. Norton & Company, 2024.[10] O. Gambelin. Responsible AI: Implement an Ethical Approach in Your Organization. New York, New York: Kogan Page, 2024.[11] NSPE. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers,” 2025. [Online]. Available http://https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[12] University of Kentucky. “AI Course Policy Examples,” 2025. [Online]. Available https://celt.uky.edu/ai-course-policy-examples[13] E. Mollick. “AI has a strategy,” 2022. [Online]. Available https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/ai-has-a-strategy[14] A. Narayanan and S. Kapoor. AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What it Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference. Princeton University Press, 2024.[15] M. Wheatley
what extent How well did the How well satisfied regularly were the did assignments exam(s) measure were the were have you objectives of contribute to your how much you course you with attended the course overall learning learned in the objectives this this SECTION RATE defined? in the course? course? achieved? course? class? Excellent 46.9% 50.0% 25.0% 34.4% 37.5% 87.5% Good 40.6% 31.3% 43.8% 40.6% 37.5
-Miguel. Implementing the sustainable development goals in university higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(6):1769–1776, 2023. 4 S. Lee and D. Shapiro. Completing college: National and state report with longitudinal data dashboard on six- and eight-year completion rates. (signature report 22),. Technical report, National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA, 2023. 5 A. Valero and J. Van Reenen. The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68:53–67, 2019. 6 M. Hanson. College Graduation Statistics. 2023. EducationData.org. 7 B. Yoder. ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation
: challenges and strategies. 2022. [7] Dorottya B Noble, Simon GJ Mochrie, Corey S O’Hern, Thomas D Pollard, and Lynne Regan. Promoting convergence: The integrated graduate program in physical and engineering biology at Yale university, a new model for graduate education. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(6):537–549, 2016. [8] Alice Y Kolb and David A Kolb. Learning styles and learning spaces: A review of the multidisciplinary application of experiential learning theory in higher education. In Learning styles and learning: A key to meeting the accountability demands in education, pages 45–91. Nova Science Publishers New York, NY, 2006. [9] Convergence Accelerator, Dec 2021. URL https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives
andscience in their degree programs, connections with local artists and community members, andconnections with local, state and federal legislatures.Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by the University of New Mexico Grand Challengeon Sustainable Water Resources.References[1] D. Buffalari et al., “Integrating Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum: 1. Early Research Experiences and Training,” J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. A52–A63, Dec. 2020.[2] S. Pierszalowski, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, and L. Marlow, “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under- Researched Factors for Students of Color,” Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, Art. no. 9
participation andprofessional development rather than assuming that This HSI Pilot Project: Fostering Hispanic Achievement inprofessional skills have already been developed by graduation Computer Science and Engineering with Affinity Research(Buket et al., 2023). To show the university's commitment to Group Model (Project Achieve) is supported by the Nationalthe initiative beyond grant funding, the newly developed Science Foundation under Award Number FAIN-2150048.course, Introduction to Scientific Research. was supported by Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendationsa $3,000 donation from the School of Engineering to expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do
Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.", Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 103-120, 2005.[6] S. A. Ambrose and C. H. Amon, "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical EngineeringCourse at Carnegie Mellon University", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, pp. 173-181,1997.[7] L. Gentiles, L. Caudill, M. Fetea, et al. "Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries in the FirstYear: A New Introductory Integrated Science Course for STEM Majors." Journal of CollegeScience Teaching, vol. 41, pp. 44-50, 2012.[8] Catamount Data Center, “Program-Level Enrollment, 2011-2021”, University of Vermont,Office of Institutional Research [Online]. Available: https://www.uvm.edu/oir/catamount-data[Accessed Sept. 3, 2021].[9] Center for Project-Based Learning
, Atlanta, GA. vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1-18, June, 2013.[10] N.J. Mourtos, “The nuts and bolts of cooperative learning in engineering,” Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94, San Jose, CA, USA.[11] Motaref, S., “The Evaluation of Different Learning Tools in Flipped Mechanics of Materials”, 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Virtual Conference, paper no. 35317, Montreal, Quebec, June 20-24, 2020. https://peer.asee.org/35317.
Academy, 2010.[4] National Center for Education Statistics, “Table 306.20. Total fall enrollment in degree- granting postsecondary institutions, by level and control of institution and race/ethnicity or nonresident status: Selected years, 1976 through 2022.” 2023. Accessed: Aug. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_306.20.asp[5] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges,” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, DOE-NASEM--0016218, 1494822, Jan. 2018. doi: 10.2172/1494822.[6] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year‐Long Faculty
, 2002. [9] Houghton Mifflin. Project-based learning: Background knowledge & theory, 2003. http://www.college.hmco.com/education/pbl/background.html.[10] M. Fasli and M. Michalakopoulos. Supporting active learning through game-like exercises. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pages 730–734. IEEE, 2005. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2005.159.[11] R. Lawrence. Teaching data structures using competitive games. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(4):459–466, 2004. doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.825053.[12] S. Lam, P. Yim, J. Law, and R. Cheung. The effects of classroom competition on achievement motivation. In Proc. of Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, 2001.[13
wouldalso be valuable. Lastly, future research could explore how giving students the autonomy toselect their scenarios influences their motivation, engagement, and overall learning experience.References[1] J. D. Ortega-Alvarez, C. Wallwey, B. D. Chambers, D. Newcomb, and D. Gray, “Stakeholder-Informed Review of a First-Year Engineering Program,” Montreal, Canada, Jun. 22, 2025.[2] B. D. Chambers, H. Murzi, M. James, D. Gray, and H. M. Matusovich, “Course Development in a First Year Engineering Program: The Interplay of Autonomy, Peer Relationships, and Content,” development, vol. 10, p. 11, 2021.[3] M. Seren Smith, S. Warnes, and V. Anne, “Scenario-based learning,” in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL
. doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0100-0.[7] J. Flaig, "How AI is already changing engineering – and the role of the engineer,” Engineering News, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, April 18, 2023. Available: https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/feature-how-ai-is-already-changing- engineering-and-the-role-of-the-engineer[8] S. D. Mohaghegh, “Ethics of artificial intelligence plays a role in engineering,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, October 4, 2021. Available: https://jpt.spe.org/ethics-of-artificial- intelligence-plays-a-role-in-engineering[9] National Academy of Engineering (NAE), Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.[10] National Academy of
Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(2), 04017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000360Cardon, M. S., Gregoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.003Cox, D. (2017). Development of Hands-on Laboratory Resources for Manufacturing Engineering. Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.Da Silva, G., De Barros, M., & Costa, H. (2015). Entrepreneurship in Engineering Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6A), 1701–1710
professional skills in engineering job advertisements. Journal of Engineering Education, 2024, Vol. 113, Issue 2, pp. 251–279.[10] Y. Y. Koh and P. L. Chong, “Incorporating student feedback into curriculum review according to outcome based education philosophy,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 541-556, 2019.[11] N. B. Robbins and R. M. Heiberger, Plotting Likert and other rating scales: Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Statistical Meeting, Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 2011, Alexandria, Virginia. pp. 1058–1066.[12] S. E. Harpe, “How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data,” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Vol. 7, Issue 6
). Annenberg Institute at BrownUniversity[28] Xu, Zeyu, and Ben Backes. (2022). Linkage Between Fields of Concentration in HighSchool Career-Technical Education and College Majors. (EdWorkingPaper: 22 -613). Retrievedfrom Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/h0ab-e718[29] Poiner, Jessica. “CTE and Non-Cognitive Skills: A Match Made in Heaven?” The ThomasB. Fordham Institute, The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 16 Feb. 2008,[30] Stringfield, S., & Stone, J. R. (2017). The Labor Market Imperative for CTE: Changes andChallenges for the 21st Century. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(2), 166–179.https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1302209[31] Lindner, Attila, et al. “The Employment and Distributional Impacts of Nationwide
ball must be directed down different paths.• Hopper: While a single collection hopper is not strictly required, all 12 bearing balls must eventually re-converge onto the same path at the location of release. The location of release is synonymous with the location where the bearing balls are cycled to the state of highest potential energy, and where the cycle rate is measured.• Complex Feature: Separate and distinct from the cycle and sort function(s), there must be a complex feature along 1 or both of the travel paths that obviously changes the direction and velocity of the bearing ball. No two teams may utilize the same complex feature.Note that the list of parameters are representative
. Balgopal, and L. Sample McMeeking, “Building professional identity: STEMteacher educators' growth through community,” International Journal of Science and MathematicsEducation, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1–19, 2021.[8] R. L. Kajfez and H. M. Matusovich, "The role of identity in understanding graduate teachingassistants: A mixed methods analysis," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36,no. 3, pp. 1049-1061, 2020.[9] S. E. DeChenne, L. G. Enochs, and M. Needham, “Science, technology, engineering, andmathematics graduate teaching assistants teaching self-efficacy,” Journal of the Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 102–123, 2012.[10] X. Zhou, L. Shu, Z. Xu, and Y. Padrón, “The effect of professional development on in
Education, 65(1):40–45, 2022.[15] Rachel S. Smith. Guidelines for authors of learning objects. The New Media Consortium, 2004.[16] Inc Instructure. Canvas. Online, March 2025. https://www.instructure.com/canvas/about [Online] (Accessed Mar. 2025).[17] Aytac Gogus. Learning Objectives, pages 1950–1954. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2012.[18] Peter J. Clarke, Debra L. Davis, Ingrid A. Buckley, Geoff Potvin, Mandayam Thirunarayanan, and Edward L. Jones. Combining learning and engagement strategies in a software testing learning environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 22(2), November 2021.[19] Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean T. MacGregor. What is Collaborative Learning? In A.S. Goodsell, M.R. Maher, and V. Tinto, editors, Collaborative
theLinkages*. Res High Educ 47, 1–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9[3] F. E. Causer, M. Baranowski, A. V. Masters, and A. M. Williams, "Quiet eye training: Reviewand future directions," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 840180, 2022. [Online].Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840180/full.[4] Cerbin, W. “Improving student learning from lectures.” Scholarship of Teaching andLearning in Psychology, 4(3), 151–163. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000113[5] Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. Student engagement inhigh school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2),158–176. (2003) https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq
Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 617-639, 2010.[9] T. R. Kelley and J. G. Knowles, "A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 11, 2016.[10] A. J. Meadows and J. S. Levenson, "Social responsibility in science," Science and Public Policy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49-55, 1975.
.[28] Kapor Center. Culturally responsive-sustaining computer science education: A framework, 2021. URL https://kaporfoundation.org/publications/.[29] OpenAI. ChatGPT, 2024. URL https://chatgpt.com.[30] Ryan L Boyd, Ashwini Ashokkumar, Sarah Seraj, and James W Pennebaker. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Technical report, University of Texas at Austin, 2022. URL https://www.liwc.app/.[31] Matthew L. Newman, James W. Pennebaker, Diane S. Berry, and Jane M. Richards. Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5):665–675, May 2003. ISSN 0146-1672, 1552-7433. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005010. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177
their petroleum partners [8]. The percent of total car sales in the US of EV’s onthe roads has increased with time from 0.2% in 2011 to 3.2-4.6% in 2021 to 7.5% in 2024 and isexpected to have a “strong acceleration” within the next decade: “S&P Global Mobility forecastselectric vehicle sales in the United States could reach 40 percent of total passenger car sales by2030” [4] [6]. EV’s are not solely increasing in the US. EV’s are also drastically increasing inChina and Europe: “In China, the number of new electric car registrations reached 8.1 million in2023, increasing by 35% relative to 2022 … [and] [i]n Europe, new electric car registrationsreached nearly 3.2 million in 2023, increasing by almost 20% relative to 2022” [11] [12]. TheUS
Practices forAssessment Paper presented at 2008 GSW, unknown. 10.18260/1-2-370-38553[8] J. K. Estell. A Heuristic Approach to Assessing Student Outcomes Using Performance Vectors.Proc. of the 2012 ABET Symposium, St. Louis, MO (2012).[9] Tahmina, Q., & Kelley, K., & Ulstad, A. T. (2021, July), Building an Effective ABET ETACAssessment Program from the Ground Up Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual AnnualConference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2—36765[10] Tahmina, Q., & Kelley, K., & Furterer, S. L. (2023, June), Implementing an Effective ABETAssessment Program for a New Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology Degree Paperpresented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. 10.18260
: National Academies Press,2021.[3] A. Johnson and T. Williams, "Mentorship as a catalyst for STEM success: A longitudinalstudy," J. High. Educ. Policy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 78–92, 2023.[4] K. Lee and P. Thompson, "Enhancing self-efficacy in STEM through structured mentorshipprograms," Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 201–215, 2023.[5] M. Rodriguez, J. Smith, and R. Taylor, "The impact of research experiences on STEMretention: A systematic review," J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 891–912, 2022.[6] S. Kim, J. Lee, and H. Park, "Developing STEM identity through mentorship: Insights fromunderrepresented students," J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 890–905, 2021.[7] X. Chen, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang, "The role of undergraduate research
Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer ….2. Gallagher, S., et al., Implementing Integrated Project-Based Learning Outcomes in a 21st- Century Environmental Engineering Curriculum in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2023, ASEE Conferences: Baltimore, MD.3. Pierrakos, O., et al. On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. in 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2009.4. Lockhart, M.E. and K. Rambo-Hernandez, Investigating engineering identity development and stability amongst first-year engineering students: a person-centred approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2024. 49(3): p. 411-433.5
Engineering Education, 30 (1), pp. 6-13, 2014.[2] M. A. Dettman and W. L. Collett, "Multidisciplinary engineering student projects," 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--18899.[3] N. Hotaling, B. B. Fasse, L. F. Bost, C. D. Hermann, and C. R. Forest, "A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, pp. 630-656, 2012.[4] R. A. Bugg and W. Collins, “Safety training for students engaged in service learning projects,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. 10.18260/1-2-- 30947.[5] M. Anderton and S. Foroudastan, “Addressing and implementing a safety plan for intercollegiate
CollegesSPF Special Focus Institutions Size VS Very small (FTE<1000) SM Small (FTE from 1000-2999) MD Medium (FTE from 3000 - 9999) LG Large (FTE >10000)References[1] J. Farison “ASEE MECC: The Great Story of a Successful Member Initiative,” inProceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference (https://peer.asee.org/15349).[2] S. H. Vander Leest, “Advocating
Computer Science Education Research Conference, ser. CSERC ’11. Heerlen, NLD: Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Apr. 2011, pp. 21–31.[16] N. Nagappan, L. Williams, M. Ferzli, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, C. Miller, and S. Balik, “Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 359–362, Jan. 2003. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/792548.612006[17] K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. Van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Gren- ning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, R. Jeffries et al., “Manifesto for agile software development,” 2001.[18] T. Dyba and T. Dingsoyr, “What do we know about agile software development?” IEEE software, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 6–9, 2009.[19] M. Brhel, H. Meth, A
Harkness, University of Florida My bio is here.Andreas Enqvist ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Modernization of Nuclear Engineering Undergraduate CurriculumIntroductionNuclear engineering is a well-established field of engineering in the United States, withundergraduate programs stretching back to the 1950's. Among such long-established disciplines,however, nuclear engineering undergraduate programs involve several unusual aspects: • The number of students per cohort is much smaller than in other programs (e.g., mechanical or electrical engineering). • The number of faculty is much smaller than in other programs. • There is no firm consensus in the names and content areas of