in engineering education and professional development for 9-12 grade science faculty designated to teach engineering. His research revolves around developing and validating curricular methods to improve en- gineering education in informal, traditional, distance, and professional environments. Dr. Goodridge currently teaches courses in ”Teaching, Learning, and Assessment in Engineering Education” and ”Engi- neering Mechanics: Statics.” Dr. Goodridge is an engineering councilor for the Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) and serves on ASEE’s project board. Dr. Goodridge actively consults for projects includ- ing the development of an online curriculum style guide for Siemens software instruction, development of
used.Class sessions and learning to sketchThe course goal was for the student to learn to communicate using standard conventions ofengineering graphics for 3D mechanical parts. This ability would enable the student tocommunicate ideas in subsequent design classes with peers on teams as well as contribute insome work settings. Learning to follow engineering graphic conventions was the base leveloutcome. Many of these conventions can be enacted algorithmically, much as a CAD systemcan automatically generate orthographic projections given geometric information about a part.So, at a deeper level the goal was to learn to generate mental imagery of a part and understandinformation from that level. Correspondingly, the underlying assumption was that
Paper ID #23831Do Students Believe Girls Belong in Engineering? So What?Ms. Henriette D. Burns, Washington State University, Vancouver Henriette has worked at Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Labs, Baxter Labs, Tenneco, Monsanto, Frucon Con- struction, SC Johnson Wax and HP as a design engineer, a manufacturing engineer and a project manager. She holds an engineering degree from Northwestern University, an MBA from University of Oregon and a MiT from Washington State University where she is currently finishing her Ph.D. in Math/Science Educa- tion. Henriette’s research agenda is unveiling and understanding the identity of non
Underrepresented Minority StudentsAbstractBoise State University (BSU) implemented an across-the-board reform of calculus instructionduring the 2014 calendar year. The details of the reform, described elsewhere (Bullock, 2015),(Bullock 2016), involve both pedagogical and curricular reform. Gains from the project haveincluded a jump in Calculus I pass rate, greater student engagement, greater instructorsatisfaction, a shift toward active learning pedagogies, and the emergence of a strongcollaborative teaching community. This paper examines the effects of the reform on studentretention. Since the curricular reform involved pruning some content and altering courseoutcomes, which could conceivably have negative downstream impacts, we report on studentsuccess
, and particularly forengineering undergraduates (Felder, Felder, and Dietz, 1998; Prince, 2004; Hake, 1998; Colbeck,Campbell, and Bjorklund, 2000; Johnson, Johnson, and Smith, 1998a,b; Springer, Stanne, andDonovan, 1999; Terenzini, 2001). The project was further informed by the positive learning andretention outcomes reported following curricular innovations to integrate math, science, andengineering content in undergraduate engineering programs at other institutions (Carr, 2003;Froyd and Ohland, 2005; Olds and Miller, 2004). The expected benefits for first-yearengineering students of the Engineering Math Workshops innovation include: a more thoroughunderstanding of the mathematical concepts in the core course; an enhanced ability
frequency of use of eachspecific item. Examples include active learning, clickers, collaborative projects, ‘traditional’lecturing, and many others. These 19 items were further categorized into four bins – Activelearning activities, Collaborative learning activities, Formative assessment, and Lecturing. Thesefour bins each represent broad themes around pedagogical approaches and together help usunderstand activities within each faculty member’s classroom. We arrive at an average score foreach of these bins, based on the extent of self-reported usage of each pedagogical approach.The exact reason for this categorization is explained in the following paragraphs. Bonwell andEison[16] define active learning as that which “involves students in doing
assessment oflearning than on the cataloging of activity, i.e. number of startups, amount of funding raised,number of students taking entrepreneurship courses, etc.In an effort to assess the entrepreneurial mindset of our students, the authors began researchingcurrent psychometric tools to assist in this charge. The two assessment instruments selected forthe project were the Entrepreneurial Profile (EP10), which was recently rebranded as the BuilderProfile (BP10), and the Entrepreneurial Mindset Profile (EMP). Both surveys are facilitatedelectronically (web-based) by Gallup and Eckerd College, respectively. Our motivation is toassess if entrepreneurship programs at our institution, both didactic and co-curricular, deliver onthe hypothesis that
Paper ID #19346Creating a Psychological Profile of Successful First-Year Engineering Stu-dentsDr. Danielle D. Gagne, Alfred University Dr. Gagne is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Alfred University. Although her formal training is in discourse processing, her professional interests in learning and cognitive theory have provided op- portunities to serve as a consultant for classroom and program assessment across disciplines. In 2010 she served as Project Faculty for a U.S. Department of Education grant for Preparing Leaders in the Educa- tion and Training of the Next Generation of School Psychology Practitioners, and
Paper ID #23819Re-envisioning the Role of the Engineering Education Chapter at a Research-I Institution: Lessons from a Cross-disciplinary ModelBeau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified K-12 teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research focus is on teaching
strictly “social” or “technical.” In this paper, we briefly reviewapproaches taken to teach energy in engineering. We then examine CSPs and make the case forhow they might be used within engineering. We discuss our preliminary ideas for the course itself.The goal of this paper is to stimulate discussion within the ASEE community to improve courseeffectiveness in enhancing student learning. This project is part of a larger overall effort at theUniversity of San Diego to integrate social justice themes across the curriculum of a new generalengineering department. This paper will present our progress towards instantiating in theclassroom the broader vision laid out for our program. 1IntroductionThere is
Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a com- missioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil En- gineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President
most students, this change to a researchinstitution was positive, but there was one student who regretted coming to a research institutionwhere he felt the emphasis was on graduate research rather than undergraduate education.Although research institutions offer opportunities to engage in undergraduate research, surveydata indicates that transfer students are less likely to be engaged in these opportunities. Only14.8% of transfer students report involvement in a faculty research project, whereas 35.1% ofnon-transfer students report engaging in research. This difference is possibly due to their shorttenure at the university and the challenges of beginning as a research assistant.Transferring to a research institution also changed the instructor
Educational Psychology at the University of Alberta, conducting research in Special Education.Dr. Stephen Andrew Gadsden, University of Guelph Andrew completed his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering and Management (Business) at McMaster University in 2006. In 2011, he completed his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at McMaster in the area of estimation theory. Andrew worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre for Mechatronics and Hybrid Technology (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). He also worked as a Project Manager in the pharma- ceutical industry (Apotex Inc.) for three years. Before joining the University of Guelph in 2016, he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of
Development Division of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. Dr. Springer is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Tenure as a Closed System: Subconscious Behavioral Characteristics of Coercion, Groupthink, Bias
dissertation research project is funded by a recently awarded NSF grant to study the nuanced gender dynamics in engineering education informed by queer theory and collaborative community ethnography. She may be contacted at haverkaa@oregonstate.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Complexity of Nonbinary Gender Inclusion in Engineering CultureAbstractGender in engineering is a long-standing source of inquiry, research, outreach, and discussion asinequity in demographics and negative experiences persist in the field. Women consist of justapproximately 20% of our engineering undergraduate programs nationally, and roughly 14% ofour national professional workforce. Absent from these
Paper ID #22471The DMVP (Detect, Measure, Valuate, Propose) Method for Evaluating Iden-tified Needs During a Clinical and Technology Transfer Immersion ProgramMiss Hannah Lynn Cash, Clemson University Hannah Cash is pursuing her PhD in Bioengineering with a focus on Engineering and Science Education. Working with students through the engineering design process, Hannah has been encouraged to aid in outreach opportunities to bring Bioengineering and Design to younger students and teachers throughout the Upstate of South Carolina through work with the Perry Initiative and Project Lead the Way. The Perry Initiative works to
to Operate aDevice," Cognitive Science, 8(3) pp. 255-273.[6] Ibrahim, B., and Rebello, N. S., 2012, "Using Johnson-Laird’s Cognitive Framework ofSensemaking to Characterize Engineering Students’ Mental Representations in Kinematics,"Physics Education Research Conference, (1413) pp. 219-222.[7] Zhang, Y., 2007, "The Influence of Mental Models on UndergraduateStudents’ Searching Behavior on the Web," Information Processing and Management, 44 pp.1330-1345.[8] Frank, M., Sadeh, A., and Ashkenasi, S., 2011, "The Relationship among Systems Engineers'Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking, Project Types, and Project Success," ProjectManagement Journal, 42(5) pp. 31-41.[9] Camelia, F, Ferris, T. L. J, and Cropley, D. H, 2015, "Development and
assessment:checking and grading the labs/tutorials assignmentgiving feedback to the students on their performancegrading thesis, course papers, projectsparticipation in appeal sessionsStudent research supervision:thesis, projects, course papers co-supervision Appendix 2Needs assessment findings. TA’s reported training needs.Planning and preparation Current TAs training needs: · Course content: sometimes TAs do not have deep knowledge of the course. · Lesson planning: preparing challenging tasks and allocating appropriate time, appropriate order of activities. Preparing enough materials
reaching their full potential [7]. The National Academy ofEngineering proposes a dramatic and fundamental transformation of engineering education tobetter prepare engineering students for the future as part of the Engineer of 2020 Project [8].However, much of the literature focuses on what the instructor is going to do to deliver contentrather than focusing on how best to get a student to interact with the content and/or takeresponsibility for their own learning [9].In a traditional lecture class, an instructor serves as an information provider while the studentscommonly serve as recipients of that information. Students should, instead, be activeparticipants in the learning process. While many traditional classrooms attempt to incorporateactive
in chemical and mechanical engineering. Campbell University started the engineering program in 2016, and she is leading the design and imple- mentation of the chemical engineering curriculum at Campbell’s innovative, project based pedagogical approach. She has a PhD in chemical engineering from Washington State University, where she special- ized in miniaturizing industrial systems for applications in the undergraduate engineering classroom.Mrs. Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University First year Chemical Engineering doctoral student pursuing research on the development and dissemi- nation of low-cost, hands-on learning modules displaying heat and mass transfer concepts in a highly visual, interactive format
Effectiveness, she worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral candidate and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University. Her re- search interests focus on higher education equity and access, particularly within STEM.Dr. Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University Casey J. Ankeny, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Instruction at Northwestern University. Casey received her bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2006 and her doctorate degree in
Paper ID #25586Exploring Differences in Senior and Sophomore Engineering Students’ Men-tal Models of Common ProductsMr. Francis Jacob Fish, Georgia Institute of Technology Francis Fish is a current Ph.D. student at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He earned his Bachelors of Mechanical Engineering and MBA at the University of Delaware, in 2016 and 2017, where he conducted research for DARPA and ARL funded projects as well as private industry projects. From 2016 to 2018 he worked as a Nuclear Engineer for NAVSEA.Alexander R. Murphy, Georgia Institute of Technology Alexander Murphy is a mechanical engineering Ph.D
team at Kettering University, and to the Society of Women Engineers at Kettering.Dr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research in- terests are dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing.Prof. Stephanie G. Wettstein, Montana State University Stephanie Wettstein is an Assistant Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering department at
the flowgraphs discussed in this paper. We briefly present an assessment surveyregarding student preferences for working with SDR systems. Finally, we conclude with asummary of our findings and recommendations for other communication experiments.PreliminariesRecommended Hardware and Development EnvironmentThere is a wide selection of SDR hardware available, with many good choices for the purposespresented herein10. Given the requirements of the projects, the recommended choice is theHackRF One open-source SDR, along with ANT500 antenna11. The HackRF One offers half-duplex transceiver capability, sampling rates up to 20 MSPS, operating frequency of 1 MHz to 6GHz, USB powered connection, SMA RF connection with programmable gain, and
Adolescence, Contemporary Educational Psychology, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27418and Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. She received a Spencer Foundation Grant in 2007to examine academic prospects, interpersonal relationships, and social well-being of students in schooldistricts with a high concentration of students of Arab and Chaldean origins. Recently, she received in-ternal grants from the University of Toledo to conduct mindfulness intervention projects with elementaryschool students and preservice teachers. She is also the recipient of the Fulbright Specialist Fellowship
, Najran University I, Mohamed Khairi, my bachelor degree in computer science. I did my Masters in system science from University of Ottawa, Canada. My PH.D was in ”Master Data Management” from University of Phoenix. I have over 20 years of experience in IT industry - ten of them with Microsoft in Redmond, WA. Currently I’m assistant professor at University of Najran. In addition of teaching and Research I’m coordinator of graduation projects and field training for computer and information system college. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Global Marketplace and American Companies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)Abstract In a
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also worked on projects and consulted for a number of private companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris, and Boeing. Zalewski served as a chairman of the International Federation for Information Processing Working Group 5.4 on Industrial Software Quality, and of an International Federation of Automatic Control Technical Committee on Safety of Computer Control Systems. His major research interests include safety related, real-time embedded and cyberphysical computer systems, and computing education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A New Robotics Educational System for teaching Advanced Engineering Concepts to
-labs,the lab session can turn into a formulaic following of the lab manual instead of activelyconstructing meaningful knowledge from it.Vertically Integrated Program on Hands-On LearningThe primary mechanism for the design of new experimental platforms for the dynamics course isthe Vertically Integrated Program (VIP) Hands-On Learning Team at Georgia Tech, establishedin 2015 under an NSF grant and advised by the two authors of this paper. The VIP program givesundergraduate students course credit to pursue research and design experience on projects that lastover multiple semesters. The VIP program is offered at a national consortium of 17 colleges and[http://vip.gatech.edu/new/vip-consortium]. We established our VIP Hands-On Learning team
graduate or simply drop out1, and thenation seeks one million additional STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics)graduates2, the competence of these STEM graduates is still paramount over quantity ofgraduates in the global competitive market. As much as traditional assessment tools ofexaminations and projects address the procedural and hopefully higher-order thinking in aparticular course, we also need tools to assess the level of conceptual thinking of our students.One such tool is the concept inventory (CI) instrument that allows instructors to not onlymeasure a student’s conceptual understanding but also the misconceptions they may havedeveloped. The instrument is typically a multiple-choice question test. The questions focus
at all ranks (i.e., tenure and non-tenure track) inthe college. This occurs via targeted faculty communications and through interactions withcollege department heads.3.2.2 Staff Positions The Associate Dean leads a team that consists of an assistant director; event coordinator;media assistant and project based specialists (i.e. website developer, technical writers, etc.). Theteam strategically tailors and executes programs providing professional guidance for facultycollege-wide; works collaboratively with upper-level administrators and cross-college teams oncutting-edge programs for leadership as well as faculty development; and interacts withdepartment heads in recruiting, retention and promotion of a diverse set of faculty at all