Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katherine Dornian, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

these knowledge" Dutta A. et al., 2017 building a permanent technology library "provide a place to host the classes for students gained "technical entry-level India high school [23] the cyber classroom" employment" in a nearby city Hendrix B. et al., 2-hour library workshop "introduce students to 3-d printing, "workshop was a positive first USA (ID) high school 2017 [29] electronics, and programming" and experience with electronics and "provide a positive

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 19

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tianshi Fu; Molly H. Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

-128,2016.[2] J. Leonard, A. Buss, A. Unertl and M. Mitchell, "USING ROBOTICS AND GAMEDESIGN TO PROMOTE PATHWAYS TO STEM", in Annual Meeting of the North AmericanChapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tucson, AZ,2016, pp. 1487-1494.[3] A. Barco, R. Walsh, A. Block, K. Loveys, A. McDaid and E. Broadbent, "Teaching SocialRobotics to Motivate Women into Engineering and Robotics Careers", in 2019 14th[4] ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea(South), 2019, pp. 518-519.[4] B. Brand, M. Collver and M. Kasarda, "Motivating Students With Robotics", The ScienceTeacher, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 44-49, 2008.[5] E. M. Silk and C. D. Schunn, "Using robotics to teach mathematics

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Dana Corrina Dimitriu, University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

visualization skills.Training and testing were the focal point of numerous studies [12] – [16] and they cover multiplemethods to challenge students to visualize objects and patterns in various settings. All have beenproven to help the students improve their spatial skills but without one being universallyaccepted to be 100% effective. They all demonstrated various degrees of success depending onstudents’ background, gender, resources, socio-economic status, time spent on practicing, and, ofcourse, their level of interest. As a result, the more variety of methods is available, the morechoices the faculty and students will have to select the most appropriate method for theirparticular situation.BackgroundAbout a year after the publication of the “A, B

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth Johnson, Playful Learning Lab; Elise Rodich, University of St. Thomas; Hannah French; Annmarie Thomas, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

design for manufacturability.ResultsFrom project launch in Phase 1 to presentations in Phase 4, the students had about four and a halfweeks to design the Little Free Library for their community partner. Following the presentations,the community partners filled out a survey to gauge their experience and satisfaction with thestudent designs and, finally, to select the library they wanted built.Following the semester, the students had the option to help participate in building the Little FreeLibraries that were selected by each partner. The CAD screen captures below in Figure 1 providea glimpse into the student designs each partner selected. a. Metro Deaf b. Minnesota c. University of St. d. Big Brothers Big School

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: RED 2 / Civil Eng

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Kauser Jahan P.E., Rowan University; Stephanie Lezotte, Rowan University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University; Harriet Hartman, Rowan University; Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University; Theresa F.S. Bruckerhoff, Curriculum Research & Evaluation, Inc.; Sarah K. Bauer, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. T.S. Popkewitz and L. Fendler, Critical Theories in Education: Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics. Psychology Press, 1999. 2. P. Layne, “Diversity by Numbers,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol 1 ed. (4), pp. 65-71. Oct, 2001. 3. D. Riley, A. Slaton, and A. L. Pawley, “Inclusion and Social Justice: Women and Minorities in Engineering.” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. Olds, Ed., Cambridge University Press 2014. 4. B.M. Ferdman, “The practice of inclusion in diverse organizations,” in Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion, B. Ferdman and B. R

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 14

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

René F. Reitsma, Oregon State University; Brian Gordon Hoglund, Oregon State University; Dua Chaker, University of Colorado, Boulder; Andrea Marks, Oregon State University; Michael Soltys, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

41 SEP group 15 CC group 12 Total number of components 913 Total number of relations between components 2,145 *12 topics repeat in all grade bandsAlmost all existing representations of NGSS content follow a tree-like, hierarchical model. Figure 1,for instance, shows a commonly found representation of two PEs (1-ESS1-1 and 1-ESS1-2), their 3Delements and their articulation across grade bands via three DCIs: PS2.A (grade 3), PS2.B (grade 5) andESS1.B (grade 5) [4]. Figure 1. Common display of NGSS Performance ExpectationsOne can find similar representations in on-line K-12 STEM

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jared Oluoch, University of Toledo

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

outcome.Faculty also provide a table for each course that shows a summary of the raw data for the directevidence that each assessment instrument generates. Let’s take CSET 4100 Server-SideProgramming as an example. An assessment on the need for continuous improvement couldinclude: a) Questions in two homework assignments involving Java web application anddeployment to reveal mastery of CAC and ETAC outcome 4; b) Two programming assignmentsinvolving Java server-side scripting designed to reveal mastery of CAC and ETAC outcome1. Figure 1: University of Toledo CSET Curriculum Computer Science & Engineering Technology Curriculum - Full Time (Effective Fall 2013

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Oziel Rios, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

) (b) (c) Figure 1. Illustration of (a) sketch dimensions, (b) sketch constraints, and (c) engineering drawing dimensions and notes. Sketch and drawing created in CREO Parametric TM version 6. • geometric constraints to create relationships between the curves (e.g., make two line segments equal in size and parallel); • and, associative constraints to create relationships between dimensional constraints.Figure 1a shows an example of a sketch with dimensions and Figure 1b shows the geometricconstraints. The way in which curves are used and how dimensions and geometric constraintsare established between them gives purpose to the sketch. This

Conference Session

Data-informed Approaches to Understanding Student Experiences and Outcomes

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mariem Boujelbene, University of Louisville; Khalil Damak, University of Louisville; Asuman Cagla Acun Sener, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville; Campbell R. Bego, University of Louisville; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville; Olfa Nasraoui , University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

and even third year, these labelings have both false positives and falsenegatives. Our study which seeks to identify, using a data science approach, a consistent wayto label all students as either ​retained​ or ​not retained​, ​enjoys the following advantages: a) It does not rely on the requirement of earning a degree in engineering, b) It is not based on enrollment at a fixed point in time, and c) It can be used as the data set continues to grow.Using a data science pipeline, we analyze student enrollment gaps to determine a reasonablelabeling of ​not-retained.​ In the following, we start by describing our methods, then presentour findings and finish with a discussion and conclusions.MethodsA Data-driven Pipeline for Retention

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bruce R. Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Gail Luera, University of Michigan, Dearborn

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

University of Michigan-DearbornAdvancement of Teaching and Learning Fund.Bibliography1. Maxim, B. R.; Decker, A.; and Yackley, J. J. (2019) “Student Engagement in Active Learning Software Engineering Courses”, Proceedings of 49th IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Cincinnati, OH, October 2019 (F3G1-F3G5).2. Branch R. (2010) Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach, Springer, 2010.3. Samavedham, L. and Ragupathi, K. (2012) “Facilitating 21st century skills in engineering students,” The Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. XXVI No. 1, 2012, pp.38-49.4. Promoting Active Learning (2016) https://utah.instructure.com/courses/148446/pages/active-learning, retrieved February 25, 2016.5. Prince, M., (2004

Conference Session

Designing and Implementing Leadership Development Experiences for Engineering Students

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy; Russell P. Lemler, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

managerial discourse," Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 363-399, 1992.[20] E. Mayo, The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Boston: Harvard University, 1945.[21] A. H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper and Row, 1954.[22] B. J. Avolio, B. M. Bass and L. E. Atwater, "Antecedent Predictors of the "full range of leadership" and management styles," Army Research Institute in the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Arlington, VA, 1994.[23] B. A. Bass, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, New York: Free Press, 1985.[24] D. Collinson, "Dialectics of Leadership," Human Relations, vol. 58, pp. 1419-1442, 2005.[25] S. J. Ashford and D. S. DeRue, "Who Will Lead and Who Will Follow? A Social Process of

Conference Session

Assessing, Expanding, and Innovating Information Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amber Janssen, California State University Maritime Academy; William W. Tsai, California State University Maritime Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

facets amongst the same and similar information sources was compared. Thiscomparison led to the modification of codes for 23 of the 622 citations or 3.7%.The authors, one of which was the instructor for the course during the three year period, alsoevaluated the theory section of each report for completeness, accuracy, as well as clarity anddepth using a rubric (Appendix B). For each year and topic, the reports were divided into threegroupings based on the rubric assessment scores: top, middle, and bottom third. The division intothirds was done by the population, meaning that the scores that define each group may havevaried from year to year or report to report. Each group consisted of approximately 35 studentsover the three year period. Using

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Mechatronics & Simulation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lan He, Beihang University; Jingjun Yu, Beihang University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

form of the mechanism, students are required to use one simulation software,such as ADAMS, to build a virtual prototype for simulating the mechanism model and theend trajectory. Fig. 5 gives some available options that students can refer to. Thus, the“handwriting robot” is embedded into the teaching process of theoretical curriculum. At thesame time, students are able to access to at least one engineering software, which can helpthem apply their engineering knowledge in practice. (a) (b) (c) Fig. 5 Mechanisms capable of linear motion. (a) slider crank mechanism (b) screw mechanism (c) rack and pinion mechanismMechanical DesignThis course generally covers

Conference Session

The Best of First-year Programs Division

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laurel Whisler, Clemson University; Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

includedsimilar writing prompts (Appendix A and B) that requested students to review their learningjourney over the semester and discuss their challenges and successes. The Fall 2018 assignmentasked students to write a minimum of three paragraphs telling the story of their challenges andtriumphs during the semester. A separate prompt asked students to identify their most successfullearning and self-regulation strategies. The Fall 2019 assignment included two prompts for thestudents: narrate their learning journey for challenges and successes as modeled in the SkillfulLearning video series [15] and identify two learning strategies and one self-regulation strategythat were helpful.A sample of student reflections was selected for analysis. One author was

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Retention & Bridge Programs #2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew Charles Bartolini, University of Notre Dame; Carson Lee Running, University of Notre Dame; Xiaojing Duan, University of Notre Dame; G. Alex Ambrose, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

consistently resulted in end-of-semester grades less than a B. These non-thriving metricsare what the authors refer to as triggers. The course-wide Sakai gradebook data was analyzed forthe 2017 and 2018 fall semesters which have nearly-identical assignment topics and calendars tothe 2019 fall course. The authors sought to identify a trigger that was: (1) consistent from year toyear, (2) successful in identifying as many of the students with a final grade less than a B, (3) nottoo broad and therefore did not identify many students with a final grade greater-than-or-equal-toa B, and (4) located within the first four weeks of the semester. Identifying a trigger by the end ofthe first four weeks of the semester is much earlier than most previous works

Conference Session

Flipped, Blended, Online, Oh My

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kimberly Warren, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Meagan Padro, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Chuang Wang, University of Macau

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

academic conferences. Dr. Wang is the recipient of the 2019 International Education Award and the 2018 Harshini V de Silva Graduate Mentor Award at University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. He received the 2008 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Distinguished Paper Award, 2009 Excellence in Research Award from the College of Education, 2010 Distinguished Research Award from the U.S. Academy of Educational Leadership, and the 2012 College of Education Excellence in Teaching Award. He served as the Editor-in-Chief of two peer-reviewed journals: (a) New Waves – Educational Research and Development; and (b) Journal of Applied Educational and Policy Research. He also served as the

Conference Session

Capstone Design Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Valerie Vanessa Bracho Perez, Florida International University; Anilegna Nuñez Abreu, Florida International University; Ameen Anwar Khan, Florida International University; Indhira María Hasbún, Virginia Tech; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

responses being vehicle specific during SD2.In Cohort 1B (spring/fall enrollment), there were a total of 135 considerations analyzed in thestudent’s responses during SD1. Of those 135, 73 were vehicle specific considerations (53%)while context and stakeholder considerations were only mentioned 23 (17%) and 39 (28%),respectively. In SD2, Cohort 1 B considered more aspects of the design with a total of 147considerations. As observed before, these considerations were mostly vehicles specificconsiderations, with 91 of the considerations being vehicle specific (61%), while context wasconsidered significantly less, with only 12 (8%) considerations, in respect to other categories.Consideration for stakeholders was also low with only 44 of the 147

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: The Remote World

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University; Lopa Bakrania, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

guidingprinciples for online learning, we can ensure a viable student experience.Transformation to online learningThe Nanotechnology CourseIntroduction to Nanotechnology ​course was designed as an undergraduate engineering elective toexpose students to the material opportunities offered at the nanometer scale. The course contentis divided into (a) fundamentals, (b) tools for synthesis and characterization, and (c) applicationsof nanomaterials within devices and more broadly technology. ​Principles of Nanotechnologycourse is a graduate level course that is combined with the undergraduate course. Graduatestudents complete additional assessments that go beyond the undergraduate level assignments.The lecture content, however, is identical between the

Conference Session

Identity, Culture, and Socialization

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Mark A. Chapman, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

," American Educational Research Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 187-219, 1999.[11] J. P. Gee, Social linguistics and literacies : ideology in discourses, 5th ed. New York: Routledge, 2015.[12] A.-F. Gilbert, "Disciplinary cultures in mechanical engineering and materials science: Gendered/gendering practices," Equal Opportunities International, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 24- 35, 2009.[13] B. M. Capobianco, B. F. French, and H. A. Diefes‐Du, "Engineering identity development among pre‐adolescent learners," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698-716, 2012.[14] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, "Factors relating to engineering identity," Global Journal

Conference Session

Learning Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Khalifa H. Harib, United Arab Emirates University; Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, United Arab Emirates University; Hayder Zulafqar Ali, United Arab Emirates University; Bobby Mathew, United Arab Emirates University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the net [2,3]) Table 1: Component Groups in a Bearing Puller Assembly Number Component Group Name Notation in Product 1 Cross Arm A 1 2 Beam Pairs B 3 3 Claw legs C 3 4 Forcing Screw D 1 5 Nuts and bolts (Fasteners) 6The assembly process starts with the first component, called the base component, onto

Conference Session

Research in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Sarah E Cooksey, University of Colorado Colorado Springs ; Kathryn Elizabeth Starkey, University of Colorado Colorado Springs

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Paper ID #29698To Be, or Not to Be, a Professor: Views of Engineering PostdoctoralScholarsDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the educational attainment and schooling experiences

Collection

2020 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Frank Vahid, University of California, Riverside; Joe Michael Allen, University of California, Riverside

Distance Education, 2010.[2] B. L. Bower, "Distance Education: Facing the Faculty Challenge," Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume IV, Number II, Summer 2001.[3] M. C.C. Musingafi1, B. Mapuranga, K. Chiwanza, and S. Zebron, "Challenges for Open and Distance learning (ODL) Students: Experiences from Students of the Zimbabwe Open University," Journal of Education and Practice Vol.6, No.18, 2015.[4] F. Paas and T. van Gog, "Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load," Learning and Instruction 16, 2006.[5] R. K. Atkinson, S. J. Derry, A. Renkl, and D. Wortham, "Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Courtney Green P.E.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

pursuit of degree attainment. This study proposes to answer thefollowing research question and sub-questions: (1) How do women who have persisted in undergraduate engineering programs, at an urban university, build engineering identity through their educational experiences? a. How do women describe secondary educational experiences that contributed to their decision to major in engineering? b. How do women describe post-secondary educational experiences that contributed to their persistence in an engineering major?Subjectivity Statement For qualitative studies, it is necessary to describe how the position of the researcher couldinfluence the data analysis and

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Professional Development and Skills

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Sinclair Curtis, University of California, Davis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, ethics, etc. throughout their four-year undergraduate program of study [9-10] orgraduate program of study [11].The course discussed here is different from the models just mentioned in that it encompasses allof the following characteristics: (a) targeted towards beginning engineering students; (b) stand-alone, college-wide course; (c) emphasizing both career development and job searching skillsnecessary to secure an internship or full-time employment; and (d) taught primarily by practicingengineers. The goal of this course is not only to teach students the tactics and tools necessary tosecure a job, as emphasized in the work of Sharp and Rowe [12], but also to introduce studentsvery early on to the types of skills that they should be developing

Collection

2020 ASEE North Midwest Section Annual Conference

Authors

Katherine Gisi, Iowa State University; Diane T. Rover, Iowa State University; Phillip H Jones III, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

introductory computer programming students in program development and observing computational errors. Proc. 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. S2G-1-S2G-6). IEEE. doi:10.1109/FIE.2011.6143104Gennert, M. A., & Putnam, C. B. (2018). Robotics as an Undergraduate Major: 10 Years' Experience. Proc. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/30943Guo, Y., Zhang, S., FAIMBE, A. B., & Man, H. (2012). Teaching Micro-robots in Biomedical Applications: A Modified Challenge-based Pedagogy and Evaluations. Proc. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences. Retrieved from https

Conference Session

Assessment of Learning in ECE Courses

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Caroline Crockett, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

engineering subject,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 222–233, Mar. 4, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1410523. [6] K. Wage, J. Buck, and M. Hjalmarson, “Analyzing misconceptions using the signals and systems concept in- ventory and student interviews,” in 2006 IEEE 12th Digital Signal Processing Workshop & 4th IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop, Teton National Park, WY, USA: IEEE, Sep. 2006, pp. 123–128, ISBN: 978-1-4244-0535-0. DOI: 10.1109/DSPWS.2006.265451. [7] J. A. Hurtado, J. Quiroga, and B. Masiero, “Motivating and envolving projects in signal processing class,” pre- sented at the 2016 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, Jun. 2016, p. 10. [Online

Collection

2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Ryan Campbell; Danny Reible; Roman Taraban; Jeong-Hee Kim

graduate students in the School of Art. Incorporating aspects of thearts and humanities to complement engineering thought and action is a critical component of ourwork, which we describe as developing reflective engineers through artful methods. The objective ofour course is to develop engineers with reflective habits and skills so they are better able to: (a)understand and address the complexities of modern real-world challenges, (b) make better ethicaldecisions, and (c) serve the public not only with technical engineering skills but with mindfulness of Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright  2020

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Miguel X. Rodriguez-Paz, Tecnológico de Monterrey; Jorge A. Gonzalez-Mendivil, Tecnológico de Monterrey; Israel Zamora-Hernandez, Tecnológico de Monterrey; Gibrán Sayeg-Sánchez, Tecnológico de Monterrey; Martha Elena Nunez, Tecnológico de Monterrey

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

course is limited to 30students and in total, 280 students have participated in the courses Mechanics of Structures I andMechanics of Structures II, taught by one of the authors of this work over the last ten years.ObjectivesThe main objective of this work is to propose a model that incorporates several elements to atraditionally theoretical course that makes it more attractive to students, especially toArchitecture students. According to our records, it is not uncommon that more than thirty percentof students fail the course in their first attempt. The evaluation of the course is usually the sumof: a) Marks of two partial exams b) Mark of collaborative work and homework c) Mark of the final examThe two partial exams usually account for

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Gau, University of Pittsburgh; Deanna Christine Easley Sinex, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Steven Abramowitch, University of Pittsburgh; Sylvanus N. Wosu, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

thefuture faculty. We also intend to engage with local institutions to develop larger-scale and inter-institution future faculty development programs; hence, creating a better culture and strongernetwork for underrepresented future faculty.References[1] E. L. Anderson, K. L. Williams, L. Ponjuan, and H. Frierson, “The 2018 Status Report onEngineering Education: A Snapshot of Diversity in Degrees Conferred in Engineering,”Association of Public & Land-grant Universities: Washington, DC, 2018.[2] M. Gumpertz, R. Durodoye, E. Griffith, and A. Wilson, “Retention and Promotion of Womenand Underrepresented Minority Faculty in Science and Engineering at Four Large Land GrantInstitutions,” PLoS ONE 12(11): e0187285, 2017.[3] J. A. Whittaker, B. L

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elif Akcali, University of Florida; Wayne C.W. Giang, University of Florida; McKenzie Landrum, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

the next section was conducted on this dataset of 32 complete responses.Findings and DiscussionTable 1 summarizes the data we obtained from the BFI. Tables 2.a and 2.b present the summaryof the data we obtained from the SSCS and the CMS. Recall that creative self-efficacy (CSE) is ameasure of one’s belief that they can be creative, whereas creative personal identity (CPI) is ameasure of one’s belief that they are creative. Also recall that fixed mindset represents a view thatcreativity is innate whereas growth mindset represents a view that creativity is something that cangrow and develop overtime. These four constructs together are used to assess the impact of DTSDtraining. Summer 2019 Summer 2019