25.1356.7In the OSU course, students follow the complete design cycle for each of the labs.Implementation: This course introduces students to the methods by which math topics are usedin engineering science and design courses. Students apply mathematics through experimentationand design projects. Both analytical and computational (MATLAB) techniques are used for dataanalysis and graphical representation. The course objectives are listed below. At the conclusionof the course the students should be able to: a) Use algebra, systems of equations, trigonometry, sinusoids, derivatives, and integrals in solving engineering analysis and design problems b) Work effectively in teams c) Communicate engineering work effectively in written form
described ACP reports cost based onschedule accomplishment, rather than on the passage of time. To determine how anuncompleted task is progressing with respect to cost, ACP compares:(a) cost/progress relationship budgeting with(b) the cost/progress relationship expended for the task.It utilizes data accumulated from periodic reports and from the same data basegenerates the following: The relationship between cost and scheduled performance The accounting relationships between cost and fiscal accounting requirements The prediction of corporate cash flow needs Page 25.184.3Unfortunately, the development of PERT/schedule techniques are still in its
traditional approach by the author. There were 10 femalesand 37 males.Cohort R (revised) consisted of 42 students (19 females and 23 males) from our two most-recentStatics classes (fall 2010 and fall 2011). Both classes were taught by the author using the revisedapproach.Because there is always the possibility that one cohort happens to be more academically adeptthan the other, the prior academic performance of each cohort was examined in terms of theirgrade point average (GPA) in prerequisite mathematics and science courses, specifically,Calculus I (MA251), Calculus II (MA252), Physics I (PH201), and Physics II (PH202). TheGPA for these courses was calculated using the following four-point scale: A 4.000 B 3.000 C
traditional approach by the author. There were 10 femalesand 37 males.Cohort R (revised) consisted of 42 students (19 females and 23 males) from our two most-recentStatics classes (fall 2010 and fall 2011). Both classes were taught by the author using the revisedapproach.Because there is always the possibility that one cohort happens to be more academically adeptthan the other, the prior academic performance of each cohort was examined in terms of theirgrade point average (GPA) in prerequisite mathematics and science courses, specifically,Calculus I (MA251), Calculus II (MA252), Physics I (PH201), and Physics II (PH202). TheGPA for these courses was calculated using the following four-point scale: A 4.000 B 3.000 C
organize this knowledge relative to the features underlying problemclassifications. Knowledge that allows the student to identify the defining features of problemsmust also be incorporated into this knowledge structure. A. Using words only, define the following terms as they relate fluid mechanics and thermodynamics. Do not just recite the symbols in words; for example, mv2/2 is kinetic energy, not one-half of the mass times the square of velocity. Also give the units of the quantity. Meaning Units a. W _________________________ ________________ b. P
engineering problems using project-‐specific math, engineering, and science concepts. (a, e) 2. Analyze, interpret and make decisions about quantitative data using basic concepts of descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation, normal distributions, and mode) and m easurement, including issues in: (b) a. precision and accuracy; b. sample and population; c. error and uncertainty. 3. Solve an open-‐ended design problem by: (c, e) a. transforming an open-‐ended design problem into an answerable one; b. breaking down a complex design problem into sub-‐problems; c. determining assumptions involved in
would have to follow the procedure 5: r r r r vB = v A + ω1 × rAB (1) Note that in equation (1) A is the connection between the crank and the housing and B is thejoint between the crank and the link. This allows for the calculation of the joint velocity based on rthe angular velocity of the crank and the position vector from A to B ( v A = 0 ). Next, r r r r vB = vC + ω 2 × rCB
) Curricula Design and Materials Development, (b) Instruction Delivery Systems, (c) Student Experiential Learning, and (d) Student Recruitment and Retention.(a) Curricula Design and Materials Development BGREEN is a STEM project that supports the integration of agricultural sciences withthe basic and applied aspects of the traditional STEM disciplines[6]. The focus of BGREEN is tomeet current and future sustainable energy workforce needs, and to better prepare students towork at different USDA agencies. Therefore, curricula will be developed/adapted based oninputs from faculty and USDA leaders. A curriculum development team has been establishedwith members representing university and USDA leaders. The curriculum development team
. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., & Allen, D.E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. Duch, S. Groh, & D. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3-11). Sterling, VA: Stylus. Page 25.1306.8Gilmartin, S.K., Li, E., & Aschbacher, P.R. (2006). The relationship between interest in physical science/engineering, science class experiences, and family contexts: Variations by gender and race/ethnicity among secondary students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12, 179-207
SessionsThe workshop was organized into two four-hour sessions. The first discussed what is meant bysuccessful research groups and the second focused on a specific case study to make concreterecommendations for fostering success. These sessions were organized using a series of smalland large group breakout sessions as shown in Figure 1. Examples of the workshop agenda canbe found in Appendix B. Page 25.356.3Figure 1: After the topic intoduced, eeach workshop session consisted of focused small groupdiscussions, presentations of each groups’ results to the larger group and then the large groupgave feedback/added to the findings of the small groups. The
AC 2012-3829: OVERVIEW OF THE FIRST YEAR OF AN INNOVATIVESCIENCE EDUCATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP VENTUREMs. Kelsey B. Hatzell, Pennsylvania State University Kelsey B. Hatzell is a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow studying material science for her doctoral studies. She received a bachelor’s of science degree in general engineering, and a bachelor’s of arts in economics from Swarthmore College. She also holds a master’s of science in mechanical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University.Marta C. Hatzell, Pennsylvania State University Marta C. Hatzell is a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow studying mechanical engineering for her doctoral studies. She received a bachelor’s of science degree
) 2010. Chesapeake Bay Phase 5.3 Community Watershed Model. In preparation EPA XXX-X-XX-010. Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis MD. December 2010.11. US EPA, (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) Region 3. (2010, December 29). Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment. U. S. EPA. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/tmdl/ChesapeakeBay/tmdlexec.html12. Williams, M., Longstaff, B., Buchanan, C., Llansó, R., & Dennison, W. (2009). Development and evaluation of a spatially-explicit index of Chesapeake Bay health. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 59(1-3), 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.11.01813. Zint, M., Kraemer, A., Northway, H., & Lim, M. (2002). Evaluation
Training Notes (rough)Q&P Logistics: 1. Classroom a. Review slides up to roles b. Have students review roles, select roles, mind quantities of each role c. GTA provide assigned roles on printed form from data spreadsheets d. Students work on pre-lab to finish off Classroom session, instructional team answers questions, complete pre-lab by beginning of Q&P Lab session, must use Classroom Q&P slides to answer questions 2. Before Lab a. Students finish pre-lab by beginning of Q&P Lab session (continued) b. Setup lab with initial layout (provided below) (see setup qty’s in doc) c. Have each station primed and ready to go with one of each variety
outreachactivities. Table 1 shows the responsibilities of the program managers. Page 25.1402.6 Table 1 Program Managers' Task List Sky’s the Limit Program Managers’ Tasks• Hold weekly meetings with the WEMS Student Leaders• Work with University Publishing on marketing brochure• Hire and supervise WEMS Student Leaders• Communicate and work with University Curriculum Leader A and Industry Professional Transportation Curriculum Leaders B, C, and D to answer curriculum questions• Reserve ropes course• Order supplies for outreach program• Make copies of handouts• Reserve hotel rooms and provide directions for leaders• Manage paperwork for outreach program funding
knowledge retention. Page 25.814.2 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing will be conducted to assess a) change in retention between courses and b)change in student problem-solving and design skills.BackgroundMany sources have made the case for reforming engineering education to reflect modern trends.Most notably, a recent National Academy of Engineering (NAE
), 768- 772. 5. King, I. (1915). An inquiry into certain aspects of the study habits of university students. School and Society, 2(49), 824-828. 6. Bailey, M., Floersheim, R. B., & Ressler, S. J. (2002). Course assessment plan: A tool for integrated curriculum management. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), 425-434. 7. Hayes, R., Kotovsky, K., Kozbelt, A., & Weissman, A. (1999). Where does students’ time go? Center for Innovation in Learning at Carnegie Mellon, Research Brief, 1(2), 1-4. 8. Ressler, S. J., & Lenox, T. A. (1996). The time survey: A course development tool that works! Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
courses.Developmental Instruction in (a) Design Knowledge, Skills, and Thinking; (b) SystemsThinking; (c) Sustainability Contexts; (d) Sustainable Design; (e) Cognitive Processes; (f)Ethics, et cetera. Each course in the six-course sequence should build off the prior providingmoderate instruction over a long period of time and building developmentally on priorlearning outcomes [23-24]. Skills and attitudes students learn and practice over a long periodof time (with regular support from and collaboration with faculty) are the skills and attitudesthat they will take ownership of and tailor to their own abilities and design habits. Thisincludes not only personal attitudes such as practicing ethical behaviors but also followingengineering best practices. Students
environment.Three principles conceptualized business incubation as developmental processes for change: a)incubators which tend to facilitate successful transitions to self-sustaining enterprises shieldideas from forces that threaten viability while simultaneously mimicking the sense of urgencyand external pressures that foster independence; b) the most effective incubators areopportunistic and able to successfully assist in the identification and navigation of environmentalconstraints; c) beneficial incubation processes recognize situational influences in theenvironment and support alignment to the real world. 19 The theory of Maital, Ravid, Seshadri, & Dumanis 19 is important because incubation isconceived broadly as an organizational change
Equations 85.4% 9.0% 78.9% 10.0%Table 2. Cañada College average retention and success rates for STEM math courses from 2001 to 2009. Retention is defined as completing the course, and success is defined as receiving a passing grade (A, B, or C) in the class.There are numerous studies that have concluded that the standard approaches to teachingtrigonometry and pre-calculus are ineffective, resulting in students who have difficulty completingmany basic tasks,14 or retaining knowledge and skills they have learned,15 and students whofrequently make algebraic errors that indicate a lack of conceptual understanding.16 Other studieshave also shown that the use of active and collaborative learning
: Page 25.620.4 A. Are students receptive to blogging in engineering education? B. How do students perceive blogging in a freshman engineering course? Is previous experience a significant contributor to this perception? C. Which factors affect the student’s ability to participate in the blogs? D. Does blog participation vary significantly with the format of the blog (i.e. RC= Required Chosen Topic, RNC=Required Non-Chosen Topic, VC= Voluntary, Chosen Topics)? E. How does blogging contribute to the students’ perception of accomplishing course outcomes?3. Methodology3.1 Course DescriptionDuring a fall semester, four sections of an introductory engineering course were utilized as thebasis of
and the “analyze the discipline” exercises foreach department presentation, my critical thinking skills are: Figure 4. Survey responses to Question 1.Question 2: The goals of this course include improving students’: a) use of tablet pcs; b) critical thinking Page 25.529.7and decision-making skills; c) team building/communication skills; d) understanding ofdiversity/harassment; e) knowledge about engineering professionalism/ethics; f) understanding ofengineering design and practice; g) knowledge of departments/engineering disciplines at SpeedSchool;h) ability to use the software tools Excel, Maple, Matlab
deeply into these two areas through applying self-authorship as a lens to otherpedagogies.Bibliography 1. National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 2. National Research Council. (2009). Rising Above the Gathering Storm Two Years Later: Accelerating Progress Toward a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 3. The Royal Academy of Engineering. (2006). Educating Engineers for the 21st Century. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering. 4. Turns, J., Sattler, B., Eliot, M., Kilgore, D., & Mobrand, K. (in press). Preparedness
practice the Four A’s strategy through a homeworkassignment in which they were asked to apply the Four A’s to a particular laboratory situation(Appendix B). The proposed case was based on a real-life example.Assessment ResultsReflective Assignment: The main goal for this assignment was to provide students with thechance to reflect on the material discussed and place it into context. Students were evaluated onwhether they provided a well-developed reflection on the implications and a personal evaluationof the proceedings (Appendix A). For the most part, students were able to synthesize theinformation presented and put it into the context of their own lives or future career goals. Withthe majority of students, obvious effort was put into
convince themselves that a) they’ve tried everything they want to try and b) there are no hidden tricks. In order to engage students’ well-‐known misconceptions, most of the activities contain a real or simulated version of a situation from one of the concept inventory questions. In this way, the activity engages the students’ interest by having a surprising result. Because there are at least five questions in each concept area, we can also examine how well students transfer their understanding to new situations they have not directly observed. These activities’ effectiveness has been assessed with the concept inventory for
reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. M. (2004). Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students' ideas about engineers and engineering. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.2. Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S. & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73.3. Dyehouse, M. Weber, N., Kharchenko, O., Duncan, D., Strobel, J., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2011). Measuring students’ perceptions of engineers: Validation of the draw-an-engineer (DAET) coding system with Interview
Aerospaceengineering laboratory at Southern Polytechnic State University. The undergraduate researchhelped the students in gaining theoretical and practical knowledge for conducting and completingresearch. Through various research activities as part of the Peach State LSAMP program,students learned and improved their ability to think critically, solve engineering problems,trouble-shoot, and better understand engineering principles. Our students presented the researchat the Peach State LSAMP annual conference in Savannah, GA. Although the students havesubmitted their work, the apparatus needs to be improved and made more robust before it can besafely used in a laboratory environment.References 1. 1. T. Goodwin, B. Holmes, ‘Challenges of engaging in
AC 2012-5185: ONE CHALLENGE, TWO COUNTRIES: A DUAL AEROSPACEENGINEERING BACHELOR’S DEGREE PROGRAM BETWEEN NEWMEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE UNIVERSITY AUTONOMOUSOF CHIHUAHUADr. Imelda Olague, New Mexico State University Imelda Olague studied civil engineering at the University Autonomous of Chihuahua (UACH). She grad- uated with a Ph.D. in engineering from New Mexico State University (NMSU) in 2008. Since 2006, Olague has been the institutional liaison between UACH and NMSU, proactively working to create and advance academic partnerships and collaborations between these institutions. Under her role as liaison, she has been in charge of the logistics and organization of several events related to the establishment
. Page 25.26.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Comparative Analysis of 3D Parametric Surface Modeling and Freeform Mesh Modeling as Tools for Investigating Student LearningAbstractThis paper investigates the effectiveness with which similar outputs can be produced fromtwo 3D CAD packages that employ different modeling approaches. The modeling approachesin question are parametric NURBS1 (Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline) surface modeling andpolygonal freeform modeling. The former refers to the creation of organic geometry using 2Dsketches and building standalone faces between sketches fig1, the latter refers to taking anexisting geometric shape and
AC 2012-5408: A SUCCESSFUL FOUR-YEAR ACADEMIC SCHOLAR-SHIP PROGRAM FOR UPPER DIVISION ENGINEERING AND COM-PUTER SCIENCE NON-TRANSFER STUDENTS AND GRADUATE STU-DENTSDr. Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University Mary Anderson-Rowland is the PI of an NSF STEP grant to work with five non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engineers. She also directs two academic scholarship programs, including one for transfer students. An Associate Professor in computing, informatics, and systems design engineering, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top
AC 2012-3816: AN 18-MONTH STUDY OF STUDENT EMBRACEMENTAND USE OF A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AT AN URBAN,RESEARCH INSTITUTIONJulie M. Little-Wiles M.S.M., Ph.D. (A.B.D.), Purdue University, West Lafayette Julie M. Little-Wiles is a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University’s College of Technology in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation.Dr. Stephen Hundley, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Stephen Hundley is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Undergraduate Programs and Associate Professor of organizational leadership and supervision in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technol- ogy, IUPUI.Dr. Wanda L. Worley, Indiana University-Purdue University, IndianapolisMr. Erich J. Bauer