, Greenwich, CT, 2020. [6] J. M. Lang. Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. Jossey-Bass, London, England, 2nd edition, 2021. [7] M. C. Lovett, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, S. A. Ambrose, and M. K. Norman. How learning works: Eight research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass, London, England, 2nd edition, 2023. [8] R. McDaniel. Active learning, Jun 2016. [9] Baskin School of Engineering. End of course survey on student experience in experiential design courses, 2023. Unpublished data.[10] M. T. Owens and K. D. Tanner. Teaching as brain changing: Exploring connections between neuroscience and innovative teaching. CBE Life Sci. Educ., 16(2), Summer 2017.[11] D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman
understanding of the desired endoutcomes. 2. Mentoring and Learning StageCISTAR. In addition to having an academic faculty and graduate student(s) mentoring the REMstudents on their research project, CISTAR leverages two Purdue engineering programs thatintroduce students to research: Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship program(https://engineering.purdue.edu/Engr/Research/EURO/students/about-SURF) and the PathwaysScholar program (how a graduate degree can prepare you for different career pathways). Thus,the REM students are part of a wider research program with other undergraduates from acrossthe U.S. and from different countries. CISTAR hires, as well, several near peers who areengineering graduate students to help the REM students be
it for support, with a cutout for thebarrier. Additionally, several 3D-printed braces were used to support the drivetrain. Figure 6: Assembled Drivetrain To ensure that the robot would be able to withstand competition, simulation tool inSolidWorks was used to analyze the structural integrity of the drivetrain. The drivetrain platewas tested by simulating the robot crashing into a wall. The final robot weighed 16.5 pounds, soassuming it was moving its top speed of 7 ft/s and came to a full stop in half a second, it wouldexperience a force of 7.18 pounds. The force was applied to the front face of the plate, and therear face was fixed. This was done to generate the most extreme examples of stress
; Fox, D. L. (1994). Collaboration as political action. Journal of Advanced Composition, 14, 53-71.Foster, M. K. (2021). Design thinking: A creative approach to problem solving. Management Teaching Review, 6(2), 123-140.Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Henderson, R. & Midgley, W. (2010). The questions of ethics in collaborative research. In Sustaining synergies: Collaborative research and researching collaboration. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150751904Huppatz, D. J. (2015). Revisiting Herbert Simon's" Science of Design
. (2014). “On the effectiveness ofsupplemental instruction: A systematic review of supplemental instruction and peer-assistedstudy sessions literature between 2011 and 2010,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 84, no.4, 2014.[15] S. B. Epps, “The work life of the professional academic advisor: A qualitative study,” Ph.D.dissertation, Dept. Edu. Leader., East Tennessee State University, Kingsport, TN, 2002.[16] K. F. Hays, Working it out: Using exercise in psychotherapy, Washington, DC: AmericanPsychological Association, 1999.[17] O. Zur, “Beyond the office walls: Home visits, celebrations, adventure
. Eng. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 411–418, 2007.[5] N. A. BACH, “Printing a place to live: In Central Texas, homes are being built with emerging 3D technology,” The Texas Tribune, Oct. 06, 2023.[6] L. Mohon, “NASA Looks to Advance 3D Printing Construction Systems for the Moon and Mars,” 2020. https://www.nasa.gov/technology/manufacturing-materials-3-d- printing/nasa-looks-to-advance-3d-printing-construction-systems-for-the-moon-and-mars/.[7] M. Jazdyk, “3-D printing a building,” U.S. ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2017.[8] J. D. Henschen, D. Blood, S. Kawashima, and H. A. Kirkvold, “Teaching Additive Manufacturing with Consideration for Cementitious Materials,” in SP-359
provided documentation for conductingthe exercise, information for the teacher and student(s), including a student worksheet.These materials were prepared with teachers, parents, and school audiences in mind asthey may all want to consider using them to support manufacturing learning in and out ofthe classroom.The activity drafts are available online to facilitate the distribution of materials as theyrelate to manufacturing. These activities are available online for all teachers across thecountry. Hence, the authors are not limiting their initiative by one community or state andencourage everyone to use those for the benefit of the nation’s attitude towards therevival of manufacturing at the I4.0 level.Development of the Example MaterialsIn the
on this positive interest from students, a committee of faculty who taught in math andsciences was convened to develop the program. Because of the institution’s historical strengths inthe sciences, the committee recommended that the institution offer a B. S. in EngineeringScience, which was subject to the same ABET criteria as B.S. programs in Engineering andEngineering Physics.[7] It was also believed that the program named Engineering Sciencewould be better accepted at a liberal arts institution where a degree such as engineering might beviewed by some as a strictly vocational major. The intent of the degree to equip students with abroad and general engineering background also reflected key principles of the liberal artsapproach.The
://www.suitable.co/products/guided-pathways (accessed 14 January 2024).[2] “Möbius MAA Placement Test Suite by DigitalEd”, Mathematical Association of America,https://maa.org/node/259 (accessed 14 January 2024).[3] J.L.M. Wilkins, B.D. Bowen, and S. B. Mullins, “First mathematics course in college andgraduating in engineering: Dispelling the myth that beginning in higher-level mathematicscourses is always a good thing”, Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 110, Issue 3,https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20411, 2021.[4] Daniel W. Knight, D.W., L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Staying in Engineering: Impact ofa Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention”, Proceedings of the2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Engineering,” Applied Sciences, 2022, 12, 7595. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157595.[2] H. Thai, “Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review,” Structures, Vol. 38, pp. 448-491, April 2022.[3] IBM, “What is a chatbot?” [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/topics/chatbots. [Accessed February 7, 2024].[4] B. Marr, “A Short History of ChatGPT: How We Got To Where We Are Today,” Forbes, May 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/05/19/a-short-history-of-chatgpt-how-we- got-to-where-we-are-today/?sh=3bb6ca85674f. [Accessed January 23, 2024].[5] S. Slocum, “ChatGPT in Structural Engineering,” Engineer’s Notebook in Structure Mag., January
, and A. Ganz, IEEE EMBS Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September, 200920. FIREGUIDE: Firefighter Guide and Tracker, by S. Gandhi, A. Ganz, and G. Mullett, the 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC'10), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1st-4th September, 2010.21. Wireless Technologies for e-Healthcare, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol.17 No. 1, February, 201022. Department of Transportation website: www.its.dot.gov/resources.htm23. Mullett, Its 2010 and the new Electronics Technology Paradigm is Emerging Page 22.936.15
, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php9. Museum of Science, Boston. (2011). Thinking inside the box: Designing a plant package. Retrieved from Museum of Science, Boston, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php10. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning: Belmont, CA.11. Hsu, M., Cardella, M., & Purzer, S. (2010). Assessing elementary teachers’ design knowledge before and after introduction of a design process model. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) annual meeting, Louisville, KY
assistant at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University. She is the coordinator of two component projects of a National Science Foundation grant focusing on retention issues and engaging early engineering students, and also serves as an academic advisor. McDonough earned a bachelor’s degree in sociology from William Smith College and a master’s degree in Public Administration from the University of Southern California. McDonough is currently a third year doctoral student in the Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education program at Michigan State. Her areas of interest include educational theory, student development and engineering education.S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University S. Patrick Walton is an
, and the electronics component interface anddisplay, respectively. We further acknowledge companion support from the World Bank for ini-tial graduate student support for PhD students involved in the study.References1. TIDEE. Integrated Design Engineering Assessment and Learning System. 2011 [cited; Available from: http://tidee.org/page/Front.2. Sageev, P. and C. Romanowski, A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 2001. 90: p. 685-693.3. Sheppard, S., et al., What is engineering practice? InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 2006. 22(3): p. 429-438.4. Johnson, M., et al., Use of the
?”Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 20-23 Page 22.1294.12June, 2010.22 Meyer, K., Bert, S., 2007, “A Technique for Program-Wide Direct Assessment of Student Performance,”Proceedings of ASEE Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.23 Marin, J.A., Armstrong, J.E. Jr., Kays, J.L., “Elements of an Optimal Capstone Design Experience,”Journal of Engineering Education, January 1999, pp.19-22.24 Welch, R.W., “Addressing Professional Practice Issues within the Curriculum,” Proceedings of theAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 26-29 June, 2011.25 http
college at America's public universities. 2009, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. xxi, 389 p.4. Ehrenberg, R.G., C.V. Kuh, and Cornell Higher Education Research Institute., Doctoral education and the faculty of the future. 2009, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ix, 308 p.5. Lowell, B.L. and H. Salzman, Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. 2007, The Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.6. Sheppard, S., et al., Exploring the engineering student experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES). 2010: Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. TR-10-01.7. Astin, A.W
AC 2011-2085: THE VALUE OF DIRECT ENGAGEMENT IN A CLASS-ROOM AND A FACULTY: THE LIAISON LIBRARIAN MODEL TO IN-TEGRATE INFORMATION LITERACYAnne Parker, University of Manitoba Anne Parker, PhD is an Associate Professor and Technical Communication Coordinator in the Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba S. Norma Godavari, MLIS, is the Head, Donald W. Craik Engineering Library and Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba Page 22.1512.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Value of Direct Engagement in a Classroom and a Faculty
. L. (1998, December). Research & curriculum. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 54-61.6. Goodwin, T. & Hoagland, K. E. (1999). How to get started in research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.7. Karukstis, K. (2006). A council on undergraduate research workshop initiative to establish, enhance, and institutionalize undergraduate research. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1744-1745.8. Malachowski, M. (1997, June). Not all research is equal: Student-oriented vs. research-oriented approaches to scholarship. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 182-185. Regalado, S. New EWU Building Makes History. . .21st Century Style, Inland Northwest Catalyst magazine
.2010.12.04910 Bednarz, S.W. (2000). Connecting GIS and problem based learning. In Audet, R. & Ludwig, G. (Eds.), GIS in Schools. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.11 Lambros, A. (2004). Problem-Based Learning in Middle and High School Classrooms: A Teacher's Guide to Implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.12 Torp, L., S. Sage (2002). Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-16 Education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.13 Kucharski, G.A., J.O. Rust, T.R. Ring (2005). Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project-Based Approach. Education, 125(4), 652.14 Hurd, P.D. (1997). Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing
late 1990’s. The student enrolments for both the U of A andMacEwan for 1995 and 2010 are provided in Table 1. Currently MacEwan students comprisealmost 10% of the second year engineering students at the U of A.Table 1 - Enrolment statistics for MacEwan and University of Alberta: 1995 & 2010Year MacEwan MacEwan % U of A U of A % Engineering Engineering / Engineering Engineering Institution /Institution Enrolment Enrolment ~25,000
23, 2011].11. S. Gustin, “Gawker Media Websites Hacked, Staff and User Passwords Leaked,” Wired. Dec. 2010. [Online]Available: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/gawker-hacked/. [Accessed: Feb 23, 2011].12. M. Wilson, K. Stine, and P. Bowen, “Information Security Training Requirements: A Role- and Performance-Based Model (Draft).” NIST Special Publication 800-16 Revision 1 (Draft). 2009.13. D. Jacobson. “Teaching Information Warfare with Lab Experimentations via the Internet.” In Frontiers inEducation, 2004. T3C/7-T3C12 Vol. 11 (2004).14. J.A. Whittaker and R. Ford, "How to think about security," IEEE Security & Privacy, vol.4, no.2, pp.68-71,March-April 2006.15. J. Viega, The Myths of Security, O’Reilly Media, Inc. Sebastopol, CA
teaching. In W. Wulf (Ed.), Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering: Papers from a workshop, October, 2003. Washington D.C: National Academic Press.10. Herkert, J.R. (2000). Engineering Education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering education, 25(4).11. Ohland, M. & Barry B., (2009) Applied Ethics in the Engineering, Health, Business, and Law Professions: A Comparison. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2009.12. Pritchard , Michael S., (2010). Teaching Engineering Ethics: A case study approach. Center for the study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University.13. Interview with Tinus (January 10, 2011).14. Svinicki, M. (2004). Learning and
Education.16. Pisupati, S. Jonathan P. Mathews and Alan W. Scaroni, “Energy Conservation Education for Non- Engineering Students: Effectiveness of Active Learning Components,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2003). American Society for Engineering Education.17. National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/., Accessed March 15, 2010.18. Committee on Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers, National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council “Educating America's Engineers: The Vital Role of Community Colleges,” The National Academies in Focus, Vol 5, No 3 (2005).19. Krupczak, J.J, and K
. Srinivasan Vanchinathan, Ph.D Professor and Chair, Civil & Advanced Process Control & LP modeling Environmental Engineering Manager Rowan University Sunoco, Inc Mother of 11 year old Father of 11 year oldB Donna S. Reese, Ph.D. Bob Reese, Ph.D. Interim Department Head Associate Professor and Director of Page 22.514.2 Computer Science & Engineering Microsystems Prototyping Laboratory Mississippi State University
annual conference of the American Industrial Arts Association (1947, 1965). Epsilon Pi Tau.11 Savage, E. and Sterry, L. (1990). A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.12 Schmitt, M. L. & Pelley, A. L. (1966). Industrial arts education: A survey of programs, teachers, students, and curriculum. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,. OE 33038, Circular No. 791. Washington, DC: Office of U.S. Government Printing Office.13 Dugger, W.E., Miller, C.D., Bame, E.A., Pinder, C.A., Giles, M.B., Young, L.H., & Dixon, J.D. (1980). Report of the survey data. Blacksburg, VA: Standards for Industrial Arts Programs Project, Virginia
for the Controls Division of the Harris Corporation, a Division with over U$S 60 million (then dollars) in annual sales. He joined the University of the Pacific in 2000 and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. His present research interests are principally in multidisciplinary engineering education and enginering economic analysis.Elizabeth A. Basha, University of the Pacific Elizabeth A. Basha is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of the Pacific. She received a S.M. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as well as a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from the University of the
implemented to achieve these outcomes: Sustainability Learning Modules Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project and Quality Sustainable Engineering InternshipEach program component addresses specific learning objectives/student outcomes associatedwith the outcomes described above. The learning objectives (Table 1) reflect increasedexpectations and levels of complexity as students attain higher academic classifications andmatriculation levels. The key components are described in the sections that follow.Table 1. Engineering sustainable Engineers Learning ObjectivesLearning Objective/Student Outcome Course Level(s)/ExperiencesExplain sustainability concepts and terminology
difference between S and P waves using Slinkys, which providestudents with a visual way to observe the waveforms. Students learn about how seismic wavespropagate and how recording the waves allow scientists to understand where and in whatdirection a fault ruptured during an earthquake. Students complete a worksheet in order to gainan understanding of the process of triangulation of a quake’s epicenter and the different types ofseismic waves.2.2.2.4. Geologic Half Life with PenniesThis activity provides a hands-on demonstration of how the concept of a half-life works forradioactive material through the shaking of pennies in a box. Initially all of the pennies areplaced heads up in the box, which is then closed and shaken. Upon inspecting the
Comprehensive Learning Spaces Evaluation Model Accessed January 10 2011 from http://www.swinburne.edu.au/spl/learningspacesproject/ [12] Woolner, P., Clark, J., Hall, E., Tiplady, L., Thomas, U., and Wall, K. (2009, in press). Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design. In Press.[13] Wall K. & Higgins, S. (2006). Facilitating metacognitive talk: a research teaching and learning tool. International Journal of Research and method in Education 29(1) p. 39-53.[14] Pitkethly, A. & Prosser, M. (2001). The First Year Experience Project: A model for university-wide change. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 185-191.[15] Pascarella, E.T. &