active learning environments and thus increase studentengagement and improve learning [2] - [4]. To realize and enhance active learning classes,undergraduate learning assistants (LAs) appear as catalysts. LAs are undergraduate students whohave typically completed the particular course and return to assist with its instruction. PracticingLAs increase interactive engagement of the students in active learning classes by providing near-peer help. The processes of facilitating student learning are also construed as a learningexperience of LAs themselves.The generalized LA program developed by the Learning Assistant Alliance has three coreelements [5]. First, LAs receive professional development in pedagogy during their firstacademic term as an LA
I’d like to ask you about what you currently do for class. • What are the goals of your class? o When your course is over, what should your students be able to do? o Can you identify words on the following chart that describe the types of objectives you would like the students to be able to do (show Eberly chart)? o • To what extent do students achieve those goals? o What kind of activities do you do during class? o What Data do you hope students will learn? o What Skills do you hope students will learn? § Gathering data § Assessing data § Writing
offering of ENGR 204 was in theFall 2014 semester with 30 students completing the course (31% of the engineering students inMath 143). These students were able to meet other first-semester engineering students, receive“inside information” on how to succeed in their engineering studies, set up a meaningfulschedule to manage their time, navigate the educational system, and take advantage of theresources available to them (instructors/professors). They also participated in two final projects:designing a Rube Goldberg Machine and writing a Becoming a World-Class EngineeringStudent paper.This paper will present the overall design of the class, comparison of math grades and first
others in a peer-to-peer further along in college, that’s been through interaction and impact of said activities it.” Resources Recommendations and use of college “I’ve recommended the physics tutoring resources including, but not limited to center, the writing center and the math center, campus tutoring labs, transportation, those are the ones I end up pushing people to student services, and more. the most.” Transition to Impacts of changes in expectations, “There’s a lot of changes between high school Adulthood workload, freedom and independence and here; in high school you showed up at 8am
essay: This assignment encouraged students to critically read and analyze literature in the engineering pedagogy field. Students chose one of the module topics described above and were asked to choose at least three readings on this topic out of a list provided by the instructors. The essay prompt required students to challenge the perspectives and assumptions of the readings’ authors in order to develop their own opinions on the topic. 3. Peer observation and reflection: Students observed and were observed teaching by a peer from the class. Observers were asked to provide constructive feedback on strengths and areas for growth, after which the observed student would write a reflection on the process and how
% (10-15% is comm) • Group presentation 10% comm • Final Exam 10% (5% is comm) • Other assignments, attendance, participation 5% (mostly comm)The full integration of oral communication into the project-based course underscores to studentsthe importance of communication skills in all aspects of an engineering career. Similarly,technical writing skills are emphasized in the Springer 2 course.Teaching MethodologyIn all teaching aspects of Springer 1, a significant emphasis on relevance is made throughout thecourse. This includes the relevance of material covered as well as the relevance of assignments.While a combination of teaching methods is used including lecture and flipped classrooms [8],the primary teaching methodology is project
oftraditional textbooks, although the latter were allowed to be used. Through short tasks thatwere designed to be initiated and terminated during in-classroom sessions, mostly to beworked in peers, we cover three general moments in the designed learning experience: ashort introduction, a discussion and a closure argument with general feedback by the end ofeach assignment.Each guide has different learning objectives: 1. Guide one: a. To distinguish sets that may or may not be subspaces of 𝑅𝑅 2 or 𝑅𝑅 3 , using GeoGebra for visualization. b. To construct linear combinations in 𝑅𝑅 2 and 𝑅𝑅 3 and identify the geometrical locus they define. c. To determine which vectors belong to the span of S for
code, but writing their own versions), the cases were added to a spreadsheet thathad been built and were submitted to the honor court. There were also several incidents of students clearlytrying to “muddy the water” by changing their variables consistently throughout their submissions, whichdue to the nature of MoSS, was ineffective. One particularly memorable incident involved one studentusing the variables “A”, “B”, “C”, “D” and “E”, while their counterpart used “F”, “G”, “H”, “I” and “J”,without making any other changes to the code. The very nature of the variable names and exact avoidancemade identification far simpler than in other instances.In cases of disagreement or where the reviewers felt a case may be flawed, the code was not
utilization of the on-line Index of Learning Styles(ILS) tool, in an effort to help guide students into the division that best matched their individuallearning style. There are three primary learning outcomes in the junior-level course, each of which isassessed using a comprehensive, in-lab practical exam: (1) an ability to write programs for acomputer in assembly language, (2) an ability to interface a microprocessor to various devices,and (3) an ability to effectively utilize the wide variety of peripherals integrated into acontemporary microcontroller. Each exam consists of three components: (a) standardizedmultiple-choice questions that gauge understanding of content; (b) analysis/design questions thatgauge basic skills; and (c) application
outside theclassroom helps develop and maintain their interest in the subject. Such activities includescience clubs, excursions to science based institutions such as hospitals, factories and zoos,partnership research (for exceptional students) and science publications or presentations.Furthermore, students could be encouraged to participate in science fairs, along with theirhearing peers, as this could boost their self esteem and persuade them to perform well. Page 12.659.43. Introducing Engineering to Pre-College StudentsThe high school robotics summer program held at Temple University is only one of several effortsbeing made by institutions and
experience, explained that herinability to learn the new material quickly had the strongest influence on her confidence incourse success, leading to the development of negative efficacy beliefs. I’d have to say how fast I learn [the material affects my confidence in succeeding the most]; because some people seem like they just catch on so, like so quick. And I’m just kind of like slow or something ‘cause I can’t like figure it out right away. Um, like in lab, we always have to write these scripts and like I can do it eventually - but some of the people will be done like ten minutes later; they’ll be like, “Are you done?” I’m like “No!”, ‘cause it just like takes me more time to do stuff and . . . aah - it’s
second runof the course, student projects were grouped so that two students focused on the same topic.Although the topics were different, the intention was to facilitate student cooperation and peer- Page 23.271.3learning among all students, irrespective of project. All students were familiar with andcontributed partially to all projects. They helped their peers and followed their projects‟development. In addition, they had joint presentations in preparation for conferences and thefinal talk, open to all interested. Moreover, students sometimes had to share resources andcoordinate with their colleagues. This brought more attention to and respect
design courses in thespring semester of 2003 with the addition of a communications instructor from the University’sCollege of Arts and Sciences.2 The impetus for the team-teaching model was tied to students'perceived weakness in their communication skills as documented in alumni surveys. Theintentional integration of engineering and communication paid large dividends in the preparationof students for employment immediately following graduation. ERAU AE alumni survey data inthe area of skill preparation in technical writing shows an increase from 28.2 percent “VeryGood” responses for the classes of 1999 through 2002 to 50 percent “Very Good” responses forthe class of 2004. 3The success of the team-teaching format encouraged the pursuit of other
, CST494 f. Pointers to functions (C/c++) CSE 494 RT g. Understanding C code/low level use of a high level CST494 language h. Standard template library (18 votes) i. Writing to virtual/physical memory in C/C++ CSE 494 RT CST494 j. Visual Basic CST326
In your small group, please discuss both strengths and suggested changes. Write down items/topics about which there is agreement among a majority of group members. If there is strong dissenting opinion, please make note of it. I. List the major strengths of the course (what is helping you learn in the course?). Please explain briefly or give an example for each strength. Number of people in group______ Strengths Explanation/Example 1. 2. 3. 4
students go through and talk about thehow I handle the postmortem.The setupEach year I must redesign the break-in lab experiment to take into account both for newtechnology and for the fact the solution for the previous year is in circulation. The basic idea ofthe lab experiment is to break in to a company network. The company called 532Corp has anumber of employees and maintains a public website (http://www.532corp.issl.iastate.edu). Thestudents must try to break in to the company and gather as much information as they can (i.e.,usernames, passwords, and data files) and then write a report that documents how they broke inand then how they would fix the holes they found.The first time I taught this class it became obvious that this lab experiment
being able to secure an internship over the summer. The RS students were enrolled in an annual cadre-based one credit hour seminar with theresearchers to maintain the program’s high-touch status within the students’ lives and to direct themto reflect and consider some of the lessons from the experiences they had encountered. Personalreflection in written form is one of the best means to glean positive knowledge from a practicallearning event [38], [39]. The students had three extra-curricular activities to cover, and they wereassisted by the researchers in producing publication quality final reports. Student essays were peer-edited and then given a final review by the research team. Samples of RS student-written activityreporting were
allstudents have team-based exposure and most claim to have had some formal teamwork training.Surprisingly, when poled in a workshop setting, students identify extracurricular team trainingsuch as scouts (boy or girl) and sports rather than the formal teamwork training that theyreceived as part of their freshman BE experience.To ascertain additional information, students are led through a small group (three to fivestudents) discovery-based activity wherein they are asked to respond to the following questionsor tasks in the order listed here: 1. What are the characteristics of a “group,” and a “team?” 2. Give some examples of groups and teams. 3. Write your own definition for what a team is. 4. What are the characteristics of good
Engineering have been trying to tap potential engineering students from theunderrepresented minority segment of the population for more than thirty years. As soon as itwas realized how few high school minority students were fully qualified to and interested instudying engineering, four-year institutions began seeking and qualifying those students whowere “almost” qualified. Summer bridge programs were developed to build needed skills, createacademic community and perhaps offer course credit. Extensive first-year programs werecreated which provided academic assistance, peer or faculty mentoring or perhaps offering firstyear research with faculty. Follow-on programs were also instituted at some colleges to giveacademic support and build community among
. These tasks can be broken into ―traditional‖tasks (e.g., graph and analyze data, answer questions about simple machines), and PBIL-basedtasks (e.g., write and discuss scientific questions for further investigation, update your projectboard, create your explanation worksheet, and communicate the design and solutioneffectiveness).These PBIL-based tasks frequently use scaffolding to facilitate learners’ use of scientificreasoning and engineering methods in order to use scientific concepts to explain observed data,to help learners monitor their own learning and identify future topics for investigations, todevelop hypotheses, and engineer solutions to ill-defined problems. These tasks occur at theindividual level (e.g., each learner answers
, which examined the effects of participation in quality afterschool programs among 3,000 elementary and middle school students in 14 cities and eightstates. Results indicated that regular participation in after school programs was associated withimprovements in work habits and task persistence, along with significant gains in standardizedmath test scores, compared to their peers who were regularly unsupervised after school.17 Page 15.478.4Demographic Disparities in After School Program ParticipationSignificant demographic differences exist in activity participation across a range of both school-based and community-based after school programs
(asphalt) - Technical -Lunch & Learn Activities Programming - High Voltage Lab Communication - International Paper - Bridge Recharge - Study Hall - Flight Research Lab - Practice Industry Tour - City tour - Supplemental -Center for Advanced Presentations - Student Spotlight - Service Training Instruction Vehicular Systems - Closing Ceremony - Group Presentation - Peer mentoring -Excel Workshop - Digital Media Center
-efficacy is likely significantbecause having a network of study buddies can provide mutual support. Previous research hasfound that “social support from peers will make individuals more resilient in dealing withproblems and foster academic self-confidence” [21]. This suggests that individuals feelsupported and encouraged by their study buddies, leading to a belief in their academic abilities.Furthermore, interacting with study buddies can facilitate constructive criticism and feedback.Interactions with colleagues around teaching and learning, including conversations aboutinstruction, peer observation and feedback, and advice seeking about instruction, illustrate thatcollaborative interactions with study buddies can increase an individual's belief
assessment ("post-test").Each learning activity was paper-based and was provided to students at the start of the classsession. Students were permitted to work with their peers in groups of 2 or 3. Control groupactivities involved solving computational problems, some of which had been used as test orlecture example problems by the instructors in previous semesters. In the case of the augmentedreality activities, the worksheet included several exercises (problems) for each student tocomplete. The exercises were arranged in order of increasing difficulty. The instructions on theAR activity worksheets provided scaffolding and paralleled the flow of the app such that studentscould record their work as they progressed through each exercise's tasks
” [17]. Furthermore,senior students with a track record of bringing their inventions to international academicpublications shared their journey in a session titled “Journeying New Horizons” [18]. Thesesharing seminars aim to inspire students and provide them with professional insights into thepotential achievements of their upcoming industrial collaborations.Stage 2. Equipping core competencies through training programs and peer learningThe “Equipping” stage commences with the identification of technical prerequisites essentialfor students to qualify for the industrial projects. These core competencies are collaborativelydefined by all stakeholders involved in industrial collaborations. In the 2023/24 period, thecore competencies outlined for
syllabus more effective tostudent’ s learning experience. A traditional syllabus can be enhanced by describing it in a warmand friendly tone, clarifying relationship among course goals and assignments, and by specifyingrationale of assignments, to name a few. Examples of how and why these factors can make asyllabus more effective are also discussed. 2.0 Previous StudyA number of papers have been published focusing on different aspects of syllabus. Numerousarticles are also available on internet sites of education instructions that provide templates, tipsand guidelines on how to write a “ good” syllabus. These publications generally focuses on, (i)general purpose of the syllabus, and (ii) checklists and best
breakout rooms and workon a virtual whiteboard together, where they can hear each other via their computers’microphones, share their screens with each other, and write on a common “whiteboard” on theircomputer screens. Virtual breakout rooms are also available and easy to use in Zoom and otherconferencing packages. This psychrometric chart activity could be done with peer groups ofwhatever size (maybe 2-4 students would be good for such an activity) synchronously usingbreakout rooms in conferencing software. This could be even better than in-class group work insome ways because the breakout session can be recorded, so students and/or the facilitator canreview later; each student is on their own computer, so has easy access to the “handout” and the
Advances in Engineering Education SUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2Interventions for Promoting Student Engagementand Predicting Performance in an IntroductoryEngineering ClassA.RAVISHANKAR RAOFairleigh Dickinson UniversityTeaneck, NJ ABSTRACT Studies show that a significant fraction of students graduating from high schools in the U.S. isill prepared for college and careers. Some problems include weak grounding in math and writing,lack of motivation, and insufficient conscientiousness. Academic institutions are under pressure toimprove student retention and graduate rates, whereas students are under pressure to graduateand find employment. Consequently
role of emotion in student learning, and synergistic learning. A recent research project uncovers the narratives of exemplar engineering faculty that have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies. She co-designed the environmental engineering synthesis and design studios and the design spine for the mechanical engineering program at UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her univer- sity and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.Karen Sweeney Gerow, University of Georgia Karen Sweeney Gerow is pursuing her PhD in the Lamar Dodd School of Art at the University
academically when they regulate their learning19–22. SRL has beenoperationalized to measure aspects of students’ metacognition, motivation, and behaviors relatedto their academic self-regulation, such as the Self-Regulated Learning Interview Scale (SRLIS)developed by Zimmerman and Martinez-Pons19. SRLIS, a semi-structured interview protocolfocused on “hypothetical learning contexts”23 based on research with K-12 students comprises 14themes19,20, including self-evaluation, organizing and transforming, goal-setting and planning,seeking information, keeping records and monitoring, environmental structuring, self-consequences, rehearsing and memorizing, seeking social assistance (peers, teachers, adults),and reviewing records (notes, books, tests).Prior