conducts research on the history, epistemology, application, and instruction of qualitative research across disciplines, research ethics, grounded theory, ethnography, grounded ethnography, and mixed methods. He is also involved in several other research tracks including faculty teaching and evaluation strategies, interdisciplinary collaboration, teaching applied anthropology, Kalahari San land and resource rights, re- search to practice links in minority health care, and student and instructor perceptions of the impact of social media on student success. With a broad and diverse background in both education and the social sciences, he strives to bring a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to all aspects of teaching
assessed? Practice data analysis 100% 93.4% Practice effective teamwork 98.4% 80.3% Demonstrate laboratory ethics 98.4% 93.4% Exercise creativity within an 88.5% 62.3% engineering context Become familiar with 78.7% 62.3% appropriate instrumentation Design an experiment 78.7% 62.3% Identify strengths and 77.1% 57.4% weaknesses of theoretical models as descriptors of real- world outcomes Practice professional 67.2% 24.6% communication Practice
prematurely. Of course, it is important topoint out that fortunately students who express interest in engineering have a good understandingabout dependence of engineering on mathematics and science. They also realize that the field ofengineering in academia and professional environment tends to be more rigorous than someother professions and requires high level of ethics and responsibility.Description of methodAfter many years of teaching this course, it has been realized that the purpose of offering anintroductory course in engineering could be threefold: a. To attract good students, especially minorities and females, to the field of engineering. b. To provide useful information about engineering for those who have undeclared majors and are
the School. Pat teaches leadership, ethics, sustainabil- ity, and study abroad courses. She has held a number of leadership roles in the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) including four terms on the ASEE Board as well as serving two times as the Chair of Engineering Technology Council. Pat is a Fellow of ASEE. Her research interests include sustainability and study abroad education.Shawn Patrick Shawn Patrick is the Faculty Development Program and Evaluation Director of the Indiana University (IU) School of Medicine Dean’s Office of Faculty Affairs and Professional Development. Shawn is also an associate faculty in the Department of Technology Leadership & Communication through the Purdue
extensive practical knowledge; c. an ability to conduct standard tests and measurements, and to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; d. an ability to function effectively as a member of a technical team; e. an ability to identify, analyze, and solve narrowly defined engineering technology problems; f. an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non- technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature; g. an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development; h. an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities
a rare opportunity for these students toperform undergraduate research. The research theme for this program is energy: specifically,catalysis, energy storage, and biofuels due to the pronounced expertise in these areas at LSU. Amajor strength of this REU program is the partnership with the LSU Business & TechnologyCenter which provides the REU students with training in technology transfer fundamentals andhow to pitch scientific ideas to non-scientists. In addition to the entrepreneurship training, theprogram offers weekly seminars in ethics, effective presenting, applying to graduate school,industrial safety, and topical seminars related to three main research areas of the programs. Thestudents were assessed individually (weekly reports
a design challenge. Communication Communication is essential to effective collaboration and to understanding the particular wants and needs of a “customer,” and to explaining and justifying the final design solution. Attention to Ethical considerations draw attention to the impacts of engineering on ethical people and the environment. considerationsFor eight months, the Fellows met twice a month with the program manager. Through thesemeetings the program manager was able to build a comfortable rapport with the group allowingthem to have conversations around sensitive subjects such as race and gender in the world ofscience, technology, engineering and math. These meetings also allowed the
Introduction to rail, water, roads, 2 Basic infrastructure functions 23 air, and pipelines Fundamentals Module 3 Systems/network analysis 24 Bridges - life cycle 4 Triple Bottom Line/Sustainability 25 Roadways 5 Social impacts of infrastructure 26 Complete streets 6 Teamwork 27 Parking 7 Ethics I
following student outcomes included in ABETGeneral Criterion 3 for Engineering Technology Programs [8]: (a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; (e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; (f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
introductory courses. It represents the other type ofintroductory course which does not focus on technical topics (i.e., circuit laws,op-amp, and so on) during the lecture portion. Instead, the lectures are structuredin a seminar style which consists of a series of sub-topics that are aimed atmotivating students and exposing students with the EE profession, career options,project design and development fundamentals, ethics, professional societies, andthe EE curriculum and program overview. The Intro to EE course also includes aweekly hands-on laboratory session aimed at introducing students to common EEinstruments, software and hardware tools, and providing a fun design experienceusing a simple and low-cost microcontroller (MCU) platform.This second
project. In order to achieve this successfully, the faculty member must beintegrated and a regular participant in the design project. In the spirit of the ASCE Code of Ethics,those mentors must serve in the area of their professional competence; thereby requiring that eachmulti-disciplinary design experience involve an engineer of a related field. While it might beassumed that multiple professors assigned to a single senior design project may be redundant, thismodel matches professional practice as each discipline would approach the contractual relationshipaware of not only the hierarchy within the design team, but also branched into the paired designfirms.In addition to adhering to ethical practice of serving in the engineering realm of
-world problems and global challenges. They will demonstrate the ability to recognize opportunity and to take initiative in developing solutions applying the principles of human centered design. Students will be able to communicate effectively and to work well on teams. We examine problems and solutions from societal, cultural, and ethical perspectives. Gateway to Technology Leadership and Innovation o This course serves as an introduction to the various Technology Leadership & Innovation (TLI) programs. Students study the interface between technology and people, while developing strategies to lead, innovate, and solve problems in a
faculty of the United States Naval Academy, Weapons and Systems Engineering Department in 2001. There, she has taught and developed engineering, design and leadership courses. She has received the Admiral Jay L. Johnson Professorship of Leadership and Ethics in 2015, and has served as Associate Chair, Weapons and Systems Engineering, and Director of Faculty and Staff Programs in the Stockade Center for Ethical Leadership.Ms. Nancy Dickson, Vanderbilt Nancy Dickson is currently the Program Director for the Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship Program, a Fulbright exchange program for educational leaders from developing countries. Additionally, she trains and endorses high school teachers throughout the state in the area of
involved in that area of research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Preparation of the Professional Engineer: Outcomes from 20 years of a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral capstone courseAbstractThe grand challenges outlined by the National Academy of Engineers and addressed by theABET (Accreditation Bureau for Engineering and Technology) learning outcomes reflect thechanging landscape of undergraduate engineering education. Indeed, to be competitive, the nextgeneration of engineering professionals must obtain skills and preparation beyond those in atraditional technical discipline. Accordingly, learners must principally demonstrate the ability to:understand ethics and social
impressed by engineering veteran students, and invitedthem for interviews, internships, and employment.The technical writing and communication course at The Citadel is designed to producefamiliarity and the ability to execute a series of professional documents, using exemplars, peerreview, and successive revisions as strategies for production. Students produce professionaldocuments, demonstrating familiarity with the rhetorical objectives, ethics, and documentconventions. Students are exposed to a variety of technical document types and conventions, e.g.,email; memoranda; RFPs; proposals; progress reports; and procedural writing.Students also gain familiarity with brief reports like white papers, producing their own state-of-the-art technical brief
, Academic Platform, Lombard, IL Dr. Ahmed S. Khan has more than thirty-five years of experience in research, instruction, curricula design and development, program evaluation and accreditation, management and supervision. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23409 Dr. Khan received an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management, and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, and Social and Ethical Implications of Technology
from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’, or from ‘very unimportant’to ‘very important’, depending on the particular wording of the question. Sample items arelisted below in Table 2. Underlined items are scored in reverse as they are negatively worded.Table 2: Representative questionnaire items from the different dimensions Dimensions Sample item Awareness Community groups need our help Ability I can make a difference in my community Connectedness I feel an obligation to contribute to society Base skills How important is ethics for a professional engineer Professional Engineering skills are not useful in making the community a better place ability Analyze I would not change my
of collaborative design and construction experiences [18]. Theseprevious initiatives have identified benefits to the collaborative approach related to relevance ofprofession, increased project success, improved communication, and better awareness of theAEC disciplines.Despite the benefits, attempts to implement and maintain cross-disciplinary collaborationoftentimes falls short due to barriers related to communication, cultural divide, work ethic,course structure, and differing academic motivations [6, 10-12, 14-17]. Studies have indicatedlonger rather than shorter learning experiences are necessary to achieve the intended success ofcross-disciplinary approaches [12, 19]. Implementing such invasive approaches may not be anoption for many
introductory course to befollowed with open-ended learning on a topic of personal interest is an optimum strategyfor meeting the needs of adult learners.”With regard to simultaneously supporting of learning “engineering skills” and“professional skills” (i.e., ABET student outcomes)10, all ten alumni agreed that skillsfrom “both-sets” were included successfully in the course. Specific skills mentioned bythe majority of alumni, included: 1) application of math, science, engineering; 2) analysisof data; 3) multidisciplinary teams (from the lab portion of the course); 4) professionaland ethical responsibility; 5) effective oral and written communication; 6) recognition ofneed for and ability to engage in life-long learning; and 7) knowledge of
), pp.222- 233.[11] T. Peck, S. Seinfeld, S. Aglioti and M. Slater, "Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias", Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 779- 787, 2013. Available: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016.[12] H. Farmer and L. Maister, "Putting Ourselves in Another’s Skin: Using the Plasticity of Self-Perception to Enhance Empathy and Decrease Prejudice", Social Justice Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 323-354, 2017. Available: 10.1007/s11211-017-0294-1.[13] Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons.[14] G. Behler. "Disability Simulations as a Teaching Tool: Some Ethical Issues and
socioeconomic class and social responsibility. She is currently completing a book manuscript on the intersection of engineering and corporate social responsibility. She is the author of Mining Coal and Un- dermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by the National Science Foundation and National Endowment for the Humanities. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Professor Smith holds a PhD in Anthropology and a certificate in Women’s Studies from the University of Michigan and bachelor’s degrees in International Studies, Anthropology and
Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her team, Beliefs in Engineering Re- search Group (BERG) utilizes qualitative methods to explore beliefs in engineering. Her research has an overarching goal of leveraging engineering education research to shift the culture of engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, she is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve the experiences of people at any level in engineering education
principles to propose novel and practical solutions to medical/human health problems 2. Ability to gain basic understanding of business, finances, intellectual property and regulatory matters 3. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities 4. Ability to communicate real-world scientific problems with bigger vision and offer solutions, as well as their impact, effectively to a diverse audience and stakeholders, both orally and in writing 5. Demonstrate moderate to high technical mastery in chosen research area, shown by the ability to identify an important scientific problem, formulate a hypothesis, and design experiments to conduct research and data analysis to test the hypothesis. The student
Paper ID #27026Board 67: Shame in Engineering: Unpacking the Expectations that StudentsCo-Construct and Live WithinDr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr. James Huff is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and teaches courses in design thinking and ethics. In the context of his research lab Beyond Professional Identity (BPI), he mentors undergrad- uate students, doctoral students, and academic professionals in using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as a qualitative research method to conduct psychological investigations on identity as experienced in and out of professional domains. He received
with younger people with different previous degrees or certifications. Some notedthat there is a need for veterans to come together and talk about these interaction issues anddifferent work ethics. In the military, they noted that if there are some problems, they do not losetheir job but instead get transferred to another. They also noted that not all veterans are the same:Navy veterans are different from Army veterans, etc., but still they have more common ground,and similar work ethic, than they do with the traditional population of students. They noted thatthey prefer classes that are attendance optional and more interactive. They agreed that whileprofessors are clicking through slides fast, it is hard for them to sit and watch a
classifiedas masters institutions by the Carnegie classification system. Out of the total 21 comparativelearning gains in the SURE survey, the EGGN 122 students’ learning gains were higher than theaverage student population for the following 10 areas: tolerance for obstacles, understandknowledge construct, assertions require evidence, understand science, learn ethical conduct,learn lab techniques, understand primary literature, understand how scientists think, learn towork independently, and potential for science teaching.Figure 8. Comparative means on the 21 learning gain items. The mean learning gains from "YourStudents" data are depicted as green triangles. For comparison, the "All Students" means (bluediamonds) represent the n≤3281 responses from
Department of Engineering Sciences and Materials at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus (UPRM). He earned B.S. degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University (1993) and a Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics at Cornell University (1999). Prior to UPRM, Papadopoulos served on the faculty in the Department of Civil engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics and bioconstruction (with emphasis in bamboo); appropriate technology; engineering ethics; and mechanics education. He has served as PI of several NSF-sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by
importance of ethics, decision making, team working, design, marketing and communications in solving a real-world problem, 2) Business students learn about importance of engineering technologies and engineering design and their role in innovation and ethics in solving a real-world problem, 3) Both group of students use presentations, project management, team work, and write-ups to enhance their learning experiences. The course also involves elements like real-world case studies, lab exercises, guestlectures and final comprehensive project involving both business and engineering technologiesand concepts. The NAE came up with fourteen grand challenges9, the world is currently facingand started the E4U2 video
oralcommunications and knowledge in engineering ethics from an instructor-led team-orientedenvironment. The industry sponsor also benefits from the project deliverables and anopportunity to interact with groups of students who are often eager for an opportunity to applytheir knowledge and ultimately launch their career. Details of sample projects and feedbackfrom students in meeting course objectives are discussed in this paper.IntroductionOne of the critical steps in the product realization process is the engineering design, whichdeserves special attention in undergraduate education to better prepare graduating engineers insatisfying the rapidly changing demands of the industry [1][2]. An engineering graduate shouldbe able to apply the knowledge of
enrolled in talent developmentprogram5, using web-based instructional materials to learn with Rube Goldberg projects in K-12classrooms6, using Rube Goldberg projects as a design based learning tool for freshmenengineering students7, providing early experience in multidisciplinary teaming and an earlyexposure to ethics in an interdisciplinary freshmen course8, integrating design andexperimentation to freshmen students with an electromechanical Rube Goldberg design project9,introducing design early in the curriculum to improve motivation and increase retention10,assessing engineering students’ understanding of design after a short workshop given precedingthe beginning of their first semester11.Besides K-12 and freshmen level, RGMs were also used in