Phenomena, Professional Development / Ethics and Mathematical / Compu- tational Methods. He is the recipient of various teaching and educational research awards, including the 2015 Raymond W. Fahien Award from the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching and assessment, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as
accredited programs to follow the student outcome criteria.Students in CAC accredited programs must satisfy outcome criteria by having the ability to: 1. Analyze a complex computing problem and to apply principles of computing and other relevant disciplines to identify solutions; 2. Design, implement, and evaluate a computing-based solution to meet a given set of computing requirements in the context of the program’s discipline; 3. Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts; 4. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles; 5. Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the
engineering education, students should have aclear understanding that the nature of their job is directly affecting the environment and theirpractices are governed by the code of ethics, which calls on sustainable development. How weteach or train students to develop their engineering skills, becomes an essential tool to nurturesustainability in their future practice, which was recognized as a pressing issue for educators [1]-[3]. Promoting sustainability as part of everyday practice could establish the missing link toenhance environmental attitudes of engineering students [4], [5].Many empirical studies reported that environmental education, either as a semester course or as asummer program, not only improves knowledge and awareness of environmental
all tests in the subjects of mathematics, probability and statistics, ethics and professionalpractice, and engineering economics [5]. Figure 1 shows a timeline which summarizes the majorchanges to the FE exam.The computer-based FE exam is administered through Pearson Vue test centers (during fourtesting windows: Jan-Feb, Apr-May, Jul-Aug, Oct-Nov), which maintains hundreds of NCEES-approved test centers both in the U.S. and at international locations [5]. Starting in 2017, thecomputer-based FE introduced a new testing component called alternative item types (AITs),which are questions other than traditional multiple-choice questions [11]. In 2018, theexamination fee was reduced from $225 to $175 [5].The only reference material that may be used
to remain a world leader in AI. • Strategy 2: Develop effective methods for human-AI collaboration. Rather than replace humans, most AI systems will collaborate with humans to achieve optimal performance. Research is needed to create effective interactions between humans and AI systems. • Strategy 3: Understand and address the ethical, legal, and societal implications of AI. We expect AI technologies to behave according to the formal and informal norms to which we hold our fellow humans. Research is needed to understand the ethical, legal, and social implications of AI, and to develop methods for designing AI systems that align with ethical, legal, and societal goals. • Strategy 4: Ensure the safety and
industrial management, financial management, computer technology, and environmental technology, as well as leading seminars in the university’s general education program. Prior to academia, Mr. Hilgarth was employed as as engineer in the aerospace industry in laboratory and flight test development, facilities management, and as a manager in quality assurance. He has contributed papers on management, ground-test laboratory and flight test facilities, and ethics to several technical and professional organizations. In education, he has served as a consultant and curriculum developer to the Ohio Board of Higher Education and the Ohio Department of Education. He holds an M.S. in engineering management from the Missouri
charts and histograms. 14. Identify appropriate behaviors, such as those listed in the American Society of Quality Code of Ethics, for various situations requiring ethical decisions. 15. Determine and select areas for data improvement using various quality tools. 16. Identify various type A and type B uncertainty components, including environment, human factors, methods and equipment, item under test, reference standards and materials.Assessments and GradingAn addition concern for the MET curriculum committee is assessments in the class. Cummins,Inc. officials expressed concern about requiring employees who have not been in any type ofschool for a long time being pressured to earn a satisfactory grade for reimbursement of
development projects served to attract women andunderrepresented minorities into engineering. They report that 40% of the projectparticipants were women and 8% were underrepresented minorities. This is asignificantly higher participation than the percentage of these populations of engineeringstudents in the College. Increased participation by students typically underrepresented inengineering is often the case when projects include a strong service learning component.This is especially the case for women14. Service learning has gained more prominence ineducation as a vehicle to expose students to societal, ethical and moral issues15-18.Engineering educators have participated actively in these efforts throughout thecurriculum. Service learning has
AC 2008-181: THE SCAVENGER HUNT: A TEAM BUILDING EXERCISEMarilyn Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn A. Dyrud has taught in the Communication Department of Oregon Institute of Technology since 1983 and regularly teaches courses in technical and business writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics. She is active in ASEE as her campus’s ETD section representative and compiler of the annual “Engineering Technology Education Bibliography.” A past chair of the Pacific Northwest section, she is a regular presenter at annual conferences and a member of the executive committee of the Engineering Ethics Division. She is also active in the Association for Business Communication and
Marshall write that theengineering community has a responsibility to produce individuals “with strong moral fiber, adedication to professional integrity, and the ability to reason soundly.”20 César Quádernas,director of the Electronics Program at ITESM (Institute Tecnólogico y de Estudios Superiores deMonterey) writes that certain values, attitudes and abilities are a priority in the academic trainingof their students. Essential attitudes include honesty, commitment, a healthy work ethic andrespect for others.21Other professions define attitudes for effective practice. In the human resource profession,Markman and Beron note that job performance is a function of how well an individual’sattitudes, values, knowledge, skills, abilities, and
expectations. The following skillsets and attributes are commonly sought by employers when hiring interns. • A desire and willingness to learn • Strong work ethic • Familiarity with 2D CAD or 3D solid modeling software • Customer service experience • Basic mechanical ‘hands on’ experience including machining, soldering, construction experience • Work experience that includes supervisory experience • Basic circuits knowledgeAlthough a willingness to learn and a strong work ethic are difficult to quantify, a largepercentage of our freshmen and sophomores surveyed have many of the skills and experienceemployers are seeking.The goal for the academic year 2005-06 is to place 15 lower division interns in industry, with
, Ethics,And Research).While finishing their graduate degrees in Communication, Rhetoric and Composition, andEnglish, these consultants collaborate with Engineering faculty to develop and implementwritten, oral and teamwork communication education in various departments within the Collegeof Engineering. In the Civil and Environmental Engineering department, faculty and consultantshave developed a capstone course intended to provide students with a unique opportunity to learnand practice written, oral and team communication in a simulated professional firm environment.They produce and present a Proposal, Feasibility Study, and Preliminary Engineering Reportwith 75% drawings and specifications for their community client, making the course a design
‚ Economical Basic ‚ Networks ‚ Political Sciences ‚ Processes ‚ Ethical ‚ EnvironmentalFigure 1 Block diagram illustrating the interaction of mathematics, basic sciences,technology, and society through social transformationThe course starts with a discussion of the scientific methodology. The maincharacteristics of sciences are explained and differences between science, non-science,and pseudo-science are discussed. The Planning Committee defined “scientificreasoning” as shown in the textbox
exploring the applications and limitationof techniques”; case methodology promotes the “development of philosophies, approaches andskills”.Case study methodology has been widely used in teaching and learning of engineering subjects.Advantages of case study methods have been presented by Sankar et al14 in “Importance ofEthical and Business Issues in Making Engineering Design Decision.” They concluded that theuse of the case study methodology to deal with real-world examples is highly motivating andincreases understanding of the importance of ethical issues in making engineering designdecisions. Page 11.27.4Jensen discussed the merits of case study
environment where they canbe exposed to the body of knowledge on effective teams.” The material covered in the PD1portion of the course consists primarily of skills-based learning meant to foster effectiveteamwork abilities. Skills and topics covered include: collaboration, effective communicationand feedback, conflict management, team development, and ethical decision-making. Thecoursework and assignments help students gain topical knowledge, analyze and apply basicconcepts, and expand written and oral communication skills. Instructors for the PD1 portion ofthe course work in close contact with the instructor in charge of the engineering portion of thecourse. Instructors work together to coordinate activities within each portion and confer witheach
that could serve as a springboard to professional degree programs such as the Master of Engineering. 3. The knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed to facilitate a lifetime of professional success. These attributes would include excellent communication skills, an understanding of ethical and global issues, and a commitment to life-long learning and professional development. 4. The ability to function on multidisciplinary teams that extend the traditional boundaries of engineering. 5. The ability to design and improve systems and processes that provide services by applying a systems perspective coupled with a thorough understanding of the customer
mechanical objects in engineering education instruction), and how engineering students’ personality traits influence ethical decision making process in engineering design.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Monica F. Cox is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and is the inaugural director of the Engineering Leadership Minor. She obtained a B.S. in Mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy
the Design Process” covers the phases of a project lifecycle, project management skills (including teaming), as well as professionalism topics including leadership, conflict resolution, lifelong learning and engineering ethics. Technical communication skills are also a focus of this course. During the final weeks, students begin to organize their capstone projects. 400-level course – “Senior Capstone Design” will be offered in three different forms: Corporate-sponsored projects, Projects with faculty and Special Topics sections.This sequence of design courses was approved by the Electrical Engineering Departmentfaculty in 2010 and by the University Faculty Senate in early 2012. The 200-level course
ECE Department at the University of Miami for the 2004-2005 academic year. Dr. Cotter worked at Nokia Mobile Phones as a senior design engineer between 2002 and 2004 in the DSP/Audio group on speech codec implementation and phone acoustic properties. Dr. Cotter received his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering with an emphasis on Digital Signal Processing from the University of California at San Diego in 2001 and 1998 respectively. He received his undergraduate degree in Electronic Engineering from University College Dublin in 1994.Dr. Anastasia Pease, Union College Dr. Anastasia Pease is a lecturer in English and an award-winning teacher. Her interests include literature and science, ethics and
building construction. Pre- and post-surveys wereconducted at the beginning and end of the quarter, respectively, to assess student learning.Results confirmed an increase in student awareness and understanding of sustainable designconcepts that were incorporated on a weekly basis throughout the course and how they can berelated to civil engineering projects.IntroductionIn the Fundamental Canons of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Code of Ethics,it states that engineers “shall strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development inthe performance of their professional duties.”1 Additionally, in the statement Dialogue on theEngineer’s Role in Sustainable Development – Johannesburg and Beyond (NAE 2002)2, anumber of American
communication skills, teamwork andunderstanding ethics and professionalism, and awareness skills which include engineering withina global and societal context, lifelong learning and knowledge of contemporary issues.3 It alsostates that some of these skills can certainly be taught and assessed.3NAE says that the engineer of 2020 is a person with strong communication skills, and that theengineers will have to deal with interdisciplinary and globally diverse teams, public officials anda global customer base.4 In its report titled The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century, NAE says: “…. It is our aspiration that engineers will continue to be leaders in themovement toward use of wise, informed, and economical sustainable development
qualifiedstudents to the University’s undergraduate engineering programs; (3) providngi professionaldevelopment for teachers of math, science and technology to enhance their teachingeffectiveness; (4) refining the University’s engineering curricula to ensure they meet Qatar’sevolving needs and to advance students’ knowledge in fields of common interest to industryin Qatar, the region and the world; (5) bolstering teaching, research and outreach in energy,the environment, sustainable technologies, ethics, project management and other such topics;(6) encouraging undergraduate students to participate in research in energy, petroleum,communications and other fields relevant to the Qatar National Research Strategy; (7)encourage undergraduate students to
by the ability to: a) Demonstrate dependable, accountable, flexible behavior. b) Work effectively and appropriately with others through collaboration and teamwork. c) Choose ethical courses of action. d) Demonstrate effective time management skills.Although these Workforce Skills led to changes throughout the program, this paper willprimarily address changes in assessment in the laboratory segment of major courses. Each majorcourse in this program has a significant laboratory segment where students apply, develop andenhance their technical skills. The new assessment model, in addition to integrating WorkforceSkills, takes a more deliberate and student centered approach to assessment and encourages self
Problem Collaboration Managing upLeadership ability, management & solving within the & down--to presence, implementation initiative & leadership school system ethics ability, ability, team administrators, evaluation confrontation to teachers, to approaches, approaches, students, and budgeting, willingness to to community planning take actionSchool System
, problem-solving techniques from many disciplines, and use of the computer as a problem-solving tool.• the ability to integrate scientific and technological factors with political, social, economic, and ethical considerations. Breadth is provided through study in several different strategic sectors that reflect nationalcritical technologies, and currently include: biotechnology, energy, engineering manufacturing,environment, information and knowledge management, health systems, and telecommunications.Depth is provided through study in an area of concentration selected from among these sectors,and includes a comprehensive capstone thesis project. One objective of the program is to educate students to solve problems in a
,thereby providing students with a better preparation for professional practice. Example topics include engineeringstandards, economic, environmental, sustainability, manufacturability, ethical, health and safety, social, and politicalissues. This paper describes the program, includes comment from the Engineer-in-Residence, undergraduates students,and the dean of engineering at Ohio Northern University.Index Terms Professional practice, Co-operative education, Experiential work, and Innovative program. IntroductionThe Engineer-in-Residence (EiR) Program was initiated on September 19th, 2001. It is a unique collaborative effortbetween the Thomas Jefferson Smull College of Engineering
Page 8.724.1ABET. As noted in the Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs [1], Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education “Students must be prepared for engineering practice through the curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skills required in earlier course work and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; and political.” [Emphasis added.]At Manhattan
working effectively with theirstudents and their faculty instructional partner. Additionally, some basics for teaching a class Page 8.1173.2such as developing a syllabus and lessons plans are also discussed as well as ethics in teaching. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThe modules typically include a lecture or discussion with activities related to ENES 100 that aredesigned to apply knowledge or practice skills. Activities include case studies, simulations,demonstrations, and role-playing
, graphics editor, and presentation software. Each student also archives his or her engineering work in a personal engineering notebook that is periodically reviewed.4. Study how engineering practice relates to a professional code of ethics. Students examine peer-reviewed case studies, identify ethical dilemmas, and propose professional practice solutions.The following student outcomes are assessed during the semester: • Ability to design and realize an electronic system to meet performance constraints. Page 25.788.2 • Ability to create experiments and draw meaningful conclusions from experimental data. • Ability to function as a
, where he teaches general literature, science fiction, composition (both beginning and advanced), ethics, and public speak- ing. He has a Ph.D. in English from the University of California, Santa Barbara (1994). His dissertation was about the portrayal of science in postmodernist fiction. He has published scholarly articles on science fiction, literature, television, film, and music. His most recent work includes a paper presented at two conferences about the design of university-level science fiction courses, using science fiction to teach the ethics of technology. He also gave a talk on Doctor Who and the critique of capitalism. At the end of 2011, his book on the humanism of Doctor Who will be published