advanced embedded controller concepts.Funding Efforts: In July 2001 one of the co-authors (sfb) submitted a $200K proposal to theNational Science Foundation (NSF), Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Divisionof Undergraduate Education (DUE), entitled “Motivational Robot-Based UndergraduateComputer Engineering Laboratory”. This proposal provided a plan to incorporate the vitalconcepts listed above into the existing curriculum via creation of a comprehensive laboratoryexperience based on robot technology. Using robots to teach digital design and non-technicalconcepts in a motivational environment has been used at many institutions [1,2] with greatsuccess including Trinity College in Hartford, CT [3,4]; MIT [5], and the US Air Force
Paper ID #36097Design of a Low-Cost PID Level Control Experiment to Teach ChemicalEngineering Concepts in an Introductory Engineering LaboratoryAlexia Leonard, The Ohio State University Alexia Leonard is a PhD candidate in the Engineering Education program at The Ohio State University. She is currently working as a Lead Graduate Teaching Associate for the First Year Engineering program within the Department of Engineering Education and as a Graduate Research Associate for the Beliefs in Engineering Research Group (BERG) led by Dr. Emily Dringenberg.Dr. Andrew Maxson, The Ohio State University Andrew Maxson is an assistant
Paper ID #32851Innovative Use of Technologies to Teach Chemical Engineering CoreClasses and Laboratories During the Covid-19 Pandemic at an HBCUDr. Rupak Dua, Hampton University Dr. Rupak Dua graduated with a Ph.D. in 2014 in Biomedical Engineering with a specialization in Tis- sue Engineering and Biomaterials from Florida International University located in Miami, FL. Dr. Dua worked for two years as a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute of Orthopedic Research and Education housed in Texas Medical Center - the world’s largest medical center - located in Houston, TX. Before joining Hampton University in the Department of
Paper ID #24379Electrical Engineering Laboratory Activities for First-Year Students: How toform TIES (Teach, Inspire, Engage, and Stimulate) to STEMDr. Ramakrishnan Sundaram, Gannon University Dr. Sundaram is a Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Gannon Univer- sity. His areas of research include computational architectures for signal and image processing as well as novel methods to improve engineering education pedagogy. 2018 FYEE Conference: Glassboro, New Jersey Jul 25 Work-in-Progress: Electrical Engineering Laboratory Activities for First-Year Students: How to form
AC 2009-820: TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS THROUGH ANAPPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY: STUDYINGSTORM-WATER PONDS AT THE UNIVERSITY AND IN LOCAL COMMUNITIESMaya Trotz, University of South FloridaKen Thomas, University of South Florida Page 14.1155.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Sustainability concepts through an applied environmental engineering laboratory: studying stormwater ponds at the University and local communitiesAbstractStormwater ponds are vital for the control of floodwaters and the reduction in pollution loadsreaching larger water bodies. Community awareness programs aim to reduce
Paper ID #29398An emancipatory teaching practice in a technical course: A layeredaccount of designing circuits laboratory instructions for a diversity oflearnersDr. Linda Vanasupa, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Linda Vanasupa has been a professor of materials engineering at the California Polytechnic State Univer- sity since 1991. She is a professor of materials engineering at Olin College. Her life’s work is focused on creating ways of learning, living and being that are alternatives to the industrial era solutions–alternatives that nourish ourselves, one another and the places in which we live. Her Ph.D. and
Paper ID #25828A Multidisciplinary Course and the Corresponding Laboratory Platform De-velopment for Teaching the Fundamentals of Advanced Autonomous VehiclesDr. Nima Lotfi, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Nima Lotfi received his B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran, in 2006, his M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 2010, and his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from Missouri University of Sci- ence and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA, in 2016. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Me- chanical
Teaching Introduction to Geographic Information Systems, Including Laboratory Sessions, using a Combination of Distance Learning and Distance Teaching Techniques. Donald Leone, Alan Hadad, Susan Coleman Hisham Alnajjar, Hesham Elsaghir University of HartfordAbstract The primary objective of this project was to teach sophomore engineering students thefundamental concepts of geographic information systems (GIS), but with the teacher andstudents in different locations. Introduction to Geographic Information Systems is a 2 credit half semester course with 6contact hours including 3 hours of laboratory work
various capacities, most recently retired as the director of engineering and information sciences programs Currently he is serving as the director of academic outreach for the university.Prof. Gary J. Mullett, Springfield Technical Community College Page 22.1586.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Use of Adaptable Simulation-based Virtual Laboratories for Teaching Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation in Engineering & Technology ProgramsAbstractThe paper presents multilayered highly interactive simulation-based integrated and adjustablevirtual
Paper ID #8362Multi-purpose Advanced Teaching and Basic Research Analytical and Phys-ical Chemistry Laboratory at Khalifa University’s Biomedical EngineeringDepartmentProf. Abdel F. Isakovic, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research Abdel F. Isakovic graduated with PhD in physics with focus on spintronics (University of Minnesota, 2003), where he was also trained in cooperative teaching method. He worked as postdoctoral research associate in nanotransport, nanofab and X-rays (2003-2006) at Cornel University, where he also served as a lecturer (2006), after which he moved to Brookhaven National Laboratory, NY to
Session Number: 2547 Development of a Low Cost Laboratory System for Teaching Automation System Integration in the Manufacturing Engineering Technology Curriculum William Ferry and Andrew Otieno, Department of Technology, Northern Illinois University, Dekalb, IL 60115 otieno@ceet.niu.eduAbstract - In many automated manufacturing assembly systems today, several components thatare manufactured by different companies have to be integrated together
Simulation-based Customizable Virtual Laboratories for Teaching Alternative Energy, Smart Grid and Energy Conservation in Engineering & Technology Programs Yakov Cherner 1 and Gary Mullett 2Abstract – The paper presents multilayered, highly interactive, simulation-based, integrated, and adjustablevirtual laboratories for engineering and technology education in the areas of renewable energy, sensors, smart grid,and energy conservation. These labs are designed to enhance the understanding of technical concepts and underlyingfundamental principles, as well as to help students master certain performance-based skills online. The virtual labscan be
10Introduction of Fieldbus into theLaboratoryThe first step in creating a Foundationfieldbus system is to select the process to 120 Tuning Bump Te stcontrol. Implementations of the fieldbus 100 Percent Spannetwork in the control laboratory can 80include a number of process systems, both 60 40new and existing. Most process control 20laboratories in colleges and universities 0have process trainers for teaching controlof temperature, pressure, flow, and level.A
knowledge of unit operations, chemical reactions, process safety, and process control. 8. Learn to use software tools typically used by Chemical Engineering professionals.All of the course activities are geared towards meeting these objectives.Course StructureThe course meets one day per week in two sections from 8 a. m. to 5 p. m. The 8–9 a. m. timeslot is normally used for lectures and for the Safety Meetings. Lecture topics include details onthe laboratory proposal and on the final report, presentation of sample calculations, and erroranalysis. There typically are 90-100 students in the course. Three faculty members supervise theexperiments with one serving as the course coordinator. Two graduate teaching assistants and alaboratory
prototypes of these systems for laboratory exercises. This simplicity is useful because itallows the instructor to focus on essential understanding of the course material withoutunnecessary complexity; however, such simplicity leads students to wonder how to extend theconcepts to more complex systems. Students also have difficulty visualizing the solutions to thedifferential equations that are ubiquitous in such courses 1 . Physical laboratories can help withstudent visualization, but there are practical limits to the number and variety of physicallaboratories that can be given in a course.Recent trends have shown the feasibility of teaching laboratory skills in the area of dynamicsystems and controls through the use of virtual and remote laboratory
Student performance in partially flipped ECE laboratory classesAbstractThe flipped classroom is a relatively new pedagogical method that is based on outside-of-class videolectures and practice problems as homework, as well as active group-based activities in the classroom. Thispaper describes the partial flipping of two electrical and computer engineering laboratory courses andevaluates the students’ performance under the flipped teaching approach. The primary motivation that drovethe first author to flip these classes was the desire to tailor class time to students’ needs, questions, andexperimentation. Both partially-flipped courses are composed of equally challenging modules that coverdifferent topics in digital signal processing and
data from the Internet, while also complementingexisting laboratory set-ups. Even though free networking software is readily available, itis not typically incorporated into undergraduate computer engineering/technology orcomputer science teaching curricula as comprehensively as one would like [1-4].Networking courses typically focus on theory, simulation and hardware applications, orsome combinations of these to impart knowledge. However, Internet-available freeware,typically used by networking professionals, can be used as a valuable resource tosupplant the use of theory, simulation and/or hardware applications in developing, andteaching through, an integrated networking curricula. The purpose in this approach is todo just that; that is, to
Testing Jigsaw Learning In a Freshman Laboratory Course Orla LoPiccolo, M Arch, RA, Assistant Professor Department of Architecture and Construction Management State University of New York - Farmingdale State CollegeAbstract:In Jigsaw Learning,1 a peer-to-peer teaching method developed by Elliot Aronson and hiscolleagues, every student in the class is placed in 2 sequential groups – an “expert” group tolearn a section of a course topic (a jigsaw puzzle piece) and a jigsaw puzzle group where theyjoin with different course topic “experts” to share and learn from each other,– thus completingthe course topic as a whole in a group (the completed jigsaw
Session 2602 The Virtual Laboratory: Technology Enhancement for Engineering Education Marilyn Smith, Narayanan Komerath School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0150AbstractThis paper continues to report on research that seeks to define the proper role of technology toenhance learning in engineering education. The first application addressed was that ofaugmenting traditional classroom lectures so that classroom and homework time becomes
enhancedlearning and teaching strategies in engineering technology education. More than ever, theeducational advance is leaning towards meeting the demands of industrial world. EngineeringTechnology curricula needs to adjust to novel technologies by enabling students to acquiremeaningful and relevant practices. Laboratory activities should be incorporated into dry-lecturedcourses, being vital to ET programs, since they are ultimately enhancing the understandingprocess, leading towards developing experience-led engineering technology degree. Laboratoryactivities are the main promoters of creativity and critical thinking, a place where studentsdevelop, practice and improve the required skills, and a place where theory meets the real-likescenarios.One way to
-requisite of each other. Students must pass both courses to go to thenext level. In another word, laboratory skill enhancement is a crucial part in ET education. Butthe current existing problem we are facing is that for each lab course, there is a set aloneequipment. We don’t have a platform that can teach students different applications of theknowledge they obtained from different level of courses. This obstacle greatly hinders theprofessional development of technology students, because they need more hands-on experimentsthan traditional engineering students.In order to better fulfill its departmental primary purpose to prepare students for a successfulcareer in engineering technology and related fields, Engineering Technology Departmentproposed
year. Regardless ofmajor, all students taking the introductory sequence are enrolled in the same inquiry-basedsecond-semester general physics laboratory. Consequently, assessing the impact of the sharedlaboratory curriculum takes on added importance to determine if students are learning what weare teaching.8Gender & Pedagogical Issues in Physics Assessment TestsThe impact of gender on undergraduate enrollments and pedagogy have bedeviled the physicseducational community for many decades.9,10 Among all fields of science and engineering,physics continues to have among the lowest representation of females at the undergraduate level.The situation deteriorates at higher levels on the educational and professional ladder.11 Thegender gap in the
2006-1382: PEER ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES FOR ALABORATORY-BASED COURSERathika Rajaravivarma, Central CT State University Page 11.987.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006Peer Assessment Methodologies for a Laboratory-Based CourseAbstractAdvances in technology and the explosive growth of the Internet have called fornew ways of learning environment. The content delivery is no longer the passiveapproach of lecture emanating from the teacher to the student. It is imperativethat computer networking courses taught at the undergraduate level containadequate hands-on implementation based projects and experiments in order tobetter train students. The computing curricula 2001 (CC2001
words in the title of this paper relay the uniqueness of theMEL approach: “multidisciplinary” and “sequence”.1.2 Sequential Laboratory Courses at Other UniversitiesSeveral universities teach sequential laboratory courses focused on topical depth. For example,Texas A&M University connected a course in microprocessors and a course in electronicinterfacing in a sequence4. Both have three hours of recitation and two of laboratory each week. Page 6.96.1Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationIn another example
he served as Program Area Coordinator and Interim Division Director. With over 21 years of teaching experience in Electrical/Electronic Engineering and Engineering Technology, he currently teaches in the areas of networking, communication systems, biomedical instrumentation, digital signal processing, and analog and digital electronics. He has worked in industry in the areas of telephony, networking, switching and transmission systems, and RF and MMIC circuits and system design. Dr. Asgill also has an MBA in Entrepreneurial Management from Florida State University. He is a member of the IEEE, the ASEE and is a licensed professional engineer (P.E.) in the state of Florida
Session No. 3460 Instrumentation for A New Strength of Materials Laboratory Mysore Narayanan Miami UniversityAbstractIn order to provide the students with practical knowledge and hands-on laboratoryexperience, and with a view to emphasize the importance of bending moments andshear force diagrams, it was decided to create a new strength of materialslaboratory for the engineering technology program at Miami University HamiltonCampus. The main objective was to encourage students to accomplish a varietyof tasks, particularly in the area of materials science and strength of materials.However, the principal focus
Paper ID #35178Paper: Necessity Brings Out a Welcomed Laboratory ChangeDr. Arthur Densmore, California State University, Long Beach Arthur Densmore has been a lecturer at CSULB for six years teaching electronics seminar and laboratory courses and loves the subject. He entered the field of electronics first as a hobby as a child, won 1st place in the California VICA Industrial Electronics state-wide competition in high school and earned all of his degrees in electronics with honors: BSEE at Cal Poly Pomona, MSEE at Caltech, and PhD at UCLA. At the end of each semester he usually receives student reviews above the department
focuses on the automated manufacturing systems and production aspects of CIEunder the umbrella term of Integrated Manufacturing with emphasis on integration andreconfigurability of laboratory equipment to provide the most effective environment for hands-on applications.The paper introduces the basic features and capabilities of a laboratory, Integrated SystemsFacility (ISF) (http://www.umr.edu/~isf/), which was established with the goal of improvingmanufacturing system related courses at the Engineering Management Department at theUniversity of Missouri – Rolla (UMR). It highlights several teaching and research aspects of thisinitiative. Courses that have been determined by considering various learning styles in order toencourage life-long
capability to recreate virtual versions of themajority of teaching laboratories in STEM fields, including manipulating objects, interactingwith realistic virtual versions of real equipment, creating visual and audio feedback based on thetheoretical parameters and the student’s inputs as well as generating realistic data from theexperiment. Incorporating VR labs into a traditional lab sequence will allow students to interactwith equipment not available at the institution and allow students to shift into an inquiry-basedinvestigation experimental techniques and practices safely. This first study into the effectivenessof VR experiments as perceived by the participants (students) has shown that utilizing VR labs ina traditional STEM curriculum is
engineeringcurricula, concerns over the low resource efficiency often dominate such that some laboratorystudies are withdrawn from the teaching plan. Such decisions, it is argued, will be detrimentalto the undergraduates learning experience. Page 12.1568.2This paper demonstrates two approaches to redress the issue. In the first example technologyis developed to better support the resource efficiency whereas in the second exampletechnology and students are used to better support the development of the educationaleffectiveness of the laboratory experience.Example 1. Using technology to enhance the resource efficiencyThe need for changeReorganisation of our degree