the third track involveda relatively new pre-existing AS degree program6 that would be updated.Furthermore, one of the faculty members on the SET curriculum feasibility committee alreadyhad a $.5 million National Science Foundation (NSF) Advanced Technology Education (ATE)grant titled, “Intelligent Infrastructure Systems Education Project”, with its foremost projectgoals being curriculum development (including course material and labs) and two-year collegefaculty development activities. Today, this technology is better known as the Internet of Things(IoT) or cyber-physical systems (CPSs) technology. Cyber-physical systems technology refers toembedded control systems that are “tightly coupled” to the real world and require timing toperform
process the studentcomes to class, listens to a lecture, takes notes of key points made, reviews the materialsometime after the lecture, uses the combination of class notes, homework solutions, anddiscussions with classmates to prepare homework, complete projects, write reports and study forexams. A major component of academic student engagement occurs outside of the classroomafter the lecture. This activity is often backend loaded with increasing independent effortexpended as an exam or deadline approaches.A flipped learning environment includes the activities found in a traditional setting, but also hasadditional activities that promise to increase academic engagement. The key difference is that thestudent must come to class prepared to
Administration from Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton): Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension and Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study.Dr. Philip Michael Sadler, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Philip Sadler holds a B.S. in Physics from MIT and an Ed.D. from Harvard. He co-authored the first integrated computer and laboratory introductory calculus course in 1975. He has taught middle school mathematics, engineering, and science and both undergraduate science and graduate teaching courses at Harvard. His research
recognized, has contributed to scholarship more than 140 articles, presentations, books and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. He received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. Dr. Springer is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. He is a State of Indiana Registered domestic
. Like I just learned the universal [coefficient] theorem and how it connects to my research project. Once I understand and can apply it, then I get it. I work twice as hard [as others] to understand, but once I get it then I really see the connection and it’s much easier for me. I have to see how it’s applied in a conceptual way for me to get it.Carina: Honestly, I'm a little lazy, to be honest, especially when it doesn't really interest me. Ifit's something I have to do and I know I'm not going to like it. I guess I come to the point where,if it's too much material to where is overwhelming just to learn one simple thing, its just toomuch, and I get lazy about it and I don't even want to pursue reading it.Jasmine: I prefer to work by myself
Paper ID #14160Transportation System Based Summer Academy for Teachers (RTP, Strand4)Dr. Shashi S. Nambisan P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville Shashi Nambisan is a Professor of Civil Engineering at University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UT). Since 1989, he has led efforts on more than 165 research, education, and outreach projects that have addressed local, statewide, regional and national issues in transportation and infrastructure systems management related to policy, planning, operations, safety, and risk analysis. He has authored or co-authored more than 125 peer reviewed journal and conference publications. Along
important for womenof color. The importance of faculty-student relationships has also been explored more broadly interms of its impact on student motivation32, learning in situated (problem- and project-based)environments e.g., 33, 34, 35, and graduate education e.g., 36, 37. Similarly, Ong et al.’s 2011 reviewof the literature found that women felt that “professors played a critical role in making a STEMcareer a reality”38 for undergraduate and graduate women. Maton and Hrabowski III39 found thatinteraction with faculty, and particularly minority faculty, in and outside the classroom candecrease the feelings of isolation among minority students and contribute to positive outcomessuch as academic achievement, confidence, and persistence.“Mentoring
stressful for somecandidates, is an invaluable means for assessing candidate’s teaching skills. A scheduledpresentation is also an opportunity for regular faculty to meet adjunct candidates, before andafter the seminar, to get to know the candidate and discuss matters of mutual interest, includingpotential future collaboration. (1)Some of the adjunct faculty-particularly those who are seniors in specific industries- could offerimportant linkages for the development of industrial affiliate programs, co-op activities, summertraining opportunities, and employment opportunities for new graduates. They may also providenew ideas for senior design projects, topics for graduate theses, or render help in theestablishment of collaborative research
. x ' x ' y = C y (2) z ' p z 1 1Then, the projection from camera-centered coordinates to image coordinates is expressed by Eq. 3. x u y v
programs.AcknowledgementsFunding for this project was supplied by the National Science Foundation under award numbersEEC-1240327 and -1240328. The authors were appreciative of the time spent by participants torespond to the survey questions and by members of the P20 Motivation and Learning Lab forhelp with data coding and analysis.References 1 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman 2 Klassen, R. M., Usher, E. L., & Bong, M. (2010). Teachers’ collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 464-486. doi: 10.1080/00220970903292975 3 Hsieh, P., Sullivan, J. R., Sass, D. a., & Guerra, N. S. (2012). Undergraduate engineering students’ beliefs
. Pedagogicallymotivated design would have integrated mathematics with applications subjects to partlyout-design motivation and contextualization problems.Much of the research in mathematics in engineering education takes for granted the traditionaldesign of engineering education with mathematics courses in the first year. The aim of theresearch is then to alleviate learning problems created by the traditional design itself and thealienation of mathematics from the application fields. There is a substantial difference betweenteaching mathematics to future mathematicians and to engineering students. 6 Alternative designslike problem-based and some project-based learning integrate mathematics with engineeringsubjects to provide a context for mathematics. 7The
—such as “the concept of force” in physics (FCI1);the area of “statics” (CATS2); or “digital logic” in computer science (DLCI3). The questions arefrequently based on science and engineering education research, including research onmisconceptions and common student errors.CIs often have substantial research guiding their development. Nevertheless, validating anassessment involves explicating the proposed uses and interpretation of test scores andmarshaling evidence to support the acceptability and plausibility of particular claims about themeaning of those scores.4 As part of a larger research project we have developed an analyticframework to assess the validity of classroom assessments such as CIs.5 In developing thisframework we have conducted
Joanneum University of Applied Sciences, we offer a variety of engineering degreeprograms. The faculty considers it especially important to apply modern didactical methodslike project based learning in the degree program as early as possible to increase theefficiency of knowledge transfer and to fortify the students’ motivation to learn and to Page 26.410.6cooperate actively. Students are confronted, complementary to their regular courses, withproblems that are of a multidisciplinary nature and demand a certain degree of mathematicalproficiency7. This leads to a closer cooperation among the faculty and thus to a bettercoordination of the courses that take
writing from completing these reports.This project officially began in summer 2012 with one comprehensive goal – to help the GTAseffectively evaluate student writing in their lab courses. Knowing that a faculty member in theuniversity’s Department of Physics had developed a one-day training session for GTAs involvedwith the first-year physics sequence required of all engineering students, my first step was tomeet with him to learn the structure and results of his efforts. While the actual structure was notgoing to be applicable to our needs (the Physics assignments required much less writing and,therefore, less feedback), the program was successful in reducing the failure rate by a significantamount thanks to a GTA handbook, common rubric, and
Paper ID #16755Early English Language Assessment to Improve First-Year Student SuccessDr. Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto Penny Kinnear currently works with the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto where she focuses on the development and delivery of Professional Language support for a highly student body. She has a background in applied linguistics, second language and bilingual education and writing education. She is co-author of the book, ”Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An in- troduction through narratives.” Her current research projects include a longitudinal study on
improving STEM learning over the past fewdecades. The majority of such projects has been focused on improving the learning of subjectcontent and student success through, for example, improving classroom teaching [e.g., refs.6, 7],curricular reform [e.g., ref.8], or providing more and better design experiences [e.g., refs.9, 10].Little attention, however, has been given to the incorporation of reflection to promote learningand the experience of learning. The psychologist Ellen J. Langer exposes the pitfall of a lack ofreflection11: Learning without being mindful sometimes leads to rote exercising that could buildbad habits and prevent learners from seeing how to apply knowledge learned in one context toother, very different ones. As Lang12 points
, she employs active learning techniques and project-based learning. Her previous education research, also at Stanford, focused on the role of cultural capital in science education. Her current interests include en- gineering students’ development of social responsibility and the impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Formative Peer Assessment of TeachingIntroductionTeaching assessment in American institutions of higher education is often viewed as a high-stakes endeavor with the potential to impact faculty promotion and tenure decisions. Despite theimportant role teaching assessment plays in a
, as well as the aesthetics of speed and performance in the automobile industry.The ninth week of the course examined aspects of industrialization and project management,with the continuing dual perspective of the artist and engineer. Course participants were firstintroduced to the processes and principles of mass and lean production. As the week progressed,the class considered a variety of topics, including 3rd century BC Greek innovations in the massproduction of decorative mold-made ceramic bowls and the ways in which the massive projectsof artists Jean-Claude and Christo can be viewed as examples of corporate management and themanagement of populations.The other weeks of the course were built along similar lines, with each week exploring
, 7, 8] in order toexamine aspects of the “weeding out” process. This perspective is part of a broaderproject in the social sciences over the past several decades, a project that explores howboth persons and forms of social organization are constituted through social practice.Among the major aims of this work has been to challenge conceptions of culture as astable and relatively unproblematic body of knowledge that is transmitted from onegeneration to the next. Instead, culture is seen as a dynamic process in which humanagents create meaning by drawing on cultural forms as they act in social and materialcontexts; in so doing people produce themselves and others as certain kinds of culturallylocated persons while at the same time reproducing
Immediate Past-President of WEPAN, was PI on Tech’s NSF ADVANCE grant, a member of the mathematical and statistical so- cieties Joint Committee on Women, and advises a variety of women and girl-serving STEM projects and organizations. She is a past Vice President of ASEE and current Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Dr. Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas Kim LaScola Needy is Dean of the Graduate School and International Education at the University of Arkansas. Prior to this appointment she was Department Head and 21st Century Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Pittsburgh
learnersmove from topic to topic, managing a range of personal learning projects rather than a set, formalcurriculum; and d) mobile learners move in and out of engagement with technology. Sharples, etal., as a further step in postulating a theory of mobile learning, set forth characteristics thatdistinguish mobile learning when compared to other types of learning and make it worth specialconsideration. They acknowledged that considerable learning occurs outside classrooms. Theydocumented contemporary accounts of ubiquitous use of personal and shared technologies thatenable successful learning. Conclusions that they reached included: a) it is the learner rather thanthe technology that is mobile; b) learning is interwoven with other activities as part
intellectually may prevent them from creating an effective solution.The goal of our project was to create narratives (case-studies) that students could understand,relate to, and be engaged with, so they can be used as the contexts to learn problem-solving andprocedural programming skills in the flowcharting component of the PS course. Since studentsknow what is relevant to them, we selected a group of five students majoring in ComputerSystems to help us develop those narratives.The use of student-developed narratives affected performance in different flowcharting structures(sequence, selection, repetition) differently. Overall, the data suggests that the use of case studieswas beneficial for increasing performance in flowcharting assessments using
Engineering & Me- chanics department, serving as a professional academic advisor to over 550 students. In January 2012, she became the Program Manager for Assessment & Retention for the College of Engineering, coordinating accreditation efforts for 12 ABET-accredited undergraduate programs and an ACCE accredited program. She created the Academic Center for Engineers (ACE) in the Spring of 2013 to provide tutoring support for engineering courses. She was promoted to Associate Director for Assessment & Retention Projects in July 2015. Kristin has completed Drexel’s Supervisory Certificate Program and ABET’s IDEAL Scholar program and is currently working toward completion of an M.S. in Human Resource Development
, grouping them into six topic areas that would drive a possible major change to Criterion 3.• This possible change would also serve to align ABET criteria more closely with Washington Accord graduate attributes referencing project management and finance• The Criterion 3 task force presented their findings to the full EAC in July 2013 and their work was transferred to the EAC Criteria Committee 32Process for Evaluation of Criteria 3 & 5 (5)• In July 2014, the EAC posted language articulating a potential revision to Criterion 3 on the ABET website and circulated this to constituent groups for informal comment in the fall of 2014• More than 100 comments were received from
engineering as well as exciting students through open- ended projects and applications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Framework for an Engineering Reasoning Test and Preliminary Results.The work reported here describes the development and initial testing of a framework to helpassess the broad understanding of technology by individuals who are not specifically educated asengineers. It is generally accepted that technology is essential to our current lifestyles and well-being, and the importance of engineering to economic prosperity is commonly acknowledged.However limited work has been done determine the extent to which undergraduates possess ageneral understanding of the principles, products
University Dr. Colleen Janeiro teaches engineering fundamentals such as Introduction to Engineering, Materials and Processes, and Statics. Her teaching interests include development of solid communication skills and enhancing laboratory skills.Dr. William E. Howard, East Carolina University William E (Ed) Howard is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He was previously a faculty member at Milwaukee School of Engineering, as well as as a design and project engineer with Thiokol Corporation, Spaulding Composites Company, and Sta-Rite Industries.Dr. Patrick F. O’Malley, Benedictine College Patrick O’Malley teaches in the Mechanical Engineering program at Benedictine College
general, I find working on engineering projects interesting 0.88 Interest I like doing engineering 0.84 (α=0.88) I am interested in my engineering work 0.78 I am interested in learning more about engineering 0.68 Research Obtaining research articles relevant to my research from 0.70 Competence library systems or online (α= 0.78) Keeping up to date on research topic(s) 0.59 Replicating key findings in journal papers 0.56 Understanding research trends and topic(s) 0.52 Research Interest
technical areas of civil engineering and analyze and interpret the resulting data explain basic concepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership analyze issues in professional ethics explain the importance of professional licensureTable 3: Observed Distribution of Hours by B.S. Degree Program Type Math & Basic Science Credit Average Average (% minimum maximum Std. Dev. Program (hours) total hours)1 (hours) (hours) (hours) COV (%) Civil 35.55 27.47 32.00
of the social high-speeddevelopment. In the same sense, the curriculum arrangement of engineering majors inundergraduate level practical teaching mainly consists of cognition practice, productivepractice, graduation practice, curriculum design and graduation project, among others.1 Beingthe significant component of practical teaching process carried out by engineeringuniversities, productive practice is recognized as the effective measure for consolidating anddeepening the professional basic theory, boosting engineering students’ abilities to linktheory with practice and to deal with practical problems, as well as optimizing the students’engineering practical abilities.Productive practice is a course which closely integrates classroom
Wednesday Friday Traditional Reading assignment Lecture Lecture Lecture Blended Online reading Lecture Worksheets, group projects, case studies, or homework time. assignment Held in active learning space working with peers and instructors.To answer the question, Do students benefit from the blended course?, we compared exam scoresfrom the traditional and blended courses. To answer the question, How do students progress onBloom’s taxonomy in the blended course?, we used worksheets that served both as learningactivities and measurements of Bloom’s taxonomy progress. We focused on two concepts thatstudents typically have