). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing andemploying America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press,2006.[2] E. Seymour, A. B. Hunter, and T. J. Weston, “Why We Are Still Talking About Leaving,”Talking About Leaving Revisited, E. Seymour and A. B. Hunter, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2019.[3] Stemstudy.com, Stem Scholarship Search, [Accessed April 16, 2021]. Available:https://stemstudy.com/stem-scholarship-search/.[4] A. P. Carnevale, S. J. Rose, and B. Cheah, B., The College Payoff: Education,Occupations, Lifetime Earnings, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Center on Educationand the Workforce, 2011.[5] T. J
module emphasizing encryption and decryption used as the semesterproject for the course. Each module is a collection of concepts related to cyber security. Theindividual cyber security concepts are presented with a general description of a security issue toavoid, sample code with the security issue written in the Java programming language, and asecond version of the code with an effective solution. The set of these modules was implementedin Computer Science I during the Fall 2019 semester. Incorporating each of the concepts in thesemodules into lectures depends on both the topic covered and the approach to resolving therelated security issue.Students were introduced to computing concepts related to both the security issue and theappropriate
held early spring of 2019 based on the student’s availability. The first interviewfocused on understanding their background, pathway to engineering, pathway to their engineeringmajor, and first-year engineering experiences. The second interview protocol elicited responsesabout their experiences throughout their second year of engineering. We also asked students abouttheir classroom experiences (intellectual), resources, and connections that were related to theirexperiences (institutional), and interactions with faculty and staff in the college of engineering,peers in engineering, and professionals in their field (networking). Each interview wasapproximately 30 to 60 minutes in duration and conducted primarily by one researcher.AnalysisThe
together for consistentdegree programs. Because we were a small state, we needed to work together to develop qualitydata science education at all levels. In late 2019, we co-hosted a workshop with representativesfrom industry, academia, state government, and students at all levels, to explore the potential fordeveloping a state-wide data science educational ecosystem. The response was overwhelmingly“yes.” As a result, and with the collaboration of our state’s division of higher education, wedeveloped a vision, strategy, and plan to do so with an “opt-in” approach and this paper presentsthe vision, strategy, plans, results, and experiences and continuous improvement over more thanfour years of collaboration. These include the development of A.S
motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self- regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002
Engineering Education, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.[7] A. Huynh and N. T. Buswell, “How was your internship? Stories about the engineering internship experi-ence from five female engineering students,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2019, pp. 1–9.[8] D. J. Bayless, “Using Industrial Summer Intern Programs as a Tool for Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 465–469, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1999.tb00475.x.[9] M. Seevers, W. Knowlton, P. Pyke, C. Schrader, and J. Gardner, “Improving Engineering Undergraduate Retention via Research and Internships,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., pp. 1–9, 2006.[10] S. Haag, E. Guilbeau, and W. Goble, “Assessing Engineering Internship Efficacy: Industry’s
. J., & Higgins, A. Z. (2016). Written justifications to multiple-choice concept questions during active learning in class. International Journal of Science Education, 38(11), 1747–1765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1214303Koretsky, M., Nolen, S., Self, B., Papadopoulos, C., Widmann, J., Prince, M., & Dal Bello, D. (2019). For Systematic Development of Conceptests for Active Learning. EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 1, 8882–8892. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2205Papadopoulos, C., Davishahl, E., Ramming, C. H., Abreu, J. C. B., & Kitch, W. A. (2022). Work in Progress: Context Matters: A Comparative Study of Results of Common Concept Questions in Statics at Several Diverse Institutions. ASEE Annual
Behaviors Among Engineering Students", 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-measuring-stigma-of- mental-health-conditions-and-its-impact-in-help-seeking-behaviors-among-engineering- students.[6] Wright, C. J., Hargis, L. E., Usher, E. L., Hammer, J. H., Wilson, S. A., & Miller, M. E. "Identifying engineering students’ beliefs about seeking help for mental health concerns". In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.[7] K. Jensen and K. Cross, “Board 73: Student Perceptions of Engineering Stress Culture,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32418. doi
of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Dr. Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato Lauren Singelmann is an Assistant Professor at Minnesota State University, Mankato with the Iron Range Engineering program. She has a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and STEM Education through North Dakota State University. Her research interests include learning analytics and alternative assessment.Mr. Rob Sleezer, Virginia Tech Rob Sleezer earned his
the Mechanical Engineer- ing Department at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. His research focuses on boundary element methods, finite element methods, atomistic modeling, and engineering education. He currently serves on the ed- itorial board of Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements and the Journal of Online Engineering Education. He is an associate editor of the International Series on Advances in Boundary Elements. He currently serves as chair of ASEE Professional Interest Council (PIC) III. He received the 2002 ASEE New England Section Teacher of Year Award, the 2004 ASEE New England Section Outstanding Leader Award, the 2006 ASEE Mechanics Division James L. Meriam Service Award, and the 2010 ASEE Mid
in transportation from Iowa State University. Dr. Fitzsimmons is a graduate of the American Society of Civil Engineers Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEED) and also has served as an assistant mentor. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in transportation and railroad engineering.Dr. Jeff Zacharakis, Kansas State University Jeff Zacharakis is a professor of adult learning and leadership in the Department of Educational Leader- ship. His areas of research include leader and organizational development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Investigating the Role of Social Responsibility on Veteran Student Retention in
for Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American Society of Engineering Educa- tion.Anila K. Shethia, Rice University Anila K
engineering students to real world design problems. The students gain first hand experi- ence communicating professionally, developing schedules, meeting deadlines and preparing professional quality reports and presentations. Prof. Brunell is the director of the Water Resouces graduate program. She also teaches Fluid Mechanics, Surveying and Water Resources. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Real-World Approach to Introducing Sustainability in Civil Engineering Capstone Design. Leslie Brunell, Ph.D., P.E.Stevens Institute of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering,Castle Point on Hudson
, numerical and experimental methods. He has participated in many research projects and has published several peer-reviewed journal papers since 2004.Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko, Morgan State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31691 Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko is currently a Doctoral student and Research Associate in the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore Maryland. Prior to joining the department in January of 2019, Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko was a Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) at Tennessee State University (TSU) in Tennessee State, where she
entry intothe practice of civil engineering at the professional level.” [1] During the 2018-9 academic year,13 capstone design projects were required to address sustainability within their proposed designs.The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals [3] and the ASCE Envision Rating Systemwere used to assess the sustainability of each design. The rationale behind using both the UNSustainable Development Goals and the Envision Rating System arose during a workshop at the2018 ASEE Annual Conference, “Applications of the Envision Rating System in EngineeringCourses and Curricula.” [4] Workshop participants were asked to look at the 17 UN SustainableDevelopment Goals, each with 10 objectives, select one goal and match it to the Envision
students’ achievements on the educational objectivespresented in the module outline. These objectives align with the new ABET students learningoutcome 1, 3, and 6. Table 1 gives the outcome indicators and the levels of achievements forexperiencing IoT transceiver with affordable SDR platform. For each instructional outcome, fourlevels of achievements were designated. A score of 1 to 4 that represents unsatisfactory,developing, satisfactory, and exemplary levels was given based on their hands-on performance,lab report, and presentation.The students enrolled in the Fall 2019 semester Communication Systems course were the firstgroup to employ the developed course module. The students’ experience of IoT transceiver withADALM-PLUTO SDR platform were
. Litzinger, P.V. Meter, C.M. Firetto, L.J. Passmore, C.B. Masters, S.R. Turns, G.L.Gray, F. Costanzo and S.E. Zappe, "A cognitive study of problem solving in statics," J EngEduc, vol. 99, pp. 337-353, 2010.[15] N. Johnson‐Glauch and G.L. Herman, "Engineering representations guide student problem‐solving in statics," J Eng Educ, vol. 108, pp. 220-247, 2019.[16] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L.W. Singleton, "Feel the force! An inquiry-based approach toteaching free-body diagrams for rigid body analysis," in ASEE annual conference exposition,2020.[17] C.S. Lee, N.J. McNeill, E.P. Douglas, M.E. Koro‐Ljungberg and D.J. Therriault,"Indispensable resource? A phenomenological study of textbook use in engineering problemsolving," J Eng Educ, vol. 102, pp. 269
Holistic REU Program,” in2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun.2019. [2] O. Qaqish, C. Hincher, T. Nguyen, and N. Goodwin, “The Grand Challenges Scholars Program Research Experience: A Great Opportunity to Cultivate Belonging in a Community of Practice,” in2019 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023. [3] S. D. Ivie, “Ausubel’s Learning Theory: An Approach to Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills,”High Sch. J., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 35–42,1998. [4] J. Novak and A. Cañas
the Learning Sciences, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 330–349, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10508406.2020.1828089.[13] K. A. Ramos, J. Gardow, E. J. Louime, E. Y. Kang, and A. Hira, “Promoting Belonging and Breaking Down Gatekeeping in Youth-Centered Engineering Spaces,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/promoting-belonging-and-breaking-down-gatekeeping-in-youth-center ed-engineering-spaces[14] D. A. Chen and S. Wodin-Schwartz, “Contextualizing Statics: Our Process and Examples,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available
University. He directs the Center for Integrated Systems in Aerospace (CISA) researching modeling, design optimization and system engineering methods for aerospace systems and systems-of-systems, including urban and regional Advanced Aerial Mobility and hypersonic systems. He is a Senior Research Fellow at the Krach Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue. DeLaurentis served as Chief Scientist of the U.S. DoD’s Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) UARC from 2019-2023. He is an elected FELLOW of the American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics (AIAA) and the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
of the ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, pp. 7200–7215, Jan. 2019.[18] P. A. Kirschner, J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark, “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does NotWork: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 75–86, 2006, doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.[19] D. R. Latimer, A. Ata, C. P. Forfar, M. Kadhim, A. McElrea, and R. Sales, “Overcoming the Hurdlefrom Undergraduate Lab to Research Lab: A Guided-Inquiry Structural Characterization of a ComplexMixture in the Upper-Division Undergraduate Organic Lab,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 2046–2049, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00421.[20] I. Miller, S
responsibility among undergraduate engineering students:Comparing baseline and midpoint survey results,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 23-27, 2018.[29] S. Nittala, S. Howland, and B. Jesiek, “Changes in perceptions of ethical climate amongundergraduate engineering students,” Annual Meeting of European Society for EngineeringEducation (SEFI), Budapest, Hungary, September 16-19, 2019.[30] C. B. Zoltowski, B. K. Jesiek, S. Claussen, S. J. Howland, D. Kim, and S. Nittala,“Foundations of Social and Ethical Responsibility Among Undergraduate Engineering Students:Overview of Results,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Virtual, June 22-26, 2020.[31] D. Kim, B. K. Jesiek, and S
interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.[10] J. A. Cruz and W. J. Frey, “An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An ABET 2000 challenge,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 543–568, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0049-2.[11] S. Fatehiboroujeni et al., “Board 72: Why engineering ethics? How do educators and administrators justify teaching engineering ethics?,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[12] B. E. Barry and M. W. Ohland, “ABET criterion 3.f: How much curriculum content is enough?,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 369–392, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11948
engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor and Associate Head of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing teams has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on
. 59421, p. V005T07A015, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019, 10.1115/IMECE2019-10248.[8] R. Moore, et al., “Biologically inspired design for engineering education—9th/10th grade engineering unit (curriculum exchange),” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022, Aug., https://strategy.asee.org/40911.[9] R. Moore, M. Alemdar, J. A. Lingle, S. H. Newton, J. H. Rosen and M. Usselman, “The engineering design Log: A digital design journal facilitating learning and assessment (RTP),” in Proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26153[10] N. Mentzer, K. Becker and M. Sutton, “Engineering design
conducted [16]found that students who received Experiment-Centric form of instruction scored higher on tests ofscientific knowledge than those who received Traditional lecture-based instruction. The authorsalso found that Experiment-Centric Pedagogy increased students’ motivation to learn, withstudents reporting greater interest in the subject and greater self-efficacy when compared tostudents in the Traditional lecture-based instruction group.Similarly, a study conducted by Zhang X., et al 2019 [17] found that Experiment-Centric Pedagogywas effective in increasing students’ knowledge and understanding of Biology topics, as well astheir interest in the subject. In addition to studies that have investigated the impact of Experiment-Centric Pedagogy
augmented it using demographic information obtained through universityrecords. We then filtered the dataset to use data from three courses. We also removed semestersthat occurred over a year before the pandemic onset. Our final dataset consists of 33,136 uniquestudent office hours encounters spanning from January 2019 to May 2021.Records were filtered for several reasons. Entries with extreme wait times or encounter lengthswere invalid because they represent people adding themselves by mistake or the instructorforgetting to close the queue at the end of the day. Additionally, many special topics coursesshared a course number, rendering them unusable. Entries in which the student removedthemselves from the queue were invalid because they did not
: 10.1007/s11465-018-0499-5.[8] V. Sima, I. G. Gheorghe, J. Subić, and D. Nancu, “Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 10, Art. no. 10, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12104035.[9] M. Johnson and B. P. Nepal, “Board 76: Bridging the Workforce Skills Gap in High Value Manufacturing through Continuing Education,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-76-bridging-the-workforce-skills-gap-in-high- value-manufacturing-through-continuing-education[10] “Narrowing the Skills Gap to Ensure the Future
students financially, though retention wasnot affected much by OER practices. Knowledge available to the public was also accessedmainly according to need, despite the wide range of resources they could access. Also,supporting resources did little to affect how well independent learners learned (or did not learn)the material.Similarly, a meta-analysis by Clinton & Khan, (2019) found lower withdrawal rates in courseswith open textbooks, as well as no difference in learning performance between courses with opentextbooks and those with traditional textbooks. Paskevicius (2017) discusses open pedagogy andOER, and suggests that students involved in open pedagogical practices may have higherengagement in their learning. Open pedagogy can promote
. Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University Maria Chierichetti joined the department of Aerospace Engineering as a full-time assistant professor in Fall 2019. Her interests lie in the field of aerospace structural design and vibrations, with particular emphasis on developing methodologies for combining finite element analysis and machine/deep learning for structural health monitoring and unmanned Structural inspections in the context of urban air mobility. Maria is also interested in investigating how students learning is affected by external factors, such as COVID-19 pandemic and community service. Before joining SJSU, she worked as a faculty member at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and at the University of