conclusions about AVdeployment. The analysis framework simplifies complex statistical techniques into digestiblesteps for students: 1. Correlation Analysis: As practiced in real-world studies, students can construct multivariate correlation matrices to identify relationships between variables such as road quality and AV safety performance. This process demonstrates how different factors interact in a transportation ecosystem. 2. Statistical Techniques: By learning regression models and factor analysis, students gain exposure to methods used in AV performance studies. For example, students can predict accident probabilities based on infrastructure disparities using simplified statistical models. 3. Regional
, engineering, or management.IntroductionPeer mentoring is a pedagogical structure in which a more experienced student works with oneof their peers to supplement their learning. Peer mentoring is often used in addition to a moreformal education structure, but may have variance in the level of formality of communicationbetween the mentor and mentees [1]. Peer mentoring can enable students to communicate abouttheir learning easier, feel more confident, improve performance, and become more connectedwith their communities [2, 3]. Within engineering, peer mentoring often occurs in Project BasedLearning (PBL) settings. PBL is a pedagogical structure focusing on learning through engagingstudents through the life cycle of a project from start to finish. This
througha fully visual learning experience. Each instruction set also includes detailed explanations ofspecific software operations. For this course, step-by-step guides were developed for two keytopics: (1) kinematics simulation and (2) engineering drawing, using Siemens NX software.Visual instruction will be provided to hearing-impaired students before lecture and student’sfeedback is discussed in the discussion section. This method significantly enhances the learningefficiency of hearing-impaired students, helping them overcome barriers posed by hearinglimitations. In this study, the proposed method was implemented in a CAD course for ahearing-impaired student. Two teaching assistants (TAs) created purely visual, step-by-stepinstructions
Interdiffusion of Mathematics and Materials Engineering: Co-Teaching with Impact (A Work in Progress) Maila Hallare1,* and Tanjore V. Jayaraman2,* 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, US Air Force Academy, CO 80840 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, US Air Force Academy, CO 80840 * Equal contributionAbstractMechanical engineering students frequently encounter concepts of diffusion, particularly in materials science andengineering, where Fick’s Laws describe the mass
, the research seeksto provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of financial, academic, and leadershipsupport on student retention and achievement, identify key program elements that contribute tostudent success, and optimize similar scholarship programs in the future. Additionally, the studyexplores any unexpected outcomes that may enhance student learning and personal development.To achieve these objectives, the study is guided by the following research questions: 1. How effective is the Lattice Scholars Program in achieving its goals? 2. What short-term and long-term benefits do students experience as a result of the program? 3. Are there any unexpected outcomes that contribute to student learning and personal
entrepreneurial mindset to adapt to the world that is rapidlyevolving. With a curiosity mindset, individuals can explore trends that are emerging and use thefindings to challenge traditional solutions, replacing them with innovative solutions. Proactiveengagement between engineers not only allows for the adaptation towards newer technologies but alsoimproves personal growth in addition to creating future engineers that can positively contribute totheir respective fields [1].Psychology and neuroscience research shows that curiosity is an important factor in decision-makingwhere individuals are motivated to develop solutions to existing problems. As a foundation ofcognitive aspect, individuals who have a curiosity mindset are motivated in seeking new
orspontaneous topic by suggesting it in the form of a question, a quote, or a broad discussionprompt. Session conveners do not need to be experts; their role is simply to initiate a discussion.Each convener briefly pitches their topic to the group and places their topics into available slotson a schedule grid posted on the wall of times and locations. Once all topics have been placed,the group can review the schedule to balance the distribution of discussions. By asking studentsto convene sessions invites them to consider what is most important or worth exploring togetherand in that way engages them in creating their own learning. Figure 1. Sample unconference schedule in development.I ran a classroom discussion with an unconference
rural engineering and engagementin SCENIC and, more broadly, in rural-based inquiry education.IntroductionIn the United States, rural settings are an important and frequently under-resourced and under-researched cultural context for education [1], despite the fact that approximately half of schooldistricts, a third of schools, and a fifth of students in the United States are located in rural areas[2][3]. Rural students are underrepresented among college attendees and STEM majors [4][5],with a larger proportion of students unprepared for engineering identity formation and with lowerretention throughout engineering pathways [6][7].SCENIC ColoradoTo bridge this gap in rural engineering education, the Colorado SCience and ENgineeringInquiry
1 Session 2025 A Student Perspective on Learning through UAV Design in an Engineering Capstone Project Pedro Cordeiro Povoa Cupertino, Anubhav Pant, Yuto Minami, Ami Goto, and Kubeshavarsha Kalithasan Department of Aerospace Engineering Wichita State University Adam Carlton Lynch, PhD Department of Applied Engineering Wichita State University
paper offers a replicable framework for educators seeking to enhanceengagement, retention, and mindset development in engineering programs.1. IntroductionEngineering education faces a persistent and well-documented challenge: student attrition. Nationally,Figure 1 shows dropout rates in undergraduate engineering programs can exceed 40–50%, particularly inthe first two years of study [1,2,3]. These losses represent not only a missed opportunity for technical skilldevelopment but also a critical failure to foster the resilient, interdisciplinary problem-solvers that the 21stcentury demands.In response, forward-thinking educators are embracing a dual transformation: one driven by pedagogicalframeworks such as the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering
resolve.Lecture formatIn the regular AME 308 classroom, the professor demonstrates design techniques in Siemens NXin real time using a projected screen while describing the step-by-step process. When introducingkey concepts, the professor uses slides to explain definitions and related ideas beforedemonstrating the practical software operations. This teaching approach is highly effective forhearing-abled students, as it allows them to learn the software through hands-on practice whiledeepening their understanding of the concepts.Figure 1: Lecture slides introducing Figure 2: AI generated preview for stu-tolerance on engineering drawing dents understanding toleranceHowever, for hearing-impaired students
parallel.The formal activities are supplemented by informal gatherings among the students to promotecommunity building. Fellows’ research mentors are required to participate in formal training inmentoring and courses in diversity, equity, and inclusion.We assessed the outcomes of the program quantitatively by pre/post-surveys (issued before theworkshop and at the end of the academic year) and qualitatively through semi-structuredinterviews, with the help of an independent evaluator. In end-of-year assessments of Year 1(2022-2023), both funded fellows and unfunded trainees reported increased confidence in aspectsof neuroengineering skills, ethics, outreach, teamwork, and communication on 5-point Likert-scale survey questions, with some individual
participants in a cross-sectional study in design-based engineering courses.Specifically, we share here our developed interview protocol for data collection using the critical incidentmethods and artifact elicitation. We share preliminary findings from a pilot interview conducted with asenior engineering student in an early phase of their capstone design project. 1. IntroductionCan the movement of novice designers in a design space offer a profound learning opportunity in design?Exploring this question is vital to improving the design learning experiences to both students and designeducators. In literature, the affordances of a physical space for learning, and as a pedagogical method, isoften referred to as active learning spaces (ALS) [1]. In a
universities. TSAP provides a structured 60-credit framework with guaranteed juniorstatus upon completion (Indiana Transfer Single Articulation Pathways, 2015). The programemphasizes competency-based learning outcomes while maintaining consistent course contentand learning objectives across institutions.Table 1: Indiana Transfer Single Articulation Pathway (TSAP) Framework Core Components Category Details Mathematics Sequence Calculus I-III (MATH 211, 212, 261), Differential Equations (MATH 264), Linear Algebra (MATH 265) Science