this change. During these years of transition Russia willalso face a problem which most fledgling democracies face - a generation of disenchanted youth. The future hopes of this nation, in the midst of all its anxiety, have been thrust upon the youngpeople, for they are the ones who have, perhaps by fate, been assigned to live through it.The task before the young is a formidable one. As reported in the International Labor Review(1994): First, the sheer size of its [Russia s] population and economy raises training and skill-related issues of unparalleled proportions; second, the political and economic reforms implemented in the final years of perestroika and in the aftermath of the
in educationalresearch on a broad scale.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirpartial support of this work (DUE grant number 1504618). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714395.n400[2] M. Parry (2012). " Supersizing" the College Classroom: How One Instructor Teaches 2,670 Students. Chronicle of Higher Education.[3] M. Soledad, J. Grohs, S. Bhaduri, J. Doggett, J. Williams, and S
% 60% 40% 18% 15% 20% 0% CIT 12000 CIT 21400 Agree Neither agree or disagree Table 7: Perceptions of Mentees towards Mentoring CIT 12000 CIT 21400 The mentors gave me the sense that s/he and I The mentors modeled how to overcome challenges shared similarities in the background. and reach personal goals. The mentors helped me explore resources to The mentors showed me how to treat failed succeed academically. attempts as a
participants to expand upon previousanswers and provide additional insights into their relationships with their advisor(s). Thequestions are included in Table 3 in Appendix A.The survey was reviewed by a group of graduate students outside of the participant pool acrossmultiple institutions and by our grant’s external advisory board. The survey was revised based onfeedback to improve clarity and ensure the appropriateness of selected subscales. Once responsesto the recommendations from the external feedback sources were implemented, the final surveywas administered via Qualtrics and was made available to participants for four weeks. Theresearchers’ Institutional Review Boards approved this study (HUM00230743, #23-901).ParticipantsThe survey was
their collective ability tomeet established research standards. Such assessment is commonly performed through a reviewof the publication(s) associated with that field of practice. By evaluating multiple years ofpublication, the caliber of research can also be evaluated for trends. Several examples of suchself-assessment studies have been performed in the field of engineering education. Thisliterature review is subdivided into three sections: example studies of scholarship, suggestedscholarship standards, and description of scholarship standards.Example Studies of ScholarshipWankat (1999) published the results from a critical review of 20 issues of the Journal ofEngineering Education (JEE). His review included 231 articles published in JEE
range of 35 ft/s ~ 40 ft/s, slow enough to allow the wireless video system to stream video. The aircraft should have good dynamic stability in all axes, and the neutral point should be far enough aft of the CG to facilitate a large static margin for good longitudinal static stability.The students decided that a flying wing configuration would satisfy these basic design criteria.The flying wing configuration allowed simplified analysis, design and fabrication as well asproviding a lightweight and aerodynamically efficient platform. A flying wing produces liftmore efficiently than a conventional aircraft configuration of wings, fuselage, and tail. Sinceweight is one of the primary concerns in the aircraft design, the flying
). Page 15.1096.1411. F. W. Taylor, The Principles of Scientific Management, New York: Harper & Brothers.12. B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison and K. G. Corley, “Identification in Organizations: An Examination ofFour Fundamental Questions”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 325 (2008).13. F. A. Mael and B. E. Ashforth, “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the ReformulatedModel of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103 (1992).14. R. Van Dick, J. Ullrich and P. A. Tissington, “Working under a Black Cloud: How to SustainOrganizational Identification after a Merger “,British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S69 (2006).15. C. Bullis and B. Bach, “Socialization Turning Points: An Examination of Change in
Paper ID #8899The Influence of Student-Faculty Interactions on Post-Graduation Intentionsin a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Program: A Case StudyDr. Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida Dr. Lisa Massi is the Director of Operations Analysis for Accreditation, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of a NSF-funded S-STEM program and program evaluator for an NSF-funded REU program. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence and career development in the STEM fields.Caitlyn R
establish remarkable footprints and make an impact that matters. Simul- taneously, Daniel is the CEO of an EdTech start-up. Prior to joining FIU, Daniel had worked in Dubai for the ministry of Education as a STEM Educator and Lead Instructor. Previous work experience was in the United Kingdom (as an assistant Lead manager) and Nigeria. To date, he has co-authored 2 journal articles, authored 2 Physics textbooks, held many leadership roles and won several awards (one notable one is a World Bank award).Dr. Bruk T. Berhane, Florida International University Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelorˆa C™s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland in 2003. He then completed a masterˆa C™s degree in
- Revised (SLQ- R) Sherman, D. K., 2021 Frontiers in Doctoral USA Perceived Adapted Zimet et al. (1988) Ortosky, L., Psychology students Social support Leong, S., Kello, C., & Hegarty, M. (2021) Smith, A. B., 2021 Nurse education Doctoral USA Collaboration DevelopedUmberfield, E., today students of LeadershipGranner, J. R., and Innovation Harris, M., in MentoringLiestenfeltz, B
design in mid-curricula engineering sciences courses.References[1] A. Rugarcia, R. M. Felder, D. R. Woods, and J. E. Stice, “The future of engineering education: Part 1. A vision for a new century,” Chem Eng Educ, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2000.[2] J. Trapani and K. Hale, “Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science & Engineering Indicators 2022. NSB-2022-3.,” National Science Foundation, 2022.[3] T. Litzinger, L. R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, and W. Newstetter, “Engineering education and the development of expertise,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 123–150, 2011.[4] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, and K. Edstrom, “Rethinking engineering education
nput C-elem and a T ment TH1n gate is equivalent s t to an n- -input OR ggate. NCL th hreshold gat may also include a reset input to initialize the output. tes o e . Circuit diagrams designate res settable gate by either a d or an n appearing i es inside the gate, along g with the gate’s thre e
] International Engineering Alliance, "Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies," Jun. 21, 2021. Accessed: Oct. 14, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/IEA-Graduate-Attributesand-Professional- Competencies-2021.1-Sept-2021.pdf[2] D. H. Jonassen, Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge, 2010.[3] S. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W. M. Sullivan, and L. S. Shulman, Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field, 1st ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[4] H. S. Lee, A. Pallant, S. Pryputniewicz, T. Lord, M. Mulholland, and O. L. Liu, "Automated text scoring and real‐time adjustable
theappropriateness of the feedback and manage the emotions (or affect) that comes withreceiving negative or constructive feedback. Carless and Boud argue that achieving thesethree feedback literacy competencies maximise the chances that a student will actually learnfrom feedback and take action.While there have been attempts to build on this model in the feedback literacy space, such asChong’s Ecological Perspective [7] and Wongvorachan et al.’s digital feedback literacymodel [8], these models have not become as ubiquitous as the original feedback literacymodel. An investigation of these models find that they tend to take the original feedbackliteracy model in its entirety and add additional dimensions and information too it (see Figure2). These dimensions
Sacramento State and by an NSF grant (DUE # 2235774).References [1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning”, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, Jan. 2005. [2] S. Rodenbusch, et al. “Early engagement in course-based research increases graduation rates and completion of science, engineering, and mathematics degrees,” CBE life sciences education, vol. 15, 2016, doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0117. [3] C. D. Wilson, J. A. Taylor, S. M. Kowalski, and J. Carlson, “The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 2009. [4] C. Katie, M. Blum Michelle, M. Julie, and S.-C. C
, alsohave the highest level of tentativeness in the LIWC analysis, suggesting that their leadership isexpressed in a way that invites others’ input. The GCA analysis (Fig. 4) is somewhat at variancewith the others, suggesting that S1 and S4 are the greater participators. The overallresponsiveness scores are very similar for all team members, but the social impact scorescorroborate the observation that S3 seems disempowered.Figure 3 - Scores for each member (S1-S4) of each team for each of the three LIWC constructs. Theresults for team F22 are skewed by S4’s very small number of utterances.Figure 4 - Scores for each member (S1-S4) of each team for each of the three GCA constructs. The resultsfor team F22 are skewed by S4’s very small number of
Hispanic Higher Education, 20(3), 297-312. 4. Prescott, A., Coupland, M., Angelini, M., & Schuck, S. (2020). Making School Maths Engaging: The Maths Inside Project. Springer. 5. Tobias, S. (1998). Anxiety and mathematics. Harvard Education Review, 50, 63–70. 6. Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2006). Closing the mathematics achievement gap in high- poverty middle schools. J. of Ed. for Students Placed at Risk, 11(2), 143-159. 7. Rowan‐Kenyon, H. T., Swan, A. K., & Creager, M. F. (2012). Social cognitive factors, support, and engagement: early adolescents’ math interests as precursors to choice of career. The Career Development Quarterly, 60(1), 2-15. 8. Bursal, M., & Paznokas, L. (2006). Mathematics
adjusted because the liftload cells counteract the moment created by the drag force due to how static mechanics work. Figure 4. Statics Diagram for Drag Moment AdjustmentUsing the statics illustrated in Figure 4, the adjustments for the lift force are [3]: 𝐹 , , =𝐹 , , −𝐹 ∗ (Eq. 1) 𝐹 , , =𝐹 , , +𝐹 ∗ (Eq. 2)Physical Models The test bed used is a Hampton H-6910 Wind tunnel with a test section of 23 in x 8 in x 8in. A cylinder of 1.6 in diameter was tested, as shown in Figure 5, to find the lift and drag forcesacting on a 3D-printed body. This was done with a flow velocity of 10.06 m/s, considering laminarflow conditions
without anyexternal disturbances, allowing them to take the test in a restful setting. All the sessions werevideo recorded with the consent of the participants.As each student completed the ping pong ball launcher design task, s/he was video recordedvia zoom. The recording of each participant was then analyzed using the following sequence: a) transcription – verbal protocol was transcribed from the video recording. b) segmentation – dividing the verbal textual data into units that could be coded using a pre-defined coding scheme [21]; c) coding – using the previously established coding scheme, a design step was chosen to describe each student’s “location” in the overall design process [22].Two coders coded each segment of the
dynamics in the construction sector. It is also vital toexplore how team performance and project outcomes are affected by the personalities ofindividuals and the entire team.References[1] M. S. Prewett, A. A. Walvoord, F. R. Stilson, M. E. Rossi, and M. T. Brannick, “The Team Personality-Team Performance Relationship Revisited: The Impact of Criterion Choice, Pattern of Workflow, and Method of Aggregation,” Human Performance, 22(4), 273–296, 2009.[2] E. Salas, E., D. L. Reyes, and A. L. Woods, “The Assessment of Team Performance: Observations and Needs,” Innovative Assessment of Collaboration, 21-36, 2017.[3] J. E. Mathieu, J. R. Hollenbeck, D. V. Knippenberg, and D. R. Ilgen, “A Century of Work Teams in the
Academies Press, 2018.Stevens and colleagues (2008, p.365)[12] J. Worell, Encyclopedia of women and gender, two-volume set: Sex similarities anddifferences and the impact of society on gender. Academic Press, 2001.[13] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, "Understanding the science experiences of successful womenof color: Science identity as an analytic lens," Journal of Research in Science Teaching: TheOfficial Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 8, pp.1187-1218, 2007[14] S. Stryker and P. J. Burke, "THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OFAN IDENTITYTHEORY."[15] S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and M. Bartlett, "Engineering identity development: A review of thehigher education literature," International journal of education
1 27 1 29 The findings suggests that the extent of reflection on a topic that a PST was curious aboutdid not meaningfully relate to any changes in their teaching confidence. This is similar to thefindings from Antink-Meyer et al.’s study wherein science curiosity and change in confidencewas not observed. Reflection on content and the development of content knowledge was notdirect. In addition to examining journaling strategies that sustain connectedness to inquiry andengineering design experiences, future studies are needed that examine whether disciplinarydomains imbue associations between types of curiosity and types of epistemic engagement.RQ2 What is the nature of the engineering curiosity expressed
increasing access to like-minded peers through astructured cohort-based community of practice. Participating in this program allows engineeringfaculty to add value to the promotion and tenure portfolio that goes beyond curriculumdevelopment to disseminating best teaching practices. Given that today engineering facultymembers are even more accountable for the effectiveness of their teaching and learningactivities, this is an ideal program to incentivize engineering faculty in a way that enhances theirpromotion and publishing opportunities.To learn more, visit www.PurduePD.com.6. Appendix7. References[1] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, "Applying authentic learning through cultivation of the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom
represented (particularly those on the outer fringes of thenetwork who have fewer connections), as those only connected through workshop attendancecan no longer be used in this calculation. However, five of node 29’s direct connections (a totalof 21 other nodes) were made and maintained through workshops alone, and so node 29’snetwork is still decreased when workshop connections are no longer considered.Also of note are the two relatively large nodes who did not use workshops in developing theirEM: 11 and 3. When connections made through workshops were removed from the network, thebetweenness of node 3 dropped a small amount from 0.08 to 0.06. However, node 3 describedtheir experience at KEEN conferences (their most influential resource) as
a team decided they’d like to obtain help from a Consultant, they could choose one to“hire” from a list of all the Consultants in the program. The team reached out to them to schedule amutually agreeable time and were asked to give advance notice on the topic(s) with which they want toreceive help. The Project Consultants were trained such that their interaction was much more aligned withfocused instruction that enabled a team to solve their own problem, as opposed to directly solving theproblem for the team. In this way, working with a Project Consultant served to both advance the progressof the team’s project and reinforce the broader course outcome of increased engineering self-efficacy. A small amount of internal funding was
Paper ID #37223Work in Progress: Developing an Engineering Community ina FablabJan Edwards Jan L. Edwards is an Associate Professor of Engineering at the College of Lake County in Illinois. She received her Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Materials Science and Engineering at Michigan Technological University. Ms. Edwards teaches general engineering courses, manages outreach initiatives and the CLC Baxter Innovation Lab at the community college. She is also serving as the Principal Investigator on the college’s NSF S-STEM grant, Building an Academic Community of Engineering Scholars.ANA PIZANO Ana K. Pizano
flexibility on how studentsidentify and integrate assets in the learning and engineering design process. To this end,instructor professional development on ABP is needed. As a next step, we will explore ways toengage other instructors in ABP-related training and identify a broader set of ABPs.References[1] A. Haverkamp, M. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and Q.-L. Driskill, “Calling for a Paradigm Shift in the Study of Gender in Engineering Education,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 55, Feb. 2021.[2] A. E. Trauth, J. M. Buckley, T. N. Barnes, J. Enszer, S. Rooney, and R. Davidson, “Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Cross-Sectional Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity
all students enrolled in TEC116 during this period, and persistence data on other majorswould provide useful information for other programs within the department.References1. Sorby, S. A. (2005). Assessment of a" new and improved" course for the development of 3-D spatial skills. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69(3).2. Veurink, N. L., Hamlin, A. J., Kampe, J. C. M., Sorby, S. A., Blasko, D. G., Holliday-Darr, K. A., Trich Kremer, J. D., Abe Harris, L. V., Connolly, P. E., Sadowski, M. A., Harris, K. S., Brus, C. P., Boyle, L. N., Study, N. E., & Knott, T. W. (2009). Enhancing visualization skills-improving options and success (EnVİSIONS) of engineering and technology students. The Engineering Design Graphics
are a few limitations of the potential study. As an exploratory research study, thestatistical significance of the analysis has limitations compared to the ones from theexplanatory research study. Another limitation is that it needs to be further tested in differentsettings such as large, commercial, educational applications, or across different institutions tomake the results more generalizable. Furthermore, the study doesn’t account for differentconfounding variables such as ethnicity, academic performance, or race. Moreover, this studycould be enhanced by including the process data such as classroom observations for students’engagement [28] , or other students analytics data.References[1] D. Yang and S. J. Baldwin, “Using technology to
Computational Toolsin Engineering Education: A Case Study on the Use of Mathcad,” Chemical EngineeringEducation (CEE), vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 180–87, 1997.[10]H. S. Fogler and N. M. Gurmen, “Aspen Plus™ Workshop for Reaction Engineeringand Design,” p. 44.[11]N. Chonacky and D. Winch, “Maple, Mathematica, and Matlab: the 3M’s withoutthe tape,” Computing in Science Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8–16, Jan. 2005, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2005.18.[12]P. V. V. R. Rao, G. Durga Prasad, and S. Dileep Kumar Varma, “PedagogicalApproach to Teach the Modeling of Power Electronic Converters,” in 2014 IEEE SixthInternational Conference on Technology for Education, Dec. 2014, pp. 191–192. doi:10.1109/T4E.2014.59