field studies are needed for biology labs. Water analysisinstruments for use in the field and in the laboratory are essential for biology. For cell biologychromatographic apparati are essential to support fractionation. The following chromaticapparati are needed: (a) partition (paper), (b) thin-layer, and (c) column.Instruments are needed for use in chemistry to prepare materials and process samples. Topromote laboratory safety, eye wash stations, chemical storage cabinets and exhaust hoods withutilities are needed. Stills are essential to generate laboratory grade water for use in bothchemistry and biology.Models and PC software are needed for geometry courses so students can better grasp three-dimensional geometry for their pre-calculus
. 152 –160.[16] Swamy, N., Kuljaca, O. & Lewis, F. L. (2002). Internet-based educational control systems lab using NetMeeting. IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp.152-160.[17] Gillet, D., Geoffroy, F, Zeramdini, K., Ngyuen, A. V., Rekik, Y. & Piquet, Y. (2003). The cockpit: An effective metaphor for remote experimentation in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, Special Issue on the Remote Access/Distance Learning Laboratories, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 389-397.[18] Shen, H. et al. (1999). Conducting laboratory experiments over the Internet. IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 180-185.[19] Zoghi, B., Rouse, R., Camacho, M. & Morgan, J. (1998
divergent phase and a rationalefor making additional choices in order to find the optimal solution, a concept we introduced asConvergent Design. In our framework, Convergent Thinking was described for students asfollows: In brief, convergent thinking may be thought to include (a) the generation of constructive design ideas that work within the constraints and (b) analysis and problem solving that assesses a particular design’s efficacy.Convergent Thinking, in our framework, involved Analysis and Problem Solving, which wereseparated along a thin line. Convergent Problem Solving was discussed as the textbook-typehomework problems with which engineering students were most familiar. The problems areextremely well defined and
presentations by Classroom/kit teachers management B. The Robotics MethodOur overall goal in the course is to provide teachers with materials to help them engage theirmiddle-school students in thinking about engineering problems, and to integrate engineering and Page 12.86.6technology into after-school programs and eventually in-school curriculum. This programaddresses a number of the MA State Curriculum Frameworks for Technology/Engineering inGrades 6-8. Students are required to pursue engineering questions and technological solutionsthat emphasize research and
Alternative Energy Initiative website - http://www.lcc.edu/energy. [4] Lawrence Technological University Alternative Energy website -http://www.ltu.edu/engineering/mechanical/alt_energy.asp. [5] Pollard, C. and Pollard R., “Research Priorities in Educational Technology: A Delphi Study,” J. of Researchon Technology in Education, December 2004. [6] Rockwell, K., Furgason, J., and Marx, D., “Research and Evaluation Needs for Distance Education: ADelphi Study,” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, V. III, # III, 2000. [7] Scott, D., Washer, B., Wright, M., “A Delphi Study to Identify Recommended Biotechnology Competenciesfor First-Year/Initially Certified Technology Education Teachers,” J. of Technology Education, V. 17, # 2
Annual Page 12.409.8Conf. and Exhibition, Albuquerque, NM, June 2001. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/00638_2001.PDF3. S. McNamara, M. Cyr, C. Rogers, and B. Bratzel, “LEGO brick sculptures and robotics in education,” Proc. ofthe ASEE Annual Conf. and Exhibition, Charlotte, NC, June 1999. http://www.asee.org/acPapers/99conf348.pdf4. J. Wakeman-Linn and A. Perry, “A proposal to incorporate LEGO® Mindstorms™ into an introduction toengineering course,” Proc. of ASEE/SEFI/TUB International Colloquium, Berlin, Germany, Oct. 2001.http://www.asee.org/conferences/international/papers/upload/A-Proposal-to-Incorporate-Lego-Mindstorms-into-an
Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 20052. “Staying in Engineering: Impact of a Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention,” Daniel W. Knight, Lawrence E. Carlson and Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 20033. “Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Analysis of Recent Research,” V. Tinto, Rev. Ed. Research, 45, No. 1, pp 89-125, 1975.4. “Adapting the MIT Stirling Engine Project at the University of Idaho, A land Grant Institution,” Nathaniel B. Allen, J. Matthew Cunnignton, Levi J. Westra, Michael K. Klien, Edwin M. Odom, and R.E. Smelser, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education
AC 2007-691: A DEPARTMENTAL REFORM STRATEGY AND THE RESULTANTNATIONAL MODEL FOR AN UNDERGRADUATE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMSandra Furterer, East Carolina University Sandra L. Furterer, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Distribution and Logistics Program, in the College of Technology and Computer Science at East Carolina University. Dr. Furterer has extensive industry experience in Quality, Six Sigma, and Information Systems Analysis. Dr. Furterer's research and teaching interests are Six Sigma, Quality Management, Lean Enterprise, and Engineering Education.Sandra Furterer, University of Central FloridaAbeer Sharawi, University of Central Florida Abeer Sharawi is a Ph.D
aggregated synchronized multimedia)The software has vast facilities for providing educational courses, particularly holdingspecialized courses for on-the-job-training for employees and being analyzed and initiallydesigned based on the SCORM electronic education standards. A- To lower the need to establish educational spaces and at the same time, to obtain quantity development in education facilities B- Better use of professors and specialists in each profession C- Decrease in education cost per capita with respect to the centralized use of educational facilitlies D- Saving in costs and loss of time for in-bound and out-bound trips (trainers and instructors of the course) E- Decrease in depreciation of
Emirates University in Al-Ain, UAE where he helped set up an innovative introductory engineering curriculum. Dr. Tanyel received his B. S. degree in electrical engineering from Bo?aziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey in 1981, his M. S. degree in electrical engineering from Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA in 1985 and his Ph. D. in biomedical engineering from Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA in 1990. Page 12.382.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Comparing the Walsh Domain to the Fourier Domain with a LabVIEW Based Communication Systems ToolkitAbstractAlthough the
Concepts, copyright 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2. cxlib website, http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/jmhill/projects/cxlib/index.htm 3. CodeWarrior Tutorial, http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/jmhill/suppnotes/CodeW12/index.htm 4. Gordon Doughman, Programming the M68HC12 Family, copyright 2000 by Gordon Doughman, published by Annabooks. 5. Steven F. Barrett and Daniel J. Pack, Embedded Systems Design and Applications with the 68HC12 and HCS12, copyright 2005 by Pearson Education, Inc. 6. John B. Peatman, Design with PIC Microcontrollers, copyright 1998 by Prentice-Hall, Inc, a division of Simon & Schuster. 7. Jean J. Labrosse, MicroC/OS-II, The Real-Time Kernel, copyright 1999 by Miller Freeman, Inc
patient outcomes. Page 12.502.11i Hwang RW, Herndon JH. (2007). The Business Case for Patient Safety. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Schmidek, J M. Weeks, W. B. (2005). What Do We Know About Financial Returns on Investments iniiPatient Safety? A Literature Review. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 31(12),690-699. S. Leatherman, et al. (2003). The Business Case for Quality: Case Studies and Analysis. Health Affairs,iii22(2), 17-30. L. Feazell and J. Marren. (2003). The Quality-Value Proposition in Health Care. Journal of Health CareivFinance, 30(2), 1-29
tutorial. Quick Test 2: Motor Model Circuit Calculations These variables are defined so that the Mathcad units system will work with the motor equations. They are used throughout the book. rpm := 1 pole := 1 Ω := ohm A three phase, 10 hp, 60 Hz, six pole, wye connected 240V induction motor is modeled in Figure 2. It has the following circuit parameters: R1 := 0.294 ⋅ Ω X1 := 0.453 ⋅ Ω f := 60 ⋅ Hz R2 := 0.139 ⋅ Ω X2 := 0.189 ⋅ Ω Xm := 12.79 ⋅ Ω Using the method described above find: a.) the motor stator current magnitude and phase shift b.) the rotor current when the machine has a shaft speed of 1176
Earth Day Teach-In: A Model for Industry, Community, and Education Collaboration Ken Barnard, Aviation Greg Stephens, Arts, Science, Business Raju Dandu, Engineering Technology College of Technology and Aviation Kansas State University at SalinaAbstractEarth Day is a driving force for environmental awareness around the world. It can also be aneffective event for educating the 21st Century Community and the Engineer community becauseengineers and technologists will play a vital role in civic engagement, green economicdevelopment, and global
are understood. In application toEngineering 149, the rubric would utilize a Likert scale from 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 5 (Excellent), althougha three point scale could also be used. Six aspects would be measured in each entry: A. understanding of the subject matter B. how well issues are addressed and understood C. appropriate placement of the subject in historical/cultural context D. how well connections are supported E. how well given questions are answered F. how thorough the discussion is and how logical the arguments areThe following is the full rubric with which to assess each learning journal entry in Engineering 149: 5: Excellent Student shows excellent
matters ‚ Assessment of students ‚ Program approval, monitoring and review ‚ Career education, information and guidance ‚ Placement learning ‚ Recruitment and admissions The QAA can be compared with the ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Engineering Technology) of the US 30. There are a number of differences between theABET and QAA: a) ABET only deals with engineering and engineering technology, whereQAA manages all branches of higher education; b) QAA deals with both the undergraduateand postgraduate programs, when ABET deals only with the undergraduate programs; c)All UK higher qualifications must be accredited by the QAA, while ABET’s accreditationis optional; d) ABET now practices outcome based
AC 2007-1309: IDENTIFYING IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE HIGHSCHOOL–COLLEGE BRIDGE FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS: A FOCUSGROUP APPROACHValerie Galarza, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez Valerie Galarza is a 4th year Industrial Engineering student at the UPRM participating in an undergraduate research opportunities program related to engineering education. Valerie is an officer of the Institute of Industrial Engineers student chapter and INFORMS.Mariela Figueroa, UPRMUniversity of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez Mariela Figueroa is a 4th year Industrial Engineering student at the UPRM participating in an undergraduate research opportunities program related to engineering education. Mariela is an officer of
packets were delivered to the girls through our high school contacts at Big Page 12.707.7Bear and Bayview High Schools and through U.S. mail for Oceanview girls who came late intothe study. Each envelope contained a cover letter from the school contact (Appendix A) twocopies of a letter to parents or guardians that doubled as a consent form (Appendix B) and a flyerdesigned to catch the girl’s attention (Appendix C). The flyer highlighted the incentives forparticipation including free food and drinks, a party, and a raffle for a computer and other prizes.Big Bear and Bayview girls were asked to return their consent forms to the school office
).” Page 12.736.19• “It is one of about four keys to success. Others include industry involvement, lab content, and student quality of preparation.” • “Technical currency is not by itself a significant determining factor. It helps relating subject matter to today, but student learning is dependent on the key classical factors: Classroom management, delivery, classroom interaction, and of course the student sensitivity and positive personal impact of the instructor.” • “Our university and department provide all resources for professional development.” • “Up keeping the technical currency of faculty is very important as new technologies emerge.”Appendix B lists the participants’ comments for the 2003
,consumers, food safety and the environment. Rome: FAO, 2001.6 Fox, M.W. Bringing life to ethics: global bioethics for a human society. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork, 2001.7 Nottingham, S. Eat your genes: how genetically modified food is entering our diet. New York Stephen Nottingham, 2003.8 Lurquin, P.F. High tech harvest: understanding genetically modified food plants. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002.9 Fleddermann, C. B. Engineering Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2004. Page 12.854.1210 Clancy, E. A., P. Quinn, and J. E. Miller, “Assessment of a Case Study Laboratory to
Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, Innovation Associates, Inc., Reston, Virginia 2000.16. Pacific Partners Consulting Group. “An Economic Impact Study of Stanford University”. Stanford. CA. 1997.17. Jansen, C. and D. Jamison. “Technology Transfer and Economic Growth. Salt Lake City, Utah.” The University of Utah. 1999.18. Gartner, William B. “What Are We Talking About When We Talk About Entrepreneurship ?” Journal of Business Venturing, (5), 1990 pp. 1519. D’Cruz, Carmo and P. Vaidyanathan “A Holistic Approach to Teaching Engineering Entrepreneurship and Technology Commercialization” - Proc. of ASEE National Conference, Nashville, Jun 200320. Kirzner, Israel. “The Entrepreneurial Process” in The Environment for
mock interviews. Other advantages include a) Link between Dean’s office and engineeringacademic departments; b) A great feeling of making a difference in the development of futureengineers and meeting company diversity goals; c) Personal growth and development throughbetter understandings of diversity issues; and d) Teaming with staff, students, and corporationson local events/sponsorshipsChallenges in Minority Engineering Student RecruitmentChallenges include the following: • Increased Minority Hiring goals from the federal government • Continued reduction in students pursuing engineering degrees • Not enough diversity candidates attending engineering programs or institutions • Not enough infrastructure to support growth and
AC 2007-1498: FACULTY WITH INDUSTRIAL EXPERIENCE BRING A REALWORLD PERSPECTIVE TO ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDonald Richter, Eastern Washington University DONALD C. RICHTER obtained his B. Sc. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He holds a Professional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manger in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include project management, robotics /automation and air pollution dispersion modeling.William Loendorf, Eastern Washington University WILLIAM R. LOENDORF obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of
AC 2007-1659: DEVELOPING AN UNDERSTANDING OF INSTRUCTORS’DESIGN LEARNING PHILOSOPHIES IN A SERVICE-LEARNING CONTEXTCarla Zoltowski, Purdue University CARLA B. ZOLTOWSKI is Education Administrator of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her BSEE and MSEE from Purdue University, and is currently pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.William Oakes, Purdue University WILLIAM C. OAKES is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University and the Interim-Director of the EPICS Program. He is a co-recipient of the 2005 National Academy of
AC 2007-1776: MODELING, SIMULATION, MONITORING AND VERIFICATIONIN A DESIGN-BUILD RESIDENTIAL HOUSING PROJECTP. Paxton Marshall, University of Virginia P. Paxton Marshall, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs, has been active in developing multidisciplinary design courses to help students experience the joy of engineering and develop their creative capacities. He was engineering advisor for the UVA solar house project, an energy independent house designed and built by students. The house placed second overall, and first in the Design and Livability and Energy Balance categories, in the 2002 DOE Solar Decathlon. Marshall is currently
. van Haneghan, B. Johnson, E.J. Newman, and S. van Eck, 2001, “A report on service-learning andengineering design: Service-learning’s effect on students learning engineering design in ‘Introduction to MechanicalEngineering’”, Int. J. Engng. Ed., 17(1), 30-39.3 - Pritchard, M.S., 2000, “Service-learning and engineering ethics”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(3), 413-4224 - Zydney, AL, JS Bennett, A Shahid, and KW Bauer, 2002, “Impact of undergraduate research experience inengineering”, Jour of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151-157.5 - Lewis, C., S. Magleby, and R. Todd, 2006, “Learning to design products in environments with limited designtraditions”, Int. J. Engng Ed, 22(3), 591-597.6 - Fernando, S., N. Murali, and S. Bhushan, 2006, “The
AC 2007-803: MEASURING STUDENT ABILITY TO WORK ONMULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS: BUILDING AND TESTING A RUBRICCarolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University. She works on various curriculum and instruction projects including instructional development for faculty and graduate students, assessment of student learning, and program evaluation. Prior to coming to MSU, Plumb was at the University of Washington, where she directed the Engineering Communication Program. While at the UW, Plumb also worked as an Instructional Development and Assessment Specialist for the School of
AC 2007-851: DEVELOPMENT AND BETA-TESTING OF ADISTANCE-LEARNING FRESHMAN ENGINEERING COURSE SERIESCarolyn Skurla, Baylor University Carolyn Skurla is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. She received a B.S. in Biomedical Science from Texas A&M University and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University. In addition to the freshman engineering course, Dr. Skurla teaches courses in materials engineering, biomaterials, and biomedical engineering. Her research interests are in biomaterials and total joint replacements.Steven Eisenbarth, Baylor University Steven Eisenbarth is Associate Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at
://www.ee.calpoly.edu/~dbraun/courses/ee307/ee307.html, cited Jan. 14, 2007.5. D. Braun, http://www.ee.calpoly.edu/~dbraun/courses/ee307/W01/Project.html, cited Jan. 14, 2007.6. S. Ye and I. Galton, “Techniques for Phase Noise Suppression in Recirculating DLLs,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 39(8), 2004, pp. 1222-1230.7. J.M. Rabaey, A. Chandrakasan, B. Nikolic, Digital Integrated Circuits, 2nd Ed. (Prentice Hall) 2003.8. K. Gopalan, Introduction to Digital Microelectronic Circuits, (Irwin) 1996.9. D. Braun, F. DePiero and M. Borland, “Illuminating Electronics Problem Solving with the Cal Poly MoHATTechnique,” Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE '02. Proceedings 32nd Annual Conference, Nov. 6-9, p. S4E-2http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2002/papers/1317.pdf
AC 2007-3086: SCALING ANALYSIS AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN TEACHINGTRANSPORT AND REACTION PROCESSESWilliam Krantz, National University of Singapore William B. Krantz is the Isaac Manasseh Meyer Chair Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the National University of Singapore, Rieveschl Ohio Eminent Scholar and Professor Emeritus at the University of Cincinnati, and President’s Teaching Scholar and Professor Emeritus at the University of Colorado. He received a B.A. in chemistry in 1961 from Saint Joseph’s College (Indiana), a B.S. in chemical engineering in 1962 from the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering in 1968 from