Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert J. Parden

#UUQEKCVKQPQH'PIKPGGTKPI5QEKGVKGU9CUJKPIVQP&%#RTKNR Page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

Collection

1997 Annual Conference

Authors

Peter A. Rosati

q All Female Engineers n=135 0 All Male Engineers n=6g2 Figure 1: Distribution of the responses of male and female engineering students on the Active/Reflective Index of the ILS. Page 2.212.2 1For most of the individual ILS items the student responses showed no significant differencesby gender and they selected the more Active choice. Both male and female studentsunderstood something better after they had “tried it out”, “talked about it” or shared ideasin” group problem-solving sessions”. However, the males were

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Joseph A. Shaeiwitz; Ph.D., Richard H. Turpin

shown on a pump and system curve plot, which is providedwith the problem statement. Increasing the reactor feed temperature can be accomplished by increasing the air and natural gasflows to the fired heater; but, the reactor operation is limited by heat transfer. The performance equation forthe reactor Q = UAATmust be obeyed. Since the remedy involves maintaining the cumene production rate, the heat removal rate, Q,remains constant. Since overall flows on the process side are almost constant, and the process side is likelythe limiting resistance, U remains constant. The heat transfer area, A, is also constant. Therefore, thetemperature difference, AT, must also remain constant. Here, it

Conference Session

Milhouse's Moment: Engineering Inclusivity, Everything's Coming Up Milhouse!

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin; Anjali Maguie Raghavan, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Subtopics: ❖ Introductions and icebreakers. ❖ Overview of “Engineering Bright Futures” program. ❖ Statistics and rankings. ❖ Engineering buildings and facilities. ❖ Technical, affinity, and academic engineering organizations. ❖ “Why engineering?” Week 2: Week of Topic: Engineering Majors Part 1 11/1 Subtopics: ❖ Summary of common engineering majors. ❖ Computer Engineering and Q&A. ❖ Software Engineering and Q&A. ❖ Aerospace Engineering and Q&A. ❖ Mechanical

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

Sam Thompson; John I. Hochstein; Tom Benson; Jeff Marchetta

University, The Netherlands; .10. Torella, C. and Lombardo, C., “Computer Codes for the Training on Auxiliary Power Units (A.P.U)”, AIAA Paper 94-3113.Appendix AQ I: For Mach number = 2.5 and wedge angle = 10o, what is the shock angle?Q 2: What is the Mach number downstream of a 20.0 degree wedge at Mach 3.5?Q 3: For Mach number = 2.0 and wedge angle = 24.0o, what is the shock angle? What type of shock is this?Q 4: For Mach number = 2.0 and wedge angle = 24.0o, is the downstream flow supersonic or subsonic? Why?Q 5: For Mach number 3.0, how does the static pressure ratio vary with wedge angle? At what wedge angle does the shock become a normal detached shock? How does the static pressure ratio vary with wedge angle after the shock becomes

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Rabbitt; Douglas Christensen

, shown in Fig. 1, is given to all the students. The assigned projectmodels only the systemic portion of the system, ignoring the pulmonary circuit, and representsthe left heart by only a single chamberÑthe ventricle (including both the mitral and aorticvalves). The systemic CV loop is broken into five segments, each with compliance andresistance values which each student calculates using physiological tables and graphs that areprovided. Q 7 R c2 systemic capillaries

Conference Session

CIP Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Atin K Sinha, Albany State University

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

can be guided to acareer in STEM disciplines. Also, the camp activities were expanded to include some of theengineering projects in CNC machine and SolidWorks CAD software.Summer Camp EvaluationsThe following two figures (Fig 7 and 8) show students’ evaluations of the 2011 and 2012summer camps. Pre-Survey Post-Survey Q 1. Computer is fun Q 2. Computing is hard Q 3. I am good at computing Q 4. I like computing Q 5. I know more than my friends about computing Q 6. I can become good at computing Q 7. I like the challenge of computing

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Gabriel Guillen; Timmy Bell; Balaji Balasubramaniam

!-'8950!:&89!'#2.?85?75((5:!#;;%5#49'%2&8.!B#(&*#+!Z'%52;#4'!g!,'49*5(56.!4#-;)2&2&5*!57!3%57'225%!/#(#2)$%#-#*-'%!589'%!8'49*5(56&'2!2)49!#2!i'#;!Q58&5*!9#*0!8%#4D&*6!0'>&4'!#*0!9#2!#!;#22&5*!&*!4.$'%!2.28'-2'(5;-'*8!7%5-!/'(('>)'!H*&>'%2&8.&25%! #8! L5%*#0.j!Q#*)7#48)%&*6! :9&49! &2! #! :5%(0?('#0&*6! &**5>#85%! 57! $)(('8+! #--)*&8&5*+! %'(5#0&*6! 855(! #*0!#44'225%.!0'2&6*!#*0!-#*)7#48)%&*6'%2&8.! B#(&*#+! Z'%52;#4'! g! ,'49*5(56.! 4#-;)2939179@(!STU!R2%4#&(#$('!#8V!l988;2Vmm42%4m6(522#%.m8'%-m45--'%4(n577n89'n29'(7mo!SZ44'22'0!T\!Q#.!Y]YYU#&(#$('V!988;2Vmm:::#&(#$('V! 988;2Vmm;.;&<5%6m;%51'48m01&8'((5;.m

Collection

2013 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

JIAJUN XU P.E.

boiling regime as shown in figure 3 with black coloredsymbols. It is also observed experimentally that the probability of the occurrence of the 1stboiling curve decreases with increasing water loading.The observed random behavior of the nanoemulsion boiling also coincides with the dynamicsand microstructure within the nanoemulsion fluids. Figure 4 shows the Small Angle NeutronScattering(SANS) data for water-in-PAO nanoemulsion fluids with water volumetricconcentration covering 1.8 Vol% to 10.3 Vol%. Two empirical fittings are used to find out theinner structure.[22-25]Figure 4 shows the processed SANS data for water volumetric concentrations covering 1.8 Vol%to 10.3 Vol%. The scattering intensity I varies with the scattering vector q = 4π sin(θ/2

Collection

2010 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

M. Minnucci; J. Ni; A. Nikolova; L. Theodore

are separated; space (B) contains the resulting mixture when bothcomponents are mixed. Both spaces are insulated (Q=0) in this closed system with no work term (W=0), so that onecan conclude from the first law (Q+W= ∆U ) that: ∆U = 0 U A = U B ;U ≡ internal energy (3) 4Although the energy levels are the same, one notes that system (A) has the capability of doing useful work (because ofthe high-temperature high-pressure steam) while system (B) does not. If an entropy analysis is performed (seeIllustrative

Collection

2010 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

M. Minnucci; J. Ni; A. Nikolova; L. Theodore

are separated; space (B) contains the resulting mixture when bothcomponents are mixed. Both spaces are insulated (Q=0) in this closed system with no work term (W=0), so that onecan conclude from the first law (Q+W= ∆U ) that: ∆U = 0 U A = U B ;U ≡ internal energy (3) 4Although the energy levels are the same, one notes that system (A) has the capability of doing useful work (because ofthe high-temperature high-pressure steam) while system (B) does not. If an entropy analysis is performed (seeIllustrative

Collection

2008 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Marie-Pierre Huguet; Tom Haley; Sehnaz Baltaci-Goktalay

curves are flat during spring break and nearly flat during anon-lesson week, indicated at the top of the figure), this maximum student continued to access the coursenormally during these times. While the course was in session, two other students who had to go out of townfor almost a week each continued to access the course normally during that time. Figure 1-1: c) posts to anonymous Q&A discussion forum by day of weekFigure 1-1c shows post frequency to the Anonymous Q&A discussion forum by day of week. The figureshows that, while there were more

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University; Mandayam Thirunarayanan, Florida International University; Sai Chaithra Allala, Florida International University; Juan Pablo Sotomayor, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

cases using equivalencepartitioning. Using these times in Equation 1 we get F2FA(0.24CL + 0.08GA + 0.17PBL+ 0.08SI + 0.43LS) where CL - collaborative learning, GA - gamification, PBL - problem-Table 3: Results from the survey for questions 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 comparing the LESs in theData Structures (DS) and the Software Engineering 1 (SE1) courses. SD - Strongly Disagree, D -Disagree, N - Neither Disagree or Agree, A - Agree, SA - Strongly Agree, NA - Not applicable,NR - No Response. * - High high number of NA and/or NR responses. Q. Item C SD D N A SA NA NR M

Conference Session

Research in Engineering Education II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dana Denick, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aidsa I. Santiago-Román, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Natalie Barrett, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

differing by Page 25.1457.3degree).3 The model is based on a Q-matrix approach in which the Q-matrix is a binaryrepresentation of the underlying cognitive attributes required for correct item responses.5Additionally, the Fusion Model uses residual information from a continuous attribute to uniquelydetermine a student’s probability for correctly performing each task. The Fusion Model employsa Bayesian approach to estimate the model parameters and estimations are made based on aMonte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) parameter estimation algorithm. The Fusion Model hasshown promising results when applied to real educational assessment data and in the

Conference Session

Committee on Instructional Technology Presents: Gamers

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott M. Katalenich, Ph.D., United States Military Academy; James Ledlie Klosky, P.E., United States Military Academy; Roderick Wilson; Kevin Taylor Scruggs, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

steps with questions (Q) and answers (A). Whether it is the instructor/ laboratorytechnician or the student asking the questions or providing the answers does not matter – it is theactive conversation and engagement that matters.1. Turn off main breaker to start. Q: What is a closed circuit? A: A closed circuit is like a circular road with a drawbridge over a river. When the bridge is down, the roadway is complete (closed), and cars can flow on the roadway. When the drawbridge is up, traffic stops. A closed circuit similarly allows electrical energy to flow along the wire – a current. For example, when a light switch is in the off position, the drawbridge is up, but when it is in the on position, the drawbridge is down. The circuit

Conference Session

NEW THIS YEAR! - ASEE Main Plenary II: Best Paper Recognition & Industry Day Session: Corporate Member Council Speaker

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen R. Turns, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors, Corporate Members Council

_________________________ ________________ c. E _________________________ ________________ d. u _________________________ ________________ e. Q  _________________________ ________________ f. h _________________________ ________________ g.  v mP _________________________ ________________ h. q _________________________ ________________ B. The letter vee (upper and lower case) is used to represent several quantities in this course. List these quantities and

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions: Mechanical Engineering Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen R. Turns, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Peggy Noel Van Meter, Pennsyvlania State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

 _________________________ ________________ e. Q  _________________________ ________________ f. h _________________________ ________________ g.  v mP _________________________ ________________ h. q _________________________ ________________ B. The letter vee (upper and lower case) is used to represent several quantities in this course. List these quantities and indicate which vee is used for each. Page 22.219.10 Figure 3. Quiz to assess students

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - the Best of NEE

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Emily Stratman, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

sectionseach semester.B. ReflectionsThree sections in 2017 engaged in weekly structured reflections focused on feedback, and sixsections in 2018 engaged in weekly structured reflections focused on learning strategies [15]. Inboth semesters, students in these sections earned the course’s standard 2% extra credit offered inall sections by completing these reflections. Reflections included a combination of closed- andopen-ended prompts (Table 1). Note that the number of close-ended prompts differed each weekdepending on the number of learning objectives addressed in the given week of instruction(Table 1: Q4- Q(X-1) in 2017 or Q(2)-Q(Y-3) in 2018). Other prompts remained the same eachweek.While the prompts in both years were intended to have students

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield; Charles Lam, California State University, Bakersfield; Ronald Hughes, California State University, Bakersfield; Stephanie Salomon, California State University, Bakersfield

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

questions about what they learned from the program, if the programchanged their goals/plans, and their satisfaction with the program. The pre-survey also gathereddemographic information and background academic information.Table 2: Questions from the pre-survey administered at the start of each summer program. Pre-Survey Question Question Type Participant identification (Student ID Number, Year, Faculty Text boxes and Lists Mentor) Participant background academic information (Major, GPA, etc.) Text boxes and Lists Participant demographic information (Gender, Race and Ethnicity) Select from lists Q: What interested you about this summer program? Open-ended comment Q

Collection

1997 Annual Conference

Authors

Jens Jorgensen; Lueny Morell de Ramírez; José L. Zayas; John Lamancusa

MatrixQuestion 1: Was a new interdisciplinary, practice-based curriculum which emphasizes the interdependencyof manufacturing and design, in a business environment developed?Subquestions Data Collection Approach Respondents Schedule1a. Did the program allow students to practice their engineering science fundamentals in the solution ofreal problems? Questionnaire (Q) or Focus Group (FG) Samples S, F, I1b. Are professional communication and team skills emphasized? Q or FG Samples Interviews S, F, I1c. Are case studies, active learning techniques, and computer technologies extensively used in theclassroom? Q or FG Samples S, F1d. Did the program provide previously unavailable opportunities for hands on

Collection

1997 Annual Conference

Authors

Jens Jorgensen; Lueny Morell de Ramírez; José L. Zayas; John Lamancusa

Data Collection Respondents9 Schedule10 Approach 1a. Did the program allow students to practice their engineering science fundamentals in the solution of real problems? Questionnaire S, F, I (Q) or Focus Group (FG) Samples 1b. Are

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS) Technical Session 5: Lab Design

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick A. Stites, University of Colorado Boulder; Micaela Valentina Bara, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

results collected from a microphone andUSB data acquisition system and discuss any discrepancies. Table 1. We organized the learning objectives into three categories: enduring understanding (EU, highlighted), important to know and do (IKD), and worth being familiar with (WF). Topic Learning Objective Priority Assessment Critique data visualizations and descriptive statistics for HW1, 3, 5-7, 9, 11- EU clarity and appropriateness 13; P1-3; Q Data

Conference Session

Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession – and ASCE

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janey Camp P.E., Vanderbilt University; Leslie Nolen, American Society of Civil Engineers; Carolyn Sofman, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

teachers may ask students when exploring the Report Card and relatedactivities are as follows: • Q: Which of these infrastructure types do you see and/or use in your daily activities? o Activities:  A discussion with students could include the infographic “How Much Infrastructure Do You Use Before Noon?”  Students choose one category of infrastructure to explore in more detail through creation of a short report, a photo collage of that infrastructure type (younger students),  Teachers lead a field trip around their community and have students identify the different infrastructure components around them

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Lueny Morell de Ramírez; José L. Zayas; Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho

) 1a. Did the program allow students to practice their Questionn- S, F, I engineering science fundamentals in the solution of aire (Q) or real problems? Focus Group (FG) Samples 1b. Are professional communication and team skills Q or FG S, F, I emphasized? Samples

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Lueny Morell de Ramírez; José L. Zayas; Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho

), h faculty (F) industr y (I) 1a. Did the program allow students to practice their engineering Question S, F, I science fundamentals in the solution of real problems? n-aire (Q) or Focus

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Mohammad Abdul Ahad, Georgia Southern University; Thomas Murphy, Georgia Southern University; Rami Jubrail Haddad, Georgia Southern University

content and enhancing the learning experience forfuture cohorts.Qualitative surveys were conducted before (Spring 2022) and after the project'simplementation to supplement the quantitative analysis. These surveys, aimed at capturingstudents’ perceptions and satisfaction levels, were administered anonymously using GoogleForms. Students were asked to rate their agreement with various statements on a scale from1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), covering aspects such as their preparedness byprevious courses, the clarity and usability of the lab manual, and the adequacy of lab time,as enumerated below: ● Q.1 - Logic Circuit Design (ENGR 2332) prepared me for the concepts and work in the Digital Design Lab (ENGR 2323). ● Q.2 - The

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadia Kellam, University of South Carolina; Veronica Addison, University of South Carolina; Michelle Maher, University of South Carolina; Mann Llewellyn, University of Queensland; David Radcliffe, University of Queensland; Walter Peters, University of South Carolina

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

e l l e a c h e q u i p

Conference Session

Architectural Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheena Nastasia Marston, The Ohio State University; Fabian Hadipriono Tan P.E., The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Michael Parke, The Ohio State University; Olga Maria Stavridis, Ohio State University; Lisa Elanna Burris, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

users were also required to judge the realism of the model in comparison toimages provided as well as perceptions on the usefulness of the model.SoftwareEach software package used in this project is presented to provide deeper understanding of theeducational module developed. Choosing the appropriate software for 3-D representation was Q c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 PAPER ID: 18690one of the key factors that aided in the development of the paper. Whereas most 3-D modellingsoftware programs have the capacity to represent the model, not all of them will represent thetrue characteristics of

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Curtis, Campbell University; Jacqueline Gartner, Campbell University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Bernard Van Wie, Washington State University; Carah Watson

are valid for the given data set. To ensurenormality, a Q-Q plot was generated for both the differences in pre-test scores and posttestscores.2. Results and Discussion2.1 Confirmation of Normality Figure 1. Q-Q plot of Posttest scores. Figure 2. Q-Q plot of difference in scores results.The two graphs shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 are Q-Q plots that confirm normality. It is clearthese are normal because all data points fall within the normal range, as illustrated by thedata points falling within the boundary shown by the dotted lines. Because the data isconfirmed to be normal, we can run an ANOVA and an f-test on this data set.2.2 Dependent Variable AnalysisBefore examining the results of

Conference Session

Teaching Methodology & Assessment 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sharanabasaweshwara Asundi, Old Dominion University; Miltos Kotinis

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

instructor was effective in keeping you motivated for completing the course?• What was most helpful in transitioning from In Class to Online instruction (Describe)?• What was most non-helpful in transitioning from In Class to Online instruction (Describe)? The scale used for assessing the participants’ timely action in watching the assigned videosindicated that ~75% of them watched them on time (Figure 3). A significant percentage of theparticipants indicated that they felt confident after watching the assigned videos (Figure 3). Q. Did you watch the assigned videos on time Q. How do you feel about watching videos to (Choose one)? understand the material (Choose one