collection and analysis processes for this phase and the final framework, which was thenintegrated in the information sheets presented at the end of the paper.Data collection. To ensure that a large enough sample of methods was gathered, we used asystematized literature review process. As suggested by Borrego and colleagues20, wefollowed the PRISMA selection process to search for and select potentially relevant papers.First, we defined three inclusion criteria:1. The papers needed to focus on the social or procedural aspects of small scale HE projects, such as: a. Frameworks, methodologies, processes, approaches, principles, or collections thereof, b. Methods, tools, techniques, dimensions, mindsets, c. Lessons learned, and/or d. Case
Paper ID #20096Teaching the Nature of Engineering in K-12 Science Education: A DelphiStudy (Fundamental)Dr. Brian Hartman, Walla Walla University Brian is a professor of education at Walla Walla University. He has 5 years of experience teaching high school science and practiced engineering for 12 years. His research interests include K-12 biological and chemical engineering curriculum development, nature of engineering, and creativity in engineering design.Randy L. Bell, Oregon State University Dr. Bell is an Associate Dean and Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Oregon State University. His
Paper ID #20552How are Threshold Concepts Applied? A Review of the LiteratureMr. David Reeping, Virginia Tech David Reeping is a graduate student pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received his B.S. in Engineering Education with a Mathematics minor from Ohio Northern University. He was a Choose Ohio First scholar inducted during the 2012-2013 school year as a promising teacher candidate in STEM. David was the recipient of the Remsburg Creativity Award for 2013 and The DeBow Freed Award for outstanding leadership as an undergraduate student (sophomore) in 2014. He is also a member of the
(McGee, Robinson, Bentley, & Houston, 2015), as well as a metaphor of ‘bait-and-switch’ (Lachney & Nieusma, 2015) as means to characterize classroom teaching strategies. Inorder to assist people searching for frameworks when pursuing future work, Table 3 shows someexamples of how authors used frameworks in our publication sample. We have also provided alist of a subset of the frameworks used along with their respective citations that could serve as aninitial selection from which to choose in Appendix B. Table 3. Examples of Frameworks in Publication SampleFramework ExampleSocial Cognitive “This research has used grounded theory and Social Cognitive CareerCareer Theory Theory to understand how
, 2015).6. Trenor, J. & Pierrakos, O. Utilizing a social cognitive theoretical framework to investigate the influences of a summer undergraduate research experience on participants’ academic and career plans. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008 (American Society for Engineering Education, 2008).7. Nadelson, L. S., Warner, D. & Brown, E. Life’s Lessons in the Lab: A Summer of Learning from Undergraduate Research Experiences. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 16, (2015).8. Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L. & Seymour, E. Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci. Ed. 91, 36–74 (2007).9
method (see Appendix A). Fig. 8: AspenPlus Column Design ResultsTo account for future projects, it was decided to design the column with 7 bubble cup trays insteadof the required 3 trays (excluding reboiler and condenser). The as built distillation column is shownin Figure 9.4 Fig. 9: The as built Distillation ColumnMajor parts used to build the column along with specifications and sources are included inAppendix B.4. The Control PlatformHuman Machine Interface (HMI) and LabVIEW ProgrammingAside from constructing the distillation column, three proportional-integral-derivative (PID)controllers were implemented to achieve the following control objectives: reflux drum levelcontrol
Triangle and Index are best used as a basicscreening level tool to compare alternatives. If no clear, best alternative exists, one might haveto re-evaluate the 0-100 values for each P, or even develop additional alternatives for evaluation.To help demonstrate these challenges (the third lesson objective), two more detailed alternativesare provided to students: Alternative A is a paved surface lot adjacent to campus on purchasedprivate land after the removal of residential homes, and Alternative B is a paved surface lot oncampus (directly across the street from Alternative A) which displaces an athletic soccer practicefield and recreation area. Students are individually asked to “Take a few minutes to considerif/why these new alternatives are more
tasks [3]. Throughout the process students have obtained and these could have been used by faculty tomust document and manage the project appropriately. have conversations with the team about work distribution.Students began keeping track of their time via timesheets. For example, in Figure 1 it is clear that Students A, B and DThese timesheets tracked: (1) the activities each group are contributing a similar percentage of time toward themember worked on, and (2) the self-reported time spent on project. An instructor may want to determine what iseach activity. Activity choices included: Documentation, happening with Student C. Figure 2 shows helpful trends ofProject Management, Coding
Editorial Advisory Board of Materials Science and Engineering B, an Elsevier journal. He was a consulting editor (2010-2011) and Editor-in-Chief of Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing (2012-2015); he is currently Editor-in- Chief, Emeritus and Chair of the International Editorial Advisory Board.Vikram Shyam, NASA Glenn Research Center c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Pigs in space: a bio-inspired design and space challenges cornerstone project AbstractOn August 2-4, 2016, the Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI) and Great Lakes Biomimicry (GLBio),in collaboration with NASA, presented the first annual National Biomimicry Summit andEducation
Radical Limited Budget Unlimited Budget You have a limited budget for this You have an unlimited budget to A project. Keep your idea within a tight Z complete this project. Don’t worry budget. about the cost. Meet Constraints Disregard Constraints Focus on a key constraint of the Pick a key constraint of the problem B problem and be sure to follow it. Y and disregard it. Already Existing Unexpected Think about a common solution that Think about a common solution
laboratoryforteachingcomputernetworks.PaperpresentedattheOptimizationofElectrical andElectronicEquipment(OPTIM),201213thInternationalConferenceon.Fanelli,R.L.,&O’connor,T.J.(2010).Experienceswithpractice-focusedundergraduatesecurity education.PaperpresentedattheProc.ofthe3rdWorkshoponCyberSecurityExperimentation andTest,Washington,DC.Ferguson,B.,Tall,A.,&Olsen,D.(2014).NationalCyberRangeOverview.Paperpresentedatthe MilitaryCommunicationsConference(MILCOM),2014IEEE.Gavas,E.,Memon,N.,&Britton,D.(2012).WinningCybersecurityOneChallengeataTime.Security& Privacy,IEEE,10(4),75-79.Hoffman,L.,Burley,D.,&Toregas,C.(2012).HolisticallyBuildingtheCybersecurityWorkforce.Security &Privacy,IEEE,10(2),33-39.Justice,C.(2015,November3-5,2015
). Retrieved from Proquest dissertations and theses - full text. (UMI No. 3408757).7. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. In Wealth of Networks (pp. 356–487). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.8. Kvavik, R. B., & Caruso, J. B. (2005). Students and information technology, 2005 : Convenience, connection, control, and learning. Boulder, CO: Educause. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0506/rs/ERS0506w.pdf9. Schmidt, H. (2013). Media literacy education from kindergarten to college : A comparison of how media literacy is addressed across the educational system. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5(1), 295–309.10. O’Neal, J. (1990). The humanities
wireless propagation characteristics and perform specific wireless experiments outsidetraditional labs. By experimenting with the mobile platform students will enhance their hands-onand programming skills, and will become more competitive in the wireless industry job market.AcknowledgementDr. Otilia Popescu’s work was supported in part by the Virginia Space Grant Consortiumthrough the 2015 New Investigator Program.References 1. Wyglinski, A. M., Orofino, D. P., Ettus, M. N., & Rondeau, T. W. (2016). Revolutionizing software defined radio: case studies in hardware, software, and education. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(1), 68-75. 2. Ge, F., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Bostian, C. W., Rondeau, T. W., & Le, B. (2008, March
the benefits of new technological developments and who does not. (a)Figure 2: (a) White Board Image of network of stakeholders if there was wide-scale adoption of carts with scanners and (b) digital reproduction of the network drawn on the white board in (a)C. The roles and responsibilities of engineersThe first semester that I conducted this activity, in fall 2011, about 10 minutes into sharing prosand cons of the different solutions, a student raised her hand and asked if it was theirresponsibility as engineers to be concerned about the various other stakeholders besides theclient (store owner) who has hired them. I turned that question over to the class inviting otherstudents’ opinions. Discussion was spirited with
future alumni surveys, such as correlating self-efficacy to pursuingcareers in engineering and engineering technology.ReferencesBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2), 191-215.Carberry, A.R., Lee, H.S., and Ohland, M.W. (2010). Measuring engineering design self- efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education 99(1), 71-79.Dieter, G., Schmidt, L. (2009). Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill Higher Education: Boston.Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., and Larkin, K.C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology 31(3), 356.Marra, R.M., Rodgers, K.A., Shen, D. and Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year
would a university want/need to hire a PoP? B. What positive change will they bring to the university? What are the desired results of this job? C. Which skills, knowledge, behavioral and cultural competencies should a PoP have? D. How do you want to verify if a candidate for this position possesses such skills, knowledge and competencies? E. In your opinion, who is a PoP role model? Why? F. Why did you reject the latest candidate? Or why would you reject a candidate?AnalysisKey words analysis was applied to identify the key concepts; utterances were clustered parallelto all key concepts. Here below are the 6 questions given to all interviewees and their answers.The number of respondents supporting a given concept, is
." Computers & Education 53.1 (2009): 74-85.5 Maguth, B. M.; List, J. S. & Wunderle, M. Teaching social studies with video games The Social Studies, Taylor & Francis, 2015, 106, 32-366 Becker, Katrin. "Teaching with games: the minesweeper and asteroids experience." Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 17.2 (2001): 23-33.7 Adams, Joel C. "Chance-It: an object-oriented capstone project for CS-1." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 30.1 (1998): 10-14.8 Moser, Robert. "A fantasy adventure game as a learning environment: why learning to program is so difficult and what can be done about it." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. Vol. 29. No. 3. ACM, 1997.9 Leutenegger, S. & Edgington, J. A games first approach to teaching
evaluations are completed online voluntarily by the student before the grades are final.The evaluation questions vary from class to class, but every course has four required questionsand multiple other questions chosen by the faculty, department, and college. Students use arating scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for all questions. For our analysis, weselected 12 questions that: (a) we believed measured the outcomes associated with the TeachingCircle and (b) had sufficient responses amongst all groups for use in the analysis. Thesequestions are listed in Table 1.We selected these 12 questions for the following reasons:• Question 1 gives an overview of what students thought of a course.• Question 2 is tied directly to our
consortium of engineering education).Prof. Jayantrao Bhaurao Patil, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur, India Jayantrao B. Patil is working as the Principal at the R. C. Patel institute of Technology, Shirpur, India and holds appointment as a Professor in the Department of Computer Engineering. He is also serving as a Dean, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Member of Senate, Member of Academic Council, and Chairman of Board of Studies in Computer Engineering & Information Technology at the North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon, India. Jayantrao’s research interests include Web caching, Web Prefetching, Web data mining, Biometrics, and digital watermarking. He is the author/co-author of over 10
. & Olds, B. M. A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design. J. Eng. Educ. 83, 311–316 (1994).4. Hotaling, N., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., Herman, C. D. & Forest, C. R. A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. J. Eng. Educ. 101, 630 (2012).
://www.afterschoolalliance.org/Afterschool_as_STEMpartner.pdf[3] Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of afterschool programs that seek topromote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45,294–309[4] Hirsch, B. J., Mekinda, M. A., & Stawicki, J. A. (2010). More than attendance: The importance of after-schoolprogram quality. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 447–452.[5] National Research Council, 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[6] Cardella, M. E., Wolsky, M., Andrews-Paulsen, C., & Jones, T. R. (2013). Informal pathways to engineering. In 120th ASEE Annual
the fit, r = 0.444 and p < 10−5.We also investigated the correlation between students’ use of CN and the number of homeworkassignments that they skipped. Skipping homework assignments is a strong (negative) indicatorof engagement with the course. For the semester described in this paper, no student earned agrade of “B” or higher while skipping more than 3 of the 28 assignments. Figure 3 shows therelationship between skipped assignments and the number of anar seeds earned. Once again, wesee a clear correlation, in this case negative, between students’ effort on CN and their effort onthe homework. 30! R²#=#0.18979
chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids in coal-bed methane and regular oil and gas wells in Colorado. While in the middle of his master’s degree, he also spent a year as a graduate intern at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory studying renewable energy commercialization in Caribbean countries among other areas. He is currently completing is second master’s in engineering for developing communities in conjunction with his PhD Civil Systems Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. His trans-disciplinary research involves addressing global development issues from an engineering, political, and economic perspective.Dr. Bernard Amadei, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Amadei is Professor of Civil
course was developed and deployed makes it model forpossible replicated at other institutions.Bibliography1. Hansen, R. E. (1995). Five principles for guiding curriculum development practice: The case of technological teacher education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education. 32(2). Winter 1995.2. Arnold, A & Flumerfelt, S. (2012). Interlacing Mission, Strategic Planning, and Vision to Lean: Powerful DNA for Change. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 9(1), 26 - 47.3. Emiliani, B., Kensington, C., & Most, U. S. (2005). Lean in higher education.Center for Lean Business Management. Available at http://www. superfactory. com/articles/lean_higher_ed. Aspx.4. Emiliani, M. L. (2004). Improving business school
attending E-GIRL. 14% 29% Urban 43% 15 Rural 16 Suburban 17 64% 7% 43% (a) (b) 13% Asian/Pacific Islander 25% 6
). Nurturing affinity spaces and game-based learning. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire & S. Barab (Eds.), Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age (pp. 123-153). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Grohs, J. R., Maczka, D. K., Soledad, M., & Bagalkotkar, K. K. (2016). Exploring the Feasibility of an Educational Computer Game as a Novel Means of Assessing Problem Solving Competencies. Paper presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Now Orleans, LA.Hazelrigg, G. A. (1998). A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), 653-658. doi: 10.1115/1.2829328Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering
science subjects.Tutoring: COMPASS scholars are required to perform at an above-average level and keep gradesin the A-B range. Tutoring or supplemental instruction (SI) sessions are critical to success. Evenwhen students are comfortable in a subject, there are benefits to participation. Students maydiscover that they have misconceptions and that they cannot relate concepts learned at differenttimes in a course or across different courses. Tutoring also challenges them to push themselves toa higher order of thinking, analysis, or evaluation. In a group setting, students learn by teachingother students. Indeed, research shows that teaching each other in small groups improves studentlearning when compared to traditional lecture-based courses in
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References:[1] Blikstein, P. (2013) Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention. FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.[2] Resnick, M. and Silverman, B. (2005). Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. Proceedings from IDC ‘05: The 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. New York, NY: ACM[3] Beckman, S.L. & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25-56.[4] New York Hall of Science. (2010) Proceedings from the “Innovation, Education, and the Maker Movement
Universityincludes a culminating cornerstone design project. The project carried out by teams of fourstudents involves designing, building, testing, and demonstrating small autonomous roboticvehicles which must perform specified tasks while operating on a specially built robot course.To control the mechatronic elements of the course, a Raspberry Pi 2 Model B is used to drive anArduino (via a serial connection), an I/O Board (via I2C), and a PWM Board (via I2C). This setof boards is synchronized via the Raspberry Pi to a central PC, allowing the four regions of thecourse to run in parallel and provide the opportunity for competition between four robots.From the student perspective, the system is simplified and abstracted through a touch screeninterface that
conducted trade studies. In the trade studies theylooked at different types of actuators, clamp actuators, injection methods, machine orientation, and machineoperation. Within each section they set up a table to compare the options available and set up a scoring system.By using a scoring system, it helped to identify which option would be the best for the application. The scoringwas done on a scale of 1- 4 with 1 being the least favorable and 4 being the most favorable, specifically accordingto their application. A copy of the trade study can be seen in Appendix B. In conjunction with the trade study,they looked to the survey results to see which options the trade studies yielded as the best fit, with whatequipment the educators had access to. For