alignment betweensocieties BOK and institutional learning objectives. Specifically, the professional certificationexam served as an external assessment, allowing for repetitive benchmarking via the PDCAmodel with continued re-calibration of the course effectiveness.1.5.1. Research questions. We used the FINER criteria to determine the key aspects of ourresearch question and the PICO(T) approach for the same research question [35], [36]. TheFINER criteria are an acronym representing the words “feasible,” “interesting,” “novel,”“ethical,” and “relevant.” Likewise, PICOT is an acronym for population, intervention,comparison group, outcome of interest, and time. To identify the impact of our strategy, wesought to answer the following research
interest in evaluating the progress of our program underABET criterion 3 through the Engineering Senior Design Program. ABET criterion 3 specifiesthe following outcomes: (a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; (d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; (f) An understanding of professional and
mission andvalues, and that can be selected from for incorporation into assignments, courses, and curricularprograms explicitly and measurably[10]. For each of six Skills Goals areas, Learning Objectivesare defined at three levels: General Education and Basic Skills Courses, Major Program, andGraduate Programs. A clear path lay for defining IL instruction associated with a targetassignment in EGR 220 to include selected ILCC skills goals and Basic-level learning objectivesthat matched with desired lifelong learning skills interpreted to fulfill ABET program outcome„i‟. ABET program outcomes relating to professional responsibility and ethics („f‟) and effectivecommunication („g‟) could also be part of this intersection between the School of
Improvement Objectives for Mechanical Engineering 1) Improve Delivery ‐ To encourage deeper student learning by: a. Integrating theory with practice b. Integrating concepts across courses c. Requiring fewer courses/semester to increase depth d. Enhancing lifelong learning skills 2) Enhance Content ‐ Increased student exposure to: a. New and emerging technologies b. Professional skills (societal impact, ethics, team skills, project management, global issues, economic justification) c. Computer and numerical skills d. Design methodologies and tools Following intensive discussions and two faculty retreats, a major revision of the MechanicalEngineering curriculum was approved in October
. Skills thatneeded additional training according to the employers included both applied skills and basicskills. Skills which were listed as high need included Creativity/Innovation, Ethics/SocialResponsibility, Professionalism/Work Ethic, Lifelong Learning/Self Direction, and CriticalThinking/Problem Solving. Responding employers were grouped into four categories or industryclusters: manufacturing, financial services, non-financial services, andeducation/government/other non-profits.10 See Table 1 below for applied skills listed byemployers.11 Table 1. Applied Skills listed by Employers in 2009 Research Report • Creativity/Innovation • Ethics/Social Responsibility • Professionalism/Work Ethic • Lifelong Learning/Self
education.Dr. Barbara B. Kawulich, University of West Georgia Dr. Barbara Kawulich is Interim Director of the Evaluation Center and Associate Professor of Research in the Educational Technology and Foundations Department at the University of West Georgia. She teaches qualitative and action research, ethics, leadership, and diversity to graduate and undergraduate students. Her research focuses on research methods, research pedagogy, and issues related to indigenous women. She has authored numerous publications on these topics and has co-authored two books on research methods.Prof. P.K. Raju, Mechanical Engineering Dept, Auburn University,Al Dr. Raju is the Thomas Walter Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at
both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Exploring the Capability of Generative AI as an Engineering Lab Report AssessmentAssisting Tool AbstractSince ChatGPT’s public launch in November 2022, considerable discussion and changes haveoccurred in higher education. Active educational research related to generative artificialintelligence (GAI) has been conducted in various areas, including student learning, ethics, andassessment. Although many authors have raised concerns about the impact of GAI
individualistic norms they associate with the United States. Public infrastructure, particularly the transitsystem, was praised for its accessibility, reliability, and environmental integration, prompting several students to reflect onthe limitations of comparable systems in the U.S. Cultural observations often centered on social restraint, rule adherence,and expectations around personal conduct in public spaces, which challenged students’ assumptions about Germanformality and perceived aloofness.Sustainability emerged as a deeply embedded societal ethic, with students noting that practices such as energyconservation, water purity, recycling, and walkability were not framed as special efforts, but as integral parts of everydaylife. This led many to
ABET outcomes selected by the engineering department forthis course. The revised class was piloted in the Fall semester of 2023. For the BS in Engineering, ABET has 7 outcomes which must be achieved to attain orretain accreditation. [7] The program must have documented student outcomes that support theprogram educational objectives. [8,9] Attainment of these outcomes prepares graduates to enterthe professional practice of engineering. For Robert Morris University, the Introduction toEngineering ENGR1010 course is designated to assess outcomes 3, 4a, 4b and 7. 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. 4. (a) an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering
Paper ID #48182Considering Personal Mastery as a Framework for Developing Students’ Affinityfor Lifelong Learning [Research]Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Bailey McOwen is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with an academic foundation in physics and industrial engineering. Her research focuses on workforce development, professional training for engineering practitioners, and engineering ethics, with an emphasis on how emerging technologies can enhance continued education. Through her research, service, and academic work, she aims to bridge engineering
discussionsremained focused and relevant, and intentionally anchored conversations around the GE learningoutcomes. Based on the number of learning outcomes and the time allocated for this portion, theUGC organized discussions around six guiding topics, each one to be discussed within 15 minuterotating table discussions: 1. Engineering design skills (e.g., problem scoping and solving, data analysis, decision making) 2. Engineering tools (e.g., programming, CAD, prototyping) 3. Holistic issues (e.g., stakeholders, ethics in engineering) 4. Teamwork (e.g., equitable teaming, conflict resolution) 5. Communication (e.g., reports, presentations, citations) 6. Academic success (e.g., major choice, transitions to college and majors, self
method being influenced by learning method. According toHassan, an assessment should be “something that affects the students’ learning, confidence inthemselves and their skills,” where “the assessment method can enrich the learning method andthey are coupled together by an appropriate methodology of learning and assessment” [55, p.327].Riley and Lambrinidou’s Canons against CannonsRiley and Lambrinidou explored the addition of six principles to the values and principlescurrently expressed in engineering ethics canon, namely the ethical principles: ● Engineers’ primary goal is to help people in need and to address social problems ● Engineers challenge social injustice ● Engineers practice cultural and epistemic humility
the building collapsed similar enough that useful and the team had to come to an agreement comparisons are drawn. whose fault the collapse was. Followed Necessitates some form of debrief by a debrief on the social difficulties or reflection. associated with ethics-related engineering disasters (Lloyd & van de Poel, 2008). Feedback-practice Students practice the application of A digital game that gave students skeleton loop concepts or skills, get feedback code, asked students fill in the rest of the
intersections between professional communication research and social justice—at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference.Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Professor Lucena is Director of Humanitarian Engineering at Colorado School of Mines and teaches Engineering & Sustainable Community Development and Engineering & Social Justice. Juan obtained a Ph.D. in STS (Virginia Tech) and two engineering degrees (Rensselaer). His books include Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (Morgan &Claypool, 2010) and Engineering Education for Social Justice (Springer, 2013). He has researched under grants like Enhancing Engineering Education through Humanitarian Ethics, and Invisible
science; historical, philosophical, cultural, sociological, political and ethical. The STSEeducational approach typically includes the following features: • An understanding of the environmental threats, including those of a global nature, to our quality of life • The economic and industrial aspects of technology • An understanding of the fallible nature of science • Discussion of personal opinion and values, as well as democratic action • The multi-cultural dimension of scienceThis paper, through an extensive literature review and qualitative data from interviews withseveral female engineering students and recent graduates, demonstrates why female studentsrespond well to this form of education, drawing from theories on
responsibleinnovations that embrace ethical and ecological contexts. Traditionally, engineering as aprofession has focused primarily on a set of technical skills, such as problem solving, design, andmodeling. It is undeniable that these skills are core and important. However, the target attributesfor future engineering graduates, such as featured in the National Academy of Engineering’s(NAE) “Engineer of 2020”, include specific character qualities and affective dispositions as well, Page 25.520.2wherein promoting traits such as empathy and care is sometimes referenced as holisticengineering education.6The NAE now emphasizes the need to promote engineering
Paper ID #37975Advancing a Model of Students' Intentional Persistence inMachine Learning and Artificial IntelligenceSharon Ferguson Sharon is a PhD student in the department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. She previously completed her Bachelors in Industrial Engineering also at the University of Toronto. She is passionate about supporting women in Engineering and STEM more broadly, both within and outside of her research. She has held fellowships in Ethics of AI and Technology & Society organizations.James Magarian James Magarian, PhD, is a Senior Lecturer at the
Paper ID #39820Board 44A: Work in Progress: Unannounced Frequent Examinations tocontribute student learning and building academic integrityMr. John Mario Bonilla, USFQ John Bonilla is an undergraduate student in the Polytechnic College of Science and Engineering at Univer- sidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. John’s interests, in civil engineering include infrastructure develop- ment and transportation. Furthermore, John is interested in supporting the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but also a strong ethical set of values. Currently John is working on his application to
engineering ethics, writing in the disciplines, and the development of professional skills.Shelly Sanders, Mississippi State University Shelly is currently an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University’s James Worth Bagley College of Engineering and has taught technical writing as well as various English composition and literature courses at MSU since 2005. She also tutored writing with the English department’s Writing Center from its inception in the early 2000’s until 2015. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English from The University of Alabama and a master’s degree in English from Mississippi State University. ©American Society for Engineering
attributes of, “The ability to learn a new skillfairly quickly.” (Student-05). Being organized as in “staying on top of your tasks” (Student-03),along with having “a positive, upbeat attitude” (Student-03), and being empathetic, patient,collaborative, self-aware and ethical were also important attributes mentioned by students.Learning to manage one’s education. Students responded to the question about what they woulddo differently if they could start over in their engineering education. Most emphasized theimportance of joining organizations, clubs, and making better use of the resources offered by theschool and university (e.g., Career Services and advising). Some described the importance ofhaving an open mind and being more proactive about having a
studies from bothcategories. Specific resources listed for case studies included West Virginia University [3],SACHE [4], University of Michigan [5], LearnChemE [6], and textbook online resources [7].Faculty also use the literature, personal experience, and alumni as resources. Case studies areused in discussions, in-class activities, homework, and/or projects for a variety of reasons: • to motivate the material, • for ending examples to show the student how much they’ve learned, • to include ethics, sustainability, health, and safety concerns, • as a context for design and analysis, • to expose students to the broad field of chemical engineering; real-world applications, and • for process flowsheets.Of the 95 courses
actively engages with powersystems and dialogue, honoring lived experiences and committing to an ethic of care andaccountability. This provocation provides a sample case for understanding accomplicerelationships and suggests heuristic for potential accomplices to use in establishing enduringcoalitions between Black and white women.IntroductionIn 1979, Audre Lorde [1] published a letter she’d written to Mary Daly, author of Gyn/Ecology.In it, Lorde, a Black queer woman poet and theorist, praised Daly for her work and yet shared thereality facing Lorde as she read it: To imply, however, that all women suffer the same oppression simply because we are women is to lose sight of the many varied tools of the patriarchy. It is to ignore
) prepared them for their professional career with respect to a number of leadershipcompetencies: 1) leading teams (lead meetings, identify personality preferences and adjustenvironment/style) 2) think strategically by applying mission, vision, and values statements to ateam or organization 3) work effectively in teams 4) apply project management processes toprojects 5) give and receive feedback 6) self-reflection on leadership skills and how to improve7) recognize ethical issues & practice ethical decision making 8) develop a culture that promotescreativity and innovation 9) cross cultural/ global competencies (appreciation of other cultures,understanding bias, working in a culturally diverse team) 10) emotional intelligence (regulateemotions
skills, such as findingand using reliable information, conducting their work ethically, and locating standards and codes[3], [4]. As such, engineering students need comprehensive and effectively designedinformation-seeking instruction.Traditionally, information-seeking behavior instruction is formally delivered in person, followedby in-class activities that give students opportunities to practice their skills. In this setting,instructors, librarians, and teaching assistants can directly observe and guide student behavior,while students can ask questions and receive real-time feedback. These interactions have beenshown to improve learning outcomes by facilitating student engagement [5]. With classes movedonline, educators are left to determine
domain area was developed (see Table 3). Table 3: Domain Areas (EVT, EI, & Sense of Belonging) Model 1st Domain Area (Initial code) 2nd Domain Area Expectancy-Value Theory Competence Belief Intellectual Development Engineering Identity Attainment Value Social Persuasion Sense of Belonging Interest (EVT) Mastery Experience Utility Value Attention to Human Ethical values Recognition Personal Integrity
ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. An ability to design and conduct experiment, as well as to analyze and interpret data An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic c. constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. An ability to communicate effectively The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
and business. Each team had to research policiesor regulations that relate to their topic, determine the stakeholders for the problem, and develop astudy to investigate the issue. Given the limited time of one semester to develop and completetheir study, all groups conducted survey-based research or observational studies. Each grouplearned about ethics in research and was required to complete human subjects based researchtraining and to submit their study to the university institutional review board.A total of six research projects were completed with each requiring a problem statement and/orresearch questions, literature review, development of data collection procedures, experimentaldesign, data analytics, oral presentations, and a final
-emphasizing social and economicpillars. Furthermore, most instruction on sustainability, as reported in the literature, appears tofocus on teaching the engineering student to be an engineer who practices sustainabledevelopment rather than a consumer who has a role in sustainable practice. In part, thisemphasis on the engineer's role in sustainability is a result of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET)'s mandate that engineering undergraduates complete theirdegrees having achieved student outcome (c): “...an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
engineering skills to addressglobal societal problems. Also, the ABET criteria requires engineering programs toprovide “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutionsin a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.” These two factors haveraised fundamental questions about how to effectively prepare engineering students toengage with underserved communities globally. This paper uses a case study approachto document the experiences of students of a global engineering course. This courseoffered students the unique opportunity to address sanitation and hygiene issues byworking with a community rather than for it. The paper highlights curricular innovationsthat ensured ethical, sustainable collaboration with the
daily meetings with mentors, the frequency for which 100% of participants report was “just right.” Likewise, the weekly program- wide lunch sessions were successful at creating a sense of community. ● Women report greater gains in confidence than men, who also had positive gains. ● The 2020 cohort had greater gains in knowledge concerning presenting research and ethics in research, yet lower gains in knowledge related to career options and graduate school awareness and preparing research proposals as compared to 2019. ● Participants report increasing their sense of belonging as scientists, but not feeling like members of a scientific community. 2020 participants were much more likely to report