cutbacks.However, knowledge of the fundamental concepts remains critical to engineering education. Theexisting paradigm for teaching engineering science is three credit hour blocks of material. Thisthree-unit course depth may not be necessary, but a basic comprehension of the material is vital.Over the past four years, eight faculty members in the College of Engineering and Mines(COEM) at the University of Arizona have created a web-based course, ENGR 211. The courseconsists of eight 1-credit hour modules on engineering science topics and spans the areastraditionally covered by the Fundamentals of Engineering professional exam (statics, thermo,dynamics, fluids, mechanics, materials, electric circuits, and economics). The modules are nowpart of the
Session 2660 International Strategic Alliances to Strengthen Engineering Education: Beyond the Learning Factory Lueny Morell, Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho, Miguel A. Torres University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Cristián Vial/Pontifical Catholic University of Chile Uriel Cukierman/National Technological University of Argentina John Spencer/Microsoft Research & Development CenterAbstractIn 1994, NSF awarded three institutions (Penn State, University of Washington and University ofPuerto Rico at Mayagüez) and a national laboratory
the freshman year. As part of the on-going implementation of these activities at Virginia Tech, we have recently introduced aseries of design/build projects for freshman student teams that are centered on astandardized kit of tools and materials dubbed the “MacGyver box”. This program hasbeen piloted with approximately 300 students during the fall semester of 2001 and is tobe fully implemented into the Virginia Tech freshman engineering class by fall of 2002.This initiative has been well received by students, and offers an engaging and instructivemethod to introduce students to design, engineering economy, and the dynamics ofteamwork.Teams of four students are issued a MacGyver box, briefly introduced to the designprocess, and assigned
),Electrical and Computer (ECE), and Chemical Engineering (ChE) are participating in the project.The purpose of this paper is to introduce the initiative and describe two projects: • A weather station designed and built by a Clinic team of ECE, Mechanical Engineering, and CEE majors; and • Soil sampling and measurement procedures developed by a team of CEE majors.INTRODUCTIONField methods are an important part of engineering often ignored in the undergraduatecurriculum. Using funds from the National Science Foundation’s Course, Curriculum, andLaboratory Improvement (CCLI) program, plus matching funds, the College of Engineering atRowan University is incorporating field methods, both sampling and measurement, across itsengineering
in PG, our Web-based application for peer review and peer grading.Usually, students are assigned randomly to review other students’ work. Often, students work inteams, with each member of the team reviewing the other members. Or, students or teams maychoose from a list of topics to work on. In this case, it is helpful to assign students to reviewothers who have chosen the same topic. To encourage students to provide adequate feedback totheir reviewees, several approaches can be taken. Students can be denied credit for theassignment unless they do the required reviews. Or, they can be prevented from seeing feedbackon their work until they provide feedback to others. Multiple review periods may be employed,with students required to give some
Session 1280 Integrating Design, Analysis, and Problem Solving in an Introduction to Engineering Curriculum for High School Students Ann McKenna and Alice Agogino Graduate Group in Engineering, Science and Mathematics Education/ Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720AbstractThe current paper describes an Introduction to Engineering class that was taught to a group ofhigh school students in the summer of 1997. The class was offered through an outreach programat the University of California at Berkeley called the Academic Talent Development Program(ATDP
Paper ID #41394Board 287: Fostering Leaders in Technology Entrepreneurship (FLiTE): SecondYear ProgressDr. Paul M Yanik, Western Carolina University Dr. Paul Yanik is a Professor of Engineering Technology at Western Carolina University. His research interests include human-robot interactions, assistive devices, pattern recognition, machine learning, and engineering education.Dr. Scott Rowe, Western Carolina University Scott Rowe is an Assistant Professor in Western Carolina University’s School of Engineering + Technology. He joined Western Carolina University in 2021 after studies in concentrated solar power and controls
USI G SIX SIGMA FOR CO TI UOUS IMPROVEME T I E GI EERI G TECH OLOGY Sarai Hedges, MS Virginia Westheider, MA sarai.hedges@uc.edu virginia.westheider@uc.edu PO Box 210207 University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH 45221-0207 Abstract: A grassroots team at the College of Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, formed to use Six-Sigma methodology, an industry familiar process, to develop an improved assessment plan that is responsive to the ABET accreditation requirements. Using Six Sigma in the evaluation process fits nicely with the engineering technology programs and was
relates to levels of attrition and retentionof undergraduate engineering students. Most institutions track this data at the university level,meaning that university administrators are easily able to identify students who switch majorsfrom engineering to other areas or identify students who leave the university completely, butthere is minimal follow-up data provided at the college and department level.Our research examines the issue of first-semester attrition from the following perspectives: (1)the individual differences perspective: can data from a 10-minute psychological learning-stylesurvey distributed on the first day of class be used as a means of early-identification of first-semester engineering students who may not continue in engineering
Session 3148 Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior: Recruiting Underrepresented Minorities to Engineering and Engineering Technology Stephen J. Kuyath UNC Charlotte, Department of Engineering TechnologyAbstractThere is mounting evidence that the United Sates will soon experience a shortage of qualifiedhigh-tech workers that will jeopardize the country’s economic future. It is imperative that werecruit more women and minorities into engineering to prevent the anticipated shortage. Clearly,past recruiting strategies have had only
AC 2011-1145: COLLABORATING TO PREPARE STUDENTS FOR THEGLOBAL WORKPLACEIsabel Simes de Carvalho, ISEL, Lisbon, Portugal Isabel S. Carvalho received a Licenciatura in Chemical Engineering from the Technical University of Lis- bon. She received her M.S. and PhD degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the Technical University of Lisbon in 1990 and 1996, respectively. Following a year in the aeronautics industry in France (aero engine manufacturer) she is, since 1999, an Associate Professor at the Military Institute and also lectures at the Mechanical Engineering Department at ISEL. Research interests include energy production and efficiency and active and collaborative and blended (online) teaching and learning in
Paper ID #39609Gendered patterns in first-year engineering students’ career aspirationsand expectationsMs. Catherine MacKenzie Campbell, University of Toronto, Canada MacKenzie Campbell is a MASc student in Chemical Engineering specializing in Engineering Education. Her thesis is exploring how the quality of work-integrated learning experiences shape women engineers’ career intentions, with a focus on intersectionality and diverse engineering fields including emerging and non-traditional areas of practice. MacKenzie has an undergraduate engineering degree in Biomedical Systems Engineering, where her research
Paper ID #35769Lab-Based Antenna Course Using Full-Wave Numerical Simulation SoftwareFEKOProf. Kai Ren, Wentworth Institute of Technology Dr. Kai Ren received the Ph. D. degree in electrical and computer engineering from The Ohio State University, Columbus in 2017. Currently, he is an assistant professor in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Wentworth Institute of Technology. He is a member of IEEE. He has published 19 journal and conference papers and holds two WO patents. His current research includes platform-based antennas, antenna characteristic modes, direction finding systems and algorithms, microwave imaging
Paper ID #37765Assessment of Precision, Foundation, and Knowledge inEngineering MechanicsJiehong Liao Dr. Jiehong Liao is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU). She earned a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in 2004 with the Rensselaer Medal award and as as a member of the inaugural class of Gates Millennium Scholars. In 2011, she earned a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Rice University. Before joining FGCU in 2015, she was a visiting Assistant Professor of Biotechnology in the Division of Science and Technology
Paper ID #38362Board 272: Engineering Pathways for Appalachian Youth: Design Principlesand Long-term Impacts of School-Industry PartnershipsMalle R Schilling, Virginia Tech Malle R. Schilling is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education and a Masters Student in Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. Malle holds a Bachelor’s of Mechanical Engineering from the University of Dayton. Malle is also a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) and is exploring how to recognize students’ assets in rural, K-12 engineering education contexts. Malle’s other research interests include issues of
graduates, co-op activities, and potential development ofcollaborative research programs. Unfortunately, adjuncts are marginalized by the academicsystems in place today; and their contributions to the academic process are undervalued. Next,the paper reports on the success story of an adjunct, a practitioner with good credentials, who“teamed-up” with a “full-time” faculty, in an attempt to bring the practice to 4 thyear students in ageotechnical/ foundation engineering class. The success achieved in meeting course objectives,as a result of practitioner’s role, was attributed, in large measure, to proper planning andcoordination that preceded course delivery. Plus, the willingness, experience and abilities of theadjunct in addressing the practice in
needed by undergraduate engineering students. At Georgia Tech, she conducts and coordinates workplace interviews and teaches communication skills to undergraduates. Her research has been support by the Sloan Foundation and the National Science Foundation. She has published in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.Paul Griffin, Georgia Tech Dr. Paul Griffin is a professor in Georgia Tech’s Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering. He received B.A. and B.S. degrees in chemistry and chemical engineering from the University of Texas and a Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. Griffin's teaching interests are in production and logistics systems, and
theseteam skills should be part of the grading process. Combining the evaluation of the projectmeeting the stated criteria and the individual’s ability to apply team skills should allowassignment of individual grades in a group project.The course where these methods have been applied is a first year Engineering design andcommunications course taken by Associate and Baccalaureate degree students in a variety ofEngineering and Engineering Technology majors. In response to the student population, thecourse uses a series of projects that emphasis creation of documentation including formal reports,drawings, web pages, and other presentation methods. The projects take approximately twoweeks to complete with a total of four projects and a final project in
AC 2008-2285: DEVELOPMENT OF AN UNDERGRADUATE COURSE INMICROSTATION © AND GEOPAK © FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTSGregory Nail, University of Tennessee-Martin Assistant Professor, Engineering Department, The University of Tennessee at Martin, Martin, TN,(2002-present) PhD, Texas A&M, 1991; MS, Texas A&M, 1986; BME, Auburn, 1984; PE Registration Civil and Mechanical (1998) Page 13.427.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Development of an Undergraduate Course in Microstation © and GEOPAK © for Civil Engineering StudentsAbstractThe paper is a report on the
in the work oplace, a need to use new educational approaches in teaching engineering courses has become essential. Inrecent years, due to the explosive market of high quality, user friendly, versatile and application-specificsoftware, many programs are in the process of redesigning their requirements within ABET guidelines withregard to programming language and additional applications of specialized problem solving software inindividual courses. In this paper, the authors present a study of current requirements and upcoming changes.The issues which prompted the project include inadequate application of traditional computer programming incourses, lack of student interest towards these programming courses, and a
participation in a team project. The Department of AerospaceEngineering offers a Master of Engineering degree under its jurisdiction and is a partner withother departments in the College in three other programs. The Master of Engineering templateand the four degree programs are briefly described.Master of Engineering Template The approval of a Master of Engineering Degree had to be sought at the State level throughthe State Council of University Presidents. This is a voluntary agreement aimed at avoidingunnecessary duplication of programs. The proposal had to define the nature and purpose of thedegree program and justify the existence of still another graduate degree. To this end a template,or a set of guidelines, was developed which distinguished
graduates, co-op activities, and potential development ofcollaborative research programs. Unfortunately, adjuncts are marginalized by the academicsystems in place today; and their contributions to the academic process are undervalued. Next,the paper reports on the success story of an adjunct, a practitioner with good credentials, who“teamed-up” with a “full-time” faculty, in an attempt to bring the practice to 4 thyear students in ageotechnical/ foundation engineering class. The success achieved in meeting course objectives,as a result of practitioner’s role, was attributed, in large measure, to proper planning andcoordination that preceded course delivery. Plus, the willingness, experience and abilities of theadjunct in addressing the practice in
Paper ID #27017Supporting Freshman Design with an Extracurricular ResourceAsma Idries, North Carolina State UniversityAkira Angel Romero-Berube, North Carolina State University Akira Romero-Berube attended NC State University for her Bachelor’s degree in Biological Engineering. She has held a position for five years working as a student with The Engineering Place, a preK-College Engineering education outreach program. Her experience at NC State has left her with a love for the theoretical, technical, and educational facets of engineering and she hopes to pursue a master’s or PhD in engineering education so she can pass
Paper ID #22627It’s Not Rocket Science: The Flipped Classroom in Space MechanicsProf. Kaela Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Kaela Martin is an Assistant Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univer- sity, Prescott Campus. She graduated from Purdue University with a PhD in Aeronautical and Astronau- tical Engineering and is interested in increasing classroom engagement and student learning.Dr. Jonathan Mark Gallimore, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Dr. Jonathan Gallimore is an Assistant Professor of Psychology in the Behavioral and Safety Sciences Department
Dr. Roberts has been teaching structural engineering topics for 13 years. He recently joined the faculty in the Integrated Engineering department at Southern Utah University.Dr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Dr. Carol Haden is a Principal Evaluator at Magnolia Consulting, LLC, a woman-owned, small business specializing in independent research and evaluation. She has served as evaluator for STEM education projects sponsored by the National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- tration, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the Arizona Department of Education, among others. Areas of expertise include evaluations of engineering education curricula and programs, informal
Paper ID #12728How Dialogue on ’Ingenuity in Nature’ Increases Enthusiasm for Engineer-ing and Science in Traditional Religious CommunitiesDr. Dominic M. Halsmer P.E., Oral Roberts University Dr. Dominic M. Halsmer is a Professor of Engineering and former Dean of the College of Science and Engineering at Oral Roberts University. He also serves as the Director of the Center for Faith and Learn- ing at ORU. He has been teaching science and engineering courses there for 23 years, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Oklahoma. He received BS and MS Degrees in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering
, and sustainable engineering applications. Page 26.1161.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Model-Based Control Systems with Intermittent Feedback: Conceptualization and Insights for the Teaching and LearningI. IntroductionThe field of engineering education has grown considerably over the past two decades, with themajority of the research focusing on empirical results or statistical studies. Alongside thisgrowth, it is important for researchers to develop increasingly intuitive and useful conceptualmodels for educational processes. In this paper we present a conceptual
years including eleven years on the faculty at the United States Military Academy.Dr. Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. Kevin C. Bower P.E., The Citadel Dr. Kevin Bower is a Professor and Assistant Provost for Academic Operations at The
2006-1732: DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHLY INTERACTIVE, ON-LINE COURSE ONENERGY CONSERVATION: LEARNING STRATEGIES USED ANDEXPERIENCE GAINEDSarma Pisupati, Pennsylvania State University SARMA V. PISUPATI is an Associate Professor of Energy & Geo-Environmental Engineering Department and a Faculty Fellow of the John A Dutton e-Education Institute of the College of Earth and mineral Sciences. He is Chair of the General Education Program of the EGEE Department and has been teaching undergraduate and graduate courses at Penn State University since 1992.Wendy Mahen, PennSylvania State University WENDY L. MAHAN is Instructional Designer in the in the Teaching and Learning with Technology (TLT) wing of
AC 2007-342: FACULTY REWARD SYSTEM REFORM FOR ADVANCEMENT OFPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR INNOVATION:REVISITING THE URGENCY FOR REFORMDennis Depew, Purdue University DENNIS R. DEPEW is dean of the college of technology, Purdue University.Gary Bertoline, Purdue University GARY R. BERTOLINE is professor and assistant dean for graduate studies of the college of technology, Purdue University.Mark Schuver, Purdue University MARK T. SCHUVER is director of the Rolls-Royce-Purdue Master’s degree program, Purdue University.Donald Keating, University of South Carolina DONALD A. KEATING is associate professor of mechanical engineering, University of South Carolina, and chair ASEE-Graduate