. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, S. Sood, J. Greene Ryan, A. Attaluri, and R. Hirsh, “Clinical Immersion and Team-based Design: Into a Third Year,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, June 24-28, 2017, Columbus, Ohio. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER, Doi: 10.18260/1-2—28040.[7] W. H. Guilford, M. Keeley, B. P. Helmke, and T. E. Allen. "Work in Progress: A Clinical Immersion Program for Broad Curricular Impact," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15, 2019, Tampa, Florida. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER, Doi: 10.18260/1-2—33581.[8] C. King, D. Salvo, J. Wang, S. Rao, R. Sreedasyam, A. Kulkarni, S. Braich, and I. Sharma. Work in progress: Development of virtual reality platform for
between these five aspects. Theevaluators are not aware of our experiment on the impact of different feedback strategies.Feedback Strategies The class consisted of 56 undergraduates, mostly seniors, who worked on15 projects. The professor of the course randomly assigned each project to one of the twograduate student teaching assistants to get feedback on all their checkpoint submissions. Oneteaching assistant (TA-a) is a former lecturer who has taught the course at the university level, andthe other (TA-b) has 4 years of experience as a web developer.The two TAs worked together to provide process-level feedback on the first checkpointassignment, to make sure the proposed project falls into the scope of the course. For the otherfour checkpoints
formative The competency assessment method was created in four stages: a) Selection ofcompetency assessment subjects; b) Development of rubrics; c) Definition of methods andtools for applying the rubrics; and d) Structured communication of competency assessmentresults.a) Selection of courses for competency assessment The courses to evaluate and monitor competencies throughout the program were chosenbased on their contribution to the competencies in the graduates' profile [3]. Based on theresults of Demore et al. [23] and subsequent curricular updating of the UndergraduateProgram's Pedagogical Project in 2021 [24] the courses with the biggest contribution todevelopment of student’s competencies were selected [23]. This definition followed
been created for this paper on the Engineering Unleashed website operated by KEEN [31].This card provides instructional materials for the Jim’s Donut Shop Assignment with all of thematerials mentioned in this paper, including the rubric, examples of student work, the surveyquestions, etc. These materials can be freely downloaded, reviewed, adopted, and if desiredmodified, by anyone for use in their courses under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license[32].References[1] B. A. Becker and K. Quille, “50 Years of CS1 at SIGCSE: A review of the evolution of introductory programming education research,” in Proc.50th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ. (SIGCSE '19), pp. 338– 344, doi: 10.1145/3287324.3287432.[2] N. B. Dale, “Most
content.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Kern Family Foundation for financial support that aided indeveloping this module.References[1] B. Villarreal, J. Thomas, and C. Hassard, “A Second-Year Project-based Course for Embedded Systems,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, USA, June 15 - 19, 2019.[2] S. Mirzaei, A. Cadavid, and V. Pedone, “An Interdisciplinary Team-based Research Initiative Through Active Learning to Increase Undergraduate Students’ Motivation, Engagement, and Retention,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, USA, June 15 - 19, 2019.[3] Z. Alavi and K. Meehan, “Enhancing a Control Systems Design Course by Using Experiential Learning Model,” in 2019 ASEE
. For each of themodules, we list and detail:(a). The motivation behind crafting the module,(b). Couse contents ⸺ Environment, tools, techniques and technology. Where applicable, we provide the motivation and rationale for including a particular BDA tool, technology and technique in their respective modules. Since the BDA course content is designed to be accessible to students from diverse backgrounds and does not require a strong computer science or mathematics background. Therefore, we detail the carefully selected material for each module to ensure that it is appropriate for dissemination to the students in a relevant and understandable manner without eliminating important concepts and technology in the field
Paper ID #39066Evaluating the quality of interviews with a process-based,self-reflective toolDr. Amy L. Brooks, Oregon State University Dr. Amy Brooks is a Postdoctoral Scholar at the Oregon State University School of Civil and Construction Engineering and member of the Beyond Professional Identity lab at Harding University. Her current research is using interpretative phenomenological analysis to understand well-being and experiences with professional shame among engineering faculty. She is also part of a research team investigating context- specific affordances and barriers faculty face when adopting evidence-based
A.1. Geometry and prob. setup B. Solution strategy A.2. Initial conditions A.2. Boundary conditions C. Problem geometry A.3. Modeling and constraints A.3. Kinematics D. Free body diagrams B. Describe position vector C. Free body diagram E. Force equilibrium C. Compute velocity and accel. E.1. Force equilibrium F. Moment equilibrium D. Free body diagrams E.2. Moment equilibrium G. Distributed effects E.1. Balance linear momentum F. Strain-displ. relationships H. Solution process E.2. Balance angular momentum G.1
learningobjectives in a laboratory environment with learners working in pairs.Figure 1. Materials Taboo. (A) Overview of a materials property chart, elastic modulus vs.density, featured as the inspiration behind our Materials Taboo game. (B) A green tray featuringrounded balls of the same dimension made from different materials for Materials Taboo. Balls areorganized in a quadrant coordinate system to mimic the materials property chart featured in (A).Figure 2. Materials Taboo Question Examples. Examples of questioning that learners can askthat related to the material properties of the balls featured.2.2. Gamified Module 2 “Materials Battleships”The second game presented called “Materials Battleships” is inspired by the popular boardgameBattleship® [27
. What are the different types of structures present in an engineering students’ timeline to major declaration? b. What is the exploratory curiosity of the activities present in an engineering students’ timeline to major declaration?RQ2: What are the different pathways engineering students took before declaring their major?4. MethodologyThe data were collected using semi-structured interviews of students enrolled in a generalengineering program within a Mid-Atlantic University. Seven students were interviewed by asenior, undergraduate, White woman student enrolled in the same engineering program at thesame university. In addition to engineering, the interviewer is working towards minors in honorsinterdisciplinary studies and
across all disciplines. These initiatives include digitallytransforming the faculty development program [1], rebuilding existing resources such as thelearning management system [2] and the university makerspace [3], and harnessing existingsocial networks [4]. Rather than documenting similar institutional initiatives for instructionaldevelopment, in this paper we investigated the process and the results of instructionaldevelopment among faculty members after a couple of years of involuntary changes in teachingand learning during the pandemic.Specifically, this study examined the following three aspects of instructional development amongfaculty members of a Canadian engineering school: (a) changes in teaching practices; (b) theevolving views
Student Factors on Achievement,” International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1089–1113, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0.[21] S. Watson, O. M. Williams-Duncan, and M. L. Peters, “School administrators’ awareness of parental STEM knowledge, strategies to promote STEM knowledge, and student STEM preparation,” Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1774747.APPENDIXInterview Protocol for the Study. 1. How would you describe your experience with the GEAR UP Engineering Summer Camp so far? a. What did you enjoy the most about the camp? b. What did you dislike about the camp? 2. How does
Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander.The summary statistics of the survey items were shown in Table A.1 (a) and (b) in the Appendix.Analysis and ResultsOur data, mostly consisted of Likert scores, or qualitative ranking, did not meet the normalityassumption that underpinned Pearson correlation analysis. Instead, we used the Spearman’scorrelation coefficients (Knapp 2018) to describe the associations within EI, teamworkdisagreement/conflict, and behaviors each, but also the cross correlation when they were paired. 3Spearman’s rho explained the monotonic correlation between two variables, producing a positivevalue when one variable always increased as the other rose, a negative value when one variablealways
of Control. (1997). Choice Reviews Online, 35(03). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-18262. Sourav, M. S., Zhang, X., & Wang, H. (2021). Social media as information support in reducing COVID – 19 depressions: Self-efficacy as mediator for behavioral modeling. 2021 11th International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing (ICICIP). https://doi.org/10.1109/icicip53388.2021.96421943. Lent, R. W., Miller, M. J., Smith, P. E., Watford, B. A., Hui, K., & Lim, R. H. (2015). Social cognitive model of Adjustment to engineering majors: Longitudinal Test across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.0044. Microsoft releases National
presented the preliminary findings of this review. To complete this effort,we plan to conduct a more in-depth comparison of the curricula content and a comprehensiveevaluation of what engineering educators and engineering education researchers can use in futureresearch and practice. In future literature, we also plan to identify the pedagogical approachesemployed to teach Al in pre-college education.AcknowledgmentWe would like to acknowledge our colleagues and mentors for their support.References[1] D. Touretzky, C. Gardner-McCune, C. Breazeal, F. Martin, F., and D. Seehorn, “A year in K-12 AI education,” AI Magazine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 88-90, 2019.[2] B. H. Payne, “AI+Ethics Curriculum for Middle School,” Cambridge, MA: MIT Media
implemented and figure 3(b) shows it coupled with theArduino UNO board. (a) (b) Figure 3: (a) Shield implemented (b) shield coupled with an Arduino UNOB. Arduino FirmwareThe firmware that controls the sensors and actuators and communicates with the PC was designedusing a Finite State Machine (FSM). Figure 4 presents the state diagram of the FSM Figure 4: FSM of the implemented firmwareState 1 is a waiting state, in which the machine will stay until there is a timeout equal to“interval” or when it receives a message from the PC. If the timeout occurs, the FSM goes tostate 2 in which the data from sensors is acquired and sent to
CriticalReflection from students in order to further our understanding and promote our goal ofcultivating reflective engineers.This work was funded by the National Science Foundation under EEC- 2022271. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. A. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integrating Reflection into Engineering Education,” presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2014, p. 24.776.1-24.776.16. Accessed: Oct. 26, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/integrating-reflection-into-engineering-education[2] J
of actionable college choice models for encouraging minoritized students toenter engineering programs. Finally, future research should investigate where college enrollmentmanagement professionals obtain their information when developing recruitment strategies, aswell as exploring the similarities and differences between recruiter and researcher perspectiveson what factors are valuable to consider for students in the midst of the college selection process.References[1] T. Holloman, W. C. Lee, J. London, A. Halkiyo, G. Jew and B. Watford, “A historical and policy perspective on broadening participation in STEM: Insights from national reports (1974-2016).” In 2018 CoNECD-The Collaborative Network for Engineering and
Paper ID #39834Proposing a Response Hierarchy Model to Explain How CS Faculty AdoptTeaching Interventions in Higher EducationDr. Elise Deitrick, Codio Elise has a BS in Computer Science and PhD in STEM Education. Her thesis was on interdisciplinary, collaborative computing using mixed methodologies. Elise combines her decade of teaching experience with her research background to create evidence-based computing education tools in her current role at Codio.Mr. Joshua Ball, Codio Vice President of Marketing at CodioMegan McHugh, Codio Megan McHugh has a BA in Communication and MA in Integrated Marketing Communications
Paper ID #36695”We Did It!” Proud Moments as a Catalyst for Engineers’ SituatedLeadership LearningDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering and Assistant Professor of Engineering Leadership at the Institute for Studies in Trans- disciplinary Engineering Education and Practice at the University of Toronto. Her research addresses the intersection of leadership, EDI, and engineers’ professional practice.Dr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for
UniversityAbstractThis paper describes activities and preliminary findings from a five-year, NSF-sponsored project(Award #1565066) at Purdue University Fort Wayne to increase the number of students whocomplete engineering, engineering technology, and computer science degrees. Purdue UniversityFort Wayne is a metropolitan, non-selective, public institution with a high percentage of under-prepared, first-generation, low-income, commuter students, many of whom work. The objectivesof this project are to (a) increase graduation rates of the STEM cohorts; (b) build the foundationfor a sustainable institutional structure and support STEM scholars and other students; (c) carryout research designed to advance understanding of the factors, practices, and curricular and
way the program was structured. Thedifficulty of navigating all of the pitfalls that can present themselves when attempting to weave aprogram like this across six different colleges and schools cannot be understated, but the benefitsof it outweigh the trouble. This program is a true space for camaraderie and support and canserve as a model for other universities looking to implement a similar program.Acknowledgements We would like to thank the University of Texas at Austin’s Office of the Vice Presidentand Provost for inviting us to interview fellows in their program.References[1] Main, Joyce B., Yanbing Wang, and Li Tan. "The career outlook of engineering PhDs: Influence of postdoctoral research positions on early career salaries
2.00 4.67 5-Point Scale Letter Grade F C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+MethodsTo communicate the IRE 5-Point scale and explore its affordances and limitations, a self-studywas conducted using the guidelines from LaBoskey [11]. The self-study reports on how the IRE5-Point grading scale has been implemented in each of the three areas of learning: design,technical, and professionalism. The three pillars of equitable grading from Feldman’s bookGrading for Equity [5] will be used as a framework for the self-study.The three pillars of equitable grading are accuracy, bias resistance, and growth mindset.Accuracy is the ability of
U.S. Universities,” Struct. Mag., no. August, 2020.[2] S. M. Francis, “2019 NCSEA Structural Engineering Curriculum Survey Results,” Struct. Mag., pp. 32–33, 2021.[3] Q. Ulrike and H. Klaus, “Design of timber structures in civil engineering education,” in CLEM, 2019, no. 1.[4] B. Chorlton, N. Mazur, and J. Gales, “Incorporating Timber Education into Existing Accredited Engineering Programs,” in Proceedings Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference, 2019, pp. 1–8.[5] A. C. Woodard, T. P. Council, and G. N. Boughton, “TIMBER ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN AUSTRALIA,” NZ Timber Des. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 6–14.[6] H. Daneshvar, T. Goni
correct answers are in “red”Example of Question Cards: ● The International Space Station orbits around the Earth about every 90 minutes. Approximately how many times will The International Space Station orbit the Earth in one 24 hour day? © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeast Section Conference - A. about 12 times B. About 16 times C. about 20 times D. about 24 times ● On a clear night, groups (or clusters) of stars forming recognizable patterns can be observed. These are traditionally named after their apparent form or identified with a mythological figure. What are these called? - A. calcination B. concentration C
B Asked Ms. Green a question about 40 course material/schedule 37 36 35 C Asked a question that could be answered by Ms. Green or a 30 classmate 25 D Responded to a classmate’s question 20 20 20 15 E Benefitted from the response to a 15 12 classmate’s
seventies,” Hum. Relat., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1179–1204, 1982.[5] S. Assegaff and A. R. C. Hussin, “Review of Knowledge Management Systems As Socio-Technical System,” p. 6.[6] E. Molleman and M. Broekhuis, “Sociotechnical systems: towards an organizational learning approach,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag., vol. 18, no. 3–4, pp. 271–294, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00038-8.[7] T. Reiman and P. Oedewald, “Assessment of complex sociotechnical systems – Theoretical issues concerning the use of organizational culture and organizational core task concepts,” Saf. Sci., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 745–768, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.010.[8] S. Winter, N. Berente, J. Howison, and B. Butler, “Beyond the
, V. Cateté, T. Barnes, Á. Lédeczi and S. Grover, "A Socially Relevant Focused AI Curriculum Designed for Female High School Students," in Proceedings of the EAAI Symposium at the 2022 AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual, 2022.[3] J. L. Kolodner, P. J. Camp, D. Crismond, B. Fasse, J. Gray, J. Holbrook, S. Puntambekar and M. Ryan, "Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice," The journal of the learning sciences, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 495-547, 2003.[4] R. Lehrer and L. Schauble, Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.[5] R. A. Engle
participant demographics across all years. A) Number of workshopsurvey participants in each department role (graduate student, post-doctoral researcher, faculty,or staff) in each year and summed across all years. B) Number of workshop survey participantsin each case study offered in each year and summed across all years.Workshop components generally proved effective and useful in supporting participantlearningEach year, we asked participants to rank each component of the workshop on a 4-point Likertscale with 1 representing “very uninformative/unhelpful” and 4 representing “very informative/helpful” with an additional “not sure” option. Given the different number of participants in eachyear of the workshop, we show the data summed across all years
the MET3060 course for Spring 2022 and Fall 2022AcknowledgmentsService Learning practices held at the CNC Machining Practices course were funded by theESCL@Te Program. This support is greatly appreciated.References[1] M. Salam, D. N. Awang Iskandar, D. H. A. Ibrahim, and M. S. Farooq, “Service learning in higher education: a systematic literature review,” Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 573–593, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6.[2] I. Fidan, B. Barger, E. Obuz, S. M. Bagdatli, I. Anitsal, and M. Anitsal, “Integrating manufacturing, management and marketing into international service learning,” 2013 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., doi: 10.18260/1-2--19791.[3] M. M. Anitsal, I. Anitsal