entire class in a large lecture hall with each presenter havingapproximately one minute of Q&A after their presentation. Students are graded by the instructorof record, the course graduate teaching assistant, and the undergraduate mentors assigned to theclass. Grading is based on oral and visual presentation, and student understanding of technicalcontent. Furthermore, a classroom response system (clickers or a streamlined Google form) isused by the class members to provide additional feedback to the presenter. Peer feedbackcontributed a very small portion (~5%) of the student’s presentation grade.The articles selected by the study population over a nine-year period were analyzed. The authorsindependently assigned each presented article to
Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. Educ. Stat. Q. 2, 59–60 (2000).8. Kokkelenberg, E. C. & Sinha, E. Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students. Econ. Educ. Rev. 29, 935–946 (2010).9. Geisinger, B. N. & Raman, D. R. Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors. This Artic. is from Int. J. Eng. Educ. 29, 1–12 (2013).10. Jensen, L. & Konradsen, F. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2018). doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9676-011. Freina, L. & Ott, M. A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art
workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Eng. Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[8] K. Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Rev., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991.[9] P. H. Collins, Black feminist thought : knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York ; London : Routledge, 2000., 2000.[10] J. S. Jordan-Zachary, “Am I a Black Woman or a Woman Who is Black?: Thoughts on the Meaning of Intersectionality,” Polit. Gend., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 254–263, 2007.[11] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, The double bind: the price of being a minority
. Higher Educ., vol. 59, pp. 1059-1073, 2018.[12] Z. S. Wilson, S. Y. McGuire, P. A. Limbach, M. P. Dowyle, L. G. Marzilli, and I. M. Warner, “Diversifying science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM): an inquiry into successful approaches in chemistry,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 91, pp. 1860- 1866, 2014.[13] J. Frechtling, User-friendly handbook for project evaluations. Washington DC: National Science Foundation. Division of Research and Learning in Formal and Informal Settings. 2010.[14] M. Q. Patton, Utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.[15] G. L. Rose, “Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale,” Res. Higher Educ., vol. 44, no. 4, pp
, no. 7, 2009.[15] K. S. Cameron, “An Introduction to the Competing Values Framework,” Haworth Press, p. 4, 2009.[16] R. E. Quinn, S. R. Faerman, M. . Thompson, and M. . McGrath, Becoming a master manager : a competing values approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1996.[17] K. A. Lawrence, P. Lenk, and R. E. Quinn, “Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 87–102, 2009.[18] GEL, “Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program (GEL) - MIT Innovation Initiative,” 2009. [Online]. Available: https://innovation.mit.edu/resource/gel/. [Accessed: 15-Jul- 2019].[19] ILE, “Georgia Tech
). Validity and reliability evidence of the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment tool. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 452-477. doi: 10.1002/jee.20124[8] Zhu, Q., Zoltowski, C., Feister, M., Buzzanell, P., Oakes, W., and Mead, A. (2014). The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decisionmaking in project-based design teams: integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Indianapolis, IN.[9] Bielefeldt, A., Canney, N., Swan, C. and Knight, D. (2019). Efficacy of macroethics education in engineering. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.[10] Bielefeldt, A., Polmer, M
response to being actively engaged in the classroom," PNAS, vol. 116, no. 39, 2019.[11] D. Pistrui, J. K. Layer and S. L. Dietrich, "Mapping the behaviors, motives, and professional competencies of entrepreneurially minded engineers in theory and practice: an empirical investigation," in Preceedings: American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[12] R.S. Harichandran, N. O. Erdil, M.-I. Carnasciali, C. Q. Li and A. R. Rana, "EML Indices to Assess Student Learning through Integrated e-Learning Modules," in Proceedings: American Society of Engineering Education, Tampa, FL, 2019.[13] B.J. LaMeres, "Deploying Adaptive Learning Environments to Overcome Background Deficiences and Facilitate Mastery of
and J. Coughlin, “Examining Person–Environment Fit and Academic Major Satisfaction,” J. Coll. Couns., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 250–262, 2017.[29] D. W. Cox, A. L. Bjornsen, T. S. Krieshok, and Y. Liu, “Occupational Engagement and Academic Major Satisfaction: Vocational Identity’s Mediating Role,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2016.[30] R. S. Burt, Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., 1992.[31] M. Scheidt, R. Senkpeil, J. Chen, A. Godwin, and E. Berger, “SAT Does Not Spell Success: How Non-Cognitive Factors Can Explain Variance in the GPA of Undergraduate Engineering and Computer Science Students,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2018- Octob, pp. 1–5, 2019.
ameasurement module connected to 5 displays: apparent power (S), active power (P), reactivepower (Q), RMS voltage magnitude (|Vs|), and RMS current magnitude (|Is|). The sign of theactive power display indicates whether that power is flowing from the DC source to the AC grid(negative) or from the grid into the converter/DC source (positive). The polarity is a conventionthat is chosen to match that of the laboratory experiment. Students can also use the providedscope to visually inspect the influence of switching frequency and filter sizes on current ripple,as well as the influence of Vc and Gamma on the current waveform, as shown in Figure 5. 60
that will documentaccomplishments over the semester. The work log content should at a minimum include thestudents’ relevant activities, contributions, and work products of the week. The students shouldalso include how much time they spent on those items, and what they anticipate the upcomingweek’s work to include.Interim Committee Presentations (25%): At some full class meetings, groups give a 5-10 minutespresentation on their progress and plans for the next week, followed by Q&A to ensureintegration and collaboration across teams. Groups should rotate presenters throughout thesemester.Self and Peer evaluations (10%): Every student is required to complete four evaluations ofthemselves and peers. The most significant criteria are
. Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, 2018, p. 7.[8] M. V Svyantek, “Missing from the Classroom: Current Representations of Disability in Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, p. 7.[9] M. F. Olney and K. F. Brockelman, “The impact of visibility of disability and gender on the self-concept of university students with disabilities,” J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2005.[10] M. H. Fitzgerald, “‘You Look So Well’ The Multiple Facets of Hidden Disabilities,” Disabil. Stud. Q., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 254
to feel confident and valuedwithin academic spaces, giving them a sense of reprieve and a greater capacity to persist in theiracademic and career goals.EMPOWERING STEM PERSISTENCE AMONG GRADUATE WOMEN 17 ReferencesAlexander, Q. R., & Hermann, M. A. (2015). African-American women's experiences in graduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at a Predominantly White University: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039705Anderson, A. J., Sánchez, B., Reyna, C., & Rasgado-Flores, H. (2020). "It just weighs in the
& Exposition Proceedings, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Jun. 2008, p. 13.1199.1-13.1199.6. doi: 10.18260/1-2--3148.[7] A. J. Jaeger, M. K. Eagan, and L. G. Wirt, “Retaining Students in Science, Math, and Engineering Majors: Rediscovering Cooperative Education.,” J. Coop. Educ. Internsh., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 20–32, 2008.[8] D. Jeske and C. M. Axtell, “The Nature of Relationships in e-Internships: A Matter of the Psychological Contract, Communication and Relational Investment,” J. Work Organ. Psychol., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2018.[9] Q. Liu, D. Reeve, C. Rottmann, and E. Moore, “Examining Workplace Affordance and Student Engagement in Engineering Co-op and Internship Literature.,” Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ., vol
Mental Illness,” Stigma Res Action, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Jan. 2011, doi:10.5463/sra.v1i1.9.[24] O. Eylem et al., “Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematicreview and meta-analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 879, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3.[25] F. Gary, “Stigma: Barrier to mental health care among ethnic minorities.,” Issues in mental health nursing,vol. 26, pp. 979–99, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1080/01612840500280638.[26] E. C. Wong, R. L. Collins, J. Cerully, R. Seelam, and B. Roth, “Racial and Ethnic Differences in MentalIllness Stigma and Discrimination Among Californians Experiencing Mental Health Challenges,” Rand Health Q,vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2017, Accessed
, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1185[28] Goonatilake, R., & Bachnak, R. (2012). Promoting Engineering Education among High School and Middle School Students. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and …, 13(1), 15–21. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Promoting+Engineering+ Education+Among+High+School+and+Middle+School+Students#0[29] Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2020). Project-based learning for middle school students monitoring standby power: replication of impact on stem knowledge and dispositions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09674-3[30] Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M
Expert Practitioners,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 359–379, 2007.[4] N. J. McNeill, E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, D. J. Therriault, and I. Krause, “Undergraduate Students’ Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 560– 584, 2016.[5] C. J. Atman and K. M. Bursic, “Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference?,” Res. Eng. Des., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 240–250, 1996.[6] G. Rowland, “What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice,” Performace Improv. Q., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 65–86, 1992.[7] D. C. Wynn and P. J. Clarkson, “Process models in design and development,” Res. Eng. Des., vol. 29, no. 2, pp
of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1967.[3] L. L. Putnam and C. Stohl, "Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context," Communication Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 248-265, 1990.[4] J. R. Wieselmann, E. A. Dare, E. A. Ring-Whalen and G. H. Roehrig, ""I just do what the boys tell me": Exploring small group student interactions in an integrated STEM unit," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, pp. 112-144, 11 July 2019.[5] M. A. Peeters, C. G. Rutte, H. F. J. M. van Tuijl and I. M. M. J. Reymen, "Designing in Teams; Does Personality Matter?," Small Group Research, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 438-467, 2008.[6] M.-É. Roberge, Q. J. Xu and D. M. Rousseau, "Collective
engineering design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013.[3] C. Garibay and R. M. Teasdale, “Equity and Evaluation in Informal STEM Education,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 2019, no. 161, pp. 87–106, 2019.[4] B. Williams, J. Figueiredo, and J. Trevelyan, Engineering Practice in a Global Context. 2013.[5] R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere, “The ‘new environmental paradigm,’” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 1978.[6] A. Byars-Winston, “Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 340–357, 2014.[7] C. Kivunja and A. B. Kuyini, “Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 5, p
implementation of blended learning model in Semiconductor Device course," 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kanazawa, 2015, pp. 176-180.[11] R. Shen, M. Wang, W. Gao, D. Novak, and L. Tang, “Mobile learning in a large blended computer science classroom: System function, pedagogies, and their impact on learning,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 538–546, Nov. 2009.[12] K. Renaud and Q. Cutts, “Teaching human-centered security using nontraditional techniques,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2013.[13] M. Redekopp and G. Ragusa, “Evaluating flipped classroom strategies and tools for computer engineering,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf., 2013.[14] E. F
gets better with time. Virtual experience makes it harder to collaborate (1 mention) o Not able to share opinion with the project members when we need them instead we focus on our part only which is a good thing but it motivates knowing what others thinking. Other challenges (3 items) o Request the data needed to create an accurate model o The most difficult challenge to my research is making sure that the Deep Q learning programs are debugged and properly rebuilt. o Technical difficulties sometimes Not anticipating any challenges (1 mention) o I don't really think anything would be challenging.What differences do
; Simmons, J. L. (1969). The constant comparative method of qualitative research. Issues in participant observation: A text and reader, 216-228.48. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.49. Hertel, J. D., Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). The roles of engineering notebooks in shaping elementary engineering student discourse and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 39(9), 1194-1217.50. Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2000). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11, 353–40051. Bazerman, C. (2006). Analyzing the multidimensionality
Measurements & Networking (M&N), Catania, Italy, July 8-10, 2019; DOI: 10.1109/IWMN.2019.8805042. [6] P. Sharma et al., “Deep Convolutional Neural Network Design Approach for 3D Object Detection for Robotic Grasping,” 2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 6-8, 2020; DOI: 10.1109/CCWC47524.2020.9031186. [7] Z-Q. Zhao et al., “ Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Review,”arXiv:1807.05511v2 [cs.CV] 16 Apr 2019. [8] N. Baker et al., “Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape,” PLoS Comput Biol 14(12): e1006613, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006613. [9] D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, A. Toshev, and D. Anguelov
, q. Seeking information physics and chemistry. r. Sketching Synthesizing s. TestingSatisfaction with the Project t. Understanding the problem u. Using creativity 9. I am happy with my
Slaughter, J.B., Tao, Y. & Pearson, W. (Eds.), Changing the Face of Engineering: The African American Experience.. (pp. 241-255). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Malcom, L., & Malcom, S.(2011). The double bind: The next generation. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 162–172.Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., & Brown, J. W. (1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science (No. 76-R-3). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from http://archives.aaas.org/docs/1975- Double%20Bind.pdfMargherio, C., Horner-Devine, M. C., Mizumori, S. J., & Yen, J. W. (2016). Learning to Thrive: Building Diverse Scientists’ Access to Community and
://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/nsf11309.pdf. [Accessed November 10, 2017].[3] D. Nelson and D. Rogers, “A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://users.nber.org/~sewp/events/2005.01.14/Bios+Links/Krieger-rec4- Nelson+Rogers_Report.pdf?q=adds. [Accessed November 10, 2017].[4] B. Yoder, Brian, “Engineering by the Numbers.” Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles/16Profile-Front-Section.pdf. [Accessed November 30, 2017].[5] V. Valian, Why so slow?: The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.[6] C
(Vol. 28, pp. 425–435). Retrieved from https://uspfodc.us/resources/41/download/Engeering_Students_and_EShip_Education_- _Involvement_Attitudes_and_Outcomes.pdfEpicenter. (2017). Epicenter Program: National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation. Retrieved from http://epicenter.stanford.edu/page/aboutJin, Q., Gilmartin, S. K., Chen, H. L., Johnson, S. K., Weiner, M. B., Lerner, R. M., & Sheppard, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial Career Choice and Characteristics of Engineering and Business Students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 598–613.Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876-1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2
). Specifically, they valued practicalexamples of how to be more receptive, what to do in problematic situations, how to respond tobias, as well as the ‘coming out’ activity (3). 5.1.4. Recommendations for improvement to Safe Zone Level 1 workshopsSeveral respondents indicated that the conference workshops did not offer sufficient time (12).One suggestion, if scheduling for longer workshops is not possible, was to have the option ofparticipants to voluntarily stay afterwards for more discussion and Q&A, at the discretion of thefacilitator. Further suggestions for improvements of future Safe Zone workshops were to providehandouts as a packet at the beginning of the session (note: that was the norm but it’s possiblethat a facilitator forgot
D: Student infographic examples - Example infographic posters from fall and winterquarters. The infographic with the most votes among their peers in each section for the fallquarter is reflected below in Figures D1-D3. The winter quarter top vote earners are shown inFigures D4-D5. Figure D1: Infographic on Peer Learning from Monday section (Team D), F2016Figure D2: Infographic on Reading from Wednesday section (Team Q), F2016Figure D3: Infographic on Questioning from Friday section (Team II), F2016Figure D4: Infographic on Questioning from Tuesday section (Team 9), W2017Figure D5: Infographic on Questioning from Thursday section (Team 18), W2017Appendix E: Peer and instructor assessment of infographic examplesThe infographic rubric
. Q. Fan, "Challenge of Model Based Definition Technology to Engineering Graphics Education", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 163, pp. 264-268, Apr. 201211. Ziemian, C. W., “A Systems Approach to Manufacturing as Implemented within a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17, No. 6, Pp. 558-568, 2001.12. Mott, R.J., Bennett, R.J., Stratton, M.J., and Scott Danielson, “Integration of Manufacturing into Mechanical Engineering Education Curricula,” ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.13. Danielson, S., Kirkpatrick, A., & Ervin, E., “ASME Vision 2030: Helping to Inform Engineering Education.” Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, IEEE/ASEE, October 12 - 15
, cohesion and performance,” Educ. Train., 2018.[27] M. A. G. Peeters, C. G. Rutte, H. F. J. M. Van Tuijl, and I. M. M. J. Reymen, “The big five personality traits and individual satisfaction with the team,” Small Gr. Res., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 187–211, 2006.[28] A. Edmondson, “Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 350–383, Jun. 1999.[29] A. C. Edmondson and Z. Lei, “Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct,” Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–43, Mar. 2014.[30] A. C. Edmondson, “Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams,” in International Handbook of Organizational