Paper ID #37935Work-in-Progress: Redesigning an Introductory MechanicsCourse to Include Meaningful Design ExperiencesDamon KirkpatrickMichael Lawrence Anderson (Associate Professor) Mike Anderson is an Associate Professor and Director of Capstone Programs, Department of Mechanical Engineering, US Air Force Academy. He has pursued research in engineering education for several years in the areas of curriculum design and assessment, capstone design experiences, innovative design methodologies, and enhancing student creativity. In addition, he pursues technical research in autonomous systems, design of terrestrial and
or possibly tooeasy in light of what the student has learned so far in their lessons. Questions also arose as towhat concept to structure each lesson around so as to adequately include all the major concepts ofthe Linux platform in a minimal number of lessons.The lessons start off with a list of objectives that the student should achieve by the end of thelesson. The lesson is then broke up into sections that each focus on a particular concept in greaterdetail.The lessons were structured in such a way as to allow the student to go through the lessons inmore of an experiential fashion instead having us walk them through the lesson. “Focusing onlearner experience rather than content as the fundamental reflection of curriculum places a
year, I plan to integrate computer science and mechanical engineering into my curriculum in aspiration of becoming a mechatronics engineer in the future.Dr. Prudence Merton, Dartmouth CollegeDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy
studies and design challenges. Richards andcolleagues [9] define five elements of a case study: Relevance, Motivation, Active Involvement,Consolidation/Integration, and Transfer (see Table 1). There are multiple similarities whencompared with the elements of a design challenge (see Table 2). For instance, the activeinvolvement element requires effective communication with peers to come up with viablesolutions. Given these similarities and the ability of a case study to connect to the practices ofengineers, there is an opportunity to examine the potential for this pedagogical method withinengineering education in elementary classrooms. Table 1 Case Study Elements Elements Description Relevance Cases
and concepts help to integrate thespecialty engineering designs together to better design and manage complex systems. Thesesame systems engineering tools can be used to teach systems engineering to engineers. Agraduate-level engineering management curriculum includes a Management of EngineeringSystems course, whose key learning objective is for the students to be able to synthesize andapply the systems engineering methods and tools to a real-world system design project. Thispaper will describe how the instructor applied systems engineering tools to enhance learning ofsystems engineering tools and concepts in an engineering management course. The studentsapplied the systems engineering tools in the course to design a system in teams of 4 to 5
skills and collaborative and inclusive teams into the curriculum. Dr. Rivera-Jim´enez graduated from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Social Responsibility Views in Science and Engineering: An Exploratory Study Among Engineering Undergraduate
(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering
-based practices that are effective [8]. Shuman et al. suggests future curriculum willinclude an understanding of pre-held misconceptions. Included should also be previous andcurrent practices of how that created the foundational mindset for the field, how and why theconcepts were first introduced. Taking that position, teaching methods can pivot to show wherethe industry and world are in order to support future research, scholarship and the field ofengineering. By incorporating ideas from the Bayesian reasoning method (Fig.2), as an examplefor the decision making process can provide and idea as to how the process affects outcomes.Shuman et al. also discusses the connections between subject matters will be considered infuture curriculum
coursework or through extracurricular activities(e.g., participation in a business plan competition, creating a written business plan, givingan elevator pitch to an audience, or completing an internship in a start-up company).Modules and Extracurricular Experiences. While the approach described here focusedon examining the more visible and formal entrepreneurship learning experiences such ascourses and programs, many students gain experiences in other ways. Some engineeringschools, rather than offer a stand alone course in entrepreneurship, integrate modules inone or more existing engineering courses. This approach allows entrepreneurship to beintroduced repeatedly and in the context of a specific engineering topic area. Otherapproaches at larger
courses for the upper division which promotes the development of such skills as well as teachingexperimental design. We are currently testing our hypothesis that traditional weaknesses in data analysis,communication of ideas, and self-motivated acquisition of knowledge can be overcome by providing studentswith a laboratory environment which encourages open-ended experimentation. To this end, we are developinga methodology for converting typical “cookbook” laboratory courses to multi-disciplinary, team-based open-ended design experiences.Our work is done in the context of the development of an interdisciplinary curriculum on electronic materialsand devices3. The curriculum consists of a three-course sequence, primarily for Electrical and
program meetings, department faculty meetings and shared with the IAB members.Each program director prepares an assessment report of their program and submit it to thechair. The entire continuous improvement process is accomplished by various tasksscheduled throughout the year as shown in Figure 4.VI. Use of Assessment Data and Role of Faculty The curriculum committee of each program meets at least once a month to discussthe issues related to curriculum, laboratory facilities, assessment information andaccreditation. The meeting is coordinated by the Program Director. Additional meetingsboth formal and informal may be held as needed. In addition, the department facultymeetings are held each month. In addition to the formal meeting
level whether itis integrated across the curriculum or delivered in a stand-alone course is essential since itis supposed to introduce students to real situations and scenarios usually encountered inthe workplace and will assist in equipping them with the needed analytical skills to solvesimilar ethical issues after graduation 4, 13, 20. Moreover, the applied ethics courses helpmeet accreditation requirements such as ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology) criteria of professional skills which includes “understanding of professionaland ethical responsibility” 16. Although researchers seem to agree that introducingengineering ethics should be done at the undergraduate level, they disagree on the meansand effectiveness of doing
ways of doing things can be discovered” (p. 126). The un-programmatic programs described in this paper seek to create such an environment.Next Steps: Developing an Intellectual Model for Integrating Creative Thinking andProblem Definition with Planning and Implementation ProcessesThe model we have arrived at broadens the back end of the entrepreneurial process byexpanding, deepening, and diversifying the activities that precede the creation of a business plan.The model is depicted visually below. STEP 1 - Socio Technical Systems Thinking! STEP 2 – Design Thinking Culture! Technology! STEP 5 – Business Plan Organiza3on! STEP 3 – Customer
ofcollaboration technologies. Although there has been great emphasis on developing collaborationcompetencies in the engineering curriculum, empirical evidence of successful strategies fordistributed team settings is scarce. As an attempt to fill this gap this study investigates theimpact of a scalable intervention in developing virtual collaboration skills. The intervention,based on instructional scaffolds embedded with collaboration technologies, is aimed atsupporting specific processes including planning, goal setting, clarifying goals and expectations,communication, coordination and progress monitoring. A quasi-experimental design was used toevaluate the impact of the intervention on student teamwork skills. Data from 278 graduate andundergraduate
logistics associated with credit-hour limitation and student contact hours provideenormous challenges to faculty to cover all fundamental concepts and assess student outcomesthat demonstrate their readiness to move on to engineering mechanics courses that follow.Recognizing the difficulty students have in Statics, engineering faculty have discussed aboutintroducing an additional laboratory hour in the curriculum to motivate students and provide aphysical framework to demonstrate the abstract concepts. While additional contact hours willcertainly enhance learning; credit hour limitation of curricula is also a “realistic constraint”around which engineering curricula has to be designed. Integration of realistic computersimulations in and
Session 2438 Development of an Advanced Course in Computer-Aided Design, Analysis and Prototyping James M. Leake University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignIntroductionThe increasing power of CAD has had a significant impact on the product development process,allowing improved quality, reduced cost products to get to market faster. Mechanical CAD(MCAD) software is rapidly evolving into what might be better described as productdevelopment, or perhaps virtual prototyping software. MCAD is increasingly integrated withanalysis and simulation tools; upfront
group. Adding unexpected ethical twists requires further innovation.Background This paper builds on a paper presented at the 2011 Vancouver ASEE conference entitled A FirstCourse to Expose Disparate Students to the BmE Field.1 This present paper expands on animportant didactic element of that course, namely an emphasis on story writing and reflection,but with an added ethics twist. This inclusion arose from the author’s participation in a Consor-tium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE) workshop at the 2016 ASEEConference in New Orleans.2 That participation led to the publication of a short CPREE activityguide on the topic of story writing as a tool for enhancing engineering education.3 Story writingwas also employed as a core
Paper ID #8528Examining the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Senior Chemical Engineering Stu-dents as a Result of Exposure to the Epistemic Game ”Nephrotex”Mr. Kerry Michael RogyDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh Cheryl A. Bodnar, PhD, CTDP is an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional
. Page 22.1159.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Planting the seeds of computational thinking: An introduction to programming suitable for inclusion in STEM curriculaAbstractInadequate math preparation discourages many capable students – especially those from traditionallyunderrepresented groups – from pursuing or succeeding in STEM academic programs. iMPaCT is afamily of ―Media Propelled‖ courses and course enrichment activities that introduce students to―Computational Thinking.‖ iMPaCT integrates exploration of math and programmed computation byengaging students in the design and modification of tiny programs that render raster graphics
answers, and on-going feedback as an integral part of itsmethodology. The Kumon method uses a sequential curriculum made up of worksheets to move thestudent though a concept in small linear steps. The curriculum has 23 progressive levels,each level of which contains 20 sets, with each set consisting of 10 worksheets. Theearliest levels cover pre-counting skills, while the highest levels move through collegelevel calculus and statistics. The student moves on to the next level as mastery of theprevious level is demonstrated by meeting the timing and accuracy requirements. Kumonencourages the student to develop his or her memory, learn and store computationalprocedures, and be independent learners. After an initial placement test, students
influences vascular smooth muscle cell glucose metabolism and studying how cell alignment can change vascular smooth muscle cell metabolism. Her current research interests focus on applying her vascular mechanobiology knowledge to vascular calcification and the related cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, Dr. Mathieu teaches multiple classes in Biomedical Engineering, Engineering and Physics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Development and Assessment of an Innovative, Student- Centered Biomechanics CourseIntroductionBiomechanics is an essential course in a biomedical engineering curriculum studying the structure,function and motion of the
consolidating learning from experiences, as many models ofservice learning and other experiential learning note. This paper addresses the mechanics ofassigning reflection, with an emphasis on assignment structure. The prompt should be open-ended enough to allow students to bring elements of their experience that they may think don’tpertain to the subject at hand -- precisely because those moments are often where the greatestlearning takes place. Drawing from years of experience with the Immersion Experiencecomponent of the Pavlis Honors College curriculum, this paper analyzes student reflections andoffers suggestions about the structure of reflective assignments and their placement in curricula.Experiential learning is increasingly recognized as a high
ways. LD #5 Social and Emotional Engagement: working in teams, teaching and helping one another, expressing pride and ownership, documenting/sharing ideas with others.Early efforts to understand student’s experiences with the tinkering and prototyping activitiesrelied on written student reflection and direct feedback. Lecture handouts were an integral part ofthe curriculum, providing opportunities for students to reflect on their communication, teamworkand design learning. Evaluation on an end of quarter in-class student reflection assignmentintended to help prepare students for their final design showcase presentation provided valuableinsight into preliminary outcomes of the “tinkering” teaching and learning approach. Of thefreshman
. Risley, “Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum,” Physics Education Research Supplement to American Journal of Physics 67(7), S16, 1999.[7] Beichner, R.J. J.M. Saul, R.J. Allain, D.L. Deardorff, D.S. Abbott, “Introduction to SCALE UP : Student- Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics,” Proceedings 2000 American Society for Engineering Education National Conference.[8] Saul, J.M. D.L. Deardorff, D.S. Abbott, R.J. Allain, and R.J. Beichner, “Evaluating introductory physics classes in light of ABET criteria : An Example of SCALE-UP Project,” Proceedings of the 2000 Annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education.[9] Beichner, R.J., J.M. Saul, R.J
are prepared to work in ourincreasingly global society [10]. A characteristic that describes global engineers is their ability totranslate engineering work to a business context which can be done with an EM.The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) is here to meet this need. KEEN is apartnership of engineering faculty across the nation dedicated to integrating the EM intoengineering coursework [11]. Within KEEN, an EM is achieved through Entrepreneurial MindedLearning (EML) and applies what are known as the 3Cs: Curiosity, Connections, and CreatingValue. Since joining KEEN in 2017, The Ohio State University College of Engineering hasintegrated EML into the standard and honors course sequences of its First-Year EngineeringProgram
introduced into the curriculum in the form of a semester long project. QFT engagesstudents to develop their own personalized questions for research as opposed to classes that relyon the instructor simply assigning questions or topics for research. QTF focuses on the studentsdeveloping an essential – yet often overlooked – lifelong learning skill of asking and creatinggood questions. The goals of this proposal are to generate curiosity and elicit connections forstudents on subjects they may have less exposure in and further develop students' soft skills. Theproject consisted of five prompts periodically spread out over the course in the form of an in-class activity. The students formed groups of 3-5 and generated questions that would then turninto an
need of essential skills, recruit and train a labor pool in need of these skills and competencies,and break down the traditional mindset of only one pathway from education to the technicalworkforce.Cost effective program modelThrough TRANSFORM, we have partnered with industry to develop an AdvancedManufacturing curriculum specifically addressing the technical skills gap liberal arts majorsmight have, being mindful of the skills they already hold. Building on current workforce trainingguidelines and through review of existing associate level course content we have developed ayearlong intensive program of study and workplace skill development offered at a price pointpalatable to those struggling with current student loan debt. The program
-time modules that NortheasternUniversity (NU) has introduced in their first-year engineering curriculum using a “High-TechTools & Toys Laboratory” (HTT&TL). At NU, the HTT&TL is used to teach MATLAB andC++ to first-year engineering students through a set of structured exercises leading the studentsto image a shape concealed in opaque gelatin using 1MHz ultrasound (MATLAB) and to use astepper motor mechanism to color-sort dyed Ping-Pong balls imaged by a video-cam (C++). The Page 25.46.3community college faculty members were participants in an NSF-supported STEP grant, andwere supported through ALERT stipends to attend the
in South AfricaAbstractAlthough it has been 16 years since South Africa’s first democratic elections were held, thelegacy of unequal educational opportunities and provision remains with us. A consequence isthat few black students are able to obtain an engineering degree in the regulation time of fouryears. The problem was exacerbated in 2009 when the first group of school leavers who wentthrough a new high school curriculum entered universities. This curriculum was designed to bemodern and skills-based, but many mathematics and science teachers, who had insufficientprofessional development and inadequate content knowledge, focused instead on drillingstudents in a restricted set of problem types. Students at universities were thus less able
Graded Homework and Hello to Homework QuizzesAbstractIn higher education, an ongoing issue is assessment of student learning. We wonder how toassess, how often to assess, why we are assessing, and even how are we, as faculty, going tohandle all the grading and management of assessment. Engineering students are frequentlyassessed on homework, quizzes, projects, and exams, but given today’s connected world,students may be copying or sharing homework solutions. Often, they do not realize how workingproblems is integral to their success in a class as well as to their understanding of engineering. Inaddition, across the disciplines we are more aware of how students study and that they often donot select the most productive