Boston, San Diego and finally Rochester, Kathy spent many years in the fitness industry while raising her daughter, wearing every hat from personal trainer and cycling instructor to owner and director of Cycledelic Indoor Cycling Studio. Kathy draws upon these many diverse career and life experiences while directing WE@RIT. In the spring of 2020, Kathy earned her Master of Science degree in Program Design, Analysis & Manage- ment through RIT’s School of Individualized Study, combining concentrations in Project Management, Analytics and Research, & Group Leadership and Development. An unabashed introvert, Kathy enjoys reading and spending time with her family, exploring the world of craft cocktails, and
. Another initiativeis the Leadership Alliance, a more comprehensive program that involves more than 30institutions of different types (Ghee et al. 2014). One of the key aspects of this consortium is 8-10 weeks of summer research experience. Students from member MSIs accepted for theexperience in a research institution carry out a research project, receive mentorship, and gainresearch and professional skills. These programs and other similar ones have the potential tobuild capacity for the transformation of higher education and the workforce. Similarly, theHBCU/MSI Research Summit has the potential for broadening participation by creating acontext in which initial encounters-- between students, and students and faculty-- may lead toresearch
Paper ID #28447Who benefits most from a holistic student support program in engineering?Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United States. Emily earned a PhD and MA in Sociology from the
positions such as Project Engineer, Lead University Recruiter, Logistics Engineer, Cost Engineer and Project Manager.Amy Marie Beebe, Women in Engineering Program Amy Beebe is the student program coordinator for the Women in Engineering Program (WEP) in the Cockrell School of Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin whose mission is to recruit, retain and graduate more women to advance gender equity in engineering. As a program coordinator, Amy assists in coordinating programming for current students which includes the WEP Leadership Collaborative student organizations, WEP’s Peer Assistance Leaders and WEP Kinsolving Living Learning Community. In addition to current student programming, she coordinates
in the course or to make sure they can access course materials Using real world examples to illustrate course content Autonomy Assignments that ask students to express what they Competence have learned and what they still need to learn Work on group projects separately from the course Relatedness meetings Frequent quizzes or other assignments Competence Live sessions in which students can participate in Relatedness discussions Meeting in “breakout groups” during a live class Relatedness Breaking up class activities into shorter pieces than an Autonomy in-person course Table 1. Mapping of recommended online teaching practices to their primary associated
on the board. Confusion on the course Suggest next lecture reviewing project information and then project using a muddiest-point- minute-paper to identify remaining points of confusion. Suggest a rubric. Students concerned they don’t Point students to learning outcomes. Potentially go over know what the exam will be some high-level review of the course showing how the ideas like are connected and what you consider important. This focuses students' review efforts on what you think is important Homework is out of
modules was made of interactive sessions that mix both theory andapplications. Although there are cases when destruction of the components was deliberate per-mitted as way of teaching students, the instructor was always monitoring student activities andproviding close guidance to avoid unintended equipment damage; additionally, the instructor alsoprovided theoretical explanations of most observations as needed during the session. Unfortu-nately, there were certain theoretical facts that could not be directly be seen using these modulesonly; in that case, the instructor would conclude the session by discussing those unobservedtheoretical facts. At the end of the program, students were asked to complete a term project of developinga
Engineering. At LMU, her main research areas are divided along two avenues: (1) numerical simulations of earthquake source physics, which relates to her graduate work, and (2) developing, imple- menting, and assessing the effectiveness of educational interventions that support student persistence in STEM.Ms. Meredith Jane Richter, Loyola Marymount University Meredith Richter is a mechanical engineering undergraduate student at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, CA. She is interested in peer-mentoring research because she is a female engineer striving to change the stigma and demographic makeup of STEM disciplines. She is currently involved in her senior design project, which focuses on using additive manufacturing
- University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Research Associate at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United States. Emily earned a PhD and MA in Sociology from the University of Washington, and a BA in Sociology from Smith College.Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University Donna Crystal Llewellyn received her BA (major in Mathematics and minor in Economics) with High Honors from
for Girls in Urbana, IL. Along with a team of undergraduates, she headlined a project to develop a unique computer science curriculum for middle school students. She then earned her M.A. in mathematics education at Columbia University. Af- terwards, she taught in the Chicago Public School system at Orr Academy High School (an AUSL school) for two years. Currently, Golnaz is working with the Epistemic Games Research Group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison where she has led the efforts on engineering virtual internship simulations for high school and first year undergraduate students. Golnaz’s current research is focused on how games and sim- ulations increase student engagement in STEM fields, how players learn
Systems Security Project:This project has been funded in part by National Science Foundation to improve embeddedsystems security education for undergraduate students in the computing and engineeringprograms. They have developed the following eight online modules on embedded systemssecurity17: 1. General Introduction to Computer Security 2. Introduction to Cryptography 3. Embedded Systems Security 4. FPGA Security 5. RFID Security 6. SCADA Security 7. JAVA Security 8. Threat ModelingThese eight modules were offered in the following two software engineering courses: • Embedded Systems Programming • Software Project in Computer NetworksOffering of these modules in the
, Washington State University Charles (Chuck) Pezeshki is the Director of the Industrial Design Clinic in the School of MME at Wash- ington State University. The Industrial Design Clinic is the primary capstone vehicle for the School and focuses on industrially sponsored projects with hard deliverables that students must complete for gradua- tion. His research area is in knowledge construction as a function of social/relational organization. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Measuring the Factors Associated with Student Persistence in the Washington State STARS ProgramAbstractAs the state of Washington continues to face a shortage of qualified workers needed to fill
women in engineering degree programs and effective pedagogy in undergraduate engineering curriculum.Dr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona BeachDr. Yosef S. Allam, Colorado School of Mines Yosef Allam is a Teaching Associate Professor in the EPICS first-year engineering program at the Col- orado School of Mines. Prior to joining Mines, he was an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Funda- mentals Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and an Affiliate Director for Project Lead The Way in Florida, as well as an Instructor in the First-Year Engineering Program at The Ohio State University. He graduated from The Ohio State University with B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial and
early feedback from thestudents was encouraging. The early feedback also confirmed the difficulty of changing thetraditional knowledge delivery and the overall resistance to change by participants (students andfaculty) in general. A set of actions have been identified by the team to address the challenges inthe near-term. As the department prepares for the next phase of the project, the experience wegained and the lessons we learned from implementing the KI modules will benefit theengineering education community as we seek to improve students learning experience, promotecritical thinking, and ultimately improve their problem solving skills.5. Acknowledgement The authors acknowledge the financial support from National Science Foundation
engineering students engaged in a design project and pays particular attention to howstudents make judgments. The analysis concludes that the practice of engineering judgmentrelies on displays to recognize and construct rhetorical tactics to satisfy the requirements of atask. This study connects to recent research in engineering education on the importance ofdisplays 15, 16 for learning the design process, and reveals the dynamics of displays for carryingout engineering judgment. Engineering judgment is a core competency for engineering practice. Philosophers,educators, practitioners, and historians agree that engineering judgment is necessary for ethical,sophisticated, and professional engineering practice1, 2, 3, 4, ,5. While scientific and
discussion. Finally, the role-structuring process is meant to get allmembers of the group to participate with interest. This approach gives the students enoughmaterial at the beginning of the project that they can relate it back to prior personal experiencesand individually acquired knowledge21. Then, the instructor gives the students a task that relieson the input from everyone in the group to think critically on the topic. The final part of theprocess requires that all students participate in order to complete the task without hinderingprogress. It is noted in this approach that convincing students to embrace a different viewpointon a topic can be challenging and sometimes sensitive due to upbringing or past experiences, soa structured approach to
Paper ID #21188Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using Mobile Learning in Engineering Dy-namics and Vibrations CoursesDr. Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University Zhaoshuo Jiang graduated from the University of Connecticut with a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering. Before joining San Francisco State University as an assistant professor, he worked as a structural engi- neering professional at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) LLP. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low- rise and high-rise projects. His
the distinction between collaborative learning on the one hand and cooperativelearning on the other (see, e.g., Olivares 2 ). Cooperative learning is group learning whose main goal is for everymember of the group to learn 3,4 . Our focus is on this type of learning. By contrast, the goal of collaborative learningis for the group to work together to solve a problem, complete a project, etc.; ensuring that each individual memberof the group learns some particular item of knowledge is secondary. We should also add that not all authors use thesedefinitions of cooperative and collaborative learning with some authors conflating the two and others interchangingthe two terms 5,2 . In any case, there seems to be consensus that there are two types of
, includingpotential future collaboration. (1)Some of the adjunct faculty-particularly those who are seniors in specific industries- could offerimportant linkages for the development of industrial affiliate programs, co-op activities, summertraining opportunities, and employment opportunities for new graduates. They may also providenew ideas for senior design projects, topics for graduate theses, or render help in theestablishment of collaborative research programs.When a choice has been made and the candidate has accepted, it is important that he/ she feelswelcome and be assisted in becoming familiar with his/ her new surroundings. To expedite theprocess, new adjuncts should sit together with their new colleagues and go over all relevantmatters related to
create positive societal attitudes, policies and practices that promote equalityfor young ladies in terms of access, retention, performance and education quality throughinfluencing the transformation of educational systems in Africa. The Church of Uganda offersprograms where large numbers of children are gathered together on a regular basis. One suchprogram that they sponsor is a Saturday morning meeting of primary and secondary age boys andgirls. Several hundred children attend these once a week meetings primarily to watch DVDvideos that are projected on a big screen. We hope to provide an opportunity for representativesfrom WETSU and FAWE to talk to the children and discuss case studies as well as distributetheir brochures.ConclusionIt can be
studies using flow cytometer and cell sorters. George conducts evaluations, project and program reviews, and evaluation workshops for both the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation, as well as reviews SMT proposals for private foundation and public agencies, including the Sloan Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation and the European Commission. She develops and coordinates conferences and workshops related to recruitment and retention of minorities, women, and persons with disabilities in SMT. She works with UNIFEM, UNESCO, and non-governmental organizations on gender, science, and technology initiatives related to
will be a key element to enable successful educational outcomes from anonline engineering education. A recent NSF report50 reviewing the literature on distanceeducation points to the challenges faced in online education. It requires a level of studentdiscipline that a more structured on-campus environment does not. It is also shown that contactwith faculty as well as with other students is critical. It is therefore important that the onlineprogram provide a supportive environment, both through instructor-student communication andthrough the development of an online student community. The latter can be facilitated bycollaborative learning approaches such as project-based coursework and other virtual team-basedactivities. Information technology
were used as guides but major input on the survey opinionaire questions came fromsenior undergraduates who have been working on this project as Research Assistants. Four areaswere identified as good indications of student engagement; a desire to learn more, asking morequestions in class, talking/thinking about the material more, and coming better prepared for class.It is interesting to note that these categories were initially arrived at by discussion with theundergraduate assistants and yet they closely match the engagement criteria used by otherresearchers8 as well as the CASEE survey. Each of these four areas was subsequently evaluatedusing a five point Likert scale (Table A2). In addition, students were asked what theirimpression was of
project because of its mathematical report appearance, because of its ability toperform calculations with automatic unit handling and conversion, and because of its wide use inthe Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.While developed for a two-course sequence in undergraduate thermodynamics, the MathCADfunction sets are useful for many other engineering courses. The functions presented in thispaper and the thermodynamic functions presented in previous works have been found to be veryuseful in courses such as internal combustion engines, propulsion, combustion, compressibleflow, and heating ventilating and air conditioning [9, 10, 11, 12].Referencing the Function Sets in MathCADThe functions are contained
achieve the highest profit and to achieve thelowest environmental detriment. A new interdisciplinary project funded by NSF has extendedthe development of the board game to create and assess a networked computer game.The game is played using stakeholders in the manufacturing supply chain in the automotiveindustry. In its current non-networked version, six students create a team of three suppliers:materials, parts, and cars. Within this team, two students take on roles for each of the threecompanies in the supply chain. During each round in the game, each company within the supplychain takes its turn to invest and select among different technologies in three areas for eachcompany: production, storage and waste disposal. There are tradeoffs in
in elementary education there should be no attempt to help precision orgeneralisation. Those who inspired the philosophy for young children movement have shownyoung children are quite capable of precision and generalisation54 but in their own terms a viewthat is supported by the work of Bruner. Furthermore as Crynes argued at an FIE conferenceengineering educators have as much to learn from elementary education as engineeringeducators have to give to it.55Applied to Whitehead’s theory the project method that has long been employed in primaryschools is relevant to the stage of generalisation in university education just as it is to first yearuniversity courses where in some programmes design rather than engineering science is theirchief
AC 2008-1061: GENERAL TRENDS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION SUPPORTTHE PARTICIPATION OF WOMENJoye Jepson, Antioch University At the time this paper was written, Letha Joye Jepson was a student in Antioch University's Ph.D. Program in Leadership and Change. The research reported herein contributed to one of two required Individualized Learning Area projects. Joye is a computer engineer with The Boeing Company.Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering Norman Fortenberry is the founding director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering. CASEE is a collaborative effort dedicated to achieving excellence in
Paper ID #35706The Use of Mixed Methods in Academic Program EvaluationMr. Michael B. O’Connor PE P.E., New York University Michael O’Connor, Retired Professional Civil Engineer (Maryland and California), M.ASCE, is a mem- ber of the ASCE Committee on Developing Leaders, History and Heritage, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBoK), and Engineering Grades. Michael has been a practicing Civil Engineer with over 50 years of engineering, construction, and project management experience split equally between the pub- lic and private sectors. Programs ranged from the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit district’s 1990’s
” (VBL) is for engineering students to learnabout experimental biomechanics without the need of actual experimental equipment or hands-on data gathering. The goal is achieved through a series of challenged-based learning modulesthat are made accessible on the internet. For this project, a human gait laboratory was chosen asthe learning environment. Two challenges have been developed to date. The first challengefocuses on recording human kinematics data and the calculations that can be performed with thedata, such as joint angles and centers of gravity. The second challenge deals with kinetic dataduring human walking measured using a ground-reaction force plate.VBL Challenge IThe VBL Challenge I is “How does your whole body center of mass (COM
into their course in avariety of ways. The calculus course coordinators generally cfxkug"vjcv"c"uvwfgpvÓu"YgDYqtM"grade count for no more than 10% of their overall course grade. In addition to WeBWorK, someof the calculus courses also utilize a web-based tutorial system called ALEKS, and somerctvkekrcvg"kp"vjg"wpkxgtukv{Óu"Uwrrngogptal Instruction Program.OpportunitiesTwo of the primary goals of this project were: 1) to increase student mastery of course content,and 2) to increase individual student accountability on out-of-class assignments. Whenhomework problems are assigned out of the textbook, students usually attempt each problemonce or twice. They will often spend more time on those problems which have an answer printedat the back of the