-in Help Tutoring and study Academic help Provided for students Center for all students groups through center; writing help in Engineering LLC staffed by TA’s for minority student office center and Women in STEM help with early- LLC for common curriculum high failure Peer mentoring also Engineering college science and classes. includes tutoring in the offers Structured engineering courses small mentoring Supplemental
National Science Foundation has called for additional pathways to and through engineering programs, and returners represent one such pathway3. 2. Returners bring a different perspective to their graduate work as well as their post- graduate endeavors than their direct-pathway peers. They have experiences in a variety of contexts, which often includes previous work in academia, industry, military, or government in addition to their graduate work, which may influence their research and research outcomes18. Research and theory describe the connection of ideas from across various contexts as an important source of innovation4. 3. Returners contribute to the diversity of the university community. Diversity has
of the semester, due tomade them felt anxious misunderstanding about CPBL, the division of tasks among theand near to giving up group members was ineffective. This caused them to feel that the learning cycle was too fast and difficult to follow. There was a sense of the shortage of time to submit reports and write peer- teaching notes.CPBL requires more on The responsibility of learning in CPBL lies with the students. Inself-efforts and fewer on CPBL, students were not given conventional lectures but werelectures as conventional required to spend some time for group and class discussions inclasses correcting concepts and
investigated how amulti-disciplinary team could coordinate tasks using a novel Computer Aided Design (CAD) toolthat enables multiple users to simultaneously access and modify a model [10]. The projectdemonstrated that students from three institutions in three time zones could effectivelycollaborate on the design of an aircraft wing assembly. The 2012 – 2013 project successfullyimplemented a “multi-site, cloud-based capstone design project” within a cross-cultural, peer-to-peer design-build-test environment [11]. Within this environment students were exposed to theindustrial principles of collaborative digital design and manufacturing, targeting complex cyber-mechanical systems. These previous projects were evaluated in order to develop a betterprogram
Paper ID #10767African American Undergraduate Success in Engineering: ”Proving themDr. Kalynda Chivon Smith, Howard University Dr. Smith earned a Ph.D. and an M.S. in Social Psychology from Howard University in Washington, D.C., and her B.A. in Psychology and English from Truman State University in Kirksville, MO. Dr. Smith has managed a three year longitudinal NSF-funded research project across four campuses, which has included collecting, analyzing/interpreting and reporting data through article writing and conference presentation. She has also taught various psychology courses.Dr. Lorraine N. Fleming P.E., Howard
. Page 9.850.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationScientific Principle 6: Disclose research to encourage professional scrutiny and critique In the NRC report, the authors state “Regardless of the medium, the goals of researchreporting are to communicate the findings from the investigation; to open the study toexamination, criticism, review, and replication (see Principle 5) by peer investigators; andultimately to incorporate the new knowledge into the prevailing canon of the field” (p. 72). Thissecond goal points out again the need for more explicit reporting of STEM education
Paper ID #44485Board 174: Fostering Inclusivity and Engagement while Learning by Doing:A New Paradigm in Engineering Education Based on Student-Designed, Student-TaughtCoursesMr. Eliot Nathaniel Wachtel, University of California, Santa Cruz Eliot Wachtel is a fourth year Robotics Engineering Student, Student Instructor, Undergraduate Researcher, and Club leader at UC Santa Cruz. He has been involved in teaching and mentoring undergraduate peers in engineering concepts for three years, acting as the formal lead instructor for two undergraduate courses. When not teaching, or learning, he is doing research in the Braingeneers
developing feedback literacy. The framework also draws from Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick's [20] principles of good feedback practice, emphasizing the role of peer and self-assessment in feedback processes. In the context of Scrum, this dimension reflects the framework's collaborative nature, where feedback sources are not limited to the traditional instructor-student dynamic but include peers and self-reflection [22]. 2. Feedback Timing: Timeliness in feedback is highlighted by Hattie and Timperley's [19] model of effective feedback, which emphasizes the importance of immediate feedback in learning processes. This aspect is mirrored in the Scrum methodology, where regular sprint reviews and retrospectives [23] provide
the programare represented in the dataset, with members from a mean of 12 teams (min=5; max=17)participating in each of the meetings, alongside the REDPAR leadership, and guest attendees.Seven out of the 31 meetings (23%) featured guest presenters.At the time of writing, two more cohorts have been funded by the RED program, for a total of 30teams. We expect the underlying structure of the community meetings and the types ofinteractions analyzed here to be similar in more recent CoT meetings.For the analysis, we transcribed and qualitatively analyzed the meetings using Dedoosequalitative data analysis software. Our codebook includes the variety of topics covered at eachmeeting (e.g., sustainability of change, building strategic partnerships
solid argument for the need to help young adults acquire theknowledge they need to be safe online.Another explanation for young adults’ risky online behaviors is the way they think aboutthe Internet and privacy in general. Many young people think of the Internet as their ownpersonal space where they interact with their peers, and fail to recognize that theinformation meant for peer groups, as well as conversations among peers, are available tomany other, unintended audiences6. Similarly, a large study of 7,000 American collegestudents found that passwords, social security and credit card numbers were included inthe respondents’ notion of online privacy, but postings on social networking sites such asFacebook were not a matter of concern7
discussion and feedback. Third, students’ peers critique their solutions andprovide comments. Finally, students are given the opportunity to respond to these comments and Page 24.1135.2criticisms, and to modify their solutions appropriately. Note that SBL, as defined above, differs from a variety of other instructional techniques that also use the terminology “studio”. Among the more notable is the Scale-Up4 program introduced at North single or individual or
strategies. Content knowledge for theclass(es) being taught can also be an important component of competence but it is not one weinvestigated. All the GTAs in this study were teaching introductory-level physics, math, and CS sowe assumed that they had sufficient knowledge and understanding of the subject content.Recognition in this model is the acknowledgment of a GTA’s teaching efforts by students, faculty,or peers. This recognition by others can significantly impact GTAs’ confidence and motivation.Positive feedback and validation reinforce GTA identity as effective educators, while well-delivered constructive criticism promotes growth by encouraging reflection and refinement ofteaching methods [11]. As Carless [12] highlights, clear and
address this challenge, KEEN provides resources through the Engineering Unleashedplatform[6], which offers over 2,500 activities—referred to as cards—designed for rapidclassroom deployment and peer collaboration. Additionally, KEEN organizes annual meetings andworkshops to support faculty in integrating EM into their teaching practices. Developing active,engaging, and time-efficient EML activities can further promote the sustained growth of anentrepreneurial mindset in engineering education.EML micromoment activities are a pedagogical tool to facilitate the incorporation of the 3 Csthrough short activity implementations that only last 2 - 30 minutes[1], [7]. These micromomentactivities also promote inclusive teaching[8], improve teaching, and
in which students learn about academic writing and out-of-classroom research with a professor. As a result, the program significantly prepared the student prior to joining a research group, helping eliminate his “fear” of research. Universities that have and encourage students to join such programs can strengthen the abilities of their students [3]. • Active recruitment by peers: The student was recruited into the lab by one of its undergraduate researchers. The researcher recognized their interest in computer vision and believed they would be a strong candidate to join. • Professor mentorship: Once accepted into the lab, the professor explained computer vision using one of the field's
Fellows to asupportive network of peers and professionals through assignment to an i2 mHub. Each i2 mHubwill consist of two to three iREDEFINE Fellows, one to two junior ECE faculty (iREDEFINEalumni), and one to two ECE academic leaders, such as current or former department chairs.Through structured virtual activities, Fellows actively applying for academic positions willreceive guidance from both junior and senior faculty within their Hub. This unique mentoringstructure also fosters a multi-level support system, where senior members provide mentorship tojunior faculty while encouraging peer mentoring among the iREDEFINE Fellows.2 BackgroundAccording to the latest U.S. Census, 50.5% of the U.S. population identifies as female 1
learning) and Theme 3 (refiningcareer goals), showing how reflection can shape academic and professional aspirations.Abstract Conceptualization (AC) and Active Experimentation (AE)The transition from conceptualizing to experimenting is a dynamic process where students applytheir developed theories to real-world challenges. A poignant example is given by Zaher whoengaged in the analysis and scripting of engine timings using MATLAB: I think courses that have a Learning Studio component, you get to see… the difference between real-world and theoretical like results. So like for the forklift dynamometer, we had to think about the timing of the engine. We had to look at all those different signals, and we had to write a
: thateveryone is treated with respect and not demeaned for their opinion. This class is considered a © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencesafe space where every student can freely voice their opinion. Hopefully, their future workplaceswill be held to the same standard.Students are also informed they will be expected to work with their teammates outside of classtime and that each of them must participate. Each group will do peer reviews to grade theinvolvement and effectiveness of each other. These peer reviews are used to help establish theoverall individual grades on the group project.Interpersonal SkillsENGR 100 topics • Diversity, Equity, and
research productivity (e.g., papers published). However, weacknowledge that excellent undergraduate research experiences often lead to peer-reviewed publicationsand help faculty career progression.In partnership with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), a workshop has been held forfour summers to help faculty integrate the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) into their work with researchstudents. We are interested in exploring the impact of this work on participation and sharing our findingswith the broader engineering community.Research questions: 1. How can faculty use an EM to adjust their approach to research activities and student mentoring? 2. What structures/practices from the workshop help faculty adjust their approach to
influenceneurodivergent students’ sense that they need to work harder and longer than other students.Several participants mentioned experiencing imposter syndrome, which may be described as thefeeling that one is a fraud despite one’s accomplishments [47]. And even though many graduatestudents may experience imposter syndrome at some point in their career, these feelings likelyplace a heavy burden on neurodivergent graduate students who may feel pressure to hide theirchallenges to prove that they belong in academia. As Ó Meadhbh Murray et al. [47] write,“Students expend time and energy doing emotional work to navigate imposter feelings withmarginalized students experiencing more persistent and intense imposter feelings than their moreprivileged peers, often in
model the learningoutcomes for the course remain the same for all who enroll regardless of the mode of attendance. Our HyFlex SQA approach consists of lectures (in class, with video recordings), face-to-face activities, as well as group assignments, group projects, and exams all facilitated through anonline campus management system. During the lecture period, the instructor delivers content inthe form of lecture slides and writing on a whiteboard. This poses significant challenges for theinstructor, as the learning outcomes have to be delivered in different modalities, but with the samequality. This is particularly difficult in SQA courses, as these require instruction in formal methodsas well as systematic justification of engineering
development. Here, it is important to remember that theentrepreneurial mindset focuses on one’s mental attitude and belief system, which is acquired andnurtured over time with continued practice, reflection and feedback. As explained by Carol S.Dweck, a change in mindset requires effort, practice, and challenging tasks [7]. Regardless ofwhether it is the entrepreneurial mindset or the growth mindset, practice and more practice canchange one’s beliefs and attitudes, which in return can instill and reinforce the entrepreneurialmindset. Common methods for integrating practice, reflection, and feedback into the curriculumcan be through semester-long scaffold projects, journaling, peer feedback, and formativeassessments.#4: Curriculum Design for Best
autoethnographies on female faculty in academia are limited [2, 11]. This researchgathered autoethnographic stories from three female faculty members in engineering, the authorsof this paper, who had also experienced gender bias in their teaching. This was then organizedinto a ”collective autoethnography”. The analysis and writing-up of the project were alsocompleted by the authors. According to Ellis’s autoethnographic principles [8], stories are centralto this paper. The literature presented and the emotions evoked after the stories are told is all doneto change the understanding of what it means to be a female instructor in the engineeringclassroom.The three authors of this paper are early-career faculty in small teaching-focused institutions.Two of the
thestudents work in a group”, “keep the timing the same”, and “don’t make them too long”. All positive and 11/14negative comments show the importance of improving independent and lifelong learning skillsthrough active learning strategies and class participation and discussions. Also, having a morecontrolled environment will help in maximizing the ML effectiveness.The students were asked to write a single fact learned from the micro-lectures topic (selectiveassembly and tolerances analysis). The student’s feedback shows increased knowledge and ad-vanced thinking about the subject. For the MLs related to the casting topics, the peer evaluationsurvey for
communicate” such as instead of b) Approximately half of these “strategies” that are unique to students specifically associated engineers. this knowledge with their PBL experience. Use language that For example: use layman’s terms, use clients can understand to make analogies, visual interpretations; your project much more valuable technical writing; knowing audience. in their eyes; One student added the importance of For example: bring a story into it people skills, “You
School of Technology. Prior to joining the School of Technology fac- ulty, she held position at U.S. Department of Energy, N.C. A&T’s Division of Research and College of Engineering. Dr. Sowells earned a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from North Carolina A&T State Uni- versity’s College of Engineering. She also holds a M.S. and B.S in Computer Science with a concentration in software engineering from the same university. Her primary research interests are in the areas of low- power high performance digital systems design, asynchronous design, self-timed digital system design and STEM education. As a result of her work, she has numerous peer reviewed journal and conference publications. She recently authored a
an organization and were provided an opportunityfor advancement, was needed as an option within the curriculum. Because of the applied natureof this integrative learning internship course, it was also decided that signature work andassignments would be created and embedded in the course.Pre-requisites for the course were as follows: completion of TCM 32000: Technical Writing inScience and Industry with a grade of B or better, cumulative GPA of 3.0, an existing internshipwithin an organization or an existing position within an organization and opportunity foradvancement, signed employer agreement, and willingness to be visited by OL faculty at least 3times per semester. The course description was developed by OL faculty and is below:This
takes note of a few ofthe programs that currently exist around the country. These programs were located by startingwith the USDOT’s listing of University Transportation Centers at http://utc.dot.gov/.One could argue that a student gains significant benefit simply by sitting in the same classroomas students from other transportation-related disciplines. Students appear to gain insight into theperspectives of other disciplines through discussion with these peers and hearing the questionsasked by these peers. In a transportation planning course at the University of Tennessee, a civilengineering student asked the question, “Why do we even need to involve the public in thetransportation decision-making process?” This was a valid question and
in the same residence hall community, it is hoped that an academicallysupportive peer group will enhance the overall experience.Such integration does not come easily. A coordinated plan has been developed to join the Page 14.749.3Cornerstone Experience and the Residential Experience to address the challenges encountered bythe development and implementation teams. These issues include facility location andcomposition including design and construction, gender balancing in a residence hall withpredominantly engineering degree program students, segregating engineering students or mixingwith other majors on single residence hall floors, development
-Tenured Fac- ulty (2000), Henry Lutes College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching Award (1999), and several other teaching awards. Dr. Nokes has published over 60 peer reviewed articles and four book chapters and has received over $10M in grant money from sources including the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and industrial support. Nokes holds one patent. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Transitioning students into BAE from a common first year engineering curriculum – A work in progressAbstractIn Fall 2016, a new First Year Experience (FYE) was implemented for all incoming engineeringstudents at the University of Kentucky
confidence and design thinking.Only one ePortfolio was assessed at the capstone level (4) for all competencies forboth reflection and integrative learning. Although no ePortfolio rated 1 or less forall competencies for either reflection or integrative learning, two ePortfolios wererated no greater than 2 for all competencies, for both reflection and integrativelearning.Students saw value of the ePortfoliosAnalysis of interviews revealed that student perspectives were broadened in anumber of ways through creation of the ePortfolio. The ways they werebroadened differed depending on which of the following two purposes theePortfolio served: 1) as a prompt for students to demonstrate— through reflectionvia writing—their achievement in the five