Large Classes. in American Society for Engineering Education 2014 National Conference & Exposition (American Society for Engineering Education, 2014).2. ASCE Policy Statement 351 - Peer Review. (2010). at 3. Verleger, M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Ohland, M. W., Besterfield-Sacre, M. & Brophy, S. Challenges to Informed Peer Review Matching Algorithms. J. Eng. Educ. 99, 397–408 (2010).4. Burnham, J. C. The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 263, 1323–1329 (1990).5. Bohannon, J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 342, 60–5 (2013).6. Wolfe-Simon, F. et al. A Bacterium That Can Grow by Using Arsenic Instead of Phosphorus. Science (80-. ). 332, 1163–1166 (2011).7. Wolfe
. Dodou, “Predicting academic performance in engineering using high school exam scores,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1343–1351, 2011.[4] J. L. Kolbrin, B. F. Patterson, E. J. Shaw, K. D. Mattern, and S. M. Barbuti, “Validity of the SAT for predicting first-year college grade point average,” New York, 2008.[5] R. Sawyer, “Beyond correlations: Usefulness of high school GPA and test scores in making college admissions decisions,” Appl. Meas. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 89–112, 2013.[6] S. Trapmann, B. Hell, J.-O. W. Hirn, and H. Schuler, “Meta-analysis of the relationship between the big five and academic success at university,” Zeitschrift für Psychol. / J. Psychol., vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 132–151, Jan
engineering education where significant opportunities existfor improving the preparedness of our students for capstone and ultimately for professionalpractice.Keywords: engineering education, capstone, culminating experience, ABET, continuousimprovement1. BackgroundIn the late 1980’s and early 1990’s industry leaders started to recognize that with globalizationand advances in computer technology, the world was getting more interconnected, complex andquicker. To compete in a rapidly changing world they needed a new breed of engineeringstudents, who could literally hit the ground running upon graduation. In addition to excellenttechnical knowledge and skills they also needed graduating engineering students with abilities toproductively work on
University. He may be contacted at s merriweather@tamu.edu for research collaborations or other information.Dr. Karen L. Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University Karen Butler-Purry is the Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies as well as a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Her research interests include computer and intelligent systems applications to power distribution systems and engineering education. She can be reached by e-mail at klbutler@tamu.edu.Dr. Shannon Walton, Texas A&M University Shannon D. Walton, PhD, is the Director of Recruiting for the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies and the Director of
, conference proceedings, magazine articles, presentations, and two handbooks. She has also received numerous prestigious teaching and research awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrating Systems Thinking in Interdisciplinary Education Programs: A Systems Integration Approach Adedeji B. Badiru Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio LeeAnn Racz st US Air Force, 1 Special Operations Aerospace Medicine Squadron U. S. Air
http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/styles.pdf.Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1-19.Heyman, G. D., Martyna, B., & Bhatia, S. (2002). Gender and achievement-related Beliefs among engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(1), 41-52.Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T
,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 997–1007, 2011.[3] M. Alfano, A. Higgins, and J. Levernier, “Identifying Virtues and Values Through Obituary Data-Mining,” J. Value Inq., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 59–79, 2018.[4] S. J. Kulich and R. Zhang, “The multiple frames of ‘Chinese’ values: From tradition to modernity and beyond,” in Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology, M. H. Bond, Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 241–278.[5] J. Graham, B. A. Nosek, J. Haidt, R. Iyer, S. Koleva, and P. H. Ditto, “Mapping the Moral Domain,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 2011.[6] J. Graham, J. Haidt, M. Motyl, P. Meindl, C. Iskiwitch, and M. Mooijman, “Moral Foundations Theory: On the Advantages of Moral Pluralism over
] M. W. Ohland, G. Zhang, B. Thorndyke, and T. J. Anderson, “The creation of the multiple-institution database for investigating engineering longitudinal development (MIDFIELD),” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2004.[13] G. Zhang, T. J. Anderson, M. W. Ohland, and B. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: A longitudinal and cross-institutional study,” J. Eng. Educ., 2004.[14] J. L. Hieb, K. B. Lyle, P. A. S. Ralston, and J. Chariker, “Predicting performance in a first engineering calculus course: Implications for interventions,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 40–55, 2015.[15] C. Moller-Wong and A. Eide, “An engineering student
the subject areas below. 8Post-program interests in STEM was different among genders. Male students were more likely toselect “interested” or “very interested” in all four STEM areas than their female peers. Femalestudents were more likely to select “slightly interested” option for technology and engineeringmajors than their male peers. Option “not interested” was selected more times by female studentsthan male students for each one of the STEM fields. 100% Pre and Post-Survey - Male 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% S-Pre S-Post T-Pre T-Post E-Pre E-Post M-Pre M-Post Not
inthe workplace.As part of an NSF S-STEM grant, the University of Wisconsin - Platteville implemented a seriesof professional development opportunities to STEM Master Students on a variety of topics. Inasking students about topics they wanted, students reported a need for soft skills. Knowing thestudents desire to learn about soft skills and knowing that employers find soft skills essential, theteam wanted to determine how effective incorporating professional development opportunities,called “Scholar Spots,” to the scholarship program were at increasing the student’s ability in thetopic areas.The team decided to advance students’ learning about soft skills through a series of monthlywebinars, dubbed “Scholar Spots.” Each spot was required
Propulsion. The MechanicalEngineering Department is committed to prepare students in these options, to work efficientlyfor various industries and government.The basic criteria of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) for theengineering program’s outcome and assessment requires that graduates must havedemonstrated abilities (ABET Criteria 3, a-k1), in mathematics, science, engineering, design,data analysis, teamwork, ethics, communications, and life-long learning. In addition to ABET3(a-k) requirements, the Mechanical Engineering program at AAMU was designed to meetthe additional requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, criteria (l-s),which require that graduating students must have knowledge about
Science from North Carolina A & T State University.Shona Morgan, North Carolina A&T State University Shona Morgan is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Business Administration at North Carolina A&T State University. She received her B. S. from Spelman College, and M. S. and Ph. D. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University.Silvanus Udoka, North Carolina A&T State University Silvanus J. Udoka is an Associate Professor with a joint appointment in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and the Department Business Administration at North Carolina A&T State University. He received his B. S. from Weber State University, and M. S
., Beyerlein, S., Thompson, P., and Harrison, Kunle. (2006) Evidence of Effective Formative Assessment in the Capstone Design Literature, Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.3. Adams, R.S., J. Turns, and C.J. Atman. (2003). Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice. Design Studies 24: 275-294. Elsevier Science Ltd.4. Atman, C.J., J.R. Chimka, K.M. Bursic, and H.L. Nachtmann. (1999). A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies 20 131-152, Elsevier Science Ltd.5. Cardella, M.E., C.J. Atman, R.S. Adams, and J. Turns. (2002). Engineering Student Design Processes: Looking at Evaluation Practices
Page 11.743.15 S ampl e o f des ign • Beam Design Propiedades de los Elementos Estructurales para Diseño por Momento h b Astop Asbottom Varillas Varillas Descripción y Ubicación (in.) (in.) 2 (in. ) (in. ) 2 Top Bottom
,assembly language, and encoding. The nod4 architecture has an 8-bit data path and an 8-bitaddress bus. From the programmer’s point of view nod4 has the following CPU registers • A – accumulator • C – condition code register (Z,C,I) • S – stack pointer • X – index register • PC – program address counterThe A register is primarily for handling data. The C register contains the zero flag (Z),carry/borrow flag (C), and the interrupt enable flag (I). The stack pointer maintains the stackdata structure. The X register is a fairly general purpose index register. The program counter(PC) can be thought of as referring to the next instruction however due to pre-fetching has a twistdiscussed later, that the assembly language programmer is
Commonwealth of Virginia. His research activities have been in the area of digital communication systems and coding theory. He is currently a co-PI on the NSF S-STEM grant at Rowan University, whose goal is to increase the number of technically proficient graduates who will contribute to the economic vitality of the region. Page 23.327.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 CONFIGURATION AND ASSESSMENT OF A SENIOR LEVEL COURSE IN BIOMETRIC SYSTEMSABSTRACTIt is very important that modern topics be covered at the senior undergraduate level inorder that students benefit
further analyses. According to student survey feedback, allparticipants were impressed by the new pulse oximeter module and found the laboratory to beenjoyable and informative. The survey-based laboratory assessment indicated a 40% qualitativeimprovement in students’ self-perceptions of their abilities relative to the learning objectives forthe laboratory. Page 15.40.11References[1] S. Warren, J. Yao, and G. E. Barnes, "Wearable Sensors and Component-Based Design for Home Health Care," in 2nd Joint EMBS-BMES Conference, Houston, TX, Oct. 23-26, 2002, pp. 1871-1872[2] M. J. Drinnan, J. Allen, and A. Murray, "Relation
8 2.517Finelli, Cynthia J University of Michigan Center 5 1.736Sheppard, Sheri D Stanford University Center 4 1.736Borrego, Maura J Virginia Tech Department 10 1.563Chen, Helen L Stanford University Center 3 1.215Diefes-Dux, Heidi A Purdue University Department 5 1.215Long, Russell A Purdue University Department 3 1.215Carpenter, Donald D Lawrence University None 3 1.128Harding, Trevor S Calif Polytech State Univ None 3
Page 24.839.8 Swassing. Educational Leadership, p. 381-382.2. Butterfield, R. (1997), Benefit Without Cost in a Mechanics Laboratory. Journal of Engineering Education, 86: 315–320. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00304.x.3. Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, NY, U.S.A., David McKay Co. Inc.4. J Güémez et al (2009) Toys in physics lectures and demonstrations—a brief review Phys. Educ. 44 535. Featonby, D. (2005) Toys and Physics. Phys. Educ. 40 537.6. Wagner, G (2009) A Circular Motion Activity with Hot Wheels® Rev-Ups Phys. Teach. 47, 11.7. Wang, E. L., LaCombe, J., & Rogers, C. (2004). Using LEGO® Bricks to Conduct Engineering
them available. This work was partially funded bythe National Science Foundation under grants EIA-9872516 and EIA-9975275, and by anacademic reinvestment grant from Purdue University.Bibliography 1 G. Abandah and E. S. Davidson. Con guration independent analysis for characterizing shared-memory applications. In 12th Int'l. Parallel Processing Symposium, 1998. 2 Ben-Miled, Z., Fortes, J.A.B., Eigenmann, R., and Taylor, V. A Simulation-based Cost-e ciency Study of Hierarchical Heterogeneous Machines for Compiler and Hand Parallelized Applications. 9th Int. Conf. on Par. and Dist. Computing and Systems, Oct 1997. 3 Brewer, E.A., Dellarocas, C.N., Colbrook, A., and Weihl, W.E. Proteus: A high-performance parallel architecture simulator
Session 1712 NSF Combined Research and Curriculum Development on Multiphase Transport Phenomena M. J. Amey 2, A. Bénard 2, G. G. Chase 1, E. A. Evans1, K. Jayaraman 2, R. S. Mohan3, S. M. Parks2, C. A. Petty 2 (presenter), O. Shoham3, S. A. Shirazi3, K. D. Wisecarver3, M. Zhuang 2 1 The University of Akron/2Michigan State University/ 3The University of TulsaSummaryThis curriculum development project on multiphase transport phenomena draws on the researchexperiences from nine research laboratories at The University of Akron, Michigan State
22.768.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Helping Freshmen Develop a Personal Identity as an EngineerAbstractFreshman retention is a top priority in nearly all engineering schools. Increased retentionoptimizes new-student recruitment dollars, decreases students‟ time to graduation, impactsschool rankings, and helps to meet industry‟s increasing demand for engineers. Most researchersand experts in the field agree on a number of basic tenants of retention. Topmost are the tenantsof creating community amongst freshmen, bonding freshmen with returning students, creatingopportunities for meaningful interaction between freshmen and faculty both in and outside of theclassroom, helping freshmen
/sec); i(t) isthe armature current, in A; R is the armature resistance, in Ω; eb(t) is the back emf, in V; Tl(t) isthe load torque, in N-m; Tm(t) is the motor torque, in N-m; Tf(t) is the friction torque, in N-m; θ isthe rotor displacement, in rad; L is the armature inductance, in H; ea(t) is the applied voltage, inV; J is the rotor inertia, in kg-m2; and Kemf = Ki. A MATLAB model was derived based onequation (1): 1 1/J s load
the dot comcollapse or concern over job security is still only one factor that can be seen as a forcing onecompared to the multitude of factors affecting the women‟s underrepresentation.In the large scale the underrepresentation of women in engineering programs continues to be aworld-wide phenomenon3-5. Some common reasons for women not to choose engineering aredepicted to be lack of suitable role models6, sex-stereotyped and/or negative view on scienceand scientists7 and masculine content and climate of technical institutes8. The impacts of old-fashioned stereotypes are surprisingly strong not only in the traditional industry, but also inthe field of ICT, where most girls drop out of the track latest after secondary school level:Even if
s s Z1sin C1+C2 Step1 K1+K2 K2 -K1*L1-K2*L2 C2 -C1*L1+C2*L2 C2*L2 Z2_dot
reasoning to exploreself-efficacy.Self-Efficacy and Self-RegulationThe lack of progress in retaining women and minorities in engineering is partially due tostudents’ self-efficacy. Self-efficacy refers to a person’s belief that s/he is capable of takingaction to achieve a certain goal, such as completion of a college degree. Self-efficacy is formedby a person’s mastery experiences (previous success leads a person to believe s/he is capable ofcompleting a similar task), vicarious experiences (when a person sees someone else completing atask and believes s/he could do the same), social persuasions (supportive people in a person’s lifesuch as teachers, family, or mentors), and physiological reactions to a task (anxiety, etc.).Self-efficacy relates to
beforecomputers were widely available. As microcomputers became more cost effective and reliable,special purpose computers were developed in the late 1960’s to replace the cumbersome relayswitchboard.1 Ladder logic was developed based on relay logic to facilitate technician training.Implementation using a microcomputer allowed PLC developers to expand PLC capability toinclude timers, counters, analog-digital conversion, better user interfaces, and many otheradvanced functions.2Figure 1 describes a very simple control problem and shows the solution in ladder logic. The wayto interpret a ladder diagram is to think of the left rail as a positive electric terminal and right railas ground. Each rung has only one output. The inputs are logically “open” or
concentrate for long periods of time. Each individual uses both extroversion andintroversion, but generally, one is preferred.Sensing (S) Versus Intuition (N). Sensing describes a preference for perceiving, or gatheringinformation, with the five senses, placing trust in factual realities, and intuition describes apreference for perceiving through the mind, placing trust in ideas and possibilities. Thus,sensing types are said to be sensible and realistic, and they place trust in their experiences anda wisdom of the past, and intuitive types are said to be imaginative, speculative, and ingenious,and they trust hunches, possibilities, and inspiration. Each individual uses both sensing andintuition, but generally, one is preferred.Thinking (T) Versus
to allow studentsmore personalized paths towards different careers [5]. One critical aspect of a chemical engineering program is course(s) on process/plant design. Processdesign is often treated as the culmination of the undergraduate chemical engineering curriculum. Thiscourse draws on knowledge from previous chemical engineering courses including transport, balances,controls, and more. Students are often reminded of what they learned in previous courses and are firstrequired to pull knowledge from multiple previous courses. This means students are likely to see the in-terconnectivity of the curricula for the first time at the very end of their education. Additionally, processdesign tends to focus on the design of a single process
, and environmental engineering help to providesome of the solutions to the underlying problems associated with bad weather such as resilienttechnologies [35, 36, 37]. Together, engineering and nursing offer a V-shaped solution to a betterfuture which supports the economic success and health of local communities. Students in thecourse are exposed to the additional policy benefit of improving conditions of immigration anddrug trafficking that impact the U.S., which is an example of a systems engineeringconceptualization of sustainable development and life-cycle assessment.MethodsInstitutional context. Founded in 1870 in Rolla, Missouri, the Missouri University of Science andTechnology, or S&T, is a technological research university offering