engineering programs to develop anentrepreneurial mindset among their engineering students with the belief that this will lead tothem being more productive and innovative whether their career path leads them into establishedindustry (becoming “intrapreneurs”) or later as entrepreneurs.While this trend toward developing more entrepreneurially minded engineering students issupported by global economic trends and a rapidly changing work environment, one factor hasbeen largely overlooked in this process. Statistically, most entrepreneurial ventures fail, withdisproportionately large value being created from a minority of entrepreneurial endeavors [8].Given this fact, until we find ways to drastically increase the success rate of entrepreneurialventures
ground their work in well-defined frameworks that include a collection of traitsdeveloped within the context. Although this perspective provides easily definable lenses foranalyzing identity, more research is needed into the factors that influence students’ identitydevelopment – particularly those that are within the control of engineering educators. This paperwill provide a review of an engineering identity study, explore the challenges and affordancesinherent in this work, and discuss the practical implications for engineering educators andscholars.IntroductionIn the early 17th century, the philosopher John Locke developed a theory of mind that advancedthe idea that individuals are born as tabula rasa, or blank slate: the mind arrives in the
,questions, and dilemmas, versus the restricted nature of a design and the necessity of itserving a specific purpose while operating under certain constraints and requirements.Their explanations were followed by the conclusion that “a good design always hassome aspect of art behind it”. In other words, a good design is also always a good pieceof art. After VCU’s presentation on the fundamentals of art and design, the engineeringteams were now tasked with presenting and explaining core engineering aspects. Theirmain objective was to share concepts, terminologies, and methodologies that could beapplied in tandem with and would complement the artistic design process discussed byVCU. These specific concepts were chosen whilst keeping in mind the broader
that the activities of these individuals are also animportant component of the solution.Course scope and content is reviewed by a team of experienced industry professionalswho set the overall requirements and expectations. Since risk overlaps the domains ofchief engineers and project managers, this course has oversight from two committees.They comment on the participant feedback from every course and make or acceptrecommendations for change and interactions with other courses.The starting point is to admit that risk management is complex. A good representationusing a mind-map format 4 is given in figure 3. “Nightmare” mind-map
engineering students who are innovative and risk-takers and who think beyondtraditional engineering approaches. In fact, many institutions of higher education offer courses andprograms that are specifically designed with this goal in mind. While initially the main objectiveof entrepreneurship education was encouraging students to create new ventures, more recentlythere has been a shift in focus to a broader concept which emphasizes entrepreneurship as a wayof thinking and behaving [1]. A student with this mentality would not only be successful indeveloping startups and ventures but can also take the creativity and self-confidence to any otherjob in industry or academia.Developing an entrepreneurial mindset and building self-confidence can (and should
.” Students cited two ways inwhich courses in the Engineering Entrepreneurship Minor were distinctive from other courses:they foster a “new way of thinking” and they emphasize application over theory.Students disclosed that courses in the minor encouraged them to think in ways that they did notencounter in their other engineering courses. For example, one junior said that the minor,“emphasizes creativity which, for engineers, we don’t really have that opportunity in our otherclasses.” Other elements of this “different way of thinking” included constantly searching foropportunities to create solutions and considering the next step to fix problems. One studentexplained that “learning how to get your mind to think a certain way – to look for
-curriculum/15. Wheadon, Jacob & Duval-Couetil, Nathalie. (2017). Elements of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: KEEN White Paper. Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. 7. 3-2016.16. Bont, de, C., Ouden, den, P. H., Schifferstein, H. N. J., Smulders, F. E. H. M., & Voort, van der, M. (Eds.) (2013). Advanced design methods for successful innovation. Den Haag: Design United.17. Brown, Tim, and Barry Katz. 2009. Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation, Harper Business.18. Osterwalder, Alexander, and Yves Pigneur. (2010) Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.19. Hixson, C., Kline, W. A., Atkin, S., & Bruemmer, T
Paper ID #23764Preliminary Insights from Exploring Engineering Learning Ecosystems ofBlack YouthNina McDaniel, University of Michigan, Dearborn Nina McDaniel is a senior at University of Michigan-Dearborn majoring in Industrial Systems Engineer- ing with a minor in Anthropology. She is also pursuing a certificate in STEM education. Nina uses anthropological skills (e.g. ethnographic and participant observation) and engineering principles to ob- serve patterns in selected environments that allows insight and discussion.DeLean Tolbert, University of Michigan, Dearborn DeLean Tolbert is an Assistant Professor in the Department
Coordinator for Minds in Motion in 2014, which later developed into also coordinating Design Camp, Physics Camp, Geography Camp and Business Camp! She is passionate about inspiring youth to explore, enrich their knowledge and be active!Dr. Philip Egberts, University of Calgary Philip Egberts obtained his Ph.D. from the McGill University in Montreal, Canada specializing in Exper- imental Condensed Matter Physics, while completing most of his research at the INM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials in Saarbr¨ucken, Germany. Following his PhD studies, he joined the Carpick Research Group in the Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics department at the University of Pennsyl- vania as a Natural Sciences and Engineering
with measuring how cultural programs andexperiences contribute to positive changes in students’ abilities to work and thrive in diverseenvironments. Global competency can be defined broadly as “having an open mind whileactively seeking to understand cultural norms and expectations of others, leveraging this gainedknowledge to interact, communicate and work effectively outside one’s environment”1.Measuring global competency levels before and after participation in cultural programs maytherefore be a potentially effective method for measuring changes in students’ ability to work ina global environment. Currently, studies on engineering students’ baseline global competencylevels are few at the undergraduate level. This research fills this gap
our overall goal for the session was to initialize a globalcollaboration to advance diversity and inclusion in engineering education, it was crucial that ouraudience be empowered to continue these conversations following the session. This trainingconsisted of two parts: 1) a definition of biases, explicit and implicit, including examples ofconsequences of implicit biases within a variety of contexts and 2) an interactive activity throughan anonymous PollEveryWhere.com survey in which audience members shared their experienceswith implicit bias within engineering spaces.In part one of the training, we defined bias as habits of mind--preferences, inclinations, orpatterns of thought. Biases play a pivotal role in shaping how we navigate judgments
University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to
Page 24.121.5explaining to others important, but discussion with others and learning from them also holdsvalue to the participants. For example, one student explained this interaction: So I think yeah, pulling in people from other disciplines, both engineering and even non- engineering. They might say something that you think why wouldn’t that work but you just would’ve never thought of it because you’re, you know, your mind is already kind of going through the steps that you’re used to …Critical thinking varying in other disciplines and majorsLearning from others was often achieved by interacting with students from different disciplinesand majors. A few students believed other engineering disciplines and non
mind and your self-esteem. It was flattering to be accepted from all the seventh grade girls instudents has been even lower since the programs Wisconsin.”inception. It is felt that the most effective means Two 1997 campersof changing this situation is a long term one: toexpose girls and all children of color to the opportunities for careers in engineering before theymake limiting curriculum decisions in middle school and high school.Several organizations document the participation rate of women in science, technology, andengineering professions or recommend interventions of innovative programs that encourage girlsto enter
technological products today. In return, technology provides science with the tools needed to explore the world.... The fundamental difference between them is that science seeks to understand a universe that already exists, while technology is creating a universe that has existed only in the minds of inventors… Mathematics and technology have a similar but more distant relationship. Mathematics offers a language with which to express relationships in science and technology and provides useful analytical tools for scientists and engineers. Technological innovations, such as the computer, can stimulate progress in mathematics, while mathematical inventions, such as numerical analysis theories can lead
learning.The vast majority of freshmen students completing their engineering courses report that their learning experience waspositive; they had to work harder in those courses than in their non engineering courses but did not mind the 'extra'effort because they were confident they knew what they were doing and could get the job done. Since our learningenvironment and freshmen engineering courses are still works in progress our evaluation procedures have beenevolving too. We are in the process of devising metrics that will allow us to better identify and evaluate those Page 8.1176.6elements of the learning environment that get our
were often the sameperson. Individuals of high principle and integrity, who were honest, open-minded, and industrious – as championed by Smiles – could be entrusted tobring forth a world worth living in. “Smiles reflected his age and also Page 5.666.4influenced it. He wrote especially of engineers, inventors, and industrialists 4as they transformed their environment – and society – through rapidindustrialization.” [8]In his Lives of the Engineers, Smiles tells the story of several engineers,including James Brindley, John Rennie, and Thomas Telford. Brindley wasan interesting example of what I am calling a traditional engineer
Developing 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills for Non-Engineering Students Sheryl A. Sorby, Thomas Drummer, Kedmon Hungwe, Paul Charlesworth Michigan Technological UniversityAbstractThe ability to visualize objects and situations in one’s mind and to manipulate thoseimages is a cognitive skill vital to many career fields, especially those requiring workwith graphical images. Unfortunately, of all cognitive processes that have beeninvestigated, spatial cognition shows some of the most robust gender differences favoringmales, especially in the ability to mentally rotate 3-dimensional objects. This has obviousimplications for our attempts to encourage gender equity in
learning concepts. Thus, this paper is about the early aspects of the knowledge agewith accent upon engineers learning knowledge from professors that are teaching both informa-tion and knowledge. Page 9.1177.1Traditionally, ordinary knowledge is obtained from systematic, purposeful, organized informa-tion; contrariwise, higher knowledge is produced by the use of insight and other creative mind Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationprocesses. The knowledge age requires a broader interpretation
Page 7.20.1the practice-oriented professions have been mulling over these questions for some time. In order Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationto begin to address them, a colloquy was organized by ABET and funded through the SloanFoundation. Held in January 2002 in Mission Bay, California, this colloquy gathered togethersome of the best minds in engineering education, particularly in regard to the laboratory. Thegoal of the colloquy was to determine through consensus a taxonomy of laboratory learningobjectives, which could be validated and disseminated throughout the educational community
century will possess, with modest exaggeration, the followingskills: (a) Knows everything – can quickly find information about anything and subsequentlyevaluate and use it. He/she will be able to transform information into knowledge; (b) Can doanything – have the know how to quickly assess what needs to be done, acquire the necessarytools, and use then tools proficiently; (c) Able to imagine and turn his/her imagination intoreality – has the entrepreneurial mind set, the imagination, and managerial skills to identifyneeds, come up with effective solutions and implement them efficiently. Additionally, in a well-publicized report published by the National Academy of Engineering, entitled The Engineer of20208 and its sequel, Educating the Engineer
-structured problems, keeping the individual learner in mind, andencouraging mistakes. They also highlighted the benefits of having teachers who are dedicated totheir growth and success. Responses from the participants for each of these suggestion areas arequoted to give participating engineering practitioners a direct voice [6], [14].1. The importance of direct, hands-on experience: “I use more of the knowledge I learned being on site and doing things in person…than I ever learned from a class.” (Martin, early-career) “It's not enough just to see a couple powerpoint slides on something. You actually have to live through it.” (Andrew, mid-to-late career) “For me, it would be courses that were not
Paper ID #37909Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks for EngineeringEducation: A Cross-Disciplinary ReviewVignesh Subbian (Assistant Professor) Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineering, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation and promoting servingness in engineering, biomedicine, and computing, particularly at land-grant and Hispanic
and look atthe problems of the world …(and) new ideas as (to) how you can change it.” Other similaritiesinclude problem-solving, creativity, and curiosity. A student stated that both are similar becausethey “have a curiosity of this world and explore multiple perspectives.”From the PSTs’ perspective, the difference between engineering and entrepreneurial mindsetswas that entrepreneurs provide value for people and innovate with the customer in mind. Onestudent said, “Engineers are problem solvers and that tends to be their main motivation forsolving issues by repurposing physics and technology or inventing new technology whereasentrepreneurs do a lot of the same things but with money being the end goal and motivation fordeveloping those new
Teaching Quantum Computer Engineering: Practical Exercises Using theIBM Quantum ExperienceShellee DyerDr Shellee Dyer is currently an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at Weber StateUniversity. Prior to that appointment, she was a senior engineer at NIST, where she conducted researchon single-photon detectors and quantum entanglement. Her current research interests include quantumcomputers, lasers, fiber optics, and fiber optic sensors. and racial, gender, and disability equity in STEMeducation. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Teaching Quantum Computer Engineering: Practical Exercises Using the IBM Quantum Experience
Paper ID #37148Measuring and Promoting Empathic Formation in aMultidisciplinary Engineering Design CourseJustin L Hess (Assistant Professor) Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His vision is to inspire change in engineering culture to become more socially responsive, environmentally friendly, and inclusive, thereby providing opportunities for all current and prospective engineers to reach their maximum potential. Dr. Hess’s research focuses on empathy, equity, and ethics in engineering education. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s
context. Adaptive expertise, orthe ability to apply prior knowledge to novel and open-ended problems, is critical in respondingeffectively to design challenges.9 Students must be able to think creatively throughout the designprocess.10,11 Problems that students face in the engineering workforce are far more complex, andfar less structured, than those they typically encounter in educational contexts, and there has beena call for an increased emphasis on problem-based learning in engineering classrooms to bridgethat gap.12Recognizing that this ability to solve complex problems calls on a host of interrelated skills,Lucas & Hanson propose a “habits of mind” approach in educating student engineers. Thesehabits of mind are organized into six
]. Conversely, PD does notnecessarily use algorithms to automatically generate design options, even though generativefunction can be added into PD. On the other hand, GD can use PD for design problems that couldbe modeled parametrically, but some GD problems could not be done so [6]. Oxman [7] proposedparametric design thinking (PDT) as “a continuity and change within the evolution of designthinking” in the context of architecture design. Similar to PDT, GDT is highly context and tool-based. The inclusive concept model for DT and EST [8] suggests that EST is a necessary skill forDT, which is supported by [8] and [9]. In addition, Lucas et al. [9] claim that CT could also be anew engineering habit of mind envisioning the importance of computation in
Advancing Engineering Education and Research Outlook and Strategy for 2018 Miriam Quintal and Otto Katt Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC February 6, 2018Lewis-Burke and ASEE• Lewis-Burke began representing ASEE on October 1, 2017• As federal consultants, Lewis-Burke promotes the policy agenda of scientific organizations to a diverse set of audiences, including: – United States Congress – White House/Administration and the Federal Agencies – Like-minded organizations and the advocacy community in Washington, DC• 28 policy experts with range of expertise/backgrounds allow multi-layered issue teams with deep expertise in agencies and scientific/education areas• 40 clients exclusively composed of non-profit
Paper ID #26742Validating a Short Form Writing Attitudes Survey for Engineering WritersEllen Zerbe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Ellen Zerbe is a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S.M.E. at Grove City College. She is currently researching under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognition Research Laboratory.Dr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn- sylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in