enhancement in original or current technologies,materials and manufacturing processes. The objective of competitive assessment through reverseengineering is to understand and outdo the competition. In the Competitive AssessmentLaboratory at Rowan University, multidisciplinary teams of freshman engineering students fromeach of the four engineering disciplines perform competitive assessment on a consumerappliance (in this case, an electric toothbrush).The objectives of the Competitive Assessment Laboratory are as follows:1. Provide the launching pad for an innovative, four year design curriculum by introducing freshmen to the science and art of design by evaluating the work of practicing engineers.2. Introduce multidisciplinary groups of engineering
ASEE North Central Section Conference 2Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Educationliterature review The literature review covers various studies that emphasize the importance of integratingvarious engineering disciplines, the role of project-based learning, and the benefits oftransdisciplinary knowledge in engineering education. A recent study [3] discuss the importance of integrating different engineering disciplinesin biomedical education. Traditionally, students learn subjects like mechanics, electronics, andprogramming separately and this makes them miss how these subjects connect to each other. Toaddress this challenge, the authors redesigned the curriculum at the
expertise in mechanical construction management Page 1.160.1 {bxi~ 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘J3J3/and mechanical cost estimating. BC students who select this option complete nine additional credit hours ofcourses in project management, scheduling, and estimating which are speciilc to mechanical construction.The MCM option emphasizes project management rather than the analysis of mechanical equipment. Whileall students recognize that the water in a hydronic system adds heat energy to an indoor space in the winter,few could calculate the required capacity of a
environment to support the biotech industry through training, research and best practice sharing. 4. Engage in high impact research with an emphasis on environmental biotechnology.The first initiative of the center was to establish a new undergraduate major in biotechnology.This new degree program was developed in collaboration with industry and academic partnersand offers two tracks, one in bioinformatics and the other in bioprocessing. The laboratorycurriculum is a research -based curriculum and uses a pesticide degrading bacteria as a model totrain students on techniques and applications of biotechnology. In summer, we offer outreachprograms to train high school teachers and students. For local incumbent biotech workers, weoffer workforce
introduced in the beginning of some lectures.The students commented that the quizzes provided direction by highlighting key concepts andcritical vocabulary. Quizzes also led to more engaging discussions in the classroom.ConclusionsThere is a clear need to convey the necessity for multidisciplinary education early in theengineering curriculum, so that students do not wait until their senior year to take courses inbiology. A good BioMEMS textbook that integrates fundamentals with applications would betremendously helpful to addressing the challenge of teaching the multidisciplinary topic ofbiomedical microsystems to engineers. Overall, the results of this three-year pilot program are
AC 2012-2964: INTEGRATING THE CREATIVE PROCESS INTO ENGI-NEERING COURSES: DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF A FAC-ULTY WORKSHOPDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. In this role, she provides support to faculty in trying innovative ideas in the classroom. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis in applied testing and measurement. Her current research interests include integrating creativity into the engineering curriculum, development in- struments to measure the engineering professional skills, and using qualitative data to enhance response process
teamwork assignments in the courses. This paper also describes studentchallenges used with the tool, including an Introduction to Engineering challenge with hands-onactivities, as examples of curriculum being developed in the engineering design curriculum.Integration of Sensors and MicrocontrollersA kit consisting of microcontroller and sensors was integrated to offer a simple to assemble andeasy to program option for students to perform experiments in the lab or at home. It consisted ofan Arduino Uno microcontroller and sensors to measure temperature, light intensity, anddeflection. Even though the microcontroller selected to read the sensors was an Arduino Uno,other microcontrollers or data acquisition systems (DAS) such as PIC microcontrollers
children’s awareness and motivations and preventingmisconceptions with a constructively designed curriculum. A real-life implementation ofcurriculum integration of sustainability in the K-12 setting plays a key role in validating andevaluating the feasibility of this approach. In this study, a module of sustainability was designedfor 12 one-hour sessions over 3 months with a focus on the recycling of electronics and wasimplemented in an industrial-oriented class. We use instructor reflections to provide preliminaryinsights for addressing difficulties associated with sustainability education, i.e., whether middleschool youth can relate the societal and economic aspects to the sustainability concept.Purpose of StudyThe purpose of the study is to
AC 2011-2077: THE IMPACT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ONTEACHERS INTEGRATING ENGINEERING INTO SCIENCE AND MATH-EMATICS CLASSROOMHui-Hui Wang, University of Minnesota Hui-Hui Wang is a graduate student in Science Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Minnesota. Her research interests are across both non-formal and formal setting. Her research primary relates to inquiry-based instruction and STEM integration in science education. She is also interested in developing STEM curriculum for K-12 science teachers.Tamara J Moore, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Tamara J. Moore is the co-director of the University of Minnesota’s STEM Education Center and an assistant professor of
provides tools to help students conceptualizedproblems, explore the influence of relevant parameters, and test fundamental engineeringprinciples. The aim of our Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement project is to meldthe problem-based learning pedagogy with CAMS to produce students with an in-depthunderstanding of the fundamentals of chemical engineering as well as the ability to use computersimulation packages effectively in the workplace. The approach used here is to integrate the useof CAMS throughout the entire chemical engineering curriculum. The Accreditation Board ofEngineering and Technology’s Engineering Criteria 2000 framework will be followed to evaluatethe outcome of this project. This reform process will beneficially affect
have a “basic understanding and familiarity with,” and experience “using”codes and standards, faculty need to consider how such material can be naturally integrated intothe curriculum.At Purdue University, education about codes and standards has been integrated into themechanical engineering technology (MET) curriculum for decades with significant success. Thispaper discusses how standards are incorporated into mechanical design and quality controlcourses, as well as strategies for integrating standards into more courses in an MET curriculum.In addition, a discussion of standards resources that are freely available is included. Finally, acall to action for industry is presented, explaining the need and potential areas where industrycan
Session 2438 Integrating Graphics and the Concurrent Engineering Design Process into Electrical Engineering Education K.A. Korzeniowski United States Naval Academy ABSTRACT This paper describes a laboratory exercise performed by Electrical Engineering majors takinga first course in electrical circuit theory. The goal of this exercise was to familiarize students withengineering drawings, concurrent product engineering and manufacturing considerations within thecontext of design applications for an
are not well-studied in the engineering education literature.In related work, in order to facilitate the integration of ethics into the engineering curriculum,Nair and Bulleit [13] propose identifying ethical philosophies that are compatible with theexisting “engineering way of thinking” (EWT). Though we see engineering ethics as related butdistinct from our interests in sociotechnical integration, we look to this work as an example ofbringing together historically disparate considerations such as ethics and the technical side ofengineering work.Engineering ways of thinking were also analyzed in a case study by Godfrey on engineeringculture in an Australian university that had previously undergone a curriculum and culturaloverhaul. Godfrey
75.0% agreement fromArchitecture students and 66.7% from CM students. These findings underscore the sharedappreciation for the perceived benefits of integrating BIM with SD in both Architecture andConstruction Management education.Results and DiscussionsThe students' viewpoints on the open-answer question provide opinions on improving theprogram's curriculum and the integration of BIM with SD. Most respondents expressed positivesentiments, believing BIM is crucial to achieving effective and SD. The general tone ofcomments is positive, with descriptors such as “great,” “fun,” and “helpful” recurring frequently.Comments indicate that BIM is an efficient tool that enhances the realism and efficiency ofdesign concepts. However, some students
laboratory curriculum should be a balance of expository and inquiry instruction and,if possible, an introduction to independent research techniques (Svinicki and McKeachie, 2014;Tomasik, et al. 2013; Galloway, et al., 2016). Fourth, the laboratory program must be feasiblewithin available resources, which included time, costs, instrumentation, physical facilities, andsupport personnel (Larsen, et al. 2013). Fifth, we developed the laboratory curriculum topromote a more complex affective learning environment. Galloway et al. showed that accessingfeelings beyond interest about the laboratory experience encourages students to make aconscious choice to more actively participate in the laboratory learning environment (2016).2. Course Description and
a New Vision for Integrative Professional Graduate Education in Engineering Practice1. IntroductionThis is the first of four papers prepared for a special panel session of the National CollaborativeTask Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that is focusing on the deliberateadvancement of professional engineering graduate education to enhance the innovative capacityof the U.S. engineering workforce in industry for global competitiveness. Founded in 2000, theNational Collaborative Task Force is an initiative of the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division,Corporate Members Council, and College Industry Partnership Division. The NationalCollaborative is comprised of leaders from industry, academia, and government all
introduce the selectedmaterials in each curriculum?; and, 3) What do we take out, or how do we modify existingsyllabi so that they meet accreditation guidelines and do not significantly increase the number ofcredit hours required? These are complex questions worthy of significant faculty debate andconsideration that have been initiated, but not completed, at our institution. However, we havetaken a significant step in moving toward an e-engineering paradigm in our freshman course,ENG 110-Fundamentals of Engineering and Technology. This course is the first of a requiredtwo semester two credit hour per semester course for all freshmen. It is similar to the freshmandesign course that has been adopted in many engineering curricula across the
AC 2010-1870: INTEGRATING HANDS-ON DISCOVERY OF LEAN PRINCIPLESINTO OPERATIONS, INDUSTRIAL, AND MANUFACTURING CURRICULASharon Johnson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Sharon A. Johnson is an associate professor of operations and industrial engineering in the Department of Management at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She teaches courses in process management, facility layout and design, and operations management. Dr. Johnson received her Ph.D. from Cornell University in Operations Research and Industrial Engineering in 1989. Dr. Johnson’s research interests include lean manufacturing and operations design, process modeling, and improving health care delivery processes. Her work has appeared
PBLis an appropriate strategy for teaching students to engage in complex problem solving, andindeed may be one of the only effective methods for doing so (Shepherd and Cosgrif, 1998,Tomkinson et al., 2008). The vertically-integrated problem-based learning (PBL) frameworkdeveloped in the course of this TUES project provides undergraduate students with bothknowledge and tools needed to address urban sustainability issues in their future careers, whetherin industry or academe. This framework is replicable and can thus be deployed acrossuniversities as part of the CCEM curriculum. In this TUES project, the researchers develop a problem-based learning framework that (1)introduces sustainability earlier in the undergraduate curriculum, and (2
and integral calculus, and probability and statistics. • IV-12 The curriculum must include at least 12 semester hours of science. • IV-13 Course work in science must include the equivalent of a two-semester sequence in a laboratory science for science or engineering majors. • IV-14 Science course work additional to that specified in Standard IV-13 must be in science courses or courses that enhance the student's ability to apply the scientific method.Additional Areas of Study • IV-15 The oral communications skills of the student must be developed and applied in the program. • IV-16 The written communications skills of the student must be developed and applied in
2006-1330: A COMPREHENSIVE MODEL FOR INTEGRATINGENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION AND CAPSTONE PROJECTS WHILEEXCEEDING ABET REQUIREMENTSJohn Ochs, Lehigh University John B Ochs is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lehigh and Director of the Integrated Product Development Program (IPD), which he co-founded with Dr. Watkins in 1994. He is the past chairman the Entrepreneurship division of the American Society for Engineering Education. From 1985-95 Dr. Ochs did extensive industry consulting and was involved in the start up of three companies. In 1996 the pilot courses IPD won the American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ curriculum innovation award and in 1997 IPD won the Newcomen Society award for
Session 2525 Integrating Production Aspects of the Product Realization Process into Mechanical Design Courses Donald L. Goddard The University of Texas, TylerAbstractThis paper describes how the integration of the Product Realization Process (PRP) into amechanical engineering curriculum is incorporated with traditional design courses, and how ithas enhanced them by increasing the range of possibilities and realism in design experience.PRP as developed in our current program involves the use of “desk top” scale manufacturingequipment2. Without an
A Capstone Course Integrating Student Leadership Development and CommunityBased Service Learning Jeffrey Birou, Alistar EricksonLudwig, Mira Olson, Kevin Scoles, Drexel University The Paul Peck Scholars Program in Drexel University’s College of Engineering provides a curriculum framework that helps develop students’ skills in leadership, management, communication and mentorship. The capstone course of this threeyear sequence is an engineering servicelearning project, where students must address the needs of a community partner by dovetailing their engineering coursework and internship backgrounds with the skills gained through the Peck Scholars program, in
significant learning curve in understanding the components of the ICsuggested that students would have an even greater challenge. Ideally, the IC would be usedthroughout an undergraduate engineering curriculum as a standardized framework for thinkingabout design. Early on, students could be asked to interact with the IC using current designs thatare on the market (like the toothbrush example discussed earlier) or by watching as others workthrough the design process. Later on, students could explore the individual sections of the IC ascomponents of different classes through the curriculum. With appropriate preparation, the ICcould then be used as a framework for senior design projects. The next paragraphs describesome approaches investigated by the
Session 1526 Integrating Manufacturing, Design and Teamwork into a Materials and Process Selection Course T.S. Harding, G.-Y. Lai, B.L. Tuttle and C.V. White Kettering UniversityIntroductionDuring the 2000 – 2001 academic year, the Manufacturing Engineering program at KetteringUniversity underwent a significant curriculum reform in preparation for ABET accreditation.Traditionally, the program offered an introductory manufacturing processes course at thefreshmen level followed by an introductory engineering materials course at the sophomore/juniorlevel. These courses were the
An Ethical Puzzle for University Administrators Craig W. Somerton Michigan State UniversityAbstractIt has long been recognized that ethical behavior is an essential element of an engineer.Considerable attention has been given to ethics in engineering education. Some programsinclude a full course in ethics, while others integrate ethical issues throughout their curriculum;but all programs need to create a culture where ethical behavior is prized and unethical behavioris not accepted. This culture must be grounded in the behavior of the faculty and administrators.With rampant student cheating and plagiarism, the faculty and administration must set
commitment to lifelong learning. Aligningcurriculum and instructional practices with the program's PEOs ensures that students acquire theknowledge, skills, and attributes necessary to achieve these outcomes and excel in their careers.Course IntroductionThe understudy course is sophomore level, Writing Intensive (W-intensive), a requiredengineering course. The course introduces architectural engineering as an academic program ofstudy and career choice, covering the analysis, integration, and application of the engineeringdesign process to solve problems associated with the design and operation of building systems.As a core curriculum requirement for all AREN degree-seeking students, the course also coverscommunication of solutions to technical
togetherin groups of 8 to 12.1 Each FLC engages in an active, collaborative, year long program with thegoal of enhancing teaching and learning. Participants in FLCs may select projects that allow forexperimenting with teaching innovations and assessing resultant student learning. FLCs increasefaculty interest in teaching and learning, and provide safety and support for faculty to investigate,attempt, assess, and adopt new (to them) teaching and learning methods. After participation in anFLC, faculty report using new pedagogies, while also seeing improvements in students’ criticalthinking and ability to synthesize and integrate information and ideas, often in an holisticmanner.1 Additionally, FLC participants in one study reported improved teaching
regardingstudents’ abilities to retain information and the efficacy of modified teaching techniques forincreased retention of material. The in-class demonstration was incorporated into the second lesson of a 40-lesson coursein 2017. Evaluation of performance on specific mass balance questions on the first exam of thesemester and final exam of the semester occurred starting in 2018 with performance shown inFigure 5. The effective integration of the in-class demonstration increased each year throughincreased instructor familiarity and deliberate rehearsals. As the mass balance demonstrationwas incorporated for a second year in 2018 and further improved in 2019, the test performanceon the mass balance questions during the first exam increased from an
relateengineering topics to other topics covered in other courses even those taken during thesame semester. For example, while students are learning to write in their “reading andwriting” course they still are unable or willing to apply their new skills and knowledge towriting technical reports in the engineering course. Based on the University’s successwith the FIGs/ILBs, the COE in 1998 had a pilot FIG. It was between ES 141, Principlesof Engineering (an introduction to engineering course), and RLC 110, Rhetoric,language, and Culture (a writing course), where the concept of FIG and ILBs wereapplied. Figure 1 shows the ILBs between the two courses. This was done as a test toserve as the basis for “FIGing” other courses in the engineering curriculum