission,partnered to create EMERGE (Entrepreneurially Minded Engineering Resource Group forEducators) in the summer of 2020. EMERGE began as a free, optional add-on workshop to theannual Olin Summer Institute and has since grown into a strong cohort of over 40 institutionsthat meet monthly over Zoom and in person
changing global economy and workforce,engineering students need to be prepared to work on complex problems within multidisciplinaryteams and design solutions with diverse social and ethical considerations in mind. To addressthis need, the Whiting School of Engineering at Johns Hopkins University initiated aMultidisciplinary Design Program. Currently, the program offers a two-semester sequence whereteams of multidisciplinary engineering students are engaged in design challenges with projectpartners from medicine, industry, or the social sector. Students are mentored through a human-centered design process to (1) conduct technical, contextual, and user research, (2) focus thechallenge, (3) ideate, and (4) prototype and test their solutions. In this
.[16] K. Beddoes and M. Borrego, “Feminist theory in three engineering educational journals:1995-2008,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 281-303, 2011.[17] M. F. Belenky, B. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. N. Tarule, Women’s Ways of Knowing:The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Sterling, VA: Basic Books, 1997.[18] B. E. Rincón, and C. E. George-Jackson, “Examining department climate for women inengineering: The role of STEM interventions,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 57,no. 6, pp. 742-747, 2016.[19] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing AmongFive Traditions, 4th ed. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
1 .— - ..—. Session 1161 , — -.. . . . . The Case for Comfort: Oral Communication in the Engineering Curricula . Betsy M. Aller Michigan Technological University Speaking in public is not a comfortable task. Few of us approach it without some apprehension; certainlycollege students are, in general, considerably more nervous. Yet oral communication is of increasing importanceand use
learning occurs, such as peer to peer discussions, students are still sitting.Learning science has shown that the brain and physical activity are connected. An active body canlead to an active mind. Significant work has been done on how to create intentional movement inelementary and middle school classrooms, but it is limited in higher education settings.This paper discusses how an “escape room” learning activity has been implemented and assessedin two small-sized engineering programs, York College of Pennsylvania and Iron RangeEngineering. Escape rooms are a physical adventure game to challenge players, where they mustsolve a series of puzzles to escape the room in a given time limit. In this activity, using movementto review content in
a product by the end of the lesson. Students will need to be able to determine a community need in addition to designing and creating a smaller-scale example of their solution. They will need to keep in mind who t hey are designing for; it is not for themselves! Once complete, students will present their projects in an engineering exhibit, and evaluate each other’s solutions. Looking for more inspiration? You can prompt your students to design something more specific. For example: Have your students design a shelter for victims of natural disasters or political conflict. Have your students design a library for small villages without access to this resource. The possibilities are endless! Project Checklist: What are you trying
states of the country,which have worked very well for many years. The Country has achieved and has built a solidreputation even abroad also creating generations of Brazilian scientists and educators. Thesepeople fortunately have refused to accept the ominous and narrow-minded neo-liberal policiesfor education having started a fighting to keep up the achievements already gotten and actionsthat help to maintain and to enhance the researches in every field of science and technology.1. IntroductionHistory shows that education for all is not enough; it has to be quality education. In superioreducation, this is a special issue because it is responsible for the formation of the minds that willbe in charge of the Country. In Engineering Education field
Paper ID #9938Issues Surrounding a Heutagogical Approach in Global Engineering Educa-tionDr. Yakut Gazi, Texas A&M University In her 20 years of experience as an instructional designer, media specialist, IT consultant, faculty mem- ber, and technology leader, Dr. Yakut Gazi has worked at higher education institutions in the US, Qatar, Turkey, and Spain. Prior to joining TAMU Engineering as the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Engineering Remote Education in September 2013, she led the distributed learning and classroom technology oper- ations at Texas A&M University-Central Texas and worked at A&M’s branch
toeffectively focus student interest.With this in mind, determining specific contextual factors able to engage more effectively thetarget audience of single-gender or mixed gender populations within a particular classroombecause of different human-impact perception might create opportunities to encourage learningeffectively. For a particular set of desired skills or theoretical knowledge to be taught in theclassroom, the utilization of specific types of human impact might be more useful for teachersseeking to maximize student interest and involvement based upon classroom demographics,particularly addressing and encouraging non-traditional students in engineering and technologyat early ages.Activity Description
GC 2012-5659: ISTE ACTIVITIES FOR PROMOTING INTERNATIONALCOLLABORATION IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDr. R. Murugesan Page 17.34.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 ISTE Activities forPromoting International Collaboration inEngineering Education Dr. R. Murugesan President, Indian Society for Technical Education, New Delhi Vice Chancellor, Anna University of Technology, Madurai, TamilNadu 1 Page 17.34.2 OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION ABOUT ISTE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT
metacognitionhas been found to be an important component of learning [1,4]. In a computer-basedenvironment, where each step of a student’s progress can be monitored, encouraging reflectionand self-evaluation at each step becomes a viable option.We have designed a new active learning environment where students in each course completeone or more modules that relate to the course content. These modules are designed withseveral goals in mind: o Each module presents a realistic engineering problem that students must solve using the declarative and procedural knowledge acquired during the course. o The modules are interconnected so that the relationships between previously isolated parts of the curriculum are
Paper ID #37022Work in Progress: Engineering First-Year Academy to HelpUnderprepared StudentsCorey Kiassat, PhD, MBA, PE (Associate Dean) Corey Kiassat is a Professor of Industrial Engineering, the Associate Dean of the School of Engineering, and a Professor of Medical Sciences at the Frank H. Netter, MD, School of Medicine, at Quinnipiac University. He has a PhD and a B.A.Sc. in Industrial Engineering, and an MBA in Marketing and International Business. His research interests are Lean applications in healthcare as well as engineering education.Michael Ben-Avie (Senior Director of Learning Assessment and Researc
BackgroundI had been a practicing engineer for four years when I first started teaching as an adjunct at theUniversity of Utah. The real struggle of applying what I learned in school to actual design problems,and how to navigate life in a structural design office was fresh on my mind. It was rough; notsomething I wanted to ever repeat. I was determined to prepare my students for these realities betterthan I had been, but how?As I pondered this question, I kept coming back to project-based instruction. While I did not knowit by this name back then, I figured if I do projects for my job, maybe that was a good way to teachstudents. Although imperfect, I began to see it working. My students left school knowing how todesign structures; the way they get
begin to see someconnections between their courses. Further, if the instructors would help students see that certainstrategies tend to be successful in approaching certain types of problems, the students mightbecome more adept at interdisciplinary problem solving. If the students could match cues aboutthe nature of a problem or the nature of its solution with a set of often useful skills, theirapproaches should be more effective than the random trial-and-error approach so often seen.With these goals in mind, a number of faculty from each of the three disciplines wereinterviewed about the kinds of problems they utilized in their teaching; all were involved inteaching first-year engineering students. The results of these interviews were
of understanding how youths’ interests and attitudes toward engineering develop in out-of-school-time environments.Our research questions are as follows: What engineering practices or habits of mind (HoM) emerge as OST youth engage in engineering activities? How do these HoMs impact youth’s interests and attitudes toward engineering?MethodsSite SelectionWith a goal of understanding the development of youth attitudes toward engineering in the OSTsetting, we began recruiting OST programs into the study. A limited budget required that we caprecruitment at four sites; however, we wanted these sites to represent both school-affiliated andnon-school-affiliated programs from urban, suburban, and rural locations. We chose two sites
Empirical StudyIntroductionIndian engineering education system is one of the colossal educational systems. As per the AllIndia Council of Technical Education (AICTE) report of 2012-13, it has 3,384 colleges admitting1.63 Million students1. The system has almost no attrition and is graduating more or less theentire intake. The study of Blom and Saeki2 shows that 64% of employers are only somewhatsatisfied or worse with the current engineering graduate skills. Earlier, NASSCOM andMcKinsey report (2005)3 had found that 75% of engineering graduates are not employable bymultinational companies. A recent report by Aspiring Mind found that there is a drop inemployability in all roles and at all locations. It has noted that the decrease in employability