Diversity, Persistence, and Success,” BioScience, p. biu076, May 2014, doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu076.[5] A. Pawley and J. Hoegh, “Exploding Pipelines: Mythological Metaphors Structuring Diversity- Oriented Engineering Education Research Agendas,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Jun. 2011, p. 22.684.1-22.684.21, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 17965.[6] B. M. Capobianco, B. F. French, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Engineering Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners,” Journal of Engineering Education; Washington, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698–716, Oct. 2012.[7] B. M. Capobianco, J. H. Yu, and B. F. French, “Effects of Engineering Design-Based Science on Elementary School
are then removed from the sandbox andplaced in front of a whiteboard. Students take photos of each board which are then used tocomplete the follow-up tasks. (a) (b)Figure 2. Plexiglas inserts to cut a profile (a) and cross section (b) in the sandbox during Module1 on elevation data and views.Assignment: The follow-up assignment requires use of the photos taken at the sandbox, placing alarge emphasis on calculating and applying scale in addition to how the various views ofelevation data are related. Students are told that the sandbox represented a scaled physical modelof the area where the new road will be built. Instructors can specify any reasonable
areas of study and directions for future research. Thus, the purpose of this contentanalysis is to explore (a) the thematic trends of ASEE gaming conference papers over time and(b) the semantic relationships between concepts.MethodsContent Analysis MethodologyContent analysis is a research procedure for making reproducible and valid interference byanalyzing text or other media 11 . This definition is relatively similar to the description provided byHolsti nearly five decades ago, as ”any technique for making inferences by objectively andsystematically identifying specified characteristics of messages” (p. 14) 12 . Content analysis haspreviously been conducted by time-consuming manual processing, such as hand coding text. Withthe development of
49 55.1 TOTAL 89 100.0 Table 4: Descriptive Chart for English learning Perspective For the last question, the authors surveyed the perception of scores, for we think most of studentswould like to have an A or B score. Table 5 just prove our theory, for 85% of students would like tohave a B and above score. We did have a final score for these students; however, we cannot connect thefinal score with the perception score one by one. Thus, we cannot determine whether those perceptionsare fit for the final score. For the final score, the mean was 76.78, and highest was 87, lowest 44.Basically, the scores follow a normal distribution curve, which
ofthree NGSS disciplinary core ideas (ETS1.A, ETS1,B, and ETS1.C) that relate to the three-stepNGSS engineering design process. More information about these topics can be found on theirstandards summary page [34].The working draft of the assessment instrument contained at total of 17 items, some of whichwere supplementary assessment measures and alternate, short form, versions of the ADE items.These consisted of ten selected-response items focused on concepts represented in NGSSstandards MS-ETS1 and MS-ETS1-2. We also designed four simple problem-solving itemsaimed at capturing indications of students’ ability to make use of the engineering design process,touching to elements in both NGSS standards MS-ETS1-3 and MS-ETS1-4, and cross
one’s skills and experiences beyond the classroom. Astudy was conducted at NYU Tandon School of Engineering and found students lack support inidentifying and developing their career pathways. This study indicates that a combinede-portfolio and micro-credentialing platform could benefit students by a) providing students witha tool to reflect on and showcase their experiences, b) matching students with upper-class andalumni mentors in career pathways they are interested in, and c) providing them with curatedlists of on-campus and experiential opportunities and micro-credentials that would support theircareer pathways.IntroductionEvery student’s experience through engineering school culminates in different results -- students’future pathways range
material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationGraduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1650044. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES[1] B. Hartmann et al., "Reflective Physical Prototyping through Integrated Design, Test, and Analysis," in Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Montreux, Switzerland, 2006: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 299-308.[2] J. Marks and C. C. Chase, "Impact of a Prototyping Intervention on Middle School Students' Iterative Practices and Reactions
Case-Based Learning: A Creative Experience in Comparison to Traditional Teaching Methods Waddah Akili Geotechnical EngineeringA b s t r a c tThis paper describes the steps taken in planning, developing, and executing a case study/ casehistory course in geotechnical/ foundation engineering at an international university. The paper ed : a ab e a ec e a a ed a ; e a a ecourse; and the results of evaluating the effectiveness of this approach versus traditionallecturing. Problems and challenges that could arise when offering the course for the first time arealso addressed. Embedded in this
Paper ID #35174Doing the impossible in a pandemic: Delivering student-designedfabricated parts to an industry clientDr. David Olawale, R.B. Annis School of Engineering, University of Indianapolis Dr. David Olawale is an Assistant Professor of Engineering (Industrial and Systems) at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering (RBASOE), University of Indianapolis. He has diverse experience in research and development, as well as technology commercialization and entrepreneurship. His research areas include multifunctional composite materials and manufacturing, as well as innovation engineering. He has pub- lished over fifty peer
Adaptive Expertise. Educational Research and Reviews, Vol. 12, pp.14–29.Bransford, J. and B. Stein (1984). The IDEAL Problem Solver. New York: W. H. Freeman.Bransford, J., A. Brown & R. Cocking, Eds. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.National Academy Press: Washington, DC.Bransford, J., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Meltzoff, A., Pea, R., Roschelle, J., Vye, N., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Barron, B.,Reeves, B., & Sabelli, N. (2006). Learning Theories and Education: Toward a Decade of Synergy, in P. A.Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 209–244. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesPublishers.Brophy, S., Hodge, L., & Bransford, J. (2004). Work in Progress - Adaptive Expertise: Beyond Apply
. The remaining two articles were excluded because they were theoreticaland did not pertain to the scope of the literature review. After the abstract decision process wascompleted, 24 articles were selected for the full read. Out of those 19-peer reviewed articles wereincluded in the final synthesis (see Figure 1).Figure 1: Prisma diagram including the information of the number of excluded and includedarticles in each step of the reviewing process [12] 3. FindingsDifferent strategies for assessing the development of computational thinking in higher educationwere found. These summaries of findings will be discussed in the following themes (a) tests,instruments, and portfolios, (b) makeshift environments and online games, and (c
impact/are impacted • A technology is informed by, B. Latour. 2005. Reassembling the by a technology • Values in and has consequences for, Social: an Introduction to Actor- engineering many different people, Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford • Students discuss how practices conditions, forces, and University Press changing an creatures. apparently-minor • Environmentally J. Law, “Technology, closure, and element of a system and socially heterogeneous engineering: The
,” Communication Monographs, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 76-82, Jan. 1993, doi: 10.1080/03637759309376297[7] M. J. Khan and C. A. Aji, “Development of Engineering Identity,” paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual, June 2020.[8] D. G. Dimitriu and D. C. Dimitriu, “Mentoring is a full-contact activity in engineering education,” paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 2018.[9] J. H. Lim, B. P. MacLeod, P. T. Tkacik, and S. L. Dika, “Peer mentoring in engineering: (un)shared experience of undergraduate peer mentors and mentees,” Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 395-416, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1080
incorporating a global view is expected.[13] Thestudent proceeds to establish a global company structure and is denoted in Figure 2. Figure 2. Organizational Structure of Global Ventilator Company (BtN)The students rapidly learn that effective organizations have dynamic and visionary leaders andthus expanded the team by 550 associates in the global count. They elect the name B-VengersNorth America which is modeled in the global team after Toyota North America.[14]3.1 Intellectual Property - Acquisition and PartnershipMedical ventilators and other electronically sophisticated devices can be manufactured withinthe automotive domain; however, they must be re-designed and readied for higher rates of mass © American
standards budget but spent $20,000 on standards in 2019.Institutions A, B, and OO did not provide values therefore they were counted as null values.Many librarians indicated a $0 budget but then reported spending money on standards.The responses to the questions 1-3 of this survey become of more interest when combined withquestion 12 of the survey. In the final question, respondents were asked to describe theirstandards access model and multiple librarians mentioned not having a budget but having aninformal cap on ordering for specific faculty/students. Figure 2A: Question 2: “What is your yearly Standards budget?” Figure 2B: Question 3: “In the last year, how much would you estimate that you spent on
).AppendixEngineering Design Survey (Delivered via Google Forms)Help us better understand your expereince with learning the engineering design process at UVU. 1. What is your major? a. Mechanical Engineering b. Civil Engineering c. Other… 2. Which year of the ME program are you currently in? a. 1st year (ENGR 1000) b. 2nd Year (ENGR 2010) c. 3rd Year (ME 3010) d. 4th Year (ME 4810) 3. Which of the following classes have you already taken at UVU? a. ENGR 1000 - Introduction to Engineering b. ENGR 2010 - Statics c. ME 3010 – Linear Systems 4. Had you learned the engineering design process prior to taking classes at UVU? If yes, where? a. Yes
Paper ID #35114Peltier Effect in Waste Heat ReclamationDavid Walden, West Texas A&M University I am David Walden. I am currently pursuing technologies that act in a way that is modular. These technologies would remove the need for high interdependence between entities such as people, states, and countries. It my vision that by implementing such technology we can allow for more people to experience greater freedom without detriment to the global environment. This is my guiding principle for the various research topics I seek to explore.Dr. Kenneth R. Leitch P.E., West Texas A&M University Kenneth R. Leitch
Yes Chemical Course-level [39] students Gomez (2018) Second- and fourth-year undergraduate Yes Chemical Course-level [40] engineering students Battistini Third-year undergraduate engineering Yes Civil Course-level (2020) [41] students Galvan (2020) Tenure-track and career-track Yes Not specified Program-level [42] instructors a b Smith (2016) Low income, first generation No Not specified Program-level [43] engineering students a Gomez First-year and second-year Yes Chemical Course-level (2018) [44
newchallenges through new ways of teaching and considering student socio-psychological needs, and(b) to support students by reaching out to them to provide the motivational and academic supportthat keeps them in school, doing well, staying focused on their goals of completing their education,and graduating. The pandemic has resulted in implementing some new initiatives, which may needto continue foreseeable future.d) Project multi-year longitudinal databaseThe project multi-year database is designed to collect pertinent student data from each StateCollege and provide accessibility for project-specific reporting functions across the 5-year project.Included as database support functions are: (a) the collection, filtering, and random selection ofState
the activities of various stages.Deliverables are achieved at the end of each activity. The gate keepers review thedeliverables with the help of the criteria and take decisions (GO/KILL/HOLD/RECYCLE)during the gate reviews.For example, the first stage is to establish context and need. The main activities of this stageare namely . a. Survey stakeholders b. Collate the inputs from various stakeholdersThe working team consists of the faculty members responsible for quality improvement inprograms, curriculum redesign and some more faculty members to carry out the activities partof this stage. The gate keepers are the senior administrators of the academic institution, thehead of the department of the program concerned and curriculum design
4 build confidence in manufacturer supplied information as well as utilize their own experimentally determined thrust curves in their rocket simulation software. (a) (b) (c) 6 10 10 4 10 8 10 4 10 7
, 2017, p. 12.[3] C. M. Phillips and Y. E. Pearson, “New Affirmative Action Federal Contractor Regulations: An Opportunity for All Engineering Organizations to Broaden the Participation of People with Disabilities,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference, 2018.[4] C. Groen, L. D. McNair, M. C. Paretti, D. R. Simmons, and A. Shew, “Exploring Professional Identity Development in Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students who Experience Disabilities,” in Proceedings of the 125th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2018, p. 14.[5] E. W. Kimball, R. S. Wells, B. J. Ostiguy, C. A. Manly, and A. A. Lauterback, “Students with Disabilities in
students in the geosciences. Advances in Engineering Education. 8(4).Fey, S. B., Theus, M. E., & Ramirez, A. R. (2020). Course-based undergraduate research experiences in a remote setting: Two case studies documenting implementation and student perceptions. Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution. 10(22): 12528-12541.Foertsch, J. A., Alexander, B. B., & Penberthy, D. L. (1997). Evaluation of the UW-Madison’s summer undergraduate research programs: Final report. Madison, WI.Gates, A. Q., Teller, P. J., Bernat, A., Delgado, N., & Della-Piana, C. K. (1998). Meeting the challenge of expanding participation in the undergraduate research experience. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998. FIE’98
technologies.Figure 2a presents the default ScribeAR main page as it appears when first loaded in a webbrowser. Selecting the hamburger icon ( ) on the top left corner of the screen opens the Optionsmenu (Figure 2b), which allows additional customization of ScribeAR’s appearance andfunctionality. (a) (b) Figure 2: (a) Main screen of ScribeAR with default options. The text shown was spoken by a speaker reading from the Wikipedia article on Mass (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass) and automatically transcribed by the Microsoft Azure Speech-to-Text service. (b) ScribeAR options menu.1 The ScribeAR repository is located at www.github.com/scribear
/pubs/nsb20201/u-s-and-global-educationNational Science Foundation. (2018). Mathematics and science education: Enrollment in postsecondary education. Arlington, VA. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181 /report/sections/elementary-and-secondary-mathematics-and- science- education/transition-to-higher-education#enrollment- in-postsecondary-educationRosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011a). The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co- educational university. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 65(9–10), 725–736. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model
Paper ID #34200Work in Progress: Remote Instruction of Circuitry in a MultidisciplinaryIntroduction to Engineering First-year CourseDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nicholas Hawkins is an Assistant Professor in the
station (model PM 5; 2000 x magnification), a pair of Karl Suss RFmicroprobes (model PH 150), and the set of Pragmatic Instruments MEMS Driver Systemarbitrary waveform generators (model 2414A).The microengines are based on the addition of electrothermal actuators in parallel in order toharness a greater force. When two sets of thermal actuators are used in conjunction, one toengage a pawl and another to move a linear mechanical slider, we can achieve continuous linearmotion. The pawl is activated first, driving the translator down and forcing a mesh between thesets of gear teeth (Fig. 2 (B)). While the gear teeth sets are meshed, the translator is activatedpushing the shuttle (Fig. 2 (C)). Before the translator finishes its cycle, the pawl is
problems), and (b) engineering as knowledge (comprising thespecialized knowledge that helps and motivates the process of problem-solving). Moreover,Streveler et al. [3] posit that gaining conceptual knowledge in engineering science is a vitalfactor in the development of competence and expertise as professional engineers.As recommended by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),technical skills are one of the attributes that an engineering student must obtain by the time ofgraduation [12]. The term technical skills encompass the knowledge and abilities required toperform a specialized task. These skills are practical and have real-world applications. Forstudents to develop these critical skills, engineering faculty must teach
og e on mee ing he a igned lea ning o come .Almost all evaluation at the level of a og am Ca one co e i bjec i e, a he co edeals with how well the student project groups can define and solve a technical problem, not anobjective measure such as whether the students know a fact or not. We have found that keepingtrack of all the evidence of student learning, and doing as objective as possible evaluation of the den o k, e i e he e of anda di ed b ic .Rubric RationaleRubrics can be defined as descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by teachers or otherevaluators to guide the analysis of the products or processes of students' efforts2. The use of arubric is more likely to provide meaningful and stable appraisals than
potentially all over theworld, team work becomes very challenging.Another integral part of the traditional introductory engineering course is the inclusion of theperspective of outside practicing engineers. This usually takes the form of either a field trip to he ac ici g e gi ee c a b i gi g he e gi ee c a a a i i i g ec e . Freasons stated above, this becomes a challenge in the online environment. Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section ConferenceBeing able to give oral presentations is an i a a ec f a e gi ee ca ee . For thisreason, it is emphasized in the traditional introductory engineering course. Given that studentsare geographically dispersed and courses are generally delivered