Topics • Identification of • Acquisition Theory and Link to SE Topics •Ethics Interests • Needs Determination •Contracts • Players • Functional Analysis and •Legal Issues • Generating • Contractor the use of M&S •Managing Risk Alternatives • Business •Knowledge IT
solution to the problem. Make sure you demonstrate theviability of your solution. It is important to present evidence in support of your proposal. Finally, show that you are capable of implementing the proposed solution. Doesyour company have the skills and resources necessary to complete the task at hand?One of the best ways to show this is to present evidence of your successful completionof other, similar projects. Traditionally, persuasive language seeks to activate three responses in a reader: 1. Ethos (ethical response): While having good ethics is one way to create a feeling of ethos in the reader, doing the right thing is only part of it. Ethos is aroused in clients when they feel respect for the writer and trust that the
will subscribe to the following mission statement: The mission of the undergraduate program in architectural engineering is to prepare students to undertake the necessary design experience in the building industry to become registered engineers with a specialization in Building Architectural Engineering, and to instill in them the importance of lifelong learning, including pursuing advanced studies leading to graduate degrees.Program Educational Objectives The program will emphasize the following educational objectives: • To provide graduates with the necessary engineering skills to engage in lifelong careers as practicing professional architectural engineers who are ethical and socially
// // Υ Υ Υ Society, Ethics & Tech. 3 1 Υ Υ Mech. Design Anal. I // // Υ Υ Υ Thermodynamics. II 3 2 Υ Υ Fluid Mechanics // // Υ Υ Kinematics & Mech. // // Υ Υ Υ Υ Mech. Lab. II // // Υ Υ Heat Transfer 4 1 Υ
Page 10.437.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright C 2005, American Society of Engineering EducationES 107, Introduction to Engineering, is a three semester-hour course. It provides an introductionto engineering through a realistic and hands-on problem-solving experience. It focuses onengineering design process--the application of math, science, and technology to create devicesand systems that meet human needs. It provides an introduction to group work, to oral andwritten communications and to engineering ethics. The course is required for all freshman-engineering students, and a large number of non-engineering majors at the University of
Circuits (EE98) American Studies IA American Studies IB Introduction to Materials (MatE 25) Statics (CE99) Oral Communication rd 3 Year Physical Chem. (Chem161A) Matls Characterization (MatE141) Systems/Structures Matls (MatE115) Safety & Ethics in Engr. (ChE 161) Electronic Props Matls (MatE 153) Design of Experiments (ISE 135) Engineering Statistics (ISE 130) Semicond. Device Physics (EE128) Technical Writing (E100) Basic IC Fab/Desgn (MatE/EE 129) Mass & Heat Transport
issues or ethics. The resulting assessment measures students’achievement of all program outcomes.Outcomes Assessment and the IE Program at WPIAs accrediting agencies have pushed toward outcomes assessment, many academic programshave revisited their mission statements and developed assessment mechanisms to demonstratethe accomplishments of their graduates. In particular, ABET has required that engineeringprograms specify program outcomes, statements that describe what students are expected toknow and be able to do by the time of graduation1. As part of the accreditation process,programs must evaluate and provide evidence that graduates satisfy these program outcomes.The results of this assessment are then used to make program improvements
Multimedia 1835 Creating a Facility for Developing Professional Skills McCowan, J.D. and Mason, J.L. Faculty of Applied Science, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada There is almost universal agreement that an effective engineer must possess a broad range ofprofessional skills, extending far beyond the technical expertise of his or her discipline. Anengineer also requires a sensitivity to societal needs, to the environment, and to other individuals,if he or she is to practise in an ethical and responsible way. An effective engineer must
course evaluations, ethical and contemporary technical issues documentation, and anumber of constituent surveys.Ideally, the infrastructure needed to enable program improvement would support the extractionof pertinent data from a common database, conveniently placed there on time by willingconstituents. What may have been a relatively infrequent compilation of materials under the oldcriteria has been transformed into a process requiring continuous support. The acquisition andmanagement of this data can be a concern for otherwise busy faculty members who may assumea responsible role for shepherding the assessment process. Though assessment events occurregularly, in some cases once or twice a year, they are not always so frequent as to make
skills, written communication skills,professional ethics, and human relations. Individual work that is evaluated consists of oralpresentations, individual contributions to the team project, and class participation. Eachpresenter is responsible for the quality of visual aids used during their part of the presentation.Individual contributions to the team project are documented in individual design notebooks inaccordance with Engineering 4390-Engineering Design Notebook Specification. The first entryin the design notebook is a narrative statement of individual work outlining that person'scontributions to the project. These contributions are supported by frequent reference to other
responded quickly to isolate the problem, find its source, and revise its practicesto make the system even more sensitive and responsive to chemical security issues along theproduction chain. The case illustrates that the decision makers exhibited some of thecharacteristics that others have put forth associated with increasing the chances for keepingsystems operational, and it illustrates some characteristics that point to ways for increasing thesecurity of its intended use.Bibliography1. Information about this case was supplied through telephone email correspondence with Albin Kaelin, Managingdirector, Rohner Textil AG, from July – September 1999.2. Gorman, M. E., M. M. Mehalik, and Patricia Werhane. (2000). Ethical and environmental challenges
chemistry, 1 thermodynamics, 1dynamics, 1 material science, 1 computers, 1 ethics and 1 engineering economics.The participants were recruited to participate in the study through email announcements. Weonly selected participants who indicated that they had a relatively high grade point average(GPA) in engineering, and who stated that they were good in engineering and that it wasimportant for them to be good in engineering. We selected participants using these criteriabecause previous stereotype threat studies1,14 have indicated that stereotype threat effects arelargest among the best students who are most identified with the subject matter.Five to 10 participants reported to each testing session in mixed gender groups. They read thetest instructions
ELE-128 - Internet of Things Networking & Security ELE-128L - Lab: IoT Networking & Security CSO-105 - Cisco – Introduction to Networking CSO-105L – Intro to Networking LabA student enrolled in this certificate must complete the required courses shown above and alsotake one course from the following list: BMT-230 – Bio-Medical Wireless Networking BMT-230L – Bio-Medical Networking Lab EET-135 – Programmable Logic Controller 1 (PLCs 1) EET-135L – Lab: Programmable Logic Controller 1 (PLCs 1)Also, a student enrolled in this certificate must also take one course from the following list: CSE-248 – Ethical Hacking CSE-248L – Ethical Hacking Lab CSE-172 – Cloud Computing for the Internet of
for use;and promoting academic integrity to ensure ethical uses of ChatGPT in an academic context (ThiThuy, 2023).The following research was done by conducting interviews with graduate students and facultiesto understand ChatGPT's abilities by providing the output on the topic of how AI and GPT willimpact academia and libraries. This research explores how graduate students are using theChatGPT and can be used to improve various research capabilities. ChatGPT can be used toimprove research and scholarship in academia in several ways. The breakdown of ChatGPT’suses by graduate students for their research is listed as follows. Based on the student’s giventopic or keyword, ChatGPT can help the researchers in identifying relevant literature
manage- ment. As a teacher, he aims to inspire his students to think intensively and critically and to live ethically and morally. Dr. Batouli received Harry Saxe Teaching award in 2022 based on students’ votes and stu- dents evaluation of instruction. His previous research has resulted in more than 30 referred journal and conference publications as well as five research reports. His past research received major awards and hon- ors including a third-place best poster award from the construction research congress and a Dissertation Year Fellowship from Florida International University in 2016.Dr. Eva Theresa Singleton, The Citadel Military College Dr. Eva Singleton is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
TOPIC • Introduction to ME Design course, Syllabus, Engr. Notebooks 1 • Report Format, Presentation Guidelines • Problem Introduction by sponsors 2 • Team Assignments • Problem Statement – Brainstorm (Instructor/Students) 3 • Background, Literature Review, Personnel, References; Allocate mfg. positions Training • Description of Design, Simulation, Design Methodology, Schedule begins • Feasibility Study, Optimization Method, Deliverables, Safety, Impact on 4 Society, Ethics • Group FSR presentation; individual FSR reports due • Assembly Details, Material Selections, Mechanisms, Design for Manufacturing 5
Integrated(VIVID) Storytelling, that makes use of educational comics for teaching humanistic subjectmatters to engineering students. Over the past two years, we have applied this pedagogy tothe teaching of visual thinking, storytelling, ethics, teamwork, motivation, and otherhumanistic topics in various curricular and co-curricular settings in two universities, includingtwo courses taken by all engineering students, a peer mentorship program attended by allfirst-year engineering students, two bridge-programs for students entering university, aworkshop for graduate researchers, and a STEAM program for female high school students.Our initial experience applying this pedagogy shows that by combining the engagingness ofvisual storytelling with the
knowledge and solutions,” [9] to “contextualism, or theunderstanding that solutions must consider social, technical, and environmental contexts” [9],prompted the restructuring of partner projects and the HE program. Project timelines wereelongated to span multiple years with continued partnership engagement. That builds andresonates with efforts and practices aimed at creating and maintaining ethical partnerships [10].A further motivation to restructure the HE program was the goal of scaffolding the educationalexperience so that students can learn principles of community engaged engineering, then engagewith a community partner, and culminate their academic experience with a year-long designcourse in partnership with the same community. The goal was
and the Achievers (i.e., high ACT students). This resultis not surprising, in that students with high ACT scores are typically in greater need ofmotivation than they are of academic ability. This is particularly true for the Purpose Seekers,who have plenty of academic ability but lack the motivation and work ethic required to deliver ahigh GPA. For those who ultimately graduated, the results of Figure 7 suggest that EGR 101provided (or at least contributed to) the motivation they needed.As shown in Figure 8, students who ultimately graduated in engineering indicated that EGR 101increased their chances of success in engineering (i.e., self-efficacy) more strongly than students
research as the catalyst for engagement, the TTE REU program hassupported 30 community college students from the California Community College System.During the nine-week summer program, each TTE participant is paired with two mentors, afaculty advisor and graduate student mentor, who oversee and guide the student in independentresearch activities, through regular research group meetings and one-on-one discussions. Outsideof their independent research projects, TTE participants are trained in research protocol,laboratory safety, and professional ethics; and participate in academic and professionaldevelopment activities to prepare for a baccalaureate degree and career in science andengineering. The TTE REU program also partners with the UC
available (http://www.laccei.org/index.php/initiatives/accreditation).The LACCEI Par Amigo training is modular and contains a module (Module A) coveringgeneral accreditation information and a second module (Module B) specific to particularaccreditation agencies. Module A can be completed online or at LACCEI annual conferencesand events or other educational conferences. Module B is delivered in collaboration withaccreditation agencies at LACCEI annual conferences and events.Individuals certified and registered in the Par Amigo Registry through LACCEI need to be experienced faculty/engineers knowledgeable in the relevant accreditation process requirements ethical and diplomatic with a clear understanding of and respect for the
factory to make the briquettes from wood and other material. However, theyrequire a special type of stove and continuous purchase of the briquettes. Their strategy is tostart from the relatively wealthier families along the coastal area and let them lead the trend.Unfortunately, for the major population living inland, it will take years or decades before theycan catch the trend because of the lack of road and transportation methods [1, 2].Another approach to the problem was proposed by an engineering student in our program at2009. She found these pressing problems in the Gambia when the students were asked toconduct engineering ethic and sustainable engineering study. As a member of Engineering
3 IET-317 Industrial Economic Analysis 3MFG-431 Controls for Industrial Automation 3 MFG-427 CIM & Global Manufacturing 3ECT-490 Senior Project 3 MFG-490 Senior Project 3PHL-316 PHL-316 Engineering Ethics 3 PHL-316 PHL-316 Engineering Ethics 3 Spring 2013 Total 18 Spring 2013 Total 18* ENG-270 + 271 will fulfill the University of Dayton requirements for ENG-101 + 102.Shanghai Normal University
choice and material availability, can be simplified completed high school physics and pre-calculus from differential equations to basic algebra.Course DescriptionThe course learning outcomes related to this course are: 1. Implement a structured design process to solve an engineering problem, from identification of customer needs through prototype testing. 2. Use an industry standard CAD package to create a complete parametric 3-D solid model. Page 23.1157.4 3. Demonstrate professional and ethical behavior as an individual and a team member. 4. Read a part drawing, in
eachdegree program within the School.This review assumed that future technological leaders will need a broad technical foundation atthe undergraduate level with opportunities to gain competency with both disciplinary and multi-disciplinary design, real-world problem-solving, communications, ethics and professionalism,global and multicultural perspectives, innovation and entrepreneurship, teamwork, computing,sustainability, and business practices. We identified this set of competencies from variousnational reports on the state of engineering education in the USA, ABET accreditationrequirements, as well as conversations with the School’s external advisory committee during the
includes coordinated professional development seminarson responsible professional conduct for engineers and research ethics, diversity awareness, aswell as the graduate school application process. Along with their graduate mentors theparticipants also become role models in a system of “each one-mentor-one”, interacting withhigh school teachers and students from a rural, underserved school district. Assessment resultsfrom program surveys indicate positive impact of mentorship, higher post-graduation careerchoices, and coordinated activities. Specifically by interacting with mentors female participantsindicated that they gained more self-confidence as researchers than their male counterparts.Index Terms: research experiences for undergraduates
include a module, teach that module, and then evaluate it. But to offer largerincentives in a research study introduces ethical problems of undue inducement to participation.While the sample size was small, there was a broad diversity of participants by institution type,size and geography, as indicated in Table 1. 2.3 Thermodynamics Instructor SurveyThermodynamics instructors (n=42 in this section) were asked to rate their agreement ordisagreement with a number of statements intended to characterize their attitudes, motivation,and experience with engineering education research as well as their home institution’s supportfor engineering education research and creative teaching practices. The survey includesstatements such as, “Current
health),hands-on activities, and an opportunity for online mentoring. The Fall 2022 offering was thecontrol group (redesigned online version), and the Winter 2023 offering was the interventiongroup (redesigned online version with choice in activities). Students of both groups were given apre-training and post-training quiz to measure their learning in their courses. Students in bothgroups (control and intervention) were offered training designed to experience identical content,instructional team, workload, and fair way to earn the ExpecTAtions Certificate. The study wasreviewed and given ethics clearance from the University Research Ethics Office prior to the startof the Fall 2022 term.Participant details and sample size: The study is conducted
researched, with studies focusing on AI’s role inproviding personalized feedback, enhancing student engagement, and offering scalable learningsolutions. As such, the integration thereof has emerged as a transformative force, reshapingpedagogical approaches and learning experiences. Various studies highlight the significance ofAI literacy, student readiness, and the adaptation of educational frameworks to accommodate theabove based on diverse learning styles, backgrounds, and more.Ng et al. [1] emphasize the necessity of defining AI literacy, which encompasses understandingAI's capabilities and ethical implications, as well as evaluating its impact on learningenvironments. The study proposed four aspects: know and understand, use, evaluate, and
experiences, we can contribute our perspective and add insights intohow engineering education graduate student researchers come to be.Reference[1] F. Goodyear-Smith, C. Jackson, and T. Greenhalgh, "Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees," BMC Med. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 78, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2.[2] C. Ellis, T. E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner, "Autoethnography: an overview," Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, pp. 273-290, 2011.[3] R. Likely and C. Wright, "The Journey of Decolonization as a Scientist and Science Education Researcher," in Equity in STEM Education Research: Advocating for Equitable Attention. Cham: Springer International Publishing