follows. Students need morethan the computers and their programs. This article presents information about a 21st centuryprogram created in 1996: a comprehensive engineering program at Madison West High Schoolwithin blocks of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin.I. IntroductionCourses including Principles of Engineering 1&2, Materials Science, and Computer AidedDesign, including mechanical design, 3D solid modeling and 3D animation, are the make-up ofthis 21st century high school engineering program.Students in engineering courses participate in at least fourteen different case studies. These casestudies are diverse in nature in order to give the students just a taste of many different types ofengineering. Engineering ethics
feedback from others. structured programs.System Thinking Skills Self-learning Skills Ability to: understand how events interrelate; syn- Ability to: learn independently; continuously seek to thesize new information with knowledge from pre- acquire new knowledge; acquire relevant knowledge vious courses and experiences. to solve problems.Ethics and Professionalism Business Skills Ability to: understand and demonstrate professional Ability to: accurately estimate production costs; cal- and ethical behavior; understand social and ethical culate the cost effects of
the instruction of the concrete physical processes thatwere chosen as fundamental biology knowledge. The concrete processes chosen include: • biological information storage and processing (the central dogma) • genome organization and genomics • biological system integration at the cellular, tissue, organism, and ecosystem levels • disease and etiology • evolution / diversification • biological energy conversion and utilization (bioenergetics) • biological signaling and communication • legal, ethical issues related to biotechnologyHaving outlined the course strategies and content, the instructors then chose the “problems”;settings that would fit within their expertise and integrate the course themes and
requirements and pros and cons of different sources of capital. 5. Abilities to apply knowledge about intellectual property to strategically create barriers to entry for competitors. 6. Abilities to plan and manage a design project to complete specified deliverables within allotted time and budget. 7. Abilities to organize, improve, and contribute effectively to a multidisciplinary project team. 8. Abilities to access, learn, process, and demonstrate knowledge competence to advance a team-based entrepreneurial engineering project. 9. Abilities to explain and demonstrate ethical and professional responsibility in the context of team interactions, class assignments, client interactions, and professional
more sustainable electric toothbrush (with lessenvironmental burden), and culturally and economically appropriate coffee-maker re-design forthe Japanese kitchen were included as projects.Assessment:Following the implementation of the modifications in the classroom setting, using parts of theE2020 national student survey (developed as part of a separate NSF project #0550608) alongwith some course specific questions, assessment of the introductory design course occurred inthe spring 2010 semester. The assessment tool asked the students to evaluate the emphasis andimpact that all their engineering courses have had on the following: • ethical issues, • professional skills, • systems thinking, • life long learning
). The departmental criteria forevaluating the proposals as suitable capstone projects are below. Project-related criteria 1. The number and variety of different disciplines the project will involve, such as structures, geotechnical, environmental and water resources, transportation, sustainability, construction and public policy. (ABET5 “multidisciplinary teams”) 2. The real-world constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, constructability and sustainability.5 In essence, the Page 25.309.3 benefits to society from doing the project. 3
provide a detailed description of a three week core module which can becompleted in two lecture hours and seven lab hours in addition to brief descriptions ofsupplemental activities that can be used to expand the unit, including biostatistics and ethics. Forthe core module and each supplemental activity, the time and materials resources required willbe indicated, as well as the ABET criterion that are addressed. Finally, we will report on ABETand student assessment relating to the unit, and end with some discussion and conclusions.Core ModuleThe core module consists of two hours of lecture and seven hours of lab. In our course, thiscovers three weeks of class – one week of lecture followed by two weeks of lab; however,supplemental activities used
AC 2012-4167: ADAPTING CURRICULAR MODELS FOR LOCAL SERVICE-LEARNING TO INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITIESJames L. Huff, Purdue University James L. Huff is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University as well as the Assistant Education Administrator for EPICS. He earned his BS in Computer Engineering at Harding University and an MS in electrical and computer engineering at Purdue University. A member of the engineering faculty at Harding University, he is on an academic leave to pursue his Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University. His research interests include ethical reasoning and social responsibility in engineering, human-centered design learning and assessment, cross-cultural
Economics and Management of 1 CPE312 Computer Organization 3 ETHICS Integrated Studies In Comp 3 CPE315 Digital Design II with Laboratory 4 FREELE Free Elective One 3 CPE387 Embedded System Design 3 HUMC20 Introduction to Humanities I 3 CPE408 Operating Systems 3 HUMC20 Introduction to Humanities II 3 CPE410 Introduction to Computer 3 MATH10 Precalculus Mathematics 4 CPE447 FPGA Design 3 MATH11 Calculus and Analytic Geometry I 4 CPE448 Introduction to
; Reich1991). Engineering Cultures takes a small step in this direction by striving to enable engineeringstudents to understand themselves as holding perspectives by systematically challenging them torecognize and explore perspectives other than their own.The course emerged from a research project sponsored by the Ethics and Values Studies program(now Societal Dimensions of Science and Technology) at the National Science Foundation. Aftercompleting undergraduate degrees in engineering, both authors went on to conduct ethnographicand historical work in the social studies of technology and engineering (e.g., Downey 1998a;Downey and Lucena 1994, 1998; Lucena 1996). With NSF support, we conducted a three-yearethnographic study of how engineering
to different views on accountability from students and professionals, which arestrengthened further by the fact the student is a customer, whereas the employee is not.Accountability is not only found across several sections (e.g. Clients & Employers, Peers) of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics [12], but is an essential part of leadership –engineering or otherwise.Fairness, or the perception of, is also different between the two settings. In classroom, fairness isoften viewed as equal work distribution on a specific team project. In an engineering firm, oneteam member may have an essential role on the project, whereas another team member may beless frequently involved – yet they are still contributing, and valued team
experiential activities often lead to situations known as ‘disorientingdilemmas’ [4] compelling learners to critically reflect on their preconceived notions andassumptions. This reflection results in modifications to their established meaning perspectivesand the development of new frames of reference through a transformative shift in perspectives[26].A learner’s frame of reference comprises their habits of mind, shaped by life experiences,previous education, personal interests, and social influences [27]. Cranton [28] categorized theseinto six dimensions: Philosophical (dealing with transcendental worldviews), Moral and Ethics(related to conscience and morality), Psychological (pertaining to self-concept and personalitytraits), Sociological (involving
ethics to mobile technology. A multitude of “how to write a teachingcase study” guidelines are available, including in construction education. However, literature thatprovides insights into developing a specific case study in construction engineering andmanagement is scarce. To fill this knowledge gap, this paper presents the dynamics ofdeveloping an educational case study to explore the implementation of target value design(TVD). This case study was developed for engineering and construction management students toformulate, discuss, and decide on strategies, actions, and solutions to provide the best value tothe project owner when implementing TVD. This work-in-progress paper focuses on the pilottest when developing the case study. Pre-class
preparingstudents for the complexities of modern engineering roles is an imperative shift recognized acrossacademic and industrial spheres (Queiruga-Dios et al., 2021). This transformation is driven by thegrowing demand for engineers who are not only technically adept but also possess a broadunderstanding of the environmental, societal, and ethical implications of engineering projects (deVere et al., 2009; McGinn, 2018). A key aspect of this educational reform is the emphasis oninterdisciplinary learning and the application of knowledge to real-world problems, fostering ageneration of engineers equipped to tackle global challenges with innovative and sustainablesolutions (Jamieson & Lohmann, 2009; Froyd, Wankat, & Smith, 2012). Pedagogical
can plan my office hour effectively’, ‘I can create instruments forevaluating group performance in a collaborative activity’, ‘I understand in what situationsimplementing a group activity is more effective than implementing an individual activity’, etc. Atotal of six factors emerged from the EFA, however, the scale ‘Harnessing the Power ofTechnology’ did not make it to final factors and a new factor was suggested ‘Ethical Practices’.The factor loadings of the final factor structure are shown in Table 4. The factor loadings for thefirst factor (F1) ranged from 0.56 to 0.8, second factor (F2) from 0.58 to 0.77, third factor (F3)from 0.54 to 0.84, fourth factor (F4) from 0.54 to 0.78, fifth factor (F5) from 0.42 to 0.81, andsixth factor (F6
Review Board (IRB) conducts ethical reviews on all researchproposals involving human research participants, including the use of their personal data.Once the list of relevant stakeholders was finalised and IRB approval was granted, the secondphase began. To gather input from the stakeholders, survey forms and several focus groupdiscussions were originally planned. Unfortunately, Covid-19 pandemic struck and restrictedour approach to mainly online surveys. As such, survey forms were prepared and sent torespondents using “Verint” online survey system that allowed each respondent to receive aunique survey link via email. The response generated from each link was stored on thesystem safely.Despite the challenges presented by the pandemic, relatively
ofSTEM education. Moreover, it explores various dimensions of AM education, includinginnovative laboratories equipped with advanced 3D printers, remote laboratories to enable accessfrom distant locations, curriculum development encompassing on-ground, online, and hybridprograms. Furthermore, this study examines AM software tools and simulations, industrycertifications, and hardware and equipment used in educational settings. The paper also delvesinto educational pathways, collaborations between academia and industry, workforce demands,and the ethical and societal aspects of AM education, focusing on sustainability and equity.Overall, this study offers insights into the diverse and evolving landscape of AM education,emphasizing adaptability
education can also be a tool forengineering design to develop better products by inspiring critical thinking. Considering justiceideas prompts engineers to develop socially-focused principles in the context of their engineeringtraining, which leads to more creative solutions to implementing projects to better servecommunities [16]. There have been many initiatives to encourage students to engage with socialjustice, ethics, and empathy focused material [17] [18] [19]. At the Colorado School of Mines, aprogram focusing on teaching engineering students’ empathy through user emersion has seenstudents developing more thoughtful solutions that work better for a diverse public. Theempathy focus expands students’ ability to think creatively and their
constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; • An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; • An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.The current professional skills include: • An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams; • An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; • An ability to communicate effectively; • The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context; • A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life
: Construction Terminology and Accreditation, Ethical Dilemmas, Resume and Career Plan, Engineering and Tech Expo (visit and summary paper), Professional & Trade Organizations, and Guest Speakers.MethodologyThe basic methodology for the development and delivery of the revised CM&E 111 is presentedbelow. The author attended the ACCE2 Mid-Year Meeting held in Phoenix (February 2012) to discuss first-year construction management courses with construction management program directors at the Baccalaureate Program Chairs Meeting. Approximately forty- five (45) ACCE accredited schools were represented at this meeting. The program chairs approved a request for a survey to collect first-year construction management course
five weeks of RAMP, we added one-hour meetings twice a week committed toworkshops focusing on DEIB. The nine workshops that students participated in were based onvarious themes such as team building, intersectional identities, going beyond one’s comfort zone,culture wheels, power and privilege, microaggressions, identifying strengths and challenges,ethics, and exploring music and art reflective of the cultural heritage of the participants. Weemployed a variety of pedagogical strategies during the workshops including but not limited todiscussions, role plays, and games. Table 3 shows the structure of each of the nine workshops. Table 3: DEIB weekly session content and activitiesSession Session structure and activities
for this focus, including to better prepare students for engineering practice, which isinherently sociotechnical [2]; to increase the sense of belonging of historically excluded students,who are more likely to be interested in the social aspects [3]; and to create better societaloutcomes that consider justice [4,5,6]. Attempts to disrupt the social/technical dualism and theapolitical nature of traditional engineering education have included revising stand-alone ethicscourses and adding sociotechnical components to traditional engineering courses, such as designcourses [7-10]. However, revising stand-alone ethics courses implicitly upholds the disconnectbetween the “technical” and “social,” and adding one or two modules to a traditional
ethics, learning styles, and methodological credibility in engineering education. Whileengineering education may be interdisciplinary in name, I argue it that it remains a multidisciplinary field withtransdisciplinary ambitions. I punctuate this analysis with implications for engineering education researchersinterested in using disciplinary fissures as a catalyst for meaningful, interdisciplinary collaboration andunderstanding.BackgroundIn October 2012, I was interviewed for a job as a staff researcher at a Canadian engineeringschool. The interview was both playful and disorienting. After more than a decade of training ineducational leadership, culminating in a tenure track position at a Canadian faculty of education,I had become deeply, and
geography, the profile of engineering graduate attributes appear to follow the samepattern, i.e., engineering graduates should be knowledgeable in science and technologyfundamentals and be problem solvers, but should also possess a number of professional skills(i.e., “soft skills”) important for the profession such as effective communication andunderstanding the world where engineering is practiced (business constraints,flexibility/adaptability, societal and ethical issues, global sensitivity, etc). Numerous student-focused events on a variety of curriculum, policy, and pedagogical issues conducted by one ofthe authors have yielded similar conclusions.Some authors and reports have comprehensively outlined the elusive set of “soft skills” that
Engineering"Similarities Between Writing a Thesis/Dissertation and Writing Major Research Proposals andReports" (10 minutes) Speaker: Professor of Electrical Engineering"The Ethical Dimensions of Writing and Talking About Research" (10 minutes) Speaker: Coordinator of the Engineering Ethics Program"Incubating Ideas" Discussion and exercise led by PCC staff (15 minutes)"Coherence in Writing" (15 minutes) Discussion and exercise led by PCC staff"Managing and Surviving the Dissertation Process" (30 minutes) Discipline-specific, peer-led discussionTwo engineering faculty members participated in the workshop. A professor of electricalengineering discussed the similarities between writing the dissertation and writing
, formulation, and solution of engineering problems and design through the use of appropriate analytical, computational and experimental tools; 4. to instill in students professional and ethical responsibility, and an understanding of the impact of engineering solutions on society; and, 5. to motivate students to engage in life-long learning and knowledge of contemporary issues.The mission statement and these objectives have been published in the “UndergraduateBulletin” of the college and in the college web site8. These objectives were first drafted by thefaculty in 1998 and revised in December 2000 based on preliminary evaluations as well asfeedback from most of our constituents (i.e., students, faculty, administration, and
Comfortable Creative a Tension n c e Degree of DiversityThe Managing Creativity ClassThe class features one or more lectures in each of the elements of the creative system. Inaddition, there are lectures on ethics and personal creativity. The lectures are presented in powerpoint format and are posted for download from the Internet on the University of Oklahoma“Coursenet” system. In the Introduction to Engineering classes students are required by Collegepolicy to have laptop computers. Students can follow the lectures on their computers, and sometake notes on the power point slides. In other classes, laptops are required
the United States. John has published on engineering-communication ped- agogy for many years, including papers on engineering ethics and communication; active-learning ped- agogies; and the intersection of engineering and theatre. He has also held multiple leadership roles at the section and national levels, including President of the Southeastern Section and the national Zone II Chair, and he presently serves as the ASEE Campus Representative for the University of Georgia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Bioengineering Professional Persona: A New Communication-Intensive Course for a New Program in a New- ish College of
content and learn about applications of AI ● Coordinating mentoring and support activities to build engagement ● Conducting a computing identity study, which is where our research team comes in ● And finally, conducting an evaluation on partnerships Project Context 12-credit Interdisciplinary AI HSCC Certificate Machine Learning AI Thinking Applied AI in Business AI & Ethics Foundations • AI and digital competency • Applied AI
anexample, one of the first assignments in our first engineering class - EGR 111 (Introduction toEngineering Thinking and Practice) - was a personal statement of what each student hoped to dowith an engineering degree and where they envisioned they would be after graduation. This wasnot an easy assignment but one that we would give back to students on graduation day (nearly 4years later). Similar visioning assignments like an Independent Development Plan (IDP) wouldbe part of the curriculum too and would continue to be improved by the founding faculty team(e.g. Melissa Kenny, Kyle Luthy, Kyana Young, Courtney DiVittorio). Ethical Leadershipassignments and Career Readiness assignments in capstone design, etc. Figure 3: Some of the