-faculty and student-student engagement. Every effort was made to ensure thatthe speaker diversity reflected that of the REU students, so that students could envisionthemselves taking the speakers’ paths. Further student-faculty interaction was provided throughweekly faculty research seminars. Each week, one faculty member presented brief vignettes oftheir research interests to the group, enabling students to learn of other imaging related researchbeyond their own projects.In addition to the program-related activities, students participated in several University-wideenrichment events. These activities included a weekly brown-bag seminar series on topics suchas Ethics, GRE preparation, Getting into Graduate School, and Abstract Writing
be around developing a mock project proposal thatwould follow the guidelines of the real directed MS project proposal as were described in thegraduate program handbook in terms of sections, length, citation (IEEE), and format. At the endof the semester, each student would present his/her proposal to the fellow graduate students whowould act as the members of the examining committee. The author would compile theirfeedback, as well as his own observation, and share it with the presenter. A sample of proposalevaluation form is shown in Appendix A.The course contents and activities were designed to help students develop their proposal. Thesemester was divided into three sections, called units: 1) Introduction to research, ethics, humansubject
University. His upcoming dissertation will focus on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineer- ing change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace.Dr. Nathan E Canney PE, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an
tounderstand their leadership capabilities, rather than a series of training interventions such ascourses or lectures.2,3Leadership competencies such as teamwork, problem solving, ethics, and communications4 arevital for the accomplishment of any construction project.5 According to the ASCE Vision 2025,civil engineers will have to command the multidisciplinary and leadership facets of their work inorder to implement complex projects that include various stakeholders.6 Similarly, it is stated inthe ASCE BOK (2008) that 21st-century engineers must possess leadership competencies inaddition to technical competencies as the industry moves forward.7 Other reasons, including risingcomplexity and the rapidly changing nature of construction projects, have
, production processes, concurrent engineering design, and detailed system description. Further it is essential to include a variety of realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact.”1Senior design is an apprentice-like involvement and the highlight of the undergraduate engineeringexperience. Most projects are sponsored by local industries or motivated by the needs of thedepartment or a faculty member. Since 2003, UST has tried to offer at least one of its senior designprojects to consider the needs of material-resource poor people at the base of the economicpyramid. These projects often bring to life the ‘realistic constraints, such as economic factors,safety, reliability
the weakness oftraditional lecture-based learning modules which may quickly become out of date for rapidlychanging areas like NSNT without diligent attention from well-informed instructors. By its nature,PBL-structured case studies promote learning at the cutting edge of a discipline and thus are well-suited to the emerging NSNT field.A central premise in using the case study technique is that the process of learning is just asimportant as the content [12]. In general, students work cooperatively during case studies to answerchallenging questions or to evaluate complex ethical issues. For PBL-structured case studies,students are expected to investigate and learn necessary content in order to understand the contextof a case. This requires
unless its intention is public responsibility, thedevelopment of which is a major goal of liberal education. “Society itself requires some othercontribution from each individual, besides the particular duties of his profession. And, if nosuch liberal intercourse be established, it is the common failing of human nature, to beengrossed with petty views and interests to underrate the importance of all in which we arenot concerned, and to carry our partial notions, into cases where they are inapplicable to act,in short, as so many unconnected units, displacing and repelling one another.”7Since there is a need for ethics to be built into the design then users should be in a position tocomment on the design for which they will also need to be
policy." Ethics & Behavior 11.3, 233247, 2001. [3] Hutton, Patricia A. "Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it." College Teaching 54.1, 171176, 2006. [4] zyBooks. https://zybooks.zyante.com/. March 2016. [5] Carnegie Research I Universities. http://www.washington.edu/tools/universities94.html, March 2016. [6] David Weerts, State Governments and Research Universities: A Framework for a Renewed Partnership. New York: Routledge, p. 26, 2002. [7] Gregory A. Krohn and Catherine M. O'Connor, "Student Effort and Performance over the Semester" The Journal of Economic Education Vol. 36, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 328, 2005. [8] Judy Shearda, Selby Markhama & Martin Dicka, "Investigating
certifications and degrees.The methodology employed to assess the potential list of resources was to make an exhaustivelist (as possible, since higher education is constantly changing) of graduate and post-baccalaureate institutions that provide certification in regulatory science fields. First, thecategories of cost, availability, and curriculum needed streamlining for comparison purposes.Then, best practices needed to be identified, for both domestic and international programs.Common themes of coursework in the life sciences, biotechnology, and policy/ethics wereidentified. Often, programs would require or prefer a bachelors in health science, life sciences, orengineering with common requirements of the advanced degree mandating courses in
. 3 Faculty-led Study Abroad in an engineering course International Engineering Internship Semester-long Engineering Exchange Program Overseas Service Learning (e.g. Engineers Without Borders)Leadership Electives 6 International Business Law Construction Engineering and Management Analysis and Mitigation of Conflicts, Claims and Disputes Civil Engineering Comprehensive Social and Ethical Issues in Computing Managing Software Projects Introduction to Engineering and Public Policy Engineering Entrepreneurship Seminar International Business International Economic Development International Economics
Program was originally founded through the Center for EnergyEfficient Electronics Science, and has since branched to multiple disciplines includedbiotechnology and robotics. TTE REU was designed as an intervention for students so thatthey would have an opportunity to build their confidence and knowledge in science andengineering with the goal that this intervention would lead to more students transferring to abachelor program. As discussed by S. Artis4, TTE REU brings students from communitycolleges around the state of California to the University of California, Berkeley to complete a9 week summer research internship. The first week of the internship has the students goingthrough a “laboratory bootcamp” where the students learn lab safety, ethics
Paper ID #20593An Integrated Data Management Plan Instructional ProgramWilliam H. Mischo, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign William Mischo is Head, Grainger Engineering Library Information Center and Professor, University Library at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UIUC). He has been a Principal Investigator on a number of digital library grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF), including the National Ethics Portal grant, several National Science Digital Library (NSDL) grants, and the Digital Library Initiative I grant. He has also received an Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS
better positionour program to be competitive with programs of other institutions. The courses in our 120semester credit hours restructured curriculum are similar to most schools and therefore nocompromises are made toward decrease in program effectiveness.Five general education courses were eliminated from the BS ME program, equivalent to areduction of 12 semester credits. The current requirements for General Education total 30semester credits, 18 of which are in the areas of oral and written communications, ethics, culturaldiversity, and personal/social environments areas. The remaining 12 required credits consist ofmathematics and science courses.2. The following pre-calculus level mathematics courses were eliminated from the
political identity, social welfare, and perspectives ofdiversity. In reflecting on the personal impact of recent national events and how politicaldiscussions have or have not been integrated into their STEM courses, two themes emerged: 1)political awareness and 2) future-self impact. Findings revealed that first year engineeringstudents recognized the personal and social impacts current national events imposed on theirfriends, family, and society. However, students did not sense the significance of politicaldiscourse concerning the social impact and ethical practice of engineering. Our research showsthat limiting political discourse in the classroom and depoliticizing engineering spacescontributed to students dissociating the relevance of political
responses to the effectiveness of writing exercises inaccomplishing ABET outcomes f through k.Slightly higher ratings were received for WWE for outcomes f, h and i. Similarly, outcomes g, jand k received slightly higher ratings for EES. Again, these observations are as anticipated giventhe nature of the writing exercises incorporated in each of the courses. Writing intensiveexercises in EES enhanced the communication skills, knowledge of contemporary issues andtechniques and skills required for engineering practice11. The design intensive exercises in WWEhelped students realize the professional and ethical responsibility, awareness of broad educationfor engineering solutions, and the need for life-long learning to stay up to the trends
Safety Teaching Practices Large, private, Practice the ability to identify needs • University certifications in chemical Northeastern (problems) and then design and hygiene and waste management region, R1 conduct engineering experiments, to • Process safety checklist before meet the desired needs within realistic experiments constraints such as economic, • Design of experiments by students, environmental, social, political, including identification of hazards ethical, health and safety, and mitigation methods, using manufacturability, OR sustainability
engineering education and related research by adoptingnew ways of thinking (ASEE, 2014; NAE, 2004; UNESCO, 2012). The Engineering EducationResearch (EER) Colloquies (JEE, 2006) specifically called for “research that will helpcharacterize the nature of engineering knowledge (i.e., its technical, social, and ethical aspects)and ways of engineering thinking that are essential for identifying and solving technicalproblems within dynamic and multidisciplinary environments” (p. 260). The ways of engineeringthinking need to be reconsidered to not only meet changing workforce demands, but also toincrease awareness of the social impacts of engineered solutions, to promote diversity andinclusion in the profession, and to solve chronic issues of student
Paper ID #24809Measuring the Conceptualization of Oppression and PrivilegeRachel M Johnson, University of Minnesota Rachel Johnson is a PhD student in Biomedical Engineering at University of Minnesota. Her research interests are cardiac tissue engineering and biopreservation. She earned her BS at Oregon State University in Bzioengineering.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering
moretraining/set-up than it is worth? Does it increase or decrease workloads of professors and staff?3. The engineering workforce?Will this student be a better worker and employee? Will they be responsible, safe, andcommunicative when called upon? Will the technologies used in the classroom carry over toindustry?4. General Society?Will this help the student be an engineer with good ethics? Will this help students speak up whennecessary? Will this uphold the professional engineering ethical responsibility of keeping thepublic safe?DefinitionsThe following terms are either used in, or are important concepts to, this paper:Access Point to Learning: A means by which students can obtain knowledge or skills. Exampleswould be: a tutoring session, a textbook
understanding of howinformation is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new knowledge andparticipating ethically in communities of learning.There are a number of scholarly works that discuss using PBL pedagogies in higher education.Barron, et al (1998) provide a 40-page primer on PBL as a general pedagogical method. Whilenot dealing specifically with engineering courses, it will provide an overview for those new tothe subject. Another article, this one by Smith Macklin (2001), discusses how to integrateinformation literacy into a one-shot course session using PBL. While not aimed specifically atengineering courses the article provides guidance that could be applicable to any subject area.Guerra, Ulseth and Kolmos (2017) edited a
an HSI”, Proceedings of the 2020ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 21-24, 2020.[8] American Society of Civil Engineers, “Code of Ethics,” ASCE, https://www.asce.org/code-of-ethics/ [Accessed February 4, 2020].
the health and safety of our society. This emphasizes that anunderstanding of the cultural, ideological, political, and historical contexts in whichenvironmental problems occur is essential to solving our society’s most pressing environmentalproblems [2-3].Over the past decade, there has been increased interest in the academic field of the environmentalhumanities, along with a push to abandon the narrow disciplinary tradition of solving problems[2]. According to Criteria 3, Student Outcome 4 of ABET, the engineering accreditation body,programs should ensure that graduating students have “an ability to recognize ethical andprofessional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which mustconsider the impact of
, and itcan be the process of questioning and keeping an open mind to evolving circumstances that ismostly highly valued sometimes.” Because Rachael’s training is in the humanities and socialsciences, it is perhaps unsurprising that her response focuses more on holistic abilities such ascritical thinking and ethical responsibility. She notes values that inform her work are “Criticalawareness of situations that enable learners to make ethical decisions about their own practicesand also to take a holistic perspective.”Rachael’s background as a qualitative educational researcher and interpretive cultural studiesanalyst causes her to focus her response on the impossibility of “true objectivity” in research,even when that research includes
in engineering practice, is selected as amentor and is given three (3) credit hours of release time per semester for helping the students intechnical as well as ethical issues related to engineering profession. More senior professors areencouraged to lead this role. The ME department at the University of Florida (UF) in Gainesville iscomparable in size with that of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM) in the sense of boththe undergraduate student population as well as the faculty strength. Hence, some similarities can beobserved and inferred. Qualitative results of educational research in both the institutions suggestsatisfactory implementation of mentoring by the dedicated senior faculty members [5]. Also, in both theME
skills and professional skills goals, including building a set of hands-onengineering skills for prototyping and manufacturing and understanding the role of analysis in thedesign process as well as learning and practicing effective teamwork skills and understanding theimportance of an ethical code for the practice of engineering. The authors reveal specific examplesof client projects, lessons on how to pair students with clients, lessons learned after several offeringsof the course, transferability to other settings, and opportunities for future improvements to thecourse. This course description adds to the growing base of available offerings for service-based,active learning courses.IntroductionDuring spring 2014, the Engineering Plus
beenestablished, the dimensions tend to include attributes similar to the list compiled by Parkinson. 1. Can appreciate other cultures. 2. Are proficient working in or directing a team of ethnic and cultural diversity. 3. Are able to communicate across cultures. 4. Have had a chance to practice engineering in a global context, whether through an international internship, a service learning opportunity, a virtual global engineering project or some other form of experience. 5. Can effectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or national differences.While many Multinational Corporations (MNCs) provide training for engineers workingglobally, some
and environmental contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for sustainable development. GA8 Ethics Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice. GA9 Individual and Team Work An ability to work effectively, as an individual or in a team, on multifaceted and /or multidisciplinary settings. GA10 Communication An ability to communicate effectively—orally and in writing—on complex engineer- ing activities with the engineering community
- tained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005 and her M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University in 2008 and 2012, respectively. Her current engineering edu- cation research interests include engineering students’ understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, and assessment of engineering pedagogies.Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is Professor of Engineering Education Research in the Division of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines, USA. Dr. Leydens’ research and teaching interests are in engineering education, communication, and social justice. Dr. Leydens is author or co-author of
achieved by a university graduate [9]. This may engage companies anduniversities in an ongoing dialogue on the expected skills and identifying areas of collaborationto enhance student learning. In engineering education, scoring rubrics have been used in the performance evaluation of awide range of ABET and other outcomes, including professional skills [10], ethics [11], writingskills [12], design competency [13, 14], and students’ software skills [15]. The motivation to usescoring rubrics in engineering education also is due to the lack of satisfaction emanating from theuse of the traditional grading process which have been criticized for their bias, and unrealisticstandards [2, 9, 15]. Rubrics are attractive since they can be adjusted to
project dataBy analyzing the assessment data, it seems students in the senior project have weaknesses inthree major areas: Design, Mathematical modelling, EthicsTo improve design, mathematical modelling, and calculation, suggestion is to have one of themajor weekly assignment be an Engineering Logbook. Every week students should submit theirdesign, and calculation. For example, if students use SONAR in their project, in the engineeringlogbook they must write all calculations and how to measure distance or in the case of motorconnection to micro-controller they must write in the logbook all calculations for the requiredcurrent. Regarding ethics, in the course shell one module should be covered the engineeringethics specially IEEE Engineering