Paper ID #36866Design of an ECE Technical Communication Course for AcceleratingEngineering CareersThomas Garrison, Portland State University Tom is a Vice President and General Manager at Intel Corporation leading the PC client strategy organi- zation. He is a 29 year veteran of Intel ever since his graduation from Portland State University where he received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering in 1994. In his free time he is an avid fisherman.Ms. Yuchen Huang, Portland State University Yuchen Huang received her M.S.E.E. degree from Portland State University. She is the Director of ECE Digital IC
the assigned percentage, 10 points are allocated for attendance and 20 points for in-class/field/lab participation. In the detailed course syllabus, it is explicitly stated that the interaction with the instructor and participation in class/field/lab, and in teamwork if assigned, is expected, and is considered an important part of this course. This participation is measured via online log files, where students record the number of scans completed, cleaned, stitched, or processed otherwise in each class. Additionally, these files assist subsequent groups of students in knowing the tasks already completed and recognizing the ones that are to be started at each new meeting. This continuous record motivates
threeunexcused absences. While these policies are not unreasonable, they tend to motivate students toparticipate in these activities. We recommend similar policies adapted to your courses toincentivize students (e.g., those who benefit from more guiding structure or who are tempted toprocrastinate) to stay engaged and not fall behind.Observations and Tips: This is a very different grading structure that many students are notfamiliar with, so it is helpful to review the grading structure and the retesting process more thanonce (e.g., after the first testing session when they may have more motivation to understand thestructure than on the first day of class when the syllabus was presented). In the end, we didn’timpose grade deductions if a student gave a
. Prather C., Harrell H.K, Bartlett L.E., and Wentworth S.M. (2016). Enhanced Radio Lab Experience Using ePortfolios. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26-29 2016, New Orleans, LA.12. Jovanovic V., Mize M., Rodrigo R., and Verma A. (2016). Use of ePortfolio as Integrated Learning Strategy in Computer Integrated Manufacturing Online Course. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26-29 2016, New Orleans, LA.AppendixePortfolio AssignmentYou will develop an ePortfolio that will contain all the material (artifacts) you produce on allactivities you worked on during the class (tests, HW, peer-review feedback, project, etc.), and areflective letter.The reason I do this is because some of my former students have
Paper ID #23162Motivational Factors of Undergraduate Engineering Students in Introduc-tory Non-technical CoursesDr. YunJeong Chang, University of Virginia Dr. YunJeong (Eunice) Chang is a Research Scientist at the University of Virginia. She earned her PhD in Learning, Design, and Technology program from the University of Georgia. Her research interests involves supporting teaching and learning in higher education and designing online or blended learner- centered learning environments within STEM context.Dr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology &
Paper ID #31330Partner Selection and Group-Based Curriculum Design for EngineeringLaboratory CoursesDr. Chad Eric Davis P.E., University of Oklahoma Chad E. Davis received the BS degree in mechanical engineering, MS degree in electrical engineering, and PhD degree in engineering from the University of Oklahoma, in 1994, 2000, and 2007, respectively. Since 2007, he has been a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering faculty at OU and serves as one of the primary advisers for ECE students and serves on the ECE Undergraduate Studies Committee. He currently teaches technical courses in circuits, electromechanical
evaluation of student learning through tests, written reports, and other assessment techniques. 6. Prepare a syllabus based on the considerations above. Figure 1: Course Development Guidelines 32.3 A Concentration Track in Embedded Systems At Arizona State University, we are completing the implementation of a novel infrastructure fora concentration track in embedded systems that combines important aspects of academic content Page 8.1237.3 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
the state of economic development in the region. Additionally, the studentsparticipated in service learning activities at a mission-operated farming cooperative. Theseactivities were designed to reinforce the socioeconomic aspects of global health from theperspective of the Guatemalan scenario, which had been introduced during the lecturecomponent of the course. Several cultural activities were also planned, including visits to a Page 25.75.6market and a Mayan burial ground.There were several products required of the students during the field experience. The studentsmaintained daily journals of their experiences as well as an online blog
.).At the same time, many courses have a list of student learning outcomes or course objectives,often presented in the syllabus. These are used for program assessment, for ensuring consistencyacross instructors and over time, and for informing students of the overall course goals.Frequently, however, there is not a direct connection between the learning outcomes and the“points” earned in the course. For example, partial credit relevant to one outcome might becombined with full credit on another, masking whether a student actually met all outcomes (orwhich ones were met). “Extra credit” points for participation can further cloud this. Likewise,high scores (for example) on a hands-on, laboratory portion can mask shortcomings in otheraspects such
Session 3230 Assessment of Introduction to Engineering and Problem-Solving Course Joni E. Spurlin, Jerome P. Lavelle, Mary Clare Robbins, and Sarah A. Rajala Office of Academic Affairs College of Engineering North Carolina State University Campus Box 7904 Raleigh, NC 27695-7904AbstractAt North Carolina State University, the freshmen’s first course in engineering is E101
are graded based on the assignments, quizzes, presentations,poster and video/live demonstrations of their prototype. The complete syllabus for ECE220 L isin Appendix A.Through this methodology, students learn how to do research and implement their knowledgeinto a real design, they also develop and reinforce their management, documentation andpresentation skills through the hands-on work and assignments. They learn how to getknowledge, how to look for trustworthy information in books, datasheets, patents, and journals,as it will be required in industry and society. This is possible due to the role of faculty as anadvisor and evaluator instead of facilitator.Project description, outcomes and timelineIn the 2nd year project course, students are
unresolved legal issues, such as copyright,considering the current legal system does not recognize AI as authors or inventors.Instructors are advised to facilitate an open discussion and establish a clear policy, which shouldbe outlined in the course syllabus. This policy should address the use of AI tools, articulate therepercussions of plagiarism, and underscore the seriousness of violating intellectual propertyrights. It's important to note that using AI-generated content, such as code, without properattribution or permission constitutes plagiarism and an intellectual property violation. A specificpoint of concern is that ChatGPT and similar AI tools typically do not provide appropriatecitations. This can inadvertently lead to instances of
gudielines addressing various issues related to online education including syllabus writing, online course design and instruction, and facilitating class discussions, etc. An online faculty success guide for online teaching is available to all teaching faculty as well. The new faculty will also be assigned to a well experienced online instructor as a Page 11.447.6 mentor through the progression of the online course. In addition, every faculty member can also get access to the B&T faculty cyber common room, a virtual community for B&T faculty, in which the faculty member can get access to the most up to date
objectives, an Internet search ofweb sites from universities, colleges and programs was conducted for courses entitled“Introduction to Engineering”, “Engineering 1”, or courses with similar titles. A team ofundergraduate research assistants was tasked with executing this Internet search and summarizingresults in cooperation with the principal investigator during the 2012 spring semester. Researchersused common search engines to search for “introduction to engineering” and similar terms. Whensuch a course was identified, an additional search for the course syllabus was completed. Eachsyllabus found was reviewed to ensure that the course was meant to apply as a commonengineering course rather than a technically oriented, discipline specific course
Policy and Sexual Misconduct Policy were found themost interesting topics from students’ responses. The Mission and Vision of the institution andthe selection of the institution were found least interesting. Figure 1 summarizes the responses tothe use of various tools used in teaching. The students have overwhelmingly found thesupplemental classroom powerpoint presentations helped them in learning. This was followed bylearning from the articles on various topics and audio/video clips. The students alsooverwhelmingly found the online course management tool, Schoology helpful as the referencesource for the class notes, external links to related news media and articles, and assignments.Figure 1. Student responses to the use of educational resources
students.ME217 was offered by the author fully online and asynchronously using the Canvas LMS. It is alsooffered by other teachers during the academic year and garners a lot larger enrollment then. In thiscourse, all lectures/presentations were pre-recorded with voice over PowerPoint presentations, asvideo with audio (or MP4), and were available to the students from day 1 of this summer offering.This course has a required textbook that its chapters are covered during the semester. ME512 wasalso used asynchronously online but as a medium to exchange course information and documents,e.g. syllabus and handouts or written notes or external class material not covered by the requiredtextbook, as well as homework information. Both online presences utilized an
, editing HTML files, creating tables, creating a web-based syllabus, introduction toonline course management systems, and tips on incorporating the web into your teaching. Theparticipants in the course had very limited to no prior experience with HTML.Completing the basic HTML class provided enough knowledge and skills to create a moderatelysophisticated course web page. The EM 535 Management of Technology course web page wasmore than just an online syllabus. The core of the page was a site directory with supporting Page 4.147.3hyperlinks, illustrated in Table 1. Each cell in the table represents a link to a web page ordocument. Assignments and
respondentsnoted that Other intervals were preferred. Those selecting Other often commented that “It is bestto be consistent” and that “every two weeks for lengthier assignments” would be helpful. Threeof the 10 participants simply stated one of the following, “every two weeks,” “biweekly,” and“week to 10 days” for assignment intervals. One participant “prefer[red] a syllabus at start of thesemester listing all assignments and due dates.”FindingsOverall, students taking online courses seem to prefer assignments that are interactive, as long asall members interact and assignments that are due directly following a full weekend.Research Question 1 – “What assignment due dates better meet the scheduling needs of adultstudents?”As noted by responses in this
thinking andproblem-solving skills [5] as this course is more technical. The course also included someobjectives targeting the affective domain, which are focused on emotional feelings and attitudinalskills [8].After writing the course objectives, the syllabus was reviewed and updated to include all necessaryinformation that helps identify the course's contents and expected outcomes, which serve as a clearcommunication of expectations with the students. Course-level objectives were included as part of © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencethe syllabus to give students an understanding of what will be covered and what are the expectedknowledge
, automated data collection and analysis, timely feedback, and easyupdate. The proposed assessment tool assists instructors to improve classroom instruction, andprovides students opportunities for self-evaluation and quality review of the course materials.The student performance in these online assessment assignments also provides valuable feedbackconcerning the quality, level of difficulty and appropriateness of assessment questions.Consequently, the assessment tool can be dynamically updated and improved during theimplementation phase. In our experiment, the questions designed for use in the web-basedassessment are targeted to specific learning objectives of the introductory circuit analysis course,as specified in the course syllabus. Therefore
the system that allows the instructor to set up asyllabus for their class. It asks the instructor the information about the number of weeks the classis going to span (Fig. 6), the starting date of all weeks (Fig. 7), allocate chapters to weeks (Fig. 8)and the system produces a tabulated syllabus (Fig. 9) for the class. The system automaticallyconstructs links in the syllabus to online mini-lectures using streaming video [3] and e-Bookcontent on the web. These links help guide the student to the correct course material so that theydo not have to search the web site. Fig. 6. Select Weeks Fig. 7. Starting Dates Fig. 8. Select Weeks Fig. 9. Starting DatesIn
documentation analysis of syllabi available on the universitywebsite. Each syllabus was anonymized and analyzed for the learning objectives and followingpedagogical content: § Textbook requirement § Attendance requirement § Schedule presence, detail, and organization § Supplemental materialSyllabi from four courses were obtained from the online syllabi database, available at theuniversity website. These syllabi cover the years of 2016 to 2021, including summer courses. Forthe purposes of analysis, only pedagogical intent was considered to prevent bias toward aspecific subject. The courses in this paper come from the Solid Mechanics portion of thecurriculum and are Statics of Mechanisms, Introduction to Solid Mechanics, Solid Mechanics,and
the coursematerials and explore major themes, comparison of views, applications, and higher-orderthinking skills [2].Chatmon et al. [2] use virtual hands-on laboratory exercises, online cooperative groupdiscussions, think- pair-share activities, student-generated laboratory exercises, and student-ledcurrent event reviews in information assurance courses to advocate the active learning. One ofthe main finding of this study suggests that the active learning activities are welcomed bystudents as they have a sense of being involved in their learning experience.Engineering Technology is one of the popular fields in College of Technology at EasternMichigan University that provides wide range of program of studies for students interested inthis
. Page 13.179.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Exploratory Assessment of Distance and On-Ground Delivery of Business, Math and Engineering Technology CoursesAbstractThis exploratory and interdisciplinary study illustrates students’ assessments on teamwork,creativity, communication, and critical thinking skills developed in multiple study areas acrossthe campus of Tennessee Tech University located in Cookeville, Tennessee. Specifically, thisillustration covers business (management and marketing), mathematics, and engineeringtechnology courses that were delivered both traditionally on-ground and fully online distanceover a period of six years. A total of 781
collaboration tools.Framework for Online EducationOur online courses are developed and taught by full-time PhD-level faculty, and a dedicated onlinefaculty coordinator oversees the program. Our online course development begins with peer reviews of theproposed course map, syllabus and development plan. The lectures, quizzes and other course content aredeveloped by the full time faculty who teach the courses. Our courses are then implemented byprofessional instructional designers, videographers and web animators. When the faculty member andinstructional designer are satisfied that the course has been developed well, we begin our post-development quality processes.Professional technical editors skilled in online course editing review all course content
traditionally used for distance learning (DL) classes. In fact, the Moodle website(http://moodle.com/) states that “Moodle is a course management system designed to helpeducators who want to create quality online courses.” Instructional delivery and the use oftechnology have changed over the years. Faculty need to identify effective strategies that couldimprove and strengthen academic programs in order to meet the learning needs of all students,especially the Net Generation students1.While these systems have been used extensively for online courses, they can also provide atechnological means to develop more effective teaching in a face to face environment. Therehave been instances where these systems have been used with both simultaneous face to face
: Mechanical Engineering program course hierarchy demonstrating the interaction of allcourses with ME 252: Engineering Dynamics.Approach and MethodologyA well-organized syllabus of ME 252 course has been prepared with a class schedule andgrading rubrics. It involves numerous laws of physics and mathematical formulas. The currentinstructional method in ME 252 is split into several portions. First, theories are discussed withactive interactions with pedagogical demonstration and real-life importance. Second, numerousproblems using the step-by-step problem-solving methods are presented to show real worldcorrelations and applications. In the end, a class participation problem is assigned to the studentsto solve in each class. The following key rules are
identity- and person-first language. This is the author’spreferred style of identification. Each disabled person has the right to choose what style they would like tobe addressed by.1) Provide instructor- and course-specific accessibility and accommodation statementsAccording to a survey of over 200 professors Box 1: Typical Required Syllabus Statement:and students, the syllabus was named thecomponent of a course that most often Disability Accommodations. If you have acontributes to effective college teaching.20 disability and have an accommodations letterUniversities usually require professors to from the Disability Resources office, I encourageinclude a statement about the
Paper ID #33642Development and Use of Open Educational Resources in an UndergraduateHeat and Mass Transfer CourseDr. Julie Mendez, Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus Julie Mendez is a Clinical Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus. Her interests include active learning strategies, online course development, alter- native grading practices, and Universal Design for Learning. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Development and Use of Open Educational Resources in an
satisfy seven principles as summarized (see Table 1).The first principle, equitable use, is applied to make the design useful and marketable to peoplewith diverse abilities [14]. This was implemented through the course website, textbook, syllabus,and captions. The course website was pre-designed and developed to be accessible to everyoneincluding neurodiverse students. A digital textbook was adopted for text-to-speech functionalityand automated pre-lecture quiz options. Pre-recorded videos were captioned. Syllabus and othercourse files were in accessible file forms and uploaded to the course website in advance. Thispackage is designed as a stand-alone package of online course an instructor can keep usingsemester by semester, once it is