(or memorized). Therefore, the approach of maximizing partial credit based onmemorizing a few problems is counter to the goals of an engineering education. Furthermore, itcan be said that the current partial credit grading model rewards students for pretending that theyknow how to solve a problem, even when they don’t. This means our grading model ispromoting behavior that is explicitly unethical for professional engineers, according to theNational Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics for Engineers [7] (paragraphsII.5.a and III.1.a).A second practice affecting learning is the copying of homework solutions from onlineresources. Collaboration on homework has occurred at some level since graded homework wasintroduced, but the
Paper ID #31555Switching Modalities: Implications of Online Education in BiomedicalEngineeringDr. Vignesh Subbian, University of Arizona Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineer- ing, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation in engineering and computing. Subbian’s educational research is focused on ethical decision-making and formation of
, academician of the Chinese Academy ofEngineering, mentioned in his speech that China's engineering education shouldlearn from Germany and cultivate senior technical engineering talents withcraftsman spirit.[12] “Tianjin University Action” emphasizes that engineeringstudents should strengthen their patriotism, global vision, legal awareness andecological awareness, cultivate design thinking, engineering thinking, criticalthinking, and digital thinking, and improve innovation and entrepreneurship,interdisciplinary integration, independent lifelong learning, communication ability,and engineering leadership.[13] “Beijing Guidance” stresses the importance ofcultivating people with morality and ethics, and strengthens engineering students'sense of
. While the section topics vary widely, each sectionis asked to incorporate group work, ethics, and engineering design into the course curriculum.The “Simple Robotics” section of the Applications in Engineering course has been offered eachyear for over five years. This section is heavily project-based and requires group workthroughout the semester. Mid-way through the fall 2019 semester, the thirty students in the“Simple Robotics” section participated in a two-day instructional module on equitableengineering talk. This module explicitly addressed the role of discourse in engineering practiceas well as the importance of inclusive and equitable discourse.The equitable engineering talk module took place over two 75-minute class sessions and
technology to subdue the natural world in service to human needs and humanprogress [5]. In contrast, many Indigenous civilizations are more closely aligned with what hasbeen called the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP), which adopts a more holistic, interdependentview of these relationships oriented more toward an ethic of care for the natural world rather thanconquest [5]. These paradigm differences are especially important in the context of engineeringeducation because the DSP positions engineering and the technology it produces as a tool forsubduing nature in the service of humanity [8]. Individuals who hold more closely to the NEPmay thus find themselves further marginalized and alienated within the field because they hold afundamentally different
State University, typically taken by freshmen students. EDSGN 100explores methods of project based learning (PBL) that emphasize three areas of instruction: 1Theengineering design process, 2Design communication methods (such as graphical, verbal, written),and 3Methods, and decision making using team design projects. PBL has shown to improveengineering curricula such that graduates have displayed increased skills in areas ofmultidisciplinary teamwork, project management, communications, ethics, and economics ofengineering; which are catalyzed by student driven motivation and ownership of theassignment/project [1]–[3]. This PBL assignment seeks to address the abovementionededucationally beneficial characteristics as well as introduce fundamental
from 0.35 Pre-course Post-course Avg. Normalized Gain to 0.57. According to Hake, Management and Planning 2.00 3.70 0.57 this would be a “medium-g” Archiving and Preservation 2.70 3.50 0.35 course for value 0.7 > “” Sharing and Reuse 2.40 3.40 0.38 > 0.3.[36] Legal and Ethical Concerns 2.38 3.50 0.43 Additional
ethical principles, and follows the ”What Works Clearing- house (WWC)” standards established by the U.S. Dept. of Education (ED) and the ”Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development” of the Institute of Education Sciences and NSF. Dr. Winter has published research findings in the Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, the Journal of the Profes- soriate, the Journal about Women in Higher Education, the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, the Department Chair, Academe, and Change. She is an editorial board member for the Journal of Diversity in Higher Education and the Journal of the Professoriate and an ad-hoc reviewer for the Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory
, whileunderemphasizing the soft skills needed for the industry 4. Consequently, a significant gap existsbetween construction management programs and the demands of current professional practice.Undergraduate programs have to make changes to ensure that their CM graduates are job-readyupon graduation 1. In an effort to advance professional development, accreditation organizationssuch as ABET, Inc. have developed criteria that place emphasis on outcomes associated withteamwork, ethics, communication, understanding of engineering impacts, passion for life-longlearning, and knowledge of contemporary issues. Administrators and faculty members ofConstruction Management programs are actively seeking for effective strategies forstrengthening the soft skills of
participants each year, spending approximately 40 hours per week onresearch and professional development activities. A smaller-scale follow-up program (fewerstudents) was also carried out in the summer of 2016. Faculty mentors paired with students,along with graduate student mentorship, to guide research projects in the area of biomedicaldevices, culminating in a research poster session at the end of the summer. Although many ofthe supplemental professional development activities focused on preparation for graduate study(GRE preparation, graduate school applications, professional skills, research ethics), seminarsand field trips designed to promote understanding of intellectual property, entrepreneurship, andindustry careers were also included as
within the Biology Curriculum. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33 (7): 34-37. 3f an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility Student Formative Etkina Exam, Gantt Chart, Summative Saterbak College Learning Assessment Formative, Frank 15. Lave, J. (1988) Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press
balance the learning 2016UndergraduateStudentsBasedon PerformanceonFinalExamobjectives tested and to align each question moreclearly with an objective. Second,studentperceptionsofinterestinandimportanceofgenomicstechnologieswillbeassessedthroughsurveysadministered at the beginning and end of the course.Third, as questions of ethics, consent, and privacy arecentral to appropriate use of these genomictechnologies, in-class discussions and studentreflections on these issues will be used to asses studentunderstanding of the non-technical challengesassociated with these tools.1. Mardis, E. R.; Trends Genet. 24, 133–141 (2008).2. Hood, L. & Flores, M.; N. Biotechnol. 29, 613
). Valli (1997, p. 70) asserts that “[Reflectiveteachers] can look back on events; make judgments about them; and alter their teachingbehaviors in light of craft, research, and ethical knowledge. Teachers who are unreflective wouldbe limited in their ability to make good decisions, to consider the consequences of their actions,or to alter their actions”. Loughran (2002, p.35) adds that “experience alone does not lead tolearning; reflection on experience is essential”. Additionally, adequate reflection requiresconsideration of alternate perspectives as well as one’s own, for the purpose of reframing theproblem for deeper understanding (Schӧn, 1987). It is for this reason that reflection in thecontext of considering peer observation feedback is
. Ability to work in teams. Time management and planning. Engineering Professional Skills Professional skills for co-op (resume, interviews, etc.). Project management (manage tasks, budget, etc.). How to use research resources. How to critically evaluate information (found online, in books, articles, etc.). Ability to interact with a diverse audience. Understand societal factors impacting engineering (aesthetics, ethics, sustainability, manufacturability, etc
Ethics Basic computer tools Time management Project management Modeling Apply mathematics and science knowledge What it means to be an engineer Role in society Synopsis of findings relative to design Design incorporates many of the Syllabi elements. No single framework existed that could: capture the design process fully or well, Or benchmark each element of the process to a commonly accepted set of referenced artifacts. Design is a stepwise, artifact driven framework typically practiced over time and is an iterative process. Many informal and formal opportunities to practice design. The Design Process is not unique to Engineering – Architecture, Fashion, etc. In essence, the learning and practice of
Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute and an Adjunct Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leader- ship and Communication at IUPUI. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role in engineering and design; designing STEM ethics curricula; and evaluating learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability. Previously, Justin worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Wel- don School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University where he created and refined ethical theory and learning modules to improve engineering students’ ethical reasoning skills and dispositions. Justin
consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well asglobal, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors” (outcome 2) as well as “an abilityto recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and makeinformed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global,economic, environmental, and societal contexts” (outcome 4) [1]. Both of these outcomes requirethat students consider the global impact of engineering. Global engineering skills are critical toprepare students for the realities of American competitiveness in global markets [2], and to buildstudents’ interdisciplinary, cross-cultural capacities to tackle grand challenges, a sentimententhusiastically supported by over 120
use their senses and insight to determine how these diagnostic devices work.These early pregnancy tests were purchased at a local “dollar store” and are very simplistic andeasy to disassemble. Higher-level students/participants are challenged to determine molecularmechanisms involved, whereas less-experienced students/participants are asked to hypothesize ageneral methodology.After approximately 5 minutes, we continue the discussion with a YouTube video showing theactual mechanism and then discuss other potential applications for at-home diagnostic devices,the engineering challenges associated with their development, and ethical considerations ofalternative applications (e.g. cancer tests). Advanced students are also challenged to use
Paper ID #22984Collaborative Research: vObjects - Understanding their Utility to EnhanceLearning of Abstract and Complex Engineering ConceptsDr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and the Director of the Abilities, Creativity and Ethics in Design [ACE(D)]Lab. Bairaktarova’s ongoing research interest spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how individual performance and professional decisions are influenced by aptitudes and abilities, interest, and manipulation of physical and virtual
4 3 2 1Construct a system or process to meet desired needs within suchrealistic constraints as economic, environmental, social, political, 52% 48%ethical, health and safety, feasibility and sustainability.Demonstrate the ability for self-directed learning by planning, 78% 22%research and design for the project.Student comments generally indicate that the course structure helped with finding out new ideas “Good design of the class. Helps to generate ideas initially. Concept of idea generation explained really well.”The exit interviews respondents have also “made numerous positive references to
wording differences. In Criterions 3 and 5, there are some wordings to more clearlyidentify the differences of the two programs, where “design” is more frequently found in theBSxE programs, and “technology” found in the BSxET programs. For example, in Criterion 3.c,the EAC wording for Student Outcomes is: “(the student must demonstrate) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. (2)”In the ETAC version, Criterion 3.d, the wording is similar, but with subtle differences: “(the student must demonstrate) an ability to design systems, components, or
, such as participate in the intellectual and organizationalhow graduate program objectives are assessed, what aspects of the profession as applicable to the majorassessment tools are used, when data are gathered and area of study, including the ethical conduct ofevaluated, and when actions of improvement are made. research.This paper will also detail how the analysis of data wasutilized in making actions of continuous improvement. At 3. Assessment Methodthe end of the paper examples of the significant actions of 3.1 Student`s Performance Indicatorsimprovement made based on the department assessment The following assessment methods are used to gather dataand
objectives 1-3 address criterion a): an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics,science, and engineering and criterion e): an ability to identify, formulate, and solveengineering problems. Course objective 4 addresses criterion f): an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility.Throughout the semester, the instructor assessed if students were learning these conceptsfrom the tests that were periodically administered. These assessments were put in a scaleof 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) for each student. At the end of the course, average of studentscores for each objective was determined to assess whether the student body in the classwas able to master that particular objective.At the end of the class, students were also asked to evaluate if
diligent disciplined ethical initiative innovative intellectual inventive professional successful Page 12.277.4Assessing
have presented excellent opportunities to discuss ethics and global and societalimpact related to EAC of ABET criteria 3(f) and 3(h) [13]. Especially in ME 242 when many ofthe students see the Dr. Evil projects for the first time, the pretenses usually raise questions suchas “Should we consider construction labor costs?” or “Would Dr. Evil pay for labor costs?” andother questions related to ethics. The competing costs of energy from different types of fuels andtheir related pollution issues is certainly a primary and contemporary concern of powercompanies. In the ABET current culture and use of “direct assessments,” projects based onfictional and comical pretenses provide many opportunities for the students to demonstrateunderstanding of
conducting research in watershed sciences. – 3.14 • I have a good understanding of the role of ethics in scientific investigations. – 3.00 • I am confident that I understand how to conduct scientific research. – 2.86 • I know everything that I need to know to conduct scientific research in the library. – 2.71 • I understand the processes used to monitor water quality. – 2.57 • I plan on going to work after graduate school. – 2.43 • I can visually examine a quantity of water and tell whether it’s safe for drinking Page 13.701.8 or not. – 1.86 • There are winners and losers in environmental conflicts; it’s as simple as
the University of Kansas Medical Center. His professional interests include bioinstrumentation, digital signal processing, and engineering ethics. Email: paulleiffer@letu.edu. Page 13.923.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Need Definition for International Humanitarian Design Projects: a Contextual Needs Assessment Case Study for Remote PowerAbstractA student team designed, prototyped, and tested a system with the end goal of providing2.5kW-hr/day of electrical power in remote areas, captured from a river with no dams orsignificant potential energy change. The project was sponsored by two
, transportation, shelter, and effective waste management while conserving and protecting environmental quality and the natural resource base essential for future development.”As Mays2 points out, the concept of sustainability is not new. However, officially recognition ofthe concept in practice has come relatively recently. For example, The ASCE Board of Directors Page 13.915.2introduced the concept into their Code of Ethics a little more than a decade ago3.Equipping civil engineers at the university level to plan and design sustainable developments,buildings, and processes is also relatively new. Steineman4 reviewed the history of
). Fundamentals of Economics for Engineering Technologists and Engineers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.4. “Teaching Engineering Economy in Engineering Technology Program” Session 1139: Trends in Engineering Economy, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June 22—25, 2003. Page 13.1160.55. Quality Matters homepage. http://www.qualitymatteres.org>. Accessed 2008 Feb 29.6. Moore, Gary S., Kathryn Winograd, and Dan Lange (2001). You Can Teach Online: Building a Creative Learning Environment. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.7. Olt, Melissa R. Ethics and Distance
approximately 2,900 undergraduate students and almost 800 graduate students inover 20 programs.The Educational Model for Engineering 1 ProgramThe first year engineering program at McMaster University is common for all students. In thisyear, students are expected to complete 13 courses: Calculus 1 and 2, Linear Algebra, Physics 1and 2, Engineering Computing, Engineering Graphics, Chemistry 1, Introductory MaterialsScience, Engineering Professionalism and Ethics, and two complementary study electives. Page 13.487.2Engineering Computing, Engineering Graphics, and Professionalism and Ethics are alladministered through the Engineering 1 Program.Although the