. degree from Princeton, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees from Cornell.Julie Dyke Ford Ph.D., New Mexico Tech Dr. Julie Ford is Professor of Technical Communication (housed in the Mechanical Engineering depart- ment) at New Mexico Tech where she coordinates and teaches in the junior/senior design clinic as well as teaches graduate-level engineering communication courses. Her research involves engineering commu- nication, technical communication pedagogy, and knowledge transfer. She has published and presented widely including work in the Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of STEM Education: Innova- tions and Research, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, the Journal of Technical Writing and
do not directly fit into the prescription of a well-researched method.Consequently, at times faculty must thoughtfully adapt these methods for their classes.However, in doing so there is no guarantee that deep interactions will ensue. Furthermore,faculty may also wish to diagnose whether their application of an active learning method isworking as planned.At Gonzaga University, we use active learning sessions in a Junior-level design class. Each ofthese sessions combine brief mini-lectures, a problem to solve situated in a case, and a set oftasks for the student team to complete. The aim of these sessions is to teach teamwork skills suchas group problem solving, team logistical planning, and giving peer feedback. During eachsession, the
systems using the Nucleo board. 5- To provide students the opportunity to work and collaborate on real-world security problems.Problem StatementWhile the demand for engineering jobs is rising, many students face critical issues during therecruitment process due to their lack of hands-on skills after college or university [20]. Somecourses available at the university or college level do not necessarily provide students with labsthat could facilitate gaining hands-on knowledge, on top of the theory learned from theclassroom, to make them more competitive with their peers [17]. Students will become criticalthinkers in this project by identifying a real-world problem faced in the IoT ecosystems. Althoughthey might realize that various IoT
, Endowed2006 NUS, Singapore Biomolecular Eng. & writing book Chair VFA – Dept. Chem. & Teaching, research, Endowed2007 NUS, Singapore Biomolecular. Eng. & writing book Chair VFA / Dept. Chem. & Teaching & Endowed2008 NUS, Singapore Biomolecular Eng. research Chair VFA / Singapore Research &2009 NTU, Singapore VFA Membrane Tech
Faculty Surveyof Student Engagement (FSSE). These engineering versions (E-NSSE and E-FSSE) assess theextent to which engineering students are being engaged by identified “best instructionalpractices” and are achieving certain learning outcomes desired of engineering graduates. Bothinstruments include sections on students’ college activities; reading, writing, and othereducational program characteristics; educational and personal growth; and opinions aboutschool. These surveys were first pilot-tested at six engineering programs across the UnitedStates. These institutions were selected to participate in the pilot administration of the surveybecause of their leadership and interest in the field of engineering education, their geographicdiversity
, including designing and starting up aresearch program and getting it funded, attracting and managing graduate students, finding andworking with appropriate faculty or industrial collaborators, planning courses and deliveringthem effectively, writing assignments and tests that are both rigorous and fair, dealing withclassroom management problems and cheating and students with a bewildering assortment ofacademic and personal problems, doing what it takes to learn about and integrate into the campusculture, and finding the time to do all that and still have a life. Figuring out how to do all these things is not trivial. Robert Boice studied the careerdevelopment of new faculty members and found that most of them take between four and fiveyears
. In the former, students use a computer to control equipment andacquire measurements in an engineering design and experimentation lab. Lab activities such asthe development of a computer interface for an oscilloscope, a set of motors, and a photodiodeculminate in the realization of an automated laser scanning microscope system. In the latter,students receive instruction and feedback on their lab notebook entries, in addition to engaging inroutine peer review of each others’ notebooks; and, in turn, use those notebooks as a resource forpreparing a Progress Report and an Instrument Design Report. The instructors collaborate inorder to facilitate improvement of students’ skills in the art of notebook use, e.g., create a rubricfor assessment
collaborators (locally, nationally, internationally) • Learn about research and funding opportunities Teaching • Develop/enhance teaching skills; learn new pedagogical approaches • Facilitate networking to identify potential collaborators and/or mentors • Increase awareness of the teaching professor role within the college Networking • Seeking to connect with a community of scholars within the university (internal) • Seeking to connect with a community of scholars outside the university (external) Skill/Capacity building • Develop leadership skills • Develop communication skills • Develop/enhance proposal writing skills • Enhance ability to promote publication and dissemination of my work Publications and awards
time was then focused on what the students gave asfeedback for the more difficult topics and example problems. My peers and I found this to be amuch more helpful way of using time. This student and her partner were in the second semesterof the Beta Labs experiment. She said that my lab partner and I participated in these and I caneasily say they have had the biggest impact on my learning techniques and abilities of anything Ihave done in my other classes thus far. I learned to be proactive in my learning, to fight to learnon my own … to write full and comprehensive lab reports, and to take pride in my work throughthe presentation of my design.Another student was both a Circuits student as well as a Graduate Teaching Assistant. As astudent that
engineering design and society and artistically build prototypeswhich can help them to improve their environment. As stated by students in their report, timeconstraints and lack of access to a greater variety of materials were two obstacles preventingthem from further developing their projects.Students also were very engaged in their writing assignments, in which they demonstrated theirunderstanding of the concept of citizen engineering, and explored the interconnectedness oftechnology and society. Students were evaluated based on writing quality, argumentation,engagement with course materials, and making connections with everyday life. Each assignmentincluded a rubric that explicitly spelled out specific evaluation criteria. For example, all
communities audiences, including nontechnical audiences • Outreach and EducationMethodsThis research was conducted out of a larger study intended to study graduate engineeringstudents’ rhetorical academic engineering writing patterns, employing the National ScienceFoundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) as a platform for studying astandard and relatively short, yet authentic, writing experience. The NSF GRFP is an annualcompetition in which graduate students in their senior year of undergraduate or their first orsecond years of graduate school compete to win three
), Carderock Division.At this point, two classes were being offered one night per week using video teleconferencingamong three sites; VCES, Carderock, and the Virginia Tech main campus in Blacksburg, VA.At that time, very few engineering classes – from anywhere – were being offered in a distance-learning mode. The problem was that the resolution of the video teleconferencing medium wastoo poor to deliver the equation-intensive material in these courses. The instructors would haveto write equations in large characters in order to be legible over the TV and were often frustratedby the small amount they could fit on one screen. Students had no way of pointing to orinteracting with the mathematical material the professor was presenting. Demonstration
investigate developing informationliteracy skills in first-year engineering technology students. It was found that ongoingcollaboration with faculty and increased student contact improved the effectiveness of librarian-led information literacy instruction. Allegorically, the authors have also found that their ownstudents, even when presented with the proper resources to search for and retrieve peer-reviewedarticles, handbooks and conference proceedings will frequently resort to web references.Examples of this may be found in three works authored with undergraduates. Admittedly, as ofthis writing, the co-author’s own work has fallen victim to the vagaries of online publishing, (e.g.Gadia et al., 2005a, Gadia et al., 2005b, Layton et al., 2007)4-6
Page 8.1304.1math and writing courses.At the University of Pittsburgh, we not only use the CIRP to provide insight into our freshmanengineering class, but we also have been using our Pittsburgh Freshman Attitudes Survey © since19952,3. This latter instrument has not only enabled us to learn much about the attitudes of ourentering students, but through its adoption by other engineering programs, it has enabled us tomake cross-institutional comparisons4,5. Three years ago we introduced a “Math Inventory”Assessment survey modeled after a similar such instrument developed and used by LeBold andBudny at Purdue6. We currently administer both instruments as well as an Algebra andTrigonometry placement test, a Calculus placement test 1 and an English
conference room in order to accommodate all ofthe students’ schedules. This means that each meeting is attended by 10 – 30 students. Themeetings usually open with an ice breaker question which each student asked to answer alongwith their name, major, and graduation date. This exercise is very important to networking andencouragement. Students report that they “liked the introduction we each had to give andlistening to good things that happened to my peers.” A common report is “It helped me to knowthat I am not the only student having trouble in my class.” Sometimes study groups are formedafter students in the meeting realize that they are in the same class.The first meeting of each semester is dedicated to talking about the Guaranteed 4.0 Plan.14 In
]. Finding the “Goldilocks” textbookfeels impossible before adding liberal arts standards of historical, literary, narrative, andinspirational excellence to the list of requirements. A multi-author textbook might be tempting,but the challenges of writing such a textbook from the blank page are numerous [21]. Even witha good textbook, freshman students are often already overwhelmed by the transition to college,homework for math and science courses, and a slowly dawning realization that college, unlikemany high school experiences, will require effort outside the classroom. Reading a textbook foran “easy” introductory course is often the first assignment to skip, particularly where there is nomechanism for assessing completion.The Problem and The
class is quite poor in preparing students for workplace report writing.” “Emphasizing communication skills. Engineers can speak from an educated standpoint but that does not mean they are always able to communicate meaningfully.” “I believe a larger emphasis could be placed on effective communication.” “I think the ME Department can do more to help students develop better oral communication skills.” “We have to be able to confidently communicate ideas with people of other departments/industries.” “The ability to communicate effectively and the ability to work on multi-disciplinary needs.” “I noticed most of my engineering peers struggled with oral presentations and writing great
experience.3) Provide a venue for peer and older engineers to relate their academic and career development practices to the SBP participants.4) Introduce shared experiences of other Hispanic/Latinx / minority (female) engineers.The SBP program each year consisted of 2 to 4-hour afternoon sessions held each weekday invirtual only or hybrid mode over the three-week program in July. A Zoom platform was used toconduct the virtual portion of the daily SBP sessions. A weekly stipend was provided to eachparticipant as an incentive for continued attendance, paid after each week. For the on-siteparticipants of the SBP, additional activities centered around either student success orengineering lab tours were held each morning. The student
flexibility in modes of thinking, the scientific method, criticalreading, sketching, communication practices, and reflective and analytical writing. It underscoresthe interplay between reasoning, imagination, creativity, abstraction, ideas, and design asessential thinking skills in problem-solving, alongside ethical thinking and deliberation inanticipating design consequences.Drawing upon the foundational theories and experience-based learning models of Piaget, whichfocus on action, reflection, and construction, as well as Dewey’s exploration of the vitalconnection between education and experience through observation, knowledge, judgement, andpurpose [86], [87], this pedagogy extends into Kolb’s work on experiential learning. Kolb'scyclical model of
areas of afterschool programming, youth leadership, college counseling and youth workforce development. Through these varied experiences, Gabe has gained significant appreciation for the importance of clearly-defined, structured, and supported pathways for program participants. Gabe has a Bachelor's degree from San Francisco State University in English; Creative Writing. He lives in the East Bay and enjoys exploring kayaking with his family and playing soccer whenever he can.Gary Barnak (Grant Project Manager) An Air Force veteran with eight years experience managing federal and state grants including Department of Labor, National Science Foundation, and California veterans credit for prior learning. Private sector
critical approaches were scaffolded in class concurrent withguidance and support from both supportive faculty and peers (p. 879).Professional IdentityProfessional identity frames the importance of one’s work to the self and is foundational foroverall personal development [46]. While a number of models exist to describe it (e.g., [47]),Lave and Wenger’s [48] Community of Practice (CoP) model has emerged as a usefulframework for understanding the engineering profession [e.g., 27, 49, 50]. This model is basedon historical apprenticeship models and the identity transformation often resulting from thisprocess. This study has adopted the CoP model to explore professional identity. The CoP modelframes a profession as a community of experts surrounded by
/or “veterans” and “engineering” by mining references from an unpublished grantproposal for research with military students [9]. This process was repeated as each subsequentpaper was located until no new references were found. Next, EBSCOHost was used to search thefollowing databases: ERIC, Academic Search Ultimate, and APA PsychInfo in tandem withGoogle Scholar. Finally, a search was conducted on ASEE’s PEER database. Key words forsearching these databases were developed by selecting common key words from the previouslyobtained literature, as well as through consultation with a university librarian whose expertise isin educational research. Key words included “military”, “veteran”, “student”, “engineeringeducation”, and “undergraduate
the instructor (80%) and more generally by apanel (other instructors, TA, experts) (20%). Similarly, the 15-min presentations are alsoprescribed in the number and content of the slides, and the balanced participation of all membersof the team. A panel grades the presentation by evaluating both the team and individualperformance.Team and communication skills developmentThe lab course also provides a comprehensive experience on team development, includingtraining, coaching and performance evaluation (self, peer and external). There is a suggested capnumber of 36 students in the lab, resulting in a maximum of six students per team to cover thesix available experiments. Though 4-5-member teams have also been operative in the past, thecurrent
take away from this module), instructional strategy (the in-class activities forEJ Week), and forms of assessment (the homework assignment and project deliverable associatedwith the module’s learning objectives). In exchange for their increased educational labor comparedto the rest of the course, students who self-select to take part in the cogen would be able to dropone homework assignment from their final grade. Ultimately, four students—Danielle Gan, Patrick Paul, Justyn Welsh, and Thomas Pauly—offered to take part in the EJ cogen, writing to Anna about their prior experience with leadingclimate discussions. Danielle, a young woman of color pursuing a minor in global environmentalchange, had taken numerous courses about environmental
; Poor Quality Assignments; Poor Intermediate Grades; Stresses; and LoweredMotivation. While most research participants experienced high stresses, a few of themexperienced low or no stresses. To minimize the impact of COVID-related learning challengeson their STEM learning and performance, research participants made effective adaptationdecisions coded as: Refined Scheduling; Alternate Learning Resources; Professor Office Hours;Teaching Assistants; Peer Collaboration; Relaxation Strategies; and Pass/Fail Options. Comparedto the fall 2019 GPAs, the improved spring 2020 GPAs of research participants may be partiallyattributed to professor leniency, pass/fail option, and cheating. Findings indicate that while STEM professors were adjusting to
conceptualized as contacts that lead to internship or job opportunities, peer relationshipsthat provide emotional or academic support, connections to faculty that can provide opportunitiesin research labs, letters of recommendation or mentoring regarding graduate school, or similarresources. Previous studies of social capital in engineering education reveal that social capital islinked to increased retention [14], and many other benefits such as “academic achievement,academic performance, and engineering identity” ([15], p. 823).Cultural and Social Capital in Engineering EducationResearch has increasingly demonstrated that the social and cultural capital of first generationcollege (FGC) students and under-represented minority (URM) students differs from
Page 14.917.5teams; hands-on and integrative experience in the first year; and emphasis on social relevance,service learning, and collaboration16.For example, the Colorado School of Mines allows freshmen to discover important connectionsamong multi-disciplines, and to acquire a deeper appreciation of the importance of theirEngineering studies and their interrelation with upper-level courses, their careers and life. Itincludes extensive use of active and cooperative learning strategies for interdisciplinary topicsthrough student peer study group17. The evaluation of the program indicates that the interventionimprove students' academic performance. Interactions with faculty and peers were the mostpositive aspect of students' experience. Turf
peer institution (who took circuitsas a service course from their EE department) via anonymous surveys administered to bothgroups (in both cases, 6 to 12 months after completion of the course). In addition, through aninternal end-of-semester assessment tool, we compare our students’ perception of their ability toachieve each course objective to embedded indicators based on performance in selected courseassessments. Finally, evidence of proficiency in circuit design and implementation is manifestedin students’ subsequent senior capstone projects, in which some groups have designed and builtPCBs to power and embody the main electronic components in their designed systems.`IntroductionIn the fall of 2012, QU held its first freshman engineering
in a meaningful way to create an enriching learning experience. Moreover,designing assessments that stretches students’ thought-process is critical to engineeringpedagogy. This is implemented in the course as structured threaded discussion forums, governedby instructors that provide thought-provoking guiding questions followed by peer discussion.This essay also explores the design and implementation of virtual laboratory sessionscomplementing the bi-weekly homework assignments and a final project. It describes theassessment design decisions, based on the overall course learning outcomes, taken to suit theonline learners. The aim of this essay is to inform, the community of asynchronous onlinecomputer engineering educators, of assessment
understanding and ask and answer questions.For both Engineering 82 and Math 45, all PowerPoint slides and tablet writing shown in thecontrol section were contained in the video watched by the inverted section. For both courses,all students completed the same problems that students in the control section completed ashomework. In Engineering 82, students in the inverted section completed specified problemsduring class meeting time (and turned them in at the end of class) and turned others in ashomework. In Math 45, students in the inverted section used in-class time to work on anyproblems from the homework assignment and turned in all of their work as homework. As a finalnote, students in both sections of Math 45 had access to the videos; only students