Paper ID #22984Collaborative Research: vObjects - Understanding their Utility to EnhanceLearning of Abstract and Complex Engineering ConceptsDr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and the Director of the Abilities, Creativity and Ethics in Design [ACE(D)]Lab. Bairaktarova’s ongoing research interest spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how individual performance and professional decisions are influenced by aptitudes and abilities, interest, and manipulation of physical and virtual
4 3 2 1Construct a system or process to meet desired needs within suchrealistic constraints as economic, environmental, social, political, 52% 48%ethical, health and safety, feasibility and sustainability.Demonstrate the ability for self-directed learning by planning, 78% 22%research and design for the project.Student comments generally indicate that the course structure helped with finding out new ideas “Good design of the class. Helps to generate ideas initially. Concept of idea generation explained really well.”The exit interviews respondents have also “made numerous positive references to
wording differences. In Criterions 3 and 5, there are some wordings to more clearlyidentify the differences of the two programs, where “design” is more frequently found in theBSxE programs, and “technology” found in the BSxET programs. For example, in Criterion 3.c,the EAC wording for Student Outcomes is: “(the student must demonstrate) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. (2)”In the ETAC version, Criterion 3.d, the wording is similar, but with subtle differences: “(the student must demonstrate) an ability to design systems, components, or
, such as participate in the intellectual and organizationalhow graduate program objectives are assessed, what aspects of the profession as applicable to the majorassessment tools are used, when data are gathered and area of study, including the ethical conduct ofevaluated, and when actions of improvement are made. research.This paper will also detail how the analysis of data wasutilized in making actions of continuous improvement. At 3. Assessment Methodthe end of the paper examples of the significant actions of 3.1 Student`s Performance Indicatorsimprovement made based on the department assessment The following assessment methods are used to gather dataand
objectives 1-3 address criterion a): an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics,science, and engineering and criterion e): an ability to identify, formulate, and solveengineering problems. Course objective 4 addresses criterion f): an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility.Throughout the semester, the instructor assessed if students were learning these conceptsfrom the tests that were periodically administered. These assessments were put in a scaleof 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) for each student. At the end of the course, average of studentscores for each objective was determined to assess whether the student body in the classwas able to master that particular objective.At the end of the class, students were also asked to evaluate if
diligent disciplined ethical initiative innovative intellectual inventive professional successful Page 12.277.4Assessing
have presented excellent opportunities to discuss ethics and global and societalimpact related to EAC of ABET criteria 3(f) and 3(h) [13]. Especially in ME 242 when many ofthe students see the Dr. Evil projects for the first time, the pretenses usually raise questions suchas “Should we consider construction labor costs?” or “Would Dr. Evil pay for labor costs?” andother questions related to ethics. The competing costs of energy from different types of fuels andtheir related pollution issues is certainly a primary and contemporary concern of powercompanies. In the ABET current culture and use of “direct assessments,” projects based onfictional and comical pretenses provide many opportunities for the students to demonstrateunderstanding of
conducting research in watershed sciences. – 3.14 • I have a good understanding of the role of ethics in scientific investigations. – 3.00 • I am confident that I understand how to conduct scientific research. – 2.86 • I know everything that I need to know to conduct scientific research in the library. – 2.71 • I understand the processes used to monitor water quality. – 2.57 • I plan on going to work after graduate school. – 2.43 • I can visually examine a quantity of water and tell whether it’s safe for drinking Page 13.701.8 or not. – 1.86 • There are winners and losers in environmental conflicts; it’s as simple as
the University of Kansas Medical Center. His professional interests include bioinstrumentation, digital signal processing, and engineering ethics. Email: paulleiffer@letu.edu. Page 13.923.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Need Definition for International Humanitarian Design Projects: a Contextual Needs Assessment Case Study for Remote PowerAbstractA student team designed, prototyped, and tested a system with the end goal of providing2.5kW-hr/day of electrical power in remote areas, captured from a river with no dams orsignificant potential energy change. The project was sponsored by two
, transportation, shelter, and effective waste management while conserving and protecting environmental quality and the natural resource base essential for future development.”As Mays2 points out, the concept of sustainability is not new. However, officially recognition ofthe concept in practice has come relatively recently. For example, The ASCE Board of Directors Page 13.915.2introduced the concept into their Code of Ethics a little more than a decade ago3.Equipping civil engineers at the university level to plan and design sustainable developments,buildings, and processes is also relatively new. Steineman4 reviewed the history of
). Fundamentals of Economics for Engineering Technologists and Engineers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.4. “Teaching Engineering Economy in Engineering Technology Program” Session 1139: Trends in Engineering Economy, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June 22—25, 2003. Page 13.1160.55. Quality Matters homepage. http://www.qualitymatteres.org>. Accessed 2008 Feb 29.6. Moore, Gary S., Kathryn Winograd, and Dan Lange (2001). You Can Teach Online: Building a Creative Learning Environment. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.7. Olt, Melissa R. Ethics and Distance
approximately 2,900 undergraduate students and almost 800 graduate students inover 20 programs.The Educational Model for Engineering 1 ProgramThe first year engineering program at McMaster University is common for all students. In thisyear, students are expected to complete 13 courses: Calculus 1 and 2, Linear Algebra, Physics 1and 2, Engineering Computing, Engineering Graphics, Chemistry 1, Introductory MaterialsScience, Engineering Professionalism and Ethics, and two complementary study electives. Page 13.487.2Engineering Computing, Engineering Graphics, and Professionalism and Ethics are alladministered through the Engineering 1 Program.Although the
their senior design experience. Specifically,the junior-level microcontroller design course, CPE 329, was enhanced to provide a systemsdesign philosophy utilizing modern computer aided design tools. In this course students have theopportunity to design a custom computer system, interface external hardware and developfirmware to best meet system design requirements. A separate technical elective course has beencreated for students to learn printed circuit board design using CAD tools that build upon themicroelectronics, digital and analog design taught in the core courses of the curriculum. Finally,a capstone design course has been created that incorporates team building, engineering designskills, project management, engineering ethics and other
. 1) Group writing Sessions 2) Weekly Individual Writing Session 3) Discovery Seminar Series 4) Weekly Group Meetings on every Fridays 5) Field Trip to TranStar: Transportation Surveillance with networked camera 6) Trip to Port of Houston, security infrastructure 7) Professional development seminars: include topics such as Patent and intellectual properties; research methods and ethics; project management and Microsoft Project training; graduate study opportunities and graduate exam preparation, 8) Group Meeting and final project presentation 9) Trip to Johnson Space Center Figure 2 Enrichment Program and Activities for REU Participants
to help students in the working world, there is a need to couple theclassroom technical knowledge with communication activities. The current organizationused by the Department of Mechanical Engineering at MSU incorporates technicalknowledge acquisition with its presentation in course throughout the curriculum. Studentsbecome immersed in both facets of the program without separation. Page 14.1372.3Table A1. Communication Activities in ME CurriculumFrosh EGR 100 – Residential ProgramYear Resumes, email, short engineering focused reports, engineering writing demands, problem solving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the
course is structured in modules, such that a particular topic module can be pulled forinclusion in another class, thus allowing an easier opportunity for export. Furthermore, themodular structure allows for reordering of the 24 topics per the instructor’s preference. Giventhis approach, modules can also be added or deleted based on topic interest. In fact, there are anumber of topics worthy of inclusion in future versions of this course, including softwaresystems engineering, human factors, design for supportability and maintainability, and six-sigmaquality methodology. In addition to lecture modules, class time is also devoted to invited guestspeakers, watching relevant videos and introducing ethics and professional leadership concepts.The SE
need to become global engineers, but the National Academy ofEngineering2 predicted that, among other attributes, “the engineer of 2020 will have tounderstand how to adapt solutions, in an ethical way, to the constraints of developingcountries.”The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) encourages educationalprograms to develop their own learning outcomes that are consistent with each individualprogram's educational objectives. However eleven outcomes (a-k) 3 are required of all accreditedU.S. engineering programs, including one that says programs must demonstrate that theirstudents attain “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions
secondday of the program. The project requirements and team collaboration ethics were emphasized.Since the project required the use of CAD software, teams were arranged in such a way that atleast one of team members was familiar with a CAD software package.Each OU ME student was randomly assigned to work on a team with two Chinese students on adesign project as part of their senior design project. Since a full time faculty member was withthe students full time in China, the amount of interaction between the student groups and thesupervising faculty was significant. Informal meetings were held with each student group nearlyeveryday in China. After they returned from China, students continued to work on this project,and finished their design by the
. That is, students in EGR120 are not seen again in the engineering programuntil their second year.The ET department lies within the College of Science and Technology, yet EGR120 drawsstudents from around the university who are interested in engineering, technology, or just afun design project. The course is offered both semesters and has no prerequisites, although itrecommends Intermediate Algebra or higher. The syllabus covers introductory material suchas the engineering profession, problem solving, measurement and units, ethics, economics,and basic mechanical and electrical concepts. Traditionally, the course includes one largegroup design project of either a cardboard boat race in the fall semester or a robot King-of-the-Hill competition in
improve world health. Our REU-RET program has a problem-basedfocus with health related solutions at its core. We have identified additional characteristics ofbiomedical engineering research that we believe makes it a compelling and beneficial researchfocus for undergraduate students and for urban STEM teachers. Biomedical engineering researchis interdisciplinary, encourages communication, is collaborative, has a bioethics focus and issolutions focused. Biomedical engineering research addresses global concerns, encouraginginternational collaboration, and ethical and contributory behaviors in students and teachers. The field of biomedical engineering is a significant need. The United States Departmentof Labor reports, “The number of
units ofmajor field work, with courses in six different core areas.Engineering Requirements1. Students must earn at least a 2.5 GPA in all math, science, and engineering courses.2. Engineering students are required to register, by petition if necessary, for the Fundamentals ofEngineering Examination at the earliest date allowed by the State of Michigan prior to graduation.Required CoursesREQUIRED PHYSICS COURSESPHY 223 Mechanics and Sound 5PHY 224 Electricity and Light 5PHY 350 Electricity and Magnetism I 3PHY 360 Heat and Thermodynamics 4PHY 406 Ethical Issues in Physics 1*PHY 420
with a foundation of knowledge in science,basic theory, and technical subjects as they prepare for their real-life counterparts. Practitioners believe that theworkplace requires graduating engineers to have many basic skills including the ability to work on a team and tocommunicate with one’s peers and supervisors. In addition, there is need for the capabilities of utilizing infor-mation technology, focusing on customer and societal needs, as well as ethical and environmental concerns, andunderstanding global needs and market forces. Therefore, the focus of engineering education should be on theimmediate applicability of the engineering knowledge to the end user. Due to system constraints, university faculty find it difllcult to remain
intellectual property has come to the forefront of the ethical debate. Unlike the property we have been talking about you could somehow sense, intellectual property is really a product of the mind. It is knowledge. And students who plan on producing products of the mind need to be aware of the issues involved. Traditional Means of Protection Traditionally, intellectual property has been protected by one of four means: copyright, patent, trade secrets, and service marks. Although these are still the primary means of protection, protection in one country does not guarantee protection in all countries where one might do business. Each case must be analyzed separately. Copyright is designed to
studies also facilitate the introduction of the multiple and often conflicting objectives facedby engineers in practice. Real engineering problems solved in the context of their environmental, societal,economic and ethical constraints as well as their technical context, provide a much improved insight into thepractice of engineering. The guidelines for ABET accreditation consistently require this broadened approach toengineering education and the structure of this new resource will respond to the recommendations of the ASEEProject Boards recommendations under “Engineering Education for a Changing World’ in making engineeringeducation relevant, attractive and connected. (A SEE Prism, 1994
special topics classes, or by completing Honors contracts in regular sections. i. ELEC 4XXX: (Senior EE Elective from an approved list). Engineers apply scientific and mathematical knowledge to real world problems. Therefore, the honors program includes a course which treats an advanced engineering application in detail. While the emphasis is on technical material, group projects, oral and written reports on background work for the project, and a discussion of the ethical and social responsibilities of engineers should also be incorporated. Honors credit given for honors sections and honors contract work in regular sections
features.The quantitative criteria require that an engineering curriculum include the equivalent of 1.0 yearof mathematics and basic science; 0.5 year of humanities and social sciences, not counting com-munication skills courses; and 1.5 years of engineering topics including a strong engineering de-sign stem that begins early in the curriculum and culminates in a major, integrative (capstone)design experience. The qualitative criteria require that the students’ educational experiences in-clude development of appropriate computer skills; development of written and oral communica-tion skills; understanding of the ethical, social, economic, and safety considerations in engineer-ing decisions; application of probability and statistics to engineering
lecture and demonstrations. 3. Graduates will acquire in-depth knowledge in areas such as applied mechanics, computer-aided engineering graphics, design, and manufacturing processes. 4. Graduates will possess effective communication skills in oral, written, visual and graphic modes for interpersonal, team, and group environments. 5. Graduates will gain appreciation for the responsibility of the contemporary engineer by demonstrating professionalism and ethics including a commitment to utmost performance quality and timeliness, respect for diversity, awareness of international issues, and commitment to continuing professional development throughout their careers.The Program Learning Outcomes (PLO’s
. Function effectively on Team dynamics Interpersonal Valuing others multidisciplinary teams communication opinions i. Ability & desire to pursue Preferred learning Self-directed Self-improvementIII life-long learning style learning g. Communicate effectively Forms of Writing, public Clarity & communication speaking understanding f. Understand professional, Principles of ethics Analyze situations Personal ethical responsibility responsibly responsibility h
. Page 14.99.6Three well-known engineering-affiliated organizations, representing an independent agency, anational manufacturer, and an accreditation bureau, offer a listing of preferred attributes ofengineers:The National Academy of Engineering developed a list of specific attributes of engineers that arekey to the success of the engineering profession: strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity (skillin planning, combining and adapting), creativity, good communication, master of business andmanagement, leadership, possess high ethical standards, strong sense of professionalism,dynamism, agility, resilience, flexibility, and lifelong learners19.The Boeing Company, manufacturer of commercial jetliners and military aircraft combined, is along
: Mechanical Engineering atSmall Scales; Designing Intelligent, Human Scale Systems; Efficient, Clean EnergyTechnologies; and Advanced Manufacturing and Processing. Another paper he co-presented at the International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exhibition in 2003was entitled: ‘Managing a Major Curriculum Reform Effort in a Large ResearchUniversity.’(4) Several recommendations were made in that paper: consolidate the separatefreshman courses in graphics and intro to ME into a single course; convert machineelements into a project-centered experience; convert thermo course into a project-basedthermal-fluid systems course. In conclusion, the authors stated that “The knowledge,skills, ethics and attitudes which we are trying to instill are