innovation-development theme.Much has been written about the need to assess entrepreneurship and innovation competencies instudents, but few tools exist. To help fill this gap, the authors created the presented assessmenttool from validated inventories that is focused specifically on innovation inclination, innovationcapability, tolerance for risk and ambiguity, and, over time, changes in those characteristics forstudents. In order to know whether or not innovation-based courses, projects, programs, orinitiatives have a positive effect – or, even any effect – it is necessary to create a baseline, followthe participants through their courses and through their academic studies.Creating a methodology, assessment protocol, and assessment process and
graduate student population.In [18], programs at different universities that aim to support veterans in STEM were examined.With one exception, these programs focused exclusively on undergraduate students. Similarly, in[19] there was a focus on policies and support services for veterans in STEM. This work diddelve somewhat into the assets that veterans have as students, including persistence or “grit”,adaptability, and levels of motivation and maturity. The authors found that these students weresuccessful particularly in teamwork-based class projects. The examination of assets of militaryservice was further examined in [20], where it was found that while age itself did not appear tobe an asset, veteran status was; it was associated with
U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor and
context (such as atschool) can stretch the imagination capacity of a student. Further assignments includedprofessional decisions that would have impacts on different stakeholders or scheduling ofconstruction projects. Finally, brief scenarios were provided of data being given to the student touse in their design (from a different discipline, from a different collaborating company, fromanother team member within their company). The students were asked whether they wouldblindly use the data in their analysis, and if that would be affected by how similar the data was topast projects, as well as who they believed would be liable if their design ultimately resulted in afailure due to errors in that data. Through imagination exercises that progress
in his department including; modified mastery learning in early engineering courses and a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for honors students. The ISD team currently has 50+ students working to design and build an electric bicycle and human powered vehi- cles. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows. He is also active in technology adoption and support. Geoffrey holds a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor de- grees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are fo- cused on best practices for student learning and student success.Dr. Michele J. Grimm, Michigan State University
-related positions: he was the Research Officer on electron beam welding and freeforming of aerospace materi- als at the NRC-IAR-AMTC, and Post Doctoral Fellow at Sandia National Laboratories. He is leading research projects in two main fields: (1) additive manufacturing and joining of advanced materials, and (2) high heating rate sintering processes. He received several distinctions, including the ASM Bradley Stoughton Award for Young Teachers (2009), the METSOC Brimacombe Award (2011) and the AAC Donald I. Johnson Award (2014).Prof. Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago,Chile Genaro Zavala is a Full Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the
place that may mitigate adversarial exploits of AI algorithms andprevent AI algorithms themselves from being used to exploit vulnerable human populations.America’s Strategy for advancing STEM Education sets the goal that “all Americans will have alifelong access to high-quality STEM education and the United States will be the global leader inSTEM literacy, innovation, and employment.” 7 While the cost of tuition has increased threefoldin private institutions, and fourfold in public institutions (compared to 1974 levels 8), the averagemedian household income has remained stagnant 8,9. Furthermore, the time needed to attain ahigher education degree typically exceeds 52 months, well beyond the projected 48 months forwhich students aim 10. Given
use and purpose of exam wrappers inhigher education, followed by the unique design and purpose of modified exam wrapperactivities within the learning strategies course for students in the GELC at Clemson University.This section will include the specific processes utilized in the first and second iterations of theactivity. Then, the methods used to analyze the exam wrapper data will be explained, followedby results. Finally, a discussion outlining the meaning of the results and implications forpractitioners will be provided.Exam WrappersExams wrappers are often used as a tool to scaffold students’ evaluation of their preparation andperformance on graded assignments, including projects, quizzes, and exams. An exam wrapper istypically a
Paper ID #29074Fantastic Cheats- Where and how to find them? How to tackle them?Dr. Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Ashish Borgaonkar works as Asst. Professor of Engineering Education at the New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Newark College of Engineering located in Newark, New Jersey. He has developed and taught several engineering courses primarily in first-year engineering, civil and environmental engineer- ing, and general engineering. He has won multiple awards for excellence in instruction. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students
for this REU Program prepares students for both graduate school and industry.During the REU program, students conduct research and participate in various professionaldevelopment sessions for forty hours per week. When conducting research, students are alsopaired with a Primary Investigator and graduate mentor to support them through the process. Thegraduate mentor relationship is a significant contributor to a student’s performance. Theybecome the REU’s guide throughout the project for questions and direction as well as providingthe necessary scaffolding to assist the student to be successful. This REU program also aims toprovide a holistic experience with different speakers from research and industry, field trips,weekly meetings focused on
Continuing Professional Development Division of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. Dr. Springer is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic
education has been mainly focused onproblems that are open-ended in nature (e.g. design problems) or enabling skills more broadly(i.e. ethics, communication). For an open-ended problem, multiple viable and correct solutionsexist. Students’ writings, portfolios, or design-based projects, laboratories, or fourth-yearcapstone projects are areas in which outcomes-based research has been extensively investigated[9]–[12].Most of the work done on closed-ended problem solving is related to aiding students with self-regulation and building their problem-solving capability, rather than aiding the feedback process.Examples of the former include models of problem-solving in engineering and informationprocessing [13]–[17]. These models provide guiding
STEM faculty; and 4) professional advice and career paths. The initial mentoringprogram design was developed through two Lean Six Sigma projects, where they collected voiceof the customer (mentors and mentees) data, and designed the program. The program waspiloted in Fall 2019, spearheaded by the Women Engineering Program in the School ofEngineering, the director and a student graduate assistant. The success of the pilot program wasassessed in three ways: 1) number of mentor/mentee pairs starting the program, compared to theinitial number interested; 2) retention of women in engineering and science during the programperiods; and 3) through mentor and mentee reflections. In the initial voice of customer datacollection, we identified 14 possible
, which may be correctedthrough further action in future research. One study, for instance, used examples of well-knownengineers to successfully counter cultural stereotypes held by teachers in fields likeenvironmental engineering and bioengineering [27] [28]. Extracurricular enrichments such assummer camps [29] or in-classroom hands-on projects for middle school students have also beenused to positively influence the perception of engineering by a grade-school audience. Outreachprograms that target specifically one, often underrepresented, demographic, such as secondaryschool girls, have also been developed and utilized [30] [31]. However, the existence of thesestereotypes is only recognized due to previous research about the perception of
Engineering, and Engineering Management. Civil and Mechanical Engineering students normally take Introduction to Engineering inthe first semester of their first year. Electrical Engineering majors usually take a differentintroductory course, except during the Fall 2017 semester, when all three engineering majorswere combined due to a sabbatical. The course includes two days of lecture per week with ahands-on lab on the third class meeting of the week. The engineering majors are combined intointerdisciplinary teams on lab day to complete a project creating a fully operational windmill.Background: library involvement with mindfulness and engineering students An assortment of mindfulness and sustainability initiatives began at the library
, Jerome P. and Keltie, Richard F. Calculus Intervention for First-Semester En- gineering Students. College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2005. http: //soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper- view.cfm?id=220303. Hensel, Robin, Sigler, J. Ryan, and Lowery, Andrew. AC 2008-2079: Breaking the Cycle of Calculus Failure: Models of Early Math Intervention to Enhance Engineering Retention. West Virginia University. ASEE 2008. http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view. cfm?id=87604. Koch, Darryl, and Herrin, Gary D. Intervention Strategy for Improving Success Rates in Calculus. University of Michigan. ASEE 2006. http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/ paper- view.cfm?id=9775. Has the calculus reform project improved
EERC and Pitt-CIRTL, April Dukes collaborates on educational research projects and facilitates professional development (PD) on instructional and mentoring best practices for current and future STEM faculty. As an adjunct instructor in the Department of Neuroscience at the Univer- sity of Pittsburgh since 2009 and an instructor for CIRTL Network and Pitt-CIRTL local programming since 2016, April is experienced in both synchronous and asynchronous online and in-person teaching environments.Dr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee Clark is Research Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering and Director of Assessment for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering
Calculus. University of Michigan. ASEE 2006. http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/ paper- view.cfm?id=977 5. Has the calculus reform project improved students’ understanding of mathematics? Published online at: http://www.scienceclarified.com/dispute/Vol- 2/ Has- the- calculus- reform- project- improved- students- understanding- of- mathematics. html 6. Abhijit Dasgupta, THE ENGINEERING CALCULUS ATTRITION ISSUE AT UDM, UDM Internal Report. 7. Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics, https://engineering-computer- science.wright.edu/research/the-wright-state-model-for-engineering-mathematics- education. 8. Rattan and Klingbeil, Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applications, Wiley & Sons
,” along with “keeping students mentally, and often physically, active in their learningthrough activities that involve them in gathering information, thinking, and problem solving”(Collins & O’Brien, 2003, p. 5). In more specific terms, the active learning experience cited bystudents referred to individual and group projects, hands-on activities and experiments, as well asfield trips. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Organized by The University of Texas at Dallas Copyright © 2017, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual ConferenceOf the 45 students included in the analyses, 29
ability. Since 2012-13 accreditation cycle, programs are no longer arerequired to demonstrate that the graduate have the ability of meeting the stated requirements of thecurriculum topics, but the programs must require the students to apply the requirement of the statedtopics. Therefore, no more outcome assessment is necessary for the curriculum requirements ofthe ME Program Criteria. In the 2012-13 accreditation cycle programs had to prepare students towork professionally in both thermal and mechanical systems areas. This required students tocomplete design projects in both thermal and mechanical systems areas. This requirement waschanged in 2013-14 accreditation cycle and the programs are now required to prepare students towork professionally
practice. The specific requirements of application domainsas diverse as cell phones, printers, smart homes or network system monitoring must also beclearly delineated to ensure successful project completion.While system designers need to understand and incorporate these technologies in projects,instructional designers need to incorporate them in computer-oriented curricula to ensure therising generation of computer students is well prepared.This paper evaluates the wireless networking standards, Bluetooth and ZigBee. We discuss theintent of the standard developers, the pros and cons of each network type, appropriateapplications, and the future of these standards. Recommendations are made for presentation intechnological educational
surface at an angle θ1. The scattering surface wherethe light is projected may have either one or two-dimensional roughness. Machined surfacestend to exhibit a grating structure on account of tool marks made during the machiningprocess. In the case of periodic roughness on a machined surface, the scattering is made up ofa specular component, at an angle predicted by ray tracing optics, and discrete components atangles predicted by the grating equation as shown in (1). θ2m = Sin −1(Sin θ1 + m λ/T) (1) where: m = 0, ±1, ±2, T = Surface period
LaboratoryAbstractThis paper describes a relatively simple method in which planar rigid body motion can bemeasured and analyzed in the context of an upper division mechanical engineering laboratorycourse. The overall intention of this work is to help facilitate upper division level laboratoryprojects in dynamics. Such projects are intended to provide students with the opportunity to i)apply and reinforce their knowledge of dynamics, ii) learn and practice modern experimentalmethods used to make and assess motion measurements, and iii) if possible, compare theoreticaland measured results.The instrumentation involves the use of two inexpensive sensors – a dual axis accelerometer anda rate gyro – and a data acquisition system (such as LABVIEW). The accelerometer
experiences into the second and third years as well? A few engineering programs havetaken major steps to incorporate significant design experiences throughout all years ofundergraduate study, but this seems to be the exception, not the rule. For example, at the HarveyMudd College, design permeates the overall curriculum: “The design and professional practicestem includes five required courses that are designed to provide students with the means to workin teams on open-ended, externally-driven design projects that, over the course of the curriculum,encompass conceptual design, preliminary (or embodiment) design, and detailed design. ‘Handson’ exposure to professional practice begins with students undertaking challenging designproblems in the first
Perceptions and Success of Active Learning Techniques in an Engineering Education CourseAbstractActive learning is extremely prevalent in discussions of how to improve teaching and learning inboth undergraduate and graduate engineering courses. However, active learning may not alwayslead to success. Rather, characteristics of the students enrolled and of the course material mayinfluence whether or not active learning is met with resistance. This project examines therelationship between graduate students’ perception of active learning techniques and the successof these techniques in an engineering education course entitled, “Teaching Seminar for GraduateAssistants.” The context of the project surrounds three sections of a course
engineeringeducation is at its infancy stage. Researchers, academic institutions, and industry have employedmultifarious projects to understand and model globalization of engineering educationWe strongly emphasize that optimum work needs to be done to prepare upcoming U.S. studentswho will be competent in an increasingly demanding global work environment. In order toestablish new models, we made an attempt to understand and analyze perspectives of current(U.S. and non-U.S.) students, academic faculty, and engineering professionals currently workingin industry. One of the goals of this study was to test the hypothesis that the current U.S.curriculum do not adequately prepare engineering students to work, manage and communicateeffectively with engineers and
seen in thefollowing case.The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a federal agency has sole authority over the designand construction of metro New Orleans’ flood protection and water management asauthorized by Congress in the Lake Pontchartrain Hurricane Protection Project in theFlood Control Act of 1965. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers now admits that faultydesign specifications and substandard construction of certain levee segments, not ahurricane was the primary cause of the flooding damage in the New Orleans area.Responsibility for the levee design failures rests squarely on the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers and on the federal government including both the executive and legislativebranches. This means that the Corps and the federal government
performance on thecourse-concept questions. The project software specifications require statistical analysis ofcorrect answers and also, more importantly, of misconceptions held by students. The threequantitative measures required are reliability, discrimination and difficulty.For a test to be useful it must be both reliable and valid. Validity can only be addressed duringdevelopment of the instrument. However, reliability can be measured. We are using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) to evaluate test reliability. The KR-20 reliability value is basedon: number of test items, student performance on every test item and variance for the set ofstudent test scores. The KR-20 index ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, with tests with an index of 0.6 orbetter
., developing a user survey or a cross-effect matrix.Both units of the course conclude by requiring students to integrate their growing understandingsof their respective content and skills into an extensive synthesis project. For the unit intechnology use, an inquiry approach is adopted to enable students to hone their data gatheringand analysis skills. In this approach, students individually plan, implement, analyze and report anoriginal usability test of a technological product, process, or system. For an overview of thisproject see Flowers [11].During the technology assessment unit, the dominant pedagogy is best described as problem-based learning (PBL). PBL is a student-driven inquiry strategy where a central problem serves asboth a content
processes practiced in industry. The second goal was for students to learnteamwork skills as practiced in industry. The instructor used a teaching method advocated byMichaelsen. 10 To align with Michaelsen’s method, the instructor created 30 minute designproblems and a few longer-term projects that required students to use both design and teamworkskills to reach a solution. Each week the teams were to solve the assigned problem as a group inclass and report their solution to the class verbally and on a large sheet of paper. Student workwas begun and completed within class.The instructor video recorded approximately 30 minutes of team interaction each week duringclass. A different team was randomly chosen each week. Teams quickly forgot they were