operations, including design, production and manufacturing, logistics, sales, andservices, at global locations and companies. The education of future engineers has to reflect thischanging trend and demand. Systems Engineering (SE) discipline provides this critical need ofeducation to handle the increasing demands for systems efficiency, effectiveness, and integrationin engineering and business operations. This paper intends to discuss the process in the design ofa Bachelor of Science in SE curriculum. The design is based on an analysis of skill requirementsin industry under the current global market environment and global supply chain operations.This paper discusses industry needs in skills and demonstrates the match of skills to various SEcourses
metric, or metrics, in mind for measuring the level of success orfailure, such as examination or homework questions, or project requirements. Course Objectivesand Outcomes should then be included in the course syllabus distributed to each student on thefirst day of class (Figure 1).At the completion of the course, each instructor completes an assessment report for each BMEcourse they taught. The report includes the following sections; Heading, Catalog Description,Grade Distribution, Modifications Made to Course, Course Outcomes Assessment, StudentFeedback, Reflection, Proposed Actions for Course Improvement. Other sections may beincluded as each instructor or the Department wishes. These extra sections may be used toassess the “soft” skills
curricula. Third, it serves as a starting point for the development of a technical andtinkering self-efficacy instrument that will reflect both the perceptions of the engineeringcommunity as well as the ABET learning outcomes.Tinkering and technical characteristics of engineers were chosen for study because there is a richliterature that indicates that a person’s perception of their efficacy in these areas has an influenceon their persistence and their success in engineering education. This is especially true forwomen. Thus, it is important to know what engineers in business, industry and academia, as wellas engineering students, deem important and value. That is because it is likely that thesecharacteristics will be emphasized in the preparation
depicts the proposed framework for enhancing student learning. It consists of fourtypes of learning that happens over the semester long course, which the author defines as thestudent learning lifecycle. Each type of learning and their timeline are briefly described in thefollowing sections. Page 23.536.3 2 Exhibit 1: A framework for enhancing student learning in a classroom setting Comparative Integrative and Direct Reflective
these activities. Participants were also asked torate, using a 4-point Likert-type scale (1 = very little, 4 = very much), 22 items that reflected thedegree to which their internet use affected their skills. Exploratory factor analysis generated fourknowledge factors involved in internet use: non-formal, informal, professional, and social.Informal was shown to be the most important knowledge factor for participants, followed bynon-formal, social, and professional.IntroductionVarious researchers have examined the impact of internet use on academic performance andachievement of students, and have come to diverse conclusions. On one hand, some researchersfound a negative effect of internet use. Kubey, Lavin, and Barrows 1 for example found
building, model verification, and result interpretation. 2- Understand and apply statistics and probability as is used in simulation analysis. 3- Use a simulation tool to model and simulate manufacturing systems. 4- Be able to complete a manufacturing system simulation project from beginning to end.Assignments and reflection papersBoth undergraduate and graduate students worked on identical problems, although graduatestudents worked on a few more problems. The assignments covering the basis of modeling andsimulation (i.e., statistical distribution, random numbers, etc.) were submitted in written format,while the later assignments on building and running models were submitted electronically viaBlackboard. For the latter, students
-loaded designs (including a mousetrap!) and one veryinnovative design incorporating a photo-flash and photo-diode. For this latter design, the studentteam appropriately documented invention and patenting of various photodiode designs at andprior to around 1893. Special recognitions were made by the instructor to teams with anespecially impressive calibration curve for pulse duration control, a team with the most rigoroustest data set on reliability meeting the main test specification (1 mA through 1 kOhm for 1mSec), and a special ‘innovation’ award for the team with the photodiode approach.Seventeen of the nineteen students submitted the requested personal reflections essays, listing upto five ‘lessons learned’ each from the RDC experience. For
American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Comprehensive approach to teaching dynamics of planar mechanisms based on modern learning theoriesAbstractIt is well known that students have different learning styles and for teaching to be effective anon-traditional approaches that can address the different styles should be attempted. Also,according to Kolb, learning is most effective if done in a cycle involving experiencing,reflection, thinking and planning. In this paper, we present an attempt at a comprehensiveapproach to teaching the course Theory of Machines, a standard course in the majority ofmechanical engineering curricula. At the beginning of the semester, students are asked toconceptualize and realize a
Summer 2012. Student participants included10 civil engineering students (9 undergraduate and 1 graduate) at a large urban researchinstitution in the southeast United States. With the first author, they designed pre- and post-tripquestionnaires, focus group interviews, and written reflection activities to assess students’perceptions, attitudes, and learning as a result of the experience. This paper addresses threeresearch questions: 1) What is the profile of engineering students who choose to participate in a study abroad/ service learning experience, in terms of motivation for enrolling in study abroad, reasons for volunteering, and previous educational, organization and service activities
project, students assessed their performance on both technical andWorkforce Skills using inspection sheets, rubrics and other tools. This self-assessment includeda reflective paper about the project; what went well, what might be improved, and lessonslearned. After the self-assessment, the instructor also assessed student performance. Aconsensus meeting between the instructor and the student was held to discuss and reconcile anydifferences, and to plan the next activity. Documentation from this cycle could be accumulatedin an optional employment portfolio4.Project planning and assessment documentsEach individual project and each team project required a detailed written plan. Highly skilledpractitioners often create mental plans rather than
(IEW) at the University ofIdaho is formed of a diverse group of graduate students whose purpose is to develop anenvironment that fosters professional as well as technical excellence. This paper analyzes theactions taken each year by IEW leading to the formation of well-trained, collaborative, and highly-reflective cohort of graduate students that support design education. This team is developedthrough directed study courses, team projects, personal reflections and monumental technical andinterpersonal challenges. Since 1994, IEW has been successful in delivering hardware thatexceeds expectations of industry customers, shortening time frames required for large-scaledesign projects, enriching senior design mentoring, and expanding the number of
light what is oftenthe primary goal of any educational program, whereas the ultimate goal is to prepare students foremployment by providing problem solving experiences similar to what they will experience intheir careers. So, in many cases the most practical method of achieving this goal is to provide ashort term simulation of the industrial environment where the student can be observed and givenadvice how to proceed by an expert in the field when necessary.This method closely follows the circular experiential learning model first proposed by Lewinthen later refined by Kolb3,4. In this cycle, student learning is a dynamic that flows throughconcrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization and active experience. Inthis
broadening participation of underrepresented groups in engineering. Page 25.660.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Future Engineering Professors’ Views of the Role of Motivation in Teaching and LearningAbstractAs part of a larger study, doctoral students were interviewed about their perspectives on teachingand learning engineering. Participants were enrolled in engineering schools across the U.S. andexpressed interest in becoming engineering professors. In their reflections, fifteen of theparticipants talked about the role of motivation in teaching and
, the reflective interview, and the studentgenerated physical traces, e.g. sketches and notes.High school student designers Both criterion and convenience sampling approaches were employed to recruit studentdesigners for this study. There were two criteria: high school students who had an interest inengineering and were upperclassmen. We assumed that student designers with awareness andinterest in engineering would be motivated to work through the engineering design challenge.We found this indeed to be the case with all of the student designers; they were completelyengaged in the design challenge from start to finish. Upperclassmen were chosen as we assumedthey would have more ability and development to help them perform engineering
clinical care facilities. The results of the health assessment were then analyzed by thecourse instructors after returning from Guatemala. In order to assess the impact of themultidisciplinary experience on the students, a set of pre- and post-course surveys weredeveloped and administered. The results from the surveys showed increased student-reportedconfidence in their ability to develop solutions to global health issues after completing thecourse. Additionally, student comments reflected the personal and professional growth thatoccurred during the experience, including a desire to apply their respective professional skills tohelp others in need.IntroductionModern engineers must be adept at functioning in a variety of roles in the workplace
experimentation; Intensive and sustained support; Engaging teachers in concrete teaching tasks that integrate teachers’ experiences; Focusing on subject-matter knowledge and deepening teacher content knowledge; Providing explicit connections between the Professional Development (PD) activities and the student outcome goals; and Providing connections to larger issues of education/school reforms.The PD institute threads the use of the INSPIRES curriculum throughout all components –which include a content course, practice instruction, reflection, and post institute enactment.Engineering faculty model various pedagogical best practices and then teachers use these samestrategies and materials as they
situation that provoked their prediction. These situations are designed so that the predictions based upon the most common misconceptions fail to explain what is observed. Students are allowed and encouraged to “mess with” the experiment to verify that the surprising result isn’t a trick. Finally a series of follow-‐up and reflection questions encourages students to incorporate the new information into their existing understanding. Each activity is designed to take about 15 minutes and use materials found commonly in chemical engineering laboratories or available at Wal-‐Mart. These activities have been shown to improve students’ concept
and use of technology and evaluate trade-offs including a balance of costs and benefits both economic and social.8 Identify technology that appropriately reflects the values and culture of society for which it is intended.9 Give examples of relationships among technologies and connections between technology and other fields of study.Responsibility10 Can identify and analyze professional, ethical, and social responsibilities as related to technology.11 Participates appropriately in decisions about the development and use of technology.12 Demonstrates an interest and ability in life-long learning and self-education about technological issues.Capabilities13 Formulate pertinent questions, of self and others
corporate partners throughout theyear to provide peer mentoring at the schools, on-campus college experiences, and fun scienceand math events to excite students about higher education and careers in science and engineeringfields.PROMES has only a small fulltime staff, so we have developed a unique framework to maximizeour financial and human resources. This framework reflects a partnership between our programoffice and five multidisciplinary student engineering societies who also have engineeringoutreach goals. Program staffers serve as university advisors for all five organizations whichinclude the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers(SHPE), National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), Society of Mexican
handle contact with, for example, the Product Owner. The Product Owneris a representative of the product to be developed, which can be an external customer orsomebody with an interest of the final product [1-4].The Scrum Team works in short development cycles, called sprints. Each sprint spans aperiod of typically a couple of weeks or a month. Each sprint starts with a preparatory task todefine the tasks to be undertaken in the sprint and ends with a delivery to the customer orproduct owner followed by a session called the Sprint Reflection to discuss and proposeimprovements for next sprint. The product is defined in a Product Backlog (which replacesthe traditional documents of requirement specification). The product backlog is agreed
participate inconversations to reflect on their work [14, 15]. Through these reflective discussions, mentorsmodel how to think and work like professionals in a domain.Shaffer [16] has characterized the learning that takes place in the practicum in terms of anepistemic frame. Epistemic frame theory suggests every profession has unique collections ofskills, knowledge, identities, values, and epistemology that construct an epistemic frame.Professionals in a field rely on domain-specific skills and knowledge to make and justifydecisions. They have characteristics that define their identity as members of the group, as well asa set of values they use to identify important issues and problems in the field. Developing anepistemic frame means making
challenges and opportunities … is to figure out and invent ways toinclude reflection and critical thinking in the learning (either built into the instruction or througha process of instructor-led debriefing) [9].”Knowing that reflection and critical thinking are essential for learning, online instruction mustinclude a means for teaching the students how to reflect on the educational process and learnfrom the experience. This concept is difficult in an online course, and online instructors mustincorporate opportunities for students to consider the ways they solved problems, not simplyfinding solutions, submitting the answers via an online format and moving on to the nextquestion or chapter.One challenge with online courses is the lack of interaction
fuel cell course has three 1-hour lecture periods per week and one 3-hour lab period perweek to make a 4 credit-hour course. One lecture period per week is devoted to discussion ofrelevant papers, which serves to reinforce the technical content and facilitate discussion of thebroader social, economic, and technical issues. The lab periods are used alternately for additionalclassroom instruction, experiments, recitation time, and modeling or project work. This adds adegree of flexibility to administering the course and provides the students with extra time toengage and reflect on what they are learning.Student learning assessment is based on homework, experimental lab write-ups, a midterm exam,a nonlinear dynamic fuel cell model, and student
project, CPR™ is an excellent"learning environment" that creates an electronic, asynchronous, discipline-independent platformfor creating, implementing, and evaluating writing assignments, without significantly increasingthe instructor’s workload. Furthermore, the extensive data collected by the "environment" can beused to measure learning outcomes. In fact, the flexibility and versatility of the platform make itvery appropriate as a fine-grained tool for ABET accreditation criteria.Original CPR Mediates Peer-Review of WritingFour structured workspaces perform in tandem to create a series of activities that reflect modernpedagogical strategies for using writing in the learning process. A separate instructor interfaceand student interface provide
Janet L. Yowell College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Colorado at BoulderAbstractMany students who graduate high school are not prepared with the educational tools tosuccessfully pursue an engineering degree. Graduation from engineering colleges has declinedsignificantly from its peak in 1988, reflecting a national malaise in interest in the engineeringprofession by today’s youth. By fostering in high school students the skills and knowledge tomore fully understand the opportunities a career in engineering affords them, we hope to increasethe number of interested and prepared students who enter engineering colleges.Working with ninth-grade students at the new Denver
with the responsibilityof promoting interest and enthusiasm for learning. Instructors are also encouraged to act ascognitive coaches who can nurture an environment that can support open inquiry (Barrows,2000). It is important that the aims and objectives of problem-based learning be reflected inevery aspect of the learning environment created. Problem-based curriculum should documentaccomplishments at the upper levels of Bloom's Taxonomy Triangle (Boud & Feletti, 1991).Scholars in the area of cognitive science and educational psychology have identified fourfeatures that clearly separate a problem-based curriculum from a traditional, topic-basedcurriculum (Nickerson, et. al. 1985). In this presentation, the author describes how he
SESSION 1732 Professional Partners as Adjunct Instructors in Emerging Technology Courses Douglas Tougaw and David Wangrow Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Valparaiso University / Global Telecom Solution Sector, Motorola 1. Introduction Like every other electrical and computer engineering program across the country, Valparaiso University’s ECE department is faced with two great challenges. The first is to continually seek input from key stakeholders to determine the skills and knowledge expected of our graduates and to update our curriculum and courses to reflect these changing expectations
decide on a set of learning objectives. Thisrequired balancing the different purposes of the course. What should the relative emphasis be ofchallenging the students to learn and practice one or more specific engineering ways of thinking,versus encouraging the students to grapple with, and reflect on, the central philosophicalquestion of whether there are, in fact, engineering ways of thinking, and if so, what are thoseways of thinking? Ultimately, the course was designed to pursue both these threads ofexploration, separately at first, but later entwined within the students’ final term projects.The following set of learning objectives were developed to balance the two threads of the course:A year or more after having taken this course, students
inmultiple languages and codes that information employs (textual, iconic, hypertextual,audiovisual, multimedia, etc.), should be a recurring, continuing goal throughout theeducation system as a whole, from primary education to higher education2.In addition, international organizations have focused their attention both on thedevelopment of advanced curricula and instruction in general. This has been reflected inseveral projects supported by UNESCO and OECD. One such project, called “DeSeCo”(Determination and Selection of Competencies), had published a number of researchpapers in the 2000s which lay a theoretical foundation for the new understanding of theconcept of competencies in education and in the IT industry5,12,13.In the 1960s, when modern
threemain reasons: (1) the sheer prevalence of that code due to the nature of the tasks, (2) the“modeling” activity we observed very closely resembled typical children’s play (thus it is harder toargue that children were engaging in engineering during those times), and (3) previous researchsuggests that there are no significant differences between novices, post-novices, and experts inhow they engage in modeling.5 Beyond the four main behaviors that we focus our discussion on,we also looked at testing, reflection, prediction, and material property codes. Page 24.256.4Table 1. Main codes for Playdates and Engineering Studio engineering behaviors