taken to better understand student development of SDL. The most Page 26.1173.2significant course of action on our part was to extend the study beyond the 2nd year, and toincorporate more qualitative measures, namely focus groups1,2,3.Quantitative Survey Results (Years 1 and 2)While some significant differences in the quantitative survey data were measured between thetwo institutions, the resulting data showed surprisingly small changes in SDL competencies overthe first two years of college4. Figure 1 displays the learning and grade orientations (LOGO)attitudes and behaviors at four different points in time over two years for the two
-course implementations, as evidenced by the candidate status received at the end of the long- term assessments of phase five, can become a standard educational technology offering that is available to all faculty members.A graphical representation of the lifecycle is provided in figure 1 below. Phase 1 Feasibility Analysis Phase 6 Phase 2 Adoption and Scale Design and Development Phase 5 Phase 3 Multi-Course Implementation
engineeringdegree programs of 155.7. The GE+ program plans to seek accreditation under ABET’s generalengineering program criteria.BackgroundIn the 2005 publication, Educating the Engineer of 2020, the National Academy of Engineeringrecommended that undergraduate engineering programs introduce interdisciplinary learning and“more vigorously exploit the flexibility inherent in the outcomes-based accreditation approach toexperiment with novel approaches for baccalaureate education.”1 The American Society ofMechanical Engineers (ASME) Vision 2030 Task Force echoed this recommendation and named“increased curricular flexibility” as one of seven recommended actions intended to strengthenundergraduate mechanical engineering education.2 Developmentally, infusing
course of short (1-2 week) timescales. A sub-question of the study is to see whether and how KB is affected by perceived accountabilitystructures. The evidence for addressing these questions comes from the KB discourse itself. Asub-goal of the work is to continue the development of tools needed to analyze KB discourse.Learning EnvironmentData was collected from a four-credit, semester-long undergraduate Strength of Materials coursetaught in the spring of 2014 with fifteen students enrolled at Smith College. The majority ofstudents were sophomores majoring in engineering science. All but one student had priorexperience with Knowledge Building from the pre-requisite course at our institution.Knowledge Forum itself is an online asynchronous
of a capstone design instructor workshop forthe 2014 Capstone Design Conference.1. IntroductionEngineering capstone design projects are intended to provide a culminating experience forseniors where they solve a complex, open-ended design challenge that requires the integration ofmany of the engineering concepts mastered over their undergraduate careers. The students are intheir final year of study and are preparing to transition out to the workforce, graduate studies, orto the military or public service.According to the 2005 comprehensive national survey of capstone design programs conducted byHowe[1], 98% of the 444 engineering programs at the 262 responding institutions (representingabout 26% of all programs) included capstone projects as
urgent need to develop a well-qualifiedand diverse STEM workforce, underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities (URMs) such as Blacksand Latinos continue to make up only 7-10% of the science and engineering workforce.1 Evenwhen URMs enroll in engineering and related majors, they are more likely to switch to non-STEM majors and much less likely to complete their degree within 6 years than their Whitepeers.2-4 URM students in STEM report feelings of alienation and invisibility, difficulty applyingtheory and curriculum to practice, and a lack of pre-college preparation in STEM majors – all ofwhich may contribute to the aforementioned enrollment and departure trends.5To reverse these trends and address many of the challenges and barriers facing URMs
and motivated by NCState’s strategic plan to expand the proportion of transfer students, the College of Engineeringteamed with the College of Education at NC State. We established initiatives aimed directly atNC CC’s and their communities: 1) to disseminate accurate information regarding engineering atNC State and 2) to develop a valuable network of higher education institutions in North Carolina.In addition to promoting the transfer of high quality students into engineering at NC State, ourgoal was to improve their retention and performance. In this paper, we detail the strategies weemployed to achieve these goals, including programming and publications created by the Collegeof Engineering, targeted solely to NC CC students and advisors. We
college upper level management to quickly evaluate theuniversity’s performance by looking at the index score. The upper management can thendrill down and see which KPI’s were responsible for the change in monthly performance.Richland used these metrics until 2007, but the structure of their dashboard had evolved,adding visual cues in the form of traffic lights to allow for faster analysis10. Table 1. Richland College Data Dashboard9 Page 26.312.5In the year 2000, The University of California (UC) realized that it would need to makechanges to its business architecture to accommodate its projected influx of futureenrollments. Since the
educationacademics and engineering curriculum developers.IntroductionLeadership definition varies to a significant extent, where each definition has different area offocus 1. One of the best ways to describe leadership is the “skills approach”, that emphasizes onthe skills or abilities that can be learned or developed. For instance, enhancing personalcapability to inspire confidence and support among the people who are needed to achieveorganizational goals 2 is a competency development definition of leadership. One of the mainattributes associated with leadership is determination of a direction and influencing people inregards with values, vision, mission, and strategy 3. As the dynamics of societal development isat highest ever pace in the 21st century
this case, the novelty of theapproach compared to traditional methods is twofold: (1) the use of a computer game enables usto directly observe problem-solving process through action in the game and (2) because of thenaturally immersive game environment, we hope to see motivation and persistence in the face ofcomplex problems that might otherwise be difficult to achieve in a laboratory setting. As afeasibility study, we will present methods and data that we suggest should guide further researchbut should not be used to make specific claims. Before describing this exploratory study, webriefly review relevant literature of problems and problem-solving.Background on Problem Solving LiteratureOne characterizing difference between problems faced in
recent years. They need to “understand andcontribute in the context of market and business pressures.”4 Furthermore, entrepreneurshipskills are relevant for career success; students with these skills are expected to be better preparedto support their employers as innovators, act as managers and competent team workers4. Thisraises three essential questions: 1. What is and what means creativity and entrepreneurship in engineering contexts? 2. What are the implications for engineering education? 3. Are creativity and entrepreneurial thinking competences which can be learned by students, or are they a result of a life-long socializing process that cannot be influenced, at least not in the small period of an engineering
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Support for Implementation of Infrastructure Education Courses Across Multiple InstitutionsIntroductionCommunities of Practice (CoP) are formed when individuals collaborate in order to shareknowledge and develop solutions for collective problems[1]. They usually grow informallyaround a need and involve voluntary membership by participants who are motivated to take partin a learning community that serves a common purpose.[2] In higher education, CoPs often formwith the intent of sharing best practices, resources, and knowledge around a common domain.They can serve to invigorate and advance the teaching and learning beyond what may bepossible by
Paper ID #14764Mobile Devices and Lifelong Learning: The Students’ PerspectiveProf. Susan L. Miertschin, University of Houston (CoT) Susan L. Miertschin, M.Ed., M.S.I.S., is an Associate Professor teaching in the Computer Information Systems program at University of Houston. Her teaching interests are in the areas of (1) information systems applications development and the complementary nature of back-end developer and front-end developer skill sets and (2) managing IT services. Her research interests are program and student as- sessment, the impact of instructional technology on student learning, and the improvement of e
motivation andlearning strategies of two groups of students are different from each other, the current study wascarried out. The current study did not compare student performance with similar HS GPA andtest scores as general students.HypothesisThe current study examined four hypotheses to understand the diversity makeup of the studentsand differences in their motivation and learning strategies listed below:H (1): There is no significant difference between high school students and university students inmotivation strategies.H (2): There is no significant difference between high school students and university students inlearning strategies.H (3): There is no significant difference between male and female students in high school anduniversity in
across campus. Not only are expenses incurred inhardware costs but also in manpower hours setting up and tearing down computing labs, installingsoftware and maintaining images.In [1], the authors provide excellent survey of the opportunities of using Cloud Computing ineducational environment. We also believe that the problems identified above can be solved byintegrating a private cloud computing environment into James Madison University’s educationalresources. This challenge became the topic of a senior capstone project at James Madison Uni-versity. Two students and their advisor proposed to address these issues by utilizing VMwarevSphere [2] and Horizon View software [3] suites. Horizon View is a cloud computing solutionthat provides access to
with decisions andcomplex project planning.At BIM’s core is a three-dimensional parametric data rich model created in a virtual reality on acomputer 7. A BIM model will support the construction, fabrication and procurement activitiesthroughout the buildings lifecycle 5. Prior to using three-dimensional parametric modelingsoftware, two-dimensional computer aided drafting / design (CAD) software was used. If an editoccurred in one area of the two-dimensional CAD views, all other views had to be updatedmanually; this process was a major source of errors. Building Information Modeling alleviatesmany errors that would hinder productivity 1.Building Information Modeling is not just a computer technology enhancement but also aprocess (workflow
Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University.Robin Neal Clayton, University of Washington ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Enhancing Engineering Faculty Implementation of Inclusive Pedagogy through an Inclusive Excellence Faculty Development ProgramIntroductionWhile the framework of culturally relevant pedagogy was originally developed 30 years ago [1],there has been a growing momentum in recent years to adopt inclusive and equitable teachingpractices in higher education [2], [3]. This shift is driven by the increasing diversity of studentpopulations, including those from historically marginalized identities, enrolling in highereducation
student willingness toindependently choose Python or R for future courses and projects. The survey responses suggestthat as computing becomes normalized, negative feelings among students become less of animpediment. Comparisons of grades among classes in semesters before and after the computingintegration do not generally show statistically significant differences. Given the lack of relevantdata available, both in our department and in the literature, these survey responses providevaluable insights into civil engineering students' attitudes toward coding for data analysis andproblem-solving, which could assist others considering similar curricular changes.1. IntroductionRapid advances in computational capacity, ability to process massive amounts
engineering students experienceindustry recognition across a four-year undergraduate program. The extent to which studentsbelieve other people see them as engineers influences how they see themselves as engineers.Students’ engineering identities can shape how they are motivated, persist, and learn engineering[1]-[3] which has inspired calls for the inclusion of identity development as part of theundergraduate engineering curriculum [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Research has shown that howstudents feel recognized by others as the kind of person who can do engineering is the mostimportant element in the development of an engineering identity [9], [10]. Understandingrecognition is critical for designing high-impact curricular practices that can effectively
more ready to face the challenges posed by complex problems with no simplesolution.To help build more entrepreneurial thinking and creativity into the students’ education, theauthor has modified earlier design projects in two senior-level technical electives in theMechanical Engineering Department at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). Oneof these modified projects is described elsewhere.1 The second modified project is in a second-semester Thermodynamics course, and is described in this paper.The design project builds from the concept of project-based learning2,3 which is not new, andexists in a wide variety of forms. Ulseth et al.4 used projects that directly connect students to anindustrial sponsor to work on a solution to a real
of engineering, requires a reorganization of how learning environments are designed and how engineering programs and faculty evaluate how learning occurs. he need to prepare students to work on socio-technical issues is better reflective of how theyTwill be working as an engineer and the types of 21st century problems that are currently in need of attention[1]. Global-scale, complex, socio-technical problems are often referred to as convergent problems in the field of engineering[2]. A key characteristic of convergent problems is that they are not well addressed by traditional approaches, because they require the sharing and application of ideas and methods across multiple disciplines and partners in
early warning and possible intervention.Ivan ZimmermanDr. Doina Bein, California State University, Fullerton Dr. Bein has an extensive publication record: 13 book chapters, 19 journal articles, and 69 conference papers. Four of her conference papers have received the best paper awards. She was awarded (as PI or co-PI) several research and teaching grants from AF ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Study on the Use of Random Forest Classifier model and Multi-Output Classifier model for Predicting Student Academic Performance and Identifying Areas of Concern Kevin Huang1, Ivan Zimmerman1, Doina Bein2 1
instruction can foster GenAI-related information literacy, and that the ISP model remains a valuable framework forunderstanding student engagement with new technologies. The findings highlightopportunities for librarian-instructor collaboration in designing effective GenAI-integrated research instruction.IntroductionGenerative AI is increasingly becoming an integral part of instructional practicesin higher education courses, and it is beneficial to understand this technology'simpact on the student research experience [1]. Over time, the field of libraryscience has used the Information Search Process (ISP) model to examine thestages of the user experience in the search process. ISP examines informationseeking through the lens of the affective
(CEBOK3) was published in 2019 [1]. Much like the prior versions ofthe CEBOK, the Third Edition made significant positive impacts on the profession of civilengineering as it outlines foundational, technical, and professional practice learning outcomes forindividuals entering into responsible charge in the practice of civil engineering. CEBOK sets thedirection for curriculum development and professional practice and sets an expectation forlifelong learning. As part of a pre-established timeline, ASCE has launched the CivilEngineering Body of Knowledge Task Committee, Fourth Edition (CEBOK4TC).The following charge was presented to the CEBOK4TC by the ASCE Committee on Educationleadership: ● Critically review published literature regarding the
students’ EM three Cs, and students’ increased appreciation of multiculturalism through in-person cultural immersion experiences.Introduction s engineering demand rises and globalization intensifies, fostering multiculturalism is vital forAglobal solutions. Transformative learning theory (TLT), developed by Dr. Jack Mezirow in the 1970s, explains how adult learners shift perspectives when confronted with challenging experiences[1,2]. While TLT guides culturally responsive teaching in international teacher training, it remains underutilized in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) contexts [1]. This research study explores the impact of international experiences on the development
positive role insupporting the personal and intellectual growth of students [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Manyuniversities actively implement formal mentorship programs to enhance the development of bothgraduate and undergraduate students [8], [9], [10]. There is less research examining howgraduate mentoring programs might facilitate collaborative, professional, and academic cultureamong engineering students. Two questions now arise:1) What is “culture” in this academicsetting and 2) Why is it important to influence these cultures among engineering students? A succinct definition of “culture” as it applies in the academic setting may be found in theMerriam-Webster Dictionary, which states that culture is “the set of values
entire neurodivergentcommunity.In the LGBTQIA+ community, the acronym stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender,Queer/Questioning, Intersex, and Asexual/Agender/Aromantic. The “+” is included to representthe many other identities within this community, including but not limited to: two-spirit,nonbinary, pansexual, and genderfluid.1.2 MotivationThe challenges faced by neurodivergent people (ableism, lack of support in meeting needs,accessibility challenges, etc.) and the challenges faced by LGBTQIA+ people (homophobia,transphobia, compulsory heterosexuality, etc.) are all faced by neuroqueer individuals; by virtueof their intersectional sociopolitical identity, neuroqueer people experience the cumulativeeffects of these challenges [1
students at academic institutions. Space is required formentorship that supports students emotionally. Findings and implications are discussed further.IntroductionMentorship has long been considered one of the cornerstones of personal and professionaldevelopment, from the arts to the sciences [1]. Within higher education, mentorship can be bothformal and informal in nature, encompassing everything from faculty-student relationships andworkplace mentoring programs to familial or peer connections. These relationships provideemotional support, practical guidance, and role modeling that influence growth and success [2].By addressing the diverse needs of mentees, mentorship serves as a critical tool to navigatechallenges, cultivate resilience, and
Student Teaching: The Cultivation of Teaching Skills and Identity among Graduate StudentsAbstractThis study investigates the development of Graduate Teaching Assistants' (GTAs') teachingidentity through professional development (PD) activities and hands-on teaching experiences.While previous research has predominantly focused on how PD programs enhance teachingpractices [1], less attention has been paid to their impact on the formation of a cohesive teachingidentity.Understanding the evolution of GTAs' teaching identities is crucial for creating PD programs thatcan support them and enhance their teaching effectiveness. This research addresses these issues byexploring how structured PD programs, such as pre-semester workshops, and
educational resources (OER) in alleviating financial strain, improving student engagement, and enhancing learning experiences in engineering education.I ntroduction Engaging in continuous improvement is a good practice for any course, and providing instructors with the tools to make effective data-driven changes can enhance student learning[1]. In engineering education, there has been a call to make changes to curricula and learning experiences to ensure that engineering students are ready to meet the complex challenges of the future[2]. This is compounded by the looming enrollmentcliff in higher education, where fewer students are expected to pursue higher education