STEM9–11.Introductory engineering courses taught with forms of active learning such as project-basedlearning and problem-based learning have led to increased retention of engineering majors12–15,improved student performance13,15, higher quality of peer interactions13, and more positivestudent attitudes about engineering13,16. In addition to the strong case for adopting active learningin introductory engineering classrooms17, there is growing concern about how to effectivelydisseminate innovations in engineering education18. Recommendation for adoption anddissemination include attending to the specific needs of varied university cultures and curricula,supporting educators in becoming reflective teachers, and providing long-term support
theperformance descriptors associated with each score for each rubric dimension. Within eachdimension, raters could give a score of 0, 1, 3, or 5. These score options reflect the conceptualdistinctions between performance descriptions. For example, the additional energy literacydemonstration required to move from a score of 1 to a score of 3 was seen as greater than theadditional demonstration required to move from a score of 0 to a score of 1. Each sub-principlewithin the DOE framework was mapped directly to one or two rubric dimensions to facilitateconsistent scoring based on tangible indicators of energy literacy.Data collection Project posters and abstracts from an annual high school energy science/designcompetition held in the Pacific
(1)Astronauts go on spacewalks to make repairs, do experiments and test new equipment . Two big challenges in spacewalks are, first, that space can feel very cold (250 degrees F) to an (2)astronaut in the shade and, second, space can feel very warm (250 degrees F) in the Sun . The reason for this is that an astronaut will be exposed to about 7 times the amount of radiation that we, on the Earth’s surface, experience due in part to the reflectivity of the surface and (3)atmosphere
: provide inputs to other team members from the owner’s perspective (more focus on budget and time control) to support their work; assist in design review and project documentation. ● One (1) Project Engineer (optional): provide inputs to other team members from a project engineer’s perspective (more focus on constructability) to support their work; assist in project documentation.Except for the LEED consultants, other team members were encouraged to rotate roles duringthe process to enhance their learning experience. The overall assessment plan of this studyemphasized on the learning progressions and periodical reflections, and included both formativeand summative approaches. Considering the lack of previous exposure
States, 1775-1945” – argues that engineering “drawings were farmore than a tool; they became a language reflective of the context in which they originated”(2000, p. 237).17As US engineering culture developed, Brown argues that engineers began to use shop drawings“to achieve thorough control over the labor of patternmakers, blacksmiths, machinists, anderectors” (p. 216) and, in combination with piecework, facilitated the “firm’s effort to subdivide Page 26.1068.9and standardize work tasks” (p. 217). As Brown continues, “Shop drawings and piecerate payprovided American engineer-managers with two interlocking methods to divide up work tasks,boost
tasks for the upcoming week. This is furthersolidified by weekly status reports that provide additional reflection on the project progress,outline problems, and highlight effort expended. In addition, students are required to draft aProblem Statement, Requirements Specification, Functional Design, Project Plan, and Test Plan.The nature of the projects varies widely from continuing a previous project with well-definedexpectations to venturing into uncharted waters with only a vague sense of a reasonabledestination. Thus all of these documents are flexible in their nature. For example, the test plancould be for the final product or for a milestone. Either way it will contain similar complexityand comprehensiveness. Assessment for this semester
this paper is to share the lessons we learned by reflecting upon our experiences withtechnology lending and teaching workshops while examining data from checkout informationand personal surveys to draw conclusions about best practices and the impact we have on thecampus community.Technology LendingLibraries have very robust systems for lending books to their users, and often use these systemsto loan non-book items. At North Carolina State University Libraries, we have loaned a varietyof technology items (such as laptops and cameras) for over a decade through our TechnologyLending Service. Using the existing infrastructure, adding a new type of item requires only asmall amount of policy decision-making and staff training. For example, in 2010
-directed learningoutside of class create opportunities for the students to apply knowledge and identify questionswhich can be resolved in the SI session. Students follow a set of steps to develop properquestions and find their own solutions by applying critical thinking skills. Finally, project basedlearning creates interactive and collaborative learning opportunities that promote the logicalprogression in creative thinking that leads to critical thinking. This paper presents theobservations made through these learning methods and provides a platform for discussion onthese topic areas. The improvement in students’ critical thinking skills were reflected by thequality of the writing assignments and the higher grades obtained by the group of
Musical Analogies as a Teaching Tool for Engineering ConceptsAbstract This project investigated the inclusion of a music laboratory experience within theexisting core Mechanical Engineering curriculum at Lafayette College. Music is a naturaladdition to engineering curricula as it can easily be used to illustrate many different engineeringconcepts. This allows students to think about their engineering topics from a differentperspective, which helps to improve their understanding of these concepts. Additionally, byusing music as a teaching tool, students are also exposed to topics from the art of music.Students completed a survey both before and after the experience in order to reflect on theirlearning. On average, the students reported a
Taxonomy1 defines higher levels of learning as “synthesis - to create, design,develop, formulate...; and evaluation - to evaluate, rate, defend, predict”. To promote higherlevels of learning (or taxonomies), proper instructional strategies should be implemented. Theseinstructional strategies should include learning elements that provide authentic contexts, criticalthinking, authentic activities, multiple roles and perspectives, coaching and scaffolding, access toexpert performances and modeling, promote reflection to enable abstraction and articulation.These elements should support collaborative construction of knowledge and the use of authentic
use time effectively during class. This paperpresents resources for addressing both of those needs. To uncover a wide variety ofresources, a web-based survey was sent to three listservs for college educators andeducational researchers: the POD Mailing List, the ACM SIGCSE Members List, and theEngineering Technology1 listserv in October 2014. These listservs have a total of about3000 subscribers, but only 32 responses were received. This probably reflects the factthat few educators have yet “flipped” their classes, but since thousands of faculty andhundreds of faculty developers were surveyed, it’s likely that they were able to namemost of the prominent resources and techniques.1 pod@listserv.nd.edu, the listserv of the Professional and
stream table, very similar to the actual stream tablesstudents used in the first activity. Students can adjust parameters for the model such as table slope, soilproperties, and water flow rate. They then make observations of the resulting erosion patterns, and discusssimilarities and differences to the real stream table. Students also reflect on the utility of a computationalmodel.Activity #3: RivertownThe second computer-based activity introduces students to Rivertown, a fictional town within the NetLogosimulation, in a flood plain next to a river. The river can overflow its banks, which will flood the town’s Page 26.1355.2fields
, and thus, suggest that learning styles may be a valuable lens through which to evaluateour methods for developing students as problem solvers. We used the Felder-Silverman modelspecifically because of its historical application in engineering, and its multidimensional natureallowing for two preferences in each of four dimensions (active/reflective, sensing/intuitive,visual/verbal, sequential/global) with subsequent strengths (strong, moderate, balanced) for eachpreference. This multi-dimensional model accounts for different facets of learning, andadditionally emphasizes that these preferences are not fixed characteristics but merely, as theyare called, preferences. Though not a specific aim of this work, we hypothesized that faculty dohave
Assurance (QA) course that integrates evidence from research andnew developments in software testing as well as engineering education. The specific goals are:1. To incorporate empirical studies in software engineering to supplement instruction in testing of all aspects, including safety, security, reliability, and performance.2. To increase focus on particular topics of high relevance such as formal testing of safety- critical systems and software inspection through targeted pedagogical interventions.3. To leverage existing instructional materials from the software engineering education community to create and explore blended learning models such as a flipped classroom.4. To integrate and promote inclusive and reflective teaching practices in
more of the teaching practices introducedand 3) developing a scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) project based on experiences intheir revised course. The summer academy includes multiple evidence-based teaching practices(such as POGIL, Mental-Model-Building, and Project Based Learning), an introduction to SoTLand IRB processes, and time for reflection and cross-disciplinary discussion of potentialapplications of each practice into participant courses. Discussion on the progress of participantSoTL projects and classroom peer observations both within and outside participant programs arethe key components of the academic year FLC.May 2014 and academic year 2014-2015 witnessed the first offering of the SPARCT Program,which engaged 16 STEM
arts majors, aswell as between the liberal arts and the areas of study leading to a major or profession.Our findings suggest that the learning objectives and the pedagogical approaches used in thecourse are adequate for a broad range of non-computer majors. Performance on writing andcomputing assessments as well as final grades (75% of students obtained a grade of C or better)indicated that a vast majority of students successfully achieved the learning objectives. Theseresults were consistent with student perceptions as reflected in an end-of-course survey. There isalso evidence that students satisfactorily integrated creative writing and computer programmingto develop their video game prototypes, making in-depth interdisciplinary connections
.-Checklist Template (see below)ACTIVITY:-Ask Students to brainstorm things they see every day that consume energy. Create a list of student ideas (i.e. therefrigerator).- Play BrainPop’s Conserving Energy video and discuss key concepts. (Note: The quiz that goes along with thevideo can be taken as a pre-test and then retaken after the video as a means of assessment for objective 1.)- Refer back to the list of student ideas of thingsthat consume energy. Ask students to brainstormways in which we could use less energy witheach item.-Assign the Sustainable energy checklist to becompleted at home that assesses several simpleareas of energy efficiency. After completing thechecklist, have students write a short reflection ofways they could improve their
testing (UT). The sound energypropagates through the test specimen in the form of waves. When the waves face any discontinuityor crack, some part of the energy is reflected due to the acoustic impedance mismatch [8] at thepoint of cracks. The transducer captures the reflected signal and transforms it into the electricalsignal which is displayed on a screen. By analyzing the signal, one can easily obtain thequantitative information about the size, location and orientation of the crack. A schematic view ofa typical UT system is shown in figure 1. Pulser/Receiver Transducer
writing and further clarifies and improves the understanding the source code from anoutside perspective. A second level of classification is still needed to further classify sufficientcomments into their own categories. These include conceptual, reflective, organizational andliteral comment types. This classification system is further documented in a previous work [3].2. Cleaning and Processing the DataThe data set for this investigation comes from six sections of an Introduction to Programmingcourse; two sections (section 05 and section 08) are writing-to-learn to program sections and theadditional four sections are taught using the traditional lab approach. The training set consists of761 comments with 30% randomly sampled out as the test data
undergraduate engineering student, and an undergraduate teacher educationstudent. The STEM Stories afterschool program began in September and ran through April. Itmet twice a week for two hours each day at the school.EVALUATIONThe evaluation was approved by the UD’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). The evaluationincluded pre- and post- survey data, attendance data, and reading scores.Participants: Fifty-five grade 2 and 3 students registered for the afterschool program.Attendance records reflect that six students attended between 66% and 100% of the time; fourstudents attended between 51 and 65% of the time, eight students attended between 31 and 50%of the time, and 37 students attended between 0 – 30% of the time. The school has a 54 %minority
research assistant observes a series of lectures in a particular class, and fills out a classroom observation protocol with categories such as content; instruction, student cognitive engagement, and student behavioural engagement with space for examples and comments under each category) [9]; Individual or group think-aloud sessions (where a research assistant records students while they work on homework assignments or laboratory reports, and where the students are expected to verbalize out loud their thinking process); Self-reflections (similar to the individual think-aloud sessions but done in writing by the students as opposed to being recorded by the research assistant); Minute papers on muddiest concepts (where
creatingchange in the education system. In 2011, after reviewing the literature on change in highereducation, Henderson et al. proposed a change model for “Facilitating Change in UndergraduateSTEM”. This model identified four strategies that facilitate change in safety education: 1.“Disseminating curriculum and pedagogy”, 2. “Developing reflective teachers”, 3. “Enactingpolicy”, and 4. “Developing shared vision” [14].Following the 2017 ASEE Chemical Engineering Summer School, the authors of this paperformed a collaboration with the shared vision of investigating safety education in UOlaboratories across their respective institutions. The authors’ universities are diverse in terms ofsize, public vs. private, and research focus, and are also
the national-level by positively impacting early-career women in academicengineering. LATTICE is a collaborative project between the University ofWashington, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, and North Carolina State University. 1I serve as evaluator of LATTICE, on a team of women working to broadenparticipation and accelerate the success of women faculty in engineering through aprogram called LATTICE. Diversity and inclusion are at the core of our worktogether and are reflected in our LATTICE team as well as in how we do ourwork together. We come from a range of social identities, including personaland professional experiences with career development programs
theories of systems of oppression, provide aforum to critique particular ideologies central to engineering culture that hinder authenticprofessional discussion and reflection on the political, social and ethical dimensions of scienceand technology, and present participants with particular examples where systems of power haveinterlaced with engineering science and design such that access to opportunities, resources andgoods have been stratified across various social identity groups. Having the ability to measure anindividual’s growth in conceptualization of oppression and privilege would be instructive for theindividual and for measuring success of programs designed to promote this learning. The lack ofsuch an instrument provided motivation for
1, Green indicates the course topic. Grey indicates the background knowledge required for this course, which students need to achieve in other core courses in the college. Red indicates the big idea, and Blue indicates the enduring understanding. Purple reflects important to know ideas and yellow shows good familiar with. The concept map indicates the relationship between all concepts of infographic design. Table 1: Visual table for infographic designBig Ideas Guiding Essential Enduring • Important to Good to be Concepts Questions Outcomes Know familiar withUnderstan • Data • What is data? • Determine
continuing their education,obtaining more STEM-related experience, and preparing themselves for the future.While our hypotheses were generally not supported, the results of this evaluation may suggestNM PREP is an effective means of helping students identify whether they are interested infurther pursuing engineering-related activities. It is possible these results reflect the nature of theprogram in that students’ may feel overwhelmed with the amount of information they are givenin a period of two weeks. It is also possible the lack of significant results is related to changes inthe evaluation procedures throughout the program’s implementation.Table 2.Independent Samples t-Test Survey Results Self-Efficacy: Self-Efficacy
research, (2) technical communication, (3) project management, (4)teamwork, (5) environmental health and safety, and (6) research ethics. Students can elect to take1, 2, or 3 credits of research each semester. Developing a concrete grading scheme that is both effective and efficient has long been adifficult task. To combat this problem, the co-author has implemented a specifications gradingapproach during the last three semesters (starting in Fall 2018). The defined specifications aremade up of two components: deliverables and hours of effort. The deliverables are comprised of mandatory university safety trainings to gain access tothe lab, responsible conduct of research training, educational and skills modules, reflections,planning
force students to thinkcarefully about their words and effectively improve their learning within the course. This ismotivated by the idea that if students have less to write, they will have more time to think abouttheir writing, as well as to reflect and revise, which is a critical component of improvingcomposition as well as developing self-criticism skills7. Since most engineering students plan towork in industry, real-world context is useful for giving them an idea of the types of writing theymay encounter in their future career.ImplementationTo satisfy the proposed objectives, five unique assignments were designed for the course whichinvolves the completion of five multi-week laboratory projects. By considering differentassignments for each
podcast viewing application (iTunes or similar)is automatically notified when a new episode is available. This eliminates the need forstudents to continually check for new episodes at the class web site.3. Pedagogical DesignIn the Introduction to Environmental Engineering class the enhanced-podcast wasdesigned as a critical component to a balanced learning environment, not as a newdelivery of ineffective teaching methods (e.g. creating hour-long lectures on an iPod).Core lecture segments were shifted to the podcast, allowing class time to be used foractive learning exclusively. Podcasts have the advantages of pause and replay by thestudent, important for such reflective course elements like lecture. The podcast, andcompanion web site, directed
• Critical reflection • Self-awareness • Taking responsibility for own learning • Working creatively with complex situationsMost recent research agrees that autonomy is a developmental process which cannot betaught or learnt 3. However, the Sheffield Hallam model with constant interactions betweenpedagogic learning environments, learner autonomy characteristics and policy impacts,achieves ‘pedagogic resonance’ for students4 - creating a space for new learning partnerships.We draw upon different traditions e.g. constructivist theories of learning, particularlyexperiential learning5,6,7, and also the central idea of a learner-led curriculum8 that isincreasingly made possible through the appropriate use of technology. Constructivism isbased