on processimprovement and automation, which has resulted in a shortage of employees with technical skills[2] . Engineers, thus, play an important and expanding role in this exciting field, yet undergraduatechemical engineering students are rarely exposed to food engineering. This course developedand integrated applied food engineering coursework and food chemistry experiments to providestudents with the skills directly relevant to the evolving needs of the food processing industry. Rowan University is pioneering a progressive engineering program that uses innovativemethods of teaching and learning to prepare students for a rapidly changing and highlycompetitive marketplace, as recommended by ASEE [3]. Rowan Engineering is
for engineering students [15]. The goal of this project is to develop high-impact online lab teaching practices and to testtheir effectiveness of them. Accordingly, during the two long semesters in 2022, we tested ourinnovative online lab teaching strategies in the laboratory sessions with the following activelearning strategies in the laboratory sessions by a) developing and implementing open-endeddesign experiences into lab work, b) establishing teamwork in online labs, c) creating an onlinelearning community and to overcome isolation, and d) incorporating pre-lab simulations and pre-lab video demonstrations. These core lab learning strategies were applied in five EE courses:Circuits, Electronics I & II, Microcomputers, and
. Ann Arbor, Michigan.3. Nesbit, S.M. (1989). Teaching Automated Manufacturing in the Industrial and Manufacturing Laboratory. KeyStrategies for Teaching Automated Manufacturing, October 31 – November 2. Detroit, Michigan.Biographical InformationJERRY GINTZJerry Gintz is now a Senior Lecturer in the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology Department atArizona State University. Prior to the fall of 2004, he was a senior technical instructor for Rockwell Automationafter working as a manufacturing engineer responsible for industrial automation and manufacturing control systems.He has extensive expertise in programmable logic control systems and robotic systems integration.SCOTT DANIELSONScott Danielson is the Chair of the Mechanical
them. However it is best that this input be solicited in a formal setting in the middle of the course after the students have some understanding of the course material. Using a third party facilitator, expert in post-secondary instruction, encourages students to be open, thoughtful and responsible with their feedback.• When introducing non-traditional teaching methods such as group assignments it is necessary to reiterate the importance of these assignments throughout the course. If an immediate benefit (such as performance in a subsequent laboratory course) can be shown the students will be more receptive .• Teaching is a dynamic process. Highly successful teaching methods in a given year may
) Class Attendance, (5) Design Project and laboratory written reports, (6) Design Project Oral Presentation, (7) Computer Simulation using FORTRAN, C, MatLab, Labview, (8) Prototype development, (9) Laboratory Testing / Project teamwork. (10) Course assessment (by students), (11) Instructor’s teaching performance evaluation (by students).To guarantee the outcome of the course, the teaching of each topic in the course contents wasdesigned to meet aforementioned criteria (a-s) and evaluated by a set of
Paper ID #20677Writing in the Disciplines for Engineers: Implementation and Assessment ofStudent LearningDr. Jordan E. Trachtenberg, Rice University Jordan Trachtenberg received her PhD in bioengineering from Rice University. She has been passion- ate about STEM education and outreach throughout her undergraduate and graduate studies. Her broad teaching interests include teaching K-12 outreach programs in 3D printing and computer-aided design, mentoring undergraduate laboratory and design teams, and organizing graduate professional development opportunities in science communication. She works on collaborative pedagogical
theseconflicting constraints, certain compromises are made in the delivery of the material to thestudents and in the exercises performed in the laboratory. Page 14.269.5The first compromise relates to the material that is selected. Rather than attempt to teach all ofthe material that might normally be associated with a 2000-level course in any one discipline, thechoice was made to pare the material to that which is essential to provide sufficient depth for thestudents to understand the related laboratory exercises. In this context, the emphasis in theclassroom is on the most commonly encountered concepts rather than interesting special cases.In
Purdue University, and his Ph.D. from the University of Washington. He worked at PACCAR Technical Center as an R&D engineer and at Oak Ridge National Laboratory as a development staff member. He was also faculty and associate chair at University of Washington, Seattle, and professor and chair at University of Detroit Mercy before starting his position as faculty and dean at CSU, Fresno. His research and teaching interests include characteriza- tion of advanced materials (e.g., ceramics), experimental mechanics, data base development, cumulative damage mechanics, and probabilistic design and reliability.Dr. Walter V. Loscutoff, California State University, Fresno Walter V. Loscutoff is a professor and Former Chair
includes:Engineering Graphics (2-credit laboratory), Engineering Seminar (1 credit), and Engineering De-sign Laboratory I (1-credit laboratory).The major goal of these activities in the first semester is to provide the students an early bondingwith engineering and its style and task orientation as distinguished from science. They are aimedat initiating development of competencies that will build through subsequent design experiences:1. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs2. Ability to function effectively on multidisciplinary teams3. Ability to identify, formulate and assess alternative technical and economic solutions to en- gineering problems.4. Ability to communicate effectively and persuasively, both in writing and
research positions,allowing for more inclusive practices across laboratories [5]. However, they are typically offeredfor only one semester or less time and require mentors to guide multiple students [6], unlikeindividual undergraduate research experiences that typically provide very few undergraduateswith research experiences over the course of a year or more [4].To be able to provide an inclusive research experience that allows many students to join researchlaboratories as well as mitigate issues associated with the short duration of course-basedundergraduate research experiences, the University of California Irvine (UCI) has developedSIRiPods: Summer Interdisciplinary Research in Pods. Unlike typical research programs within asingle laboratory
Lessons Learned from a Mobile Robot Based Mechatronics Course Brian Surgenor*, Kevin Firth* and Peter Wild** * Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen’s University ** Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of VictoriaAbstractExperience with an elective course in mechatronics is discussed. The course is structuredaround a series of laboratories involving a mobile robot. The course introduces students toselected sensor and actuator technologies and sensitizes them to mechatronic systems designissues. The course is organized to promote a high level of active learning. The course has beenvery well received by students to date
Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus
Prototyping CourseAbstractManufacturing and Industrial Technology (MIT) is one of the well-known majors at the Collegeof Engineering of Tennessee Tech University (TTU) located in Cookeville, TN. MIT studentsgraduate with a BS in Industrial Technology and take 121 credit-hour coursework to completetheir degrees.During the Fall 2007 semester MIT4450--Rapid Prototyping course has been re-structured tooffer fully online laboratory component for students’ practice. Students were able to prototypetheir parts through remotely accessible Rapid Prototyping Laboratory.Web-enhanced MIT4450 course students were also able to interact with students in WesternNevada College and prototype joint project parts with the campus engineering students. AnotherK-12 school
fimdamentals of a 16-bit microprocessor. In the lab for; the second course, each student designs and implements a complete 8086-based microcomputer board. Once~ this prototype board is implemented, the student can use it for various microprocessor-based applications. ~A microprocessor development system designed to provide up-to-date development tools for the lab is also described. This development system is implemented as a network consisting of six stations, each equipped with a PC, an emulator, a logic analyzer and an EPROM programmer.!I INTRODUCTION For many microprocessor courses, laboratory projects are often limited to assembly language programming. A main reason is that software
the Sibley Schoolof Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Cornell University and the Hospital for SpecialSurgery (HSS) affiliated with the Weill Medical College of Cornell University. The main goalwas to expose Cornell engineering students to research and clinical practice in a hospital setting.The Immersion Terms took place at HSS in New York City. Students from the graduate fields ofMechanical and Biomedical Engineering at the main campus spent either 6 weeks (doctoralstudents) or 3.5 weeks (masters students) at the hospital. The students participated in orientation,courses on musculoskeletal mechanics, independent studies, observation in the operating room,tours of laboratory research facilities, and multiple seminars and meetings. Based
coursework and theincorporation of state of the art technologies and innovative teaching methodologies. Allengineering students from the four engineering disciplines namely Civil, Chemical, Electricaland Mechanical share a common engineering clinic class. This class is major hallmark of theRowan engineering program as all engineering students throughout their eight semesters of studytake it. The theme of the Freshman clinic class in the fall semester is engineering measurementsfollowed by a competitive assessment laboratory in the spring semester. This paper focuses onthe engineering measurement modules. The course is team-taught by faculty form each
. This paper presents anattempt to develop a low cost prototype equipment for "Impact of a Jet" experiment throughsenior design course at Southern Arkansas University.Introduction“Impact of a Jet” is a common laboratory exercise offered by most undergraduate engineeringprograms. The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate the relationship between force and rateof change of momentum. In an undergraduate fluid mechanics course, theoretical equations forrate of change of momentum are usually derived from the Reynolds transport theorem.Almost all technical teaching equipment companies such as TQ equipment, EDIBON, and USDidactic produce and market an apparatus for the measurement of force on solid surfaces due tothe impact of a water jet. Most
exercise and the design andadministration of the survey are described in detail elsewhere.5, 6Results were presented previously describing current and expected future teaching methodsand curriculum approaches as well as the prevalence and acceptance of online courses andMassive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and different teaching resources.5 Regarding Page 26.198.3teaching methods, it is not surprising that lectures were by far the most likely educationalpractice used currently and expected to be used in the next five years. However, 4% ofrespondents indicated that they never plan to lecture again. Laboratories were also likely tobe used often. The only
engineering up front and incorporating the hands-on laboratory experiences was intendedto attack the problems of poor retention by getting students involved and excited aboutengineering right from the beginning of their first term. An important element here was (and is)the use of regular faculty from across the departments of the College in the first- year courses toprovide significantly more interaction between first- year student and engineering faculty, whichestablishes a sense of identity with or belonging to engineering. It provided and continues tooffer the additional benefits of advancing toward the goals of increasing diversity, developing adynamic curriculum able to respond and adapt to the changing needs of the engineeringworkforce, and
hands-onplatform from which to teach both areas of control can be found in the process controlindustry—the programmable logic controller (PLC).A few industrial, chemical, and electrical engineering as well as various technology programshave included some introduction to PLCs into their programs, where they are often presented aspart of a laboratory course. However, several programs have begun offering courses dedicated tolearning and applying PLCs. In contrast, very few mechanical engineering programs offer anyexposure to PLCs throughout the curriculum. 14,25 Yet, they remain the most common and usefulcomponent in controlling manufacturing processes and machinery. Mechanical engineers need tounderstand how issues of control can affect their
Conference & Exposition. Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationCourse Development and ImplementationThe CSC divided the topics among the three courses of the sequence in such a way thatteaching and learning takes into consideration the proper prerequisite knowledge. Thefollowing paragraphs describe the contents of the courses as they were implemented.More details may be found at http://www.sci.tamucc.edu/~entc/BachnakPage.html.Developing and teaching Principles of MeasurementsThis course was developed and offered for the first time in spring semester 2001. It is afour-credit hour course with a weekly laboratory of three hours. Topics covered includefundamental principles and methods of measurements and
education component. Most students taking the ITV courses were surveyed andhave expressed satisfaction over the quality of transmission of the ITV courses. Even though thelimitations in technology such as delayed response to questions and jerky video are somewhatdistracting initially, they seem to become less noticeable over time. The largest advantage tomost students from this program appears to be in the form of small class sizes and individualattention received from the faculty in FSU courses - all the recitation and laboratory sessions aretaught by the faculty as no teaching assistants are available locally, as opposed to the coursesoffered at larger universities. The small numbers of students in classes also lets them performlaboratory studios
-line laboratories for speech and image processing and for communication Systems Using J-DSP”, in Proc. of 10th DSP workshop and 2nd Sig. Proc. Ed. workshop, pp. 174-179, Oct 13-16, 2002. [5] The J-DSPTM web-page, MIDL LAB, Arizona State University: http://jdsp.asu.edu [6] Spanias A., K. Ahmed, A. Papandreou-Suppappola, and M. Zaman, “Assessment of the Java- DSP (J-DSP) On-Line Laboratory Software,” in 33rd ASEE/IEEE FIE-03, Boulder, Nov. 2003 [7] V. Atti and A. Spanias, “On-line simulation modules for teaching speech and audio compression,” in 33rd ASEE/IEEE FIE-03, Boulder, Nov. 2003 [8] M. Zaman, A., and A. Spanias, “Advanced concepts in time-frequency signal processing made simple,” in 33rd ASEE/IEEE FIE-03
basic thermodynamic principles and assumptions.This experiment has several safety and operation concerns that make it very time consumingduring the laboratory. The nonlinear and transient response of the system to user control makesit difficult for the students to initially operate, at least within safety margins. While exposure tothis nonlinear nature is very educational for the students the amount of time taken to get a “feel”for the system limits what can be accomplished experimentally. In addition, the previousapparatus used for this experiment experienced a catastrophic failure when the students used itimproperly, making safety and supervision during this learning phase a primary concern.Through a MSU Presidential Teaching Scholar
first on the exams, followed by written and numerical assignments. Theinstructor continued covering new material in both classes, however, no additional assignments,other than laboratory reports, were assigned through the end of the semester.Possible AlternativesAt many institutions, alternatives exist for providing instructional materials online. The Universityof Pittsburgh provides faculty access to CourseInfo v. 3.0, the online course management systemfrom Blackboard, Inc. The author had attended a one-day workshop in 2000 introducingCourseInfo. Limited use by other faculty within the Engineering Technology Division and theamount of time required to prepare materials, resulted in the author not incorporating CourseInfointo his teaching at
with a range ofaudiences), 5 (an ability to function effectively on a team . . .) and 6 (an ability to develop andconduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgmentto draw conclusions) are most easily satisfied through laboratory and capstone design activities.In teaching undergraduate laboratory, the development of a “stable” of good quality labexperiments is essential. The experiments can be either virtual or physical (hands-on with theequipment), although there have been many discussions on the pros and cons of using each ofthese types of undergraduate labs. Korestky et al. [2] offered an opinion that virtual labs arebetter for experimental design, critical thinking and dealing with ambiguity
University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. David Whittinghill is an Associate Professor of Computer Graphics Technology and Computer and Information Technology. Dr. Whittinghill’s research focuses on gaming, simulation and computer pro- gramming education and how these technologies can more effectively address outstanding issues in health, education, and society. Dr. Whittinghill leads projects in pediatric physical therapy, sustainable energy simulation, Chinese language learning, virtual reality, and games as a tool for improving educational out- comes. Dr. Whittinghill is the director of the Games Innovation Laboratory (www.gamesinnovation.org). c American Society for
classrooms.2. Assessment PlanAssessment was accomplished using surveys given at the end of each day. This daily survey had Page 10.165.1two parts. The first part asked the K-12 teachers to identify, in writing, the best and worst things 1from that day’s activities. The second part asked for quantitative responses to six questions. Thefirst three questions covered instructional content and the last three covered laboratory content.Figure 1 below shows the 6 quantitative questions along with the numerical scale used in therating. Circle the
Conference, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL.[7] Hsieh, S., "Development and Evaluation of Remote Virtual Teach Pendant for Industrial Robotics Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 35, No. 6(A), pp. 1816-1826, 2019.[8] X Chen, G Song, Y Zhang, “Virtual and remote laboratory development: A review,” Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 2010 (ASCE), pp 3843-3852.[9] Ming Teng, Hugh Considine, Zorica Nedic, Andrew Nafalski, “Current and Future Developments in Remote Laboratory NetLab,” Vol. 8, No. 8, 2016, pp 4-12.[10] Siew Wei Tho, Yau Yuen Yeung, Rui Wei, Ka Wing Chan1 and Winnie Wing-mui, “A Systematic Review of Remote Laboratory Work in Science
, S., "Current Trends in Remote Laboratories," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 4744-4756, Dec. 2009.[3] Grodotzki, J., Ortelt, T.R. and Tekkaya, A.E., 2018. Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI project at the TU Dortmund University. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, pp.1349-1360, 2018.[4] Hsieh, S. “Design of Remotely Accessible Automated Systems to Enhance Industrial Automation Education,” ASEE 2017 Annual Conference, June 25 - 28, Columbus, Ohio.[5] Hsieh, S. “Development of Remote Virtual Teaching Pendant for Robot Programming: Lessons Learned,” ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL.[6] Hsieh, S. “Lessons Learned from Remote