serves on the College of Engineering’s Industrial and Professional Advisory Council (IPAC). Since July 2020, Dr. Johnson Austin is serving as the president of AAUW Tampa, Inc. In addition, she currently serves as Member-At-Large for American Association for Engineering Education Minorities In Engineering Division (ASEE MIND), a member of the Smithso- nian Science Education Center’s Advisory Committee for ’Zero Barriers in STEM Education,’ and on the executive advisory board member for the Northeast STEM Starter Academy at Mount Vernon, NY. Dr. Johnson Austin is a member of the editorial review board for the Caribbean Educational Research Journal (CERJ). She also served as a reviewer for the National Science
Development: leadership, teamwork, communication, career planning • Transition Support: transfer portal, academic advisors, peer networking, supplemental resources, community engagement • Active Engagement: ambassadors, peer mentors, student organization liaisonTuition and stipend support can be up to $10,000 each, depending on student circumstances.Most of the various types of student support involve direct student engagement so students areboth receiving and providing support.The IEC is a nonprofit organization founded in 2019 to enable its core Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) programs at Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) to work togethercollectively to address opportunities and problems that they find difficult or
Professor of Engineering Edu- cation at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assign- ment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Daniel M. Ferguson
Dean of Academic Affairs (Jan. 2003-April 2006), and the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies (April 2006-September 2013). Dr. Karimi is a Fellow of ASEE, a Fellow of ASME, senior member of AIAA, and holds membership in ASHRAE, and Sigma Xi. He has served as the ASEE Campus Representative at UTSA, ASEE-GSW Section Campus Representative, and served as the Chair of ASEE Zone III (2005-07). He chaired the ASEE-GSW section during the 1996-97 academic year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of Department-Level New Teacher Workshop on Reducing Student ComplaintsAbstractSince the fall 2017, the mechanical engineering department has
Gulf conflict, in support of the Global War on Terrorism in Iraq, and during peace enforcement operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina. He was awarded three Bronze Star Medals for leadership and service during wartime operations. He earned his commission through ROTC and was a Distinguished Military Graduate, He is a graduate of the U.S. Army Ranger School and the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. He earned a M.S. in leadership development and counseling from Long Island University and a B.A. in psychology from Boston University. He is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Leo is an avid hiker, and when not at work can usually be found on a New Hampshire White Mountains high
ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/38051[10] D. R. Simmons and S. M. Lord, “Removing invisible barriers and changing mindsets to improve and diversify pathways in engineering,” Adv Eng Educ, 2019, Accessed: Jan. 06, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1220293.pdf[11] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering & Engineering Technology: By the Numbers,” 2021.[12] B. Burt et al., “Racial microaggressions within the advisor-advisee relationship: Implications for engineering research, policy, and practice,” in Education Conference Presentations, Posters, and
-Couetil, N., Dyrenfurth, M., Teaching students to be technology innovators:Examininng approaches and identifying competencies. ASEE 2012, San Antonio, TX.[3] Steuer-Dankert, L., Gilmartin, S., Muller, C., Dungs, C., Sheppard, S., Leicht-Scholten, Ca.,“Expanding Engineering Limits—A Concept for Socially Responsible Education of Engineers,”International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 1–16, 2019.[4] Brunhaver, SR, RF Korte, SR Barley, and SD Sheppard. April 13, 2018. Bridging the Gapsbetween Engineering Education and Practice. In R. Freeman, and H. Salzman (eds.), U.S.Engineering in the Global Economy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.[5] Gilmartin, SK, AA Antonio, HL Chen, SR Brunhaver, and SD Sheppard. April 13
´ Ecole Centrale de Nantes in Nantes, France. Dr. Tucker is the director of the Design Analysis Technology Advancement (D.A.T.A) Laboratory. His research interests are in formalizing system design processes under the paradigm of knowledge discovery, optimization, data mining, and informatics. His research interests include applications in complex sys- tems design and operation, product portfolio/family design, and sustainable system design optimization in the areas of engineering education, energy generation systems, consumer electronics, environment, and national security. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An introduction to the CLICK approach: Leveraging Virtual Reality
20 Years: The Promise and the Challenges | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore.” Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6519290[12] “Navigate the Circuit.” Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://navigate.aimbe.org/[13] “Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers: Occupational Outlook Handbook: : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.” Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/biomedical-engineers.htm[14] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad, and B. Belmont, “What is Biomedical Engineering? Insights from Qualitative Analysis of Definitions Written by Undergraduate Students,” presented at the 2019 ASEE
feedback from students. Post-implementation surveys indicated that a vastmajority of students found the scaled models to be a valuable addition to their learning experience.Many students reported increased confidence in their engineering abilities and expressed a desirefor more practical learning opportunities in their curriculum.LimitationsThis analysis only works with open-ended questions, there are no spectrums to be analyzed basedon answers and was only applied to the project of this class.References[1] Cervantes, A. E., and Guerra, M. A. A., 2023, “Work in Progress: Impact on Students Dropout Rates of Introducing a First-Year Hands-on Civil Engineering Course,” 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[2] Mariño, M., Ubidia, C
University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan. Her research work aims to improve the learning experience for undergraduate students by examining conceptual knowledge gains, affect, identity development, engineering judgment, and problem solving.Dr. Emma Treadway, Trinity University Emma Treadway received the B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Trinity University in 2011, and her M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2017 and 2019, respectively. She is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 56, pp. 3–23, 2019.[14] L. Smyth, F. Davila, T. Sloan, E. Rykers, S. Backwell, and S. B. Jones, “How science really works: the student experience of research-led education,” Higher Education, vol. 72, pp. 191–207, 2016.[15] Y.-H. Lu, T. Hacker, C. Zoltowski, and J. Allebach, “Cross-cohort research experience for project management and leadership development,” 2016.[16] R. Burga, J. Leblanc, and D. Rezania, “Exploring student perceptions of their readiness for project work: Utiliz- ing social cognitive career theory,” Project Management Journal, vol. 51, pp. 154 – 164, 2020. Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright
.), and University of Michigan (Ph.D.). Before joining Texas Tech, he was a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University and an assistant professor at University of Notre Dame. His research and teaching interests include developing innovative water treatment technolo- gies and incorporating knowledge related to such efforts in the environmental engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exploring Ways to Develop Reflective Engineers: Toward Phronesis-Centered Engineering EducationAbstractThe purpose of this work-in-progress research paper is to explore how engineering students’phronesis (ethical judgement or practical wisdom) can be fostered in
United States and the world,stakeholders, including NAE, NSPE, and ASEE, increasingly acknowledge the importance ofcreativity in engineering design. High school curricula are starting to introduce engineeringconcepts, including robotics, 3D printing, and the engineering design process. Traditionally,these technical concepts have been separated from opportunities to practice creativity andinnovation. In this setting, students are led to think that creativity and innovation are notcompatible with engineering design.The following paper evaluates the effectiveness of strategies geared toward encouragingcreativity and innovation in conjunction with the engineering design process to foster new,unique, or atypical approaches to engineering problems. In
,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1- 2--28244.[9] J. A. Rohde, A. Kirn, and A. Godwin, “Engineering allies: The personalities of cisgender engineering students,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28248.[10] D. M. Riley and A. L. Pawley, “Complicating difference: Exploring and exploding three myths of gender and race in engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2011.[11] B. Love, We Want to Do More Than Survive by Bettina L. Love. Penguin Random House, 2019.[12] K. Quianmo, How women of color can navigate relationships with white “allies.” .[13] “On Making Black Lives Matter: The Way Forward from
author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2018 ASEE/IEEE Fron- tiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala.Dr. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica M. Smith is Associate Professor in the Engineering, Design & Society Division at the Colorado
, and M. Koretsky, “Destigmatizing Confusion – A Path Toward Professional Practice,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32625. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32625.[2] M. Kapur, “Learning from productive failure,” Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–65, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195.[3] A. D. Robertson, R. Scherr, and D. Hammer, Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics. Routledge, 2015.[4] H. S. Barrows, “Problem-Based, Self-directed Learning,” JAMA, vol. 250, no. 22, pp. 3077– 3080, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.1001/jama.1983.03340220045031.[5] D. R. Woods, “Problem‐based learning for large classes in chemical engineering,” New
course?” Students replied with a number -2 (strongly disagree)TO +2 (strongly agree). They were also asked “What features of the simulation experience didyou find most useful for learning? The least? Rate the features below from 0 (not useful) to 5(extremely useful).” The features are listed in Table 4. Student outcomes (final grades in thecourse) anonymously linked to which simulation was done by the student were also considered. Table 3. Terms from which data was collected Term University Mode Number of Graduate or Simulations Students Undergraduate Summer 2 2019 LMU In-person 18 Graduate Healthcare
nanotechnology engineering education and research. He is a licensed PE in the State of Colorado, a member of ASEE, a senior member of IEEE, and a senior member of SME. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Silver Lining: Engineering Senior Capstone Projects During PandemicAbstract Most of the undergraduate engineering programs culminate in a required senior capstoneproject where students demonstrate their knowledge, skills, creativity, and design capabilities.These projects are frequently completed by teams having 3 - 5 students per team. Often, the successof an undergraduate engineering
, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645.[2] D. Chambers, “Networked intimacy: Algorithmic friendship and scalable sociality,” European journal of communication (London), vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 26–36, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0267323116682792.[3] K. Kyung-Hoon, “Government oversight in managing risks of AI in health care,” Reuters, Jan. 12, 2022. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/government-oversight-managing- risks-ai-health-care-2022-01-12/ (accessed Jan. 19, 2022).[4] M. Kantor, “When Data Meets AI, Retailers Predict Shopping Trends,” Forbes, Apr. 12, 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/esri/2019/04/12/halo-forecasting-predicting-customer- shopping-patterns/ (accessed Jan. 19, 2022).[5] T. Klosowski, “Facial
September 2015.TAMUS LSAMP continued funding subsequent ELCIR cohorts in 2016-2019. Starting with theELCIR 2018 cohort, TAMUS LSAMP offered participant research stipends to students whoconducted research with a faculty mentor after the completion of their ELCIR experience.Several modifications were made in the program administration to improve participants’experiences: • ELCIR 2016 cohort: The ELCIR experience was offered as a 1-hour credit course for participants in the Spring semester before leaving for the hands-on experience in Mexico. To increase cultural interactions, participants stayed with host families while in Mexico. The research was hosted by the Universidad Marista [5]. • ELCIR 2017 cohort: In addition to the
meant to be interpreted and used for a given context (i.e., “situated” [5]).The connections between the components are also complex and dynamic.SEVT has been useful in predicting both small-scale decisions, such as whether or not to engage inan in-class activity, and broad-scale decisions, such as persistence in an academic major. Perez etal. (2019 [13]), for example, identified three different latent SEVT profiles and examined achieve-ment and course completion in STEM at the end of the first year of college. They found firstthat students with below-average competence beliefs and task values and above-average perceivedcosts were the least likely to be retained in STEM. They also found that underrepresented mi-norities were most commonly in a
] J. Lugowski, “Development Of A Competency Based Introductory Course In Fluid Power,” Jun. 2002, p. 7.404.1-7.404.8. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/development-of-a-competency-based-introductory-course-in-fluid-power[13] K. M. DeGoede, “Board 16: Mechanical Engineering Division: Competency Based Assessment in Dynamics,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-16-mechanical-engineering-division-competency-based-assessment-in-d ynamics[14] S. Ramakrishnan, “A competency-based flipped classroom for a first year hands-on engineering design course,” presented at the 2017 FYEE
the answers from such primary sources and establish how all thisinformation together allows the problem to be defined, but more importantly they need to learnthe right questions to ask. The notion of problem statements were introduced to students inboth earlier course versions and in the current version with students working in groups of 5-6,and they are expected to demonstrate their creative flair in addition to solving the actualproblem.In the original version of the 1st year design project, students were addressing a design problembased on the unacceptably high radioactivity levels in part of a pressurised water nuclearreactor. In the entirely face-to-face (F2F) iteration of pre-pandemic years (2019 model),students would spend 2 weeks
towards improving diversity in the field, as women and certainracial/ethnic groups remain underrepresented. Specifically, women only held 16.2% of positionsin engineering occupations in 2019, while Hispanic/Latino engineers only held 8.3% of positionsand Black or African American engineers only held 4.0% of positions [3]. Further, the recentgrowth of engineering bachelor’s degrees awarded to Hispanic/Latino graduates has not matchedtheir overall population growth in the last decade [4]. Outreach programs with designed curricula can be implemented to provide engineeringcontent to students, particularly when teachers have limited training in engineering pedagogy [5].Such programs are frequently organized by engineering faculty, students