, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. In addition, he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses for the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Computer-Aided Drafting: A Hybrid Teaching ModelIntroductionThis “Work in Progress” describes a hybrid/blended teaching model using discipline-basedengineering assignments to enhance student learning in a computer engineering drafting course.Engineering communication skills are recognized as vital for all engineers to be successful intoday’s global economy [1]. Many engineering, education and governmental agencies, such as theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
infectious disease in animals. However, collection of a rectaltemperature can be difficult and stressful on the animal. New technologies such as thermalimaging cameras have recently become more prevalent to collect the body temperature ofanimals at other, less invasive sites. The objective of this research was to compare a firstgeneration prototype non-contact thermography device (NCTD) to a traditional FLIR® thermalimager as well as to determine a comparison between rectal and thermographic temperatures asan indicator of health status [1].A traditional clinical or serological examination of large numbers of livestock is logistically andeconomically challenging, and visual observations alone are not the most sensitive indicators todetect early
focusedon supporting specific transition and action processes. Transition processes relate to preparationfor work accomplishment whereas action processes involve the actual execution of the task. Theintervention was designed to provide support for key transition and action processes that areknown to drive team effectiveness. Definitions of the types of action and transition processesfrom the team literature and the associated scaffolds used as part of the intervention evaluated inthis study are presented in Table 1. The last column in the table indicates the specific element ofthe intervention that was designed and utilized to support each team process. The scaffoldsincluded cognitive tasks such as an activity focused on the development of shared
telecommunications fields.While students interested in communication networks typically have a computer science orengineering background. This divergence results in many challenges for the coeducation of suchprofessionals and students. We are discussing our approach in the design, development andimplementation of an undergraduate course, and the associate laboratory on smart grids. Projectchallenges include the selection of most appropriate course level, content and topics, textbooks,additional learning materials, laboratory experiments, inclusion or not an end-of-semesterproject, or field trips, etc. Two fundamental issues characterize smart grid education:multidisciplinary education and integrative nature of the smart grid solutions. 1
-Centric Capstone Design Teams: A comparison of military and civilian engineering programs.IntroductionThere is a continuing call for the development of engineers who can become leaders in helpingsolve the world’s grand challenges.1-3 Although many programs look toward the capstone designexperience to help build students’ professional skills,4-6 which includes leadership,7 studentpreparation for the leadership challenges associated with the capstone design team experience maywidely vary. Leadership scholars suggest that “shared leadership” may be a more effectiveleadership model than the hierarchical, individual leadership model that is typically used in team-based capstone design projects.8 The
, effective STEM instruction is must be present.However, in the United States, the lack of effective STEM teaching in the secondary level is aglaring issue.1 For a nation that has increasing STEM workforce demands, the flat response fromeducational system makes the STEM pedagogical issues increasingly urgent. Despite theseproblems, there are schools and organizations that utilize problem- and inquiry-based teachingmethods that appear to address the problem. One example of such an organization is SystemsGo.SystemsGo is a non-profit organization headquartered in the southwestern region of the UnitedStates, that uses the conceiving, design, production, and deployment of rockets as a way to teachand improve students’ STEM-related workforce skills
profession to others. More specifically, asillustrated in Figure 1, various members of the engineering community and stakeholdersin the engineering community can draw on and benefit from the EBOK. 4 Prospective engineering students Parents Certification boards Teachers/ advisors Licensing boards General EBOK public Mentors and supervisors
project-based course, so students become more inspired with technology development andproduct design. For Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC), New Engineering 2030 has been theopportunity to validate existing efforts to create an innovative and entrepreneurial curriculum.Since 2013, the Engineering Design and Innovation major (www.di-lab.cl) has imparted project-based courses that prepare students to: 1. be comfortable with ambiguity and ill-defined challenges, 2. be able to overcome team conflict , 3. acquire critical thinking and problem solving capabilities with a bias on making, 4. focus on people-driven innovation, 5. manage information through visual thinking strategies, 6. and adapt to a fast moving
the institutional level by improvingthe efficiency of classroom use3. A recent meta-analysis of the effectiveness of online educationas compared to traditional education by the U.S. Department of Education also revealed thatstudents in online learning conditions performed modestly better than students in face-to-faceconditions; and students in hybrid learning conditions performed better than both completelyonline and face-to-face conditions4. Prior research indicates that people choose blended or hybrid learning for three mainreasons: 1) improved pedagogy, 2) increased access/flexibility and 3) increased costeffectiveness5,6. Hybrid learning approaches increase the opportunities for active learningstrategies, group work, and learner
stakeholder needs and design requirements.IntroductionService-learning in the engineering disciplines utilizes service as a vehicle for both professionaland technical knowledge gains. The use of service in engineering education in the United Statesbegan in the 1990s (e.g., see Tsang et al.1 and Duffy2) and has recently increased based on theneed to reconsider the priorities of the professoriate,3 a desire to improve human conditions tofulfill higher education goals,4 and to meet the interest and demand of students and faculty acrossthe nation. Many engineering programs are exploring ways to offer new and meaningful serviceexperiences for their students.Since 2009, first year engineering students at LMU, a primarily undergraduate private liberal
approximately twenty-year history ofthe program, teams have submitted drafts of each half of the report earlier in the term forfeedback. This recursive approach is in line with recommended best practices in writing.1-2 Inspite of the heavy emphasis on technical writing in the prior semester, these drafts were oftendisappointing and time-consuming to grade. Also, it sometimes seemed that feedback on thefirst half draft had little impact on the quality of the second half draft; instructors often felt thatthey were seeing the same problems with the second half draft that they had on the first.Peer review of writing was identified as a possible technique for helping students improve theirwriting more quickly. Use of peer review has been common in other
learned material by demonstrating and racing these gokarts at the end of the semester in front of their peers. Furthermore, we explore how this structure for projectbased learning may be applicable to development of similar programs nationwide. Introduction Manufacturing is critical to the economy and has received renewed focus after President Obama 1declared a focus on American manufacturing during his second term . In order to create an increased proficiency in manufacturing, colleges and universities must prepare students for design and manufacturing jobs, and encourage
. Page 26.48.31. IntroductionKey challenges for engineering education involve creating and evaluating pedagogicalinnovations that can improve not only immediate student outcomes but also motivational factorsthat predict future success. For many students, their engagement with the material and susequentmotivation depend on the context in which that material is presented; psychological researchshows that if material appears to be directly relevant to a meaningful problem, learning andmemory are enhanced.1 Recognizing that engineering has a critical role to play in major societalproblems, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) has identified a set of Grand Challenges(GC). The diverse challenges include reverse-engineering the brain, making solar
to State transferability requirements). These learning outcomes were used to define thebadges for the Digital Narratives seminar learning experience. For our Digital Narratives course weproduced 8 badges: 4 for English, 3 for Fundamentals of Speech, and 1 for Information Literacy. In eachbadge there were 3-5 challenges, totaling 29 challenges across the 8 badges. The parallel construction ofthe badges to the more traditional classes and credit hour system also facilitated the broaderunderstanding at the university where our learning experiences can map to classes for use on transcripts.In addition, this ability to map to the existing structure enables transferring into and out of the programmore easily.The 8 badges also represented credit
receive feedback, towards more customized modes of STEMeducation delivery.1. IntroductionEach year, Universities spend millions of dollars constructing new laboratory facilities ormaintaining existing ones 1. However, these laboratory facilities are typically only available tostudents during “normal working hours”, as the time constraints of instructors and teachingassistants limit the availability of these resources. Furthermore, due to the instructor/student ratioin a typical engineering classroom/laboratory, it is challenging for students to get one-on-oneinstruction on demand, if they are faced with challenges while performing engineering laboratorytasks. Figure 1 presents the fundamental challenge of customizing laboratory instruction
development and infrastructure provision in asociety. The dearth of engineers in South Africa is hampering its ability to meet both itsinternal social development needs and to compete globally. Poor throughput rates inengineering degree programs are exacerbating the problem. Of the 2006 entering cohort ofengineering students nationally only 23% completed their degrees in the regulation time offour years, and 41% completed after five years 1 . Of black a students, only 9% completed infour years and 22% in five years. There are thus both social and economic imperatives forimproving retention and equity in engineering programmes.Although it has been 21 years since a democratic government was installed in South Africafollowing the end of apartheid, great
exploring data visualizations of usability data. Page 26.485.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing a Learning Analytics Dashboard for Undergraduate Engineering Using Participatory DesignUniversities have been seeking innovative ways to measure and track student learning outcomesand empirically identify the conditions that lead to their development. Academic analyticsanswers this call by focusing on the “intersection of technology, information, managementculture, and the application of information to manage the academic enterprise” (p. 2)1. Usingtechnology
activities and funded researchprojects.(1) Some international faculty prefer non-tenure track (lecturer positions) as a career.They are usually satisfied with their choice for reasons including less stress, more flexibility butrealizing the cons including lack of job security and lower salaries. (2) The first author is afaculty member with international background who taught in both temporary and permanentsettings. The second author mentored international faculty at US institutions and overseas. In thenext sections, the authors will address, based on their own experiences and that from theliterature, the challenges and opportunities in temporary and permanent positions for
- ogy.Prof. Mark E. Law, University of FloridaDr. John G. Harris, University of Florida Page 26.1087.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Lessons Learned from Two Years of Flipping Circuits IIntroductionA “target point” is a vulnerable transition, or perhaps even an undesirable climate, that impactsthe preparation steps toward becoming an engineer [1, 2]. According to the NSF EngineeringDirectorate, “one of the most critical “target points” to successful professional formation ofengineers is the engineering “core,” the middle two years of the four-year undergraduateexperience
experiential learning, has been shown by many educationalresearchers to result in superior learning outcomes than traditional delivery methods likelecturing.1 As a result, educators have developed various active learning activities basedon experiments that students can manipulate and learn firsthand for themselves. Severalapproaches have been taken, with some researchers focusing on take-home experimentsthat students can undertake as homework, others developing experiments that can beaccessed remotely for distance education, and a third group designing experiments for in- Page 26.1121.2class use.In an example of this first group, T. Scott reported on two fluid
through failure, systems thinking with creativity and innovation,project and personnel management skills14.The qualities or attributes of “entrepreneurial mindset” described above are very well aligned withsystems thinking and practicing systems engineering principles as shown in the Table 1 below.Curriculum ModulesThe curriculum modules were developed without eliminating or reducing the actual course content,rather the concepts of systems engineering principles were introduced to the existing projects withminor modifications, like; team based hands-on exercises, discussions concerning the systemengineering implications for each project and experiencing entrepreneurial thinking. In addition, byimproving some of the project methods using a system
andengineering is a fruitful research experience as an undergraduate [1-4]. Such experiences can beeffective in helping students who exhibit uncertainty or a lack of confidence regarding attendinggraduate school. According to a study by SRI International [3,4], undergraduate researchprograms can be highly effective in helping students who are uncertain about going to graduateschool to clarify their intent to pursue those goals and in bolstering the certainty of those studentswho have already decided to do so. Many underrepresented students interested in engineeringand computer science fit into these categories. While some are unsure whether to pursuegraduate education at all, other students want an advanced degree, but are uncertain about theother
products are not wellconnected to outside problems 5. Engineering is an applied science and mathematics field that isto a significant extent problem solving and design oriented, hence engineering design connectstudents to real-world problems 6; Main steps of Incorporating Engineering Design Challengesinto STEM courses are shown in Figure (1) 7 The paper provides an analysis on the impact of engineering design in K-12 student’sperception and attributes towards STEM fields, as well as, impact on 21st century skillsdevelopment. The paper reports on Quantitative analysis investigating the impact of engineeringdesign based experience “Life is Engineering project” on soft skills enhancement and technicaldevelopment of K-12 students. Figure (1) the
, theremaining points were for completing the homework and presenting a portion of the solution.Initially, the grading sheet contained three blanks. One for the student’s name, another for thescore, and the last for comments explaining why students received less than the full twentypoints. This was quickly found to be inadequate because students did not feel the supervisorswere grading uniformly. Name Prep. Part. Name Prep. Part. Comments: Comments: Name Prep. Part. Name Prep. Part. Comments: Comments: Figure 1: The grading sheet used by the supervisors. The supervisor would
of 3 courses, Linear Circuits,Electronics 1, and Signals and Systems - a very traditional approach. Linear Circuits had alaboratory component that met bi-weekly, Electronics 1 had a weekly laboratory, and Signalsand Systems had no laboratory at all. The first and third courses were assigned 3 credit hours, thesecond 4 credit hours. In this scenario, the students viewed each course as its own entity andfrequently did not make the connections between the concepts in each. Electronics 1 wouldrequire a massive review of basic circuit concepts, and students did not see how Signals andSystems was anything other than a straight mathematics course, with no relevance to workingwith real devices.All electrical and computer engineering students study
, most students in a group did not evenlydistribute the tasks amongst them.1. Introduction“Laboratories are places where elegant theories meet messy everyday reality.” [1]. Forengineering education, laboratories bridge the knowledge that is covered in textbooks and theskills that can only be acquired through solving real-world problems. With the emergence ofonline distance education, the traditional method of delivering educational laboratory exerciseshas been challenged. For distance engineering education, can a ‘messy reality’ that always hidesthe truth behind noise, errors and mistakes be delivered through the Internet? While there weredoubts whether engineering educational experiments could be delivered remotely [2], there werealso many
and anunderstanding of each document that they would encounter in their future career. They alsolearned how to formally present, organize, and articulate the necessary information required foreach construction document. The project milestone breakdown is as follows:Milestone 1: Soil Characteristics and Recommendation The purpose of this milestone is to introduce and educate the students on a major factor Page 26.1262.4that can affect concrete construction. Since most of concrete construction is placed on the soil,the type of soil and compaction of the soil can directly affect the concrete above. This projectprovided students’ an
colleges to undergraduate serving institutions and research-focused universities,both with and without engineering education degree programs.1 With such a wide range ofinstitutions being served with Student Chapters, it can be difficult to ensure that all needs are metand all Chapters have the same goals.According to the ASEE Student Chapter Mission,1 the general mission of Student Chapters is: I. To develop relationships with local schools (K-12) and aid them in fostering student interest in future careers and study in engineering and engineering technology II. To encourage engineering undergraduate students to continue their studies on the graduate level III. To increase the interest of engineering graduate students in
PrincipleFluid mechanics is one of the important fields of study in chemical and mechanical engineeringbecause graduates will deal with fluids and the effects of forces on fluid motion many timesduring their careers. Because of the subject’s importance and because it became clear to us thateven students who completed a fluid mechanics course have difficulties in describing the truemeaning of continuity and the relationship between flow work and kinetic energy in flowthrough varying cross sectional areas8, we became persuaded we needed to rectify the knowledgegaps maintained after a lecture-based style of instruction by systematically incorporating hands-on learning strategies.As shown in Figure 1 and alluded to earlier, identifying misconceptions should
computerized testing lab and runningthe bulk of a 200-student computer organization class’s exams using computerized testing. Wediscuss the mechanics of operating the testing lab, the work required by the instructor to enablethis approach (e.g., generating a diversity of equivalent difficulty problems), and the studentresponse, which has been strongly positive: 75% prefer computerized testing, 12% prefertraditional written exams, and 13% had no preference.1 IntroductionIn many college courses, exams contribute heavily to final course grades. As such, it is importantthat exams be an accurate and fair measurement of a student’s understanding/ability, but examsare subject to resource and real-world constraints and involve tensions between