Engineering and Acquisition Division Director for the base. His areas of specialization include construction management, public works, and government acquisition & contract management.Ms. Sarah Isabel Romero, University of Florida Currently a graduate student at University of Florida achieving a Masters in Environmental Engineering Sciences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 1 THE LARGE SCALE USE OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY AND ITS BENEFITS OVER OTHER SOURCES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY.ABSTRACT As climate change becomes more of a reality, and as our non-renewable resources arebecoming depleted, finding "cleaner" renewable energy for
exclusive excellenceThe institutional context of this action research was a comprehensive undergraduate institution inthe Western United States, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly).Cal Poly’s many successes have created a traditional culture of exclusive excellence. Like many“successful” universities, entry and graduation highly favor those who have a wealth of historicaladvantages--this is particularly true for what is traditionally called “STEM”--Science,Technology, Engineering, and Math. These exclusive dynamics show up as gaps in access(Figure 1) as well as an apparent “achievement gap” with respect to students who aretraditionally underrepresented in STEM and other majors (Figure 2). At Cal Poly, this
), learningopportunities designed and delivered by the Center, and the faculty, staff, administration andstudents are the muscles that work to facilitate the changes.Stepping away from the metaphor, the framework that informs our work focuses on four settingsand three lenses from which to consider each setting. The four settings are: 1. Faculty, 2. Class/Students, 3. Administrators, and 4. the University.While the first three may be obvious, the forth is included not as an umbrella for the first three.The University is identified as a setting so that we explicitly consider the University as a whole,considering the institutional needs and strategic shifts. Considering the needs and shifts of theinstitution alongside those of faculty, students, and
provided a sense of community and place to receive advice to address these and other challenges. We found that the proposed collaborative qualitative research methodology was useful for not only exploring the experiences of new faculty, but also supporting the development of EERs. Introduction As the demands and expectations for faculty increase, many institutional leaders and future faculty question whether the typical graduate school model provides the necessary training for an academic career [1]–[4]. Prior studies suggest that graduate education provides students with anticipatory socialization of the role of a
against reference solutions submitted by theinstructors on various data sets. This computation task is run in the back end as is done through acloud hosting service such as Amazon Web Services (AWS).The web interface from a student’s point-of-view is shown in Figure 1. In Cody Coursework allquestions should be part of an “assignment”. Each assignment can have any number of questions.A start and end time can only be set at the assignment level, hence all questions in a givenassignment have a common administering time frame.When a student selects a question, its description will be shown in the right panel. The studentthen goes on to submit the solution to a given solution in a specified space. The solution is runthrough multiple tests and the
districts across Ohio preparing students for STEM career and college endeavors.Larraine A. Kapka, Sinclair Community College Assistant Dean and Professor, Sinclair Community College MSME, MS Ind Mgt, PE (Ohio) Over 20 years industry experience 15 years higher education experience c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Virtual Online Tensile Strength Testing SimulationAbstractSupported through NSF-DUE, this TUES Type 1 project is 1) developing an open source,virtual, online tensile testing laboratory simulation; 2) conducting research to compare the costsand learning outcomes for using on-site, hands-on tensile testing equipment versus an onlinesimulation; 3) creating close industry
followingresearch question: How and when do students use prototypes to engage with stakeholdersthroughout the design process? This research project was approved by a Midwestern university’sInstitutional Review Board.ParticipantsA total of 16 students from three different engineering capstone design courses were interviewedfor this study. Table 1 shows the distribution of students based on their gender, design course,and prior design experience. All student names were replaced by pseudonyms to ensureanonymity. Less than half of the students had not referenced previous design experience outsideof their capstone design project. Three students had higher education levels, having completed orwere currently in a Master’s Program while three students previously
, institutions, and policymakers. Byidentifying and synthesizing recurring themes, this framework will guide future research andpolicy development, ensuring the responsible and effective integration of GenAI tools inengineering education.IntroductionSince the introduction of generative pre-trained transformers and other generative artificialintelligence (GenAI) tools, the use of GenAI tools has grown significantly. While ArtificialIntelligence (AI) has been around for decades, GenAI has emerged more recently. The launch ofOpenAI’s generative pre-trained transformer model—more widely known as GPT— made thesetools widely accessible to almost anyone [1]. As a result, people across different fields havefound a range of uses for these tools, including in
the first semester of a two-course sequence in the first-year general engineering (GE) program housed in the Engineering Education Department withinthe College of Engineering Virginia Tech called Foundations of Engineering. The programoutcomes for the GE program are to equip students to 1. select a major that aligns with their interests and goals, 2. have the foundational academic, technical, and professional knowledge and skills needed to succeed in a degree-granting major, and 3. develop a sense of belonging and identification with engineering to support long-term persistence toward a degree.The Foundations of Engineering I course was designed to introduce students to engineering byexploring data collection and analysis
aside the part of themselves that wants to be a "teacher" in favor ofbecoming a "researcher." Since "good teaching comes from the identity and the integrity of theteacher." [1], overlooking teacher identity could negatively impact the academic experiences ofengineering students. In general, identity studies have become more prevalent in engineeringeducation research, particularly as they relate to engineering identity or other related roleidentities such as research, math, or physics [2], [3], [4]. Identification with a role or profession,such as engineering, contributes to motivation, self-efficacy, and improved performance in thoseroles [5]. Understanding engineering graduate students' identification with the role of teacher andhow that
K-20 STEM Outreach while a National Science Foundation Fellow with the GK-12 Outreach Program at NCSU where she began Energy Clubs, an out-of-school-time program for third, fourth and fifth graders to introduce them to renewable energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Campus and Community Decarbonization – Campus as a Living Classroom of Transformative Energy PerformanceBackgroundIn the USA and Canada, hundreds of municipalities [1] and corporations [2], along with thousandsof universities and colleges, have the goal to decarbonize their entire operations by no later than2050. This goal is also commonly
, and societalneeds influence the design and application of robotics in both countries. Understanding thesedifferences provides insight into the emerging global direction of HRI and how robot design andfunction might evolve to meet human needs in different cultural contexts.Based on this gap, we developed a new interdisciplinary course to address the following: 1. Advancement of HRI: By focusing on next-generation service robots, this program addresses the growing demand for robots that can work alongside humans in real-world environments like healthcare, manufacturing, and logistics. The students’ exposure to HRI, a key aspect of robotics, directly contributes to the development of robots that can effectively
solutions developed as part of the CCDC Southside project for theOakleaf Forest Community.The Olde Huntersville Empowerment Coalition has collaborated with faculty from the Institutefor Coastal Adaptation and Hanbury Architects to submit two EPA Thriving Community Grantsusing design solutions from the 2017-2018 academic year of the CCDC. These proposals are aTier 2 Connecting Streets Proposal and a Tier 3 Empowerment Center and Urban Garden.3.0 Case Study Southside Norfolk3.1 Understanding the communitySouthside Norfolk, an environmental justice community, comprises the neighborhoods ofBerkley, Campostella, Campostella Heights, Oakleaf Forest, and Diggs Town in Norfolk,Virginia (Figure 1). This community faces systemic challenges rooted in both
dimension has at least two authors’ experiences.Dimension 1: Emotional wellnessThis dimension highlights the authors’ accounts of how immigration policies force them to makedifficult decisions that negatively impact their emotional well-being. One author explains: I am married to the best husband in the whole wide world, and I have two beautiful kids aged 7 and 5 ( I call them my jewels). Coming to study here meant separation from my family for only God knows how long. This is by far the most difficult, bravest, and scariest decision I have made in my life ( I hope and pray by God that I don’t regret it). I wake up some mornings, missing them like crazy.She
neurodivergent faculty,offering tailored guidance and support. The third narrative involves a speculative design exercisewhere faculty engaged in equity-centered institutional change used AI to create “dark futures”narratives and envisioned emancipatory interventions to prevent those futures from becomingreality. Together, these narratives illustrate how AI, far from being solely a technical tool, can bea relational and transformative force in engineering education.In many current conversations about AI in engineering education, AI is framed as a purelytechnical tool, often divorced from its social and ethical implications [1], [2]. AI can perpetuateoppression, domination, and control when designed and deployed without critical reflection.Furthermore
their growing presence, such courses oftenlack clearly defined characteristics and practical design frameworks. Consequently, severalchallenges persist—such as insufficient integration of comprehensive engineering elements,misalignment between course content and industry needs, rigid teaching methods, and limitedstudent engagement.This study addresses two key research questions: (1) What are the core characteristics ofgeneral engineering courses designed for postgraduate students pursuing professionalengineering degrees? (2) How can these courses be effectively designed to embody anddeliver these core characteristics? To answer these questions, the paper first conducts aliterature review to identify the defining features of such courses. Based
from the program. However, it is challenging to keep students engaged and attentive inthis age and time using traditional teaching mediums such as boards and slide decks.1 Theabstract and sometimes intimidating nature of engineering concepts—such as thermodynamics,material balances, or reaction kinetics—requires teaching approaches that are accessible,impactful, engaging, and frankly exciting.In this context, student engagement is more than a matter of participation; it directly correlateswith how well students internalize and apply the material. Traditional lecture methods canstruggle to keep students actively involved, especially in large classes where individualinteraction is limited.2,3 Without opportunities for hands-on exploration or
Intelligence research group. She is responsible for the Cyber-Learning & Data Sciences Lab. She belongs to the National Research System of Mexico (SNI level II), the IEEE Computer Society, the IEEE Education Society, the Mexican Society of Artificial Intelligence, and the Mexican Academy of Computing. She got 3 awards (2 Gold winners and 1 silver winner) for her participation in the Project ”Open Innovation Laboratory for Rapid Realization for Sensing, Smart, and Sustainable Products”. QS Stars Reimagine Education. She obtained seven first-place awards for Educational Innovation from Tecnologico de Monterrey. She has published more than 150 research articles in international journals and conferences. She has directed 12
faculty did not care enough about their well-being and thatfaculty were fostering studio environments in which students could not get enough sleep andcould not afford project materials. This pilot study points to a need for further research intofaculty-student relationships and interactions and faculty pedagogical choices in designeducation.Keywords: design education; diversity; equity; inclusion; race; gender1. IntroductionEven though designers create the products and spaces that people of all backgrounds use everyday, most design fields are not diverse. White men are overrepresented in architecture, designengineering, and industrial design, and white women are overrepresented in interior design in theUnited States [1], [2], [3], [4]. Of course
initiatives, libraries, databases, funding, bibliographic mapping,interdisciplinary collaboration, strategic research tools; research intelligence; competitiveintelligence; gap analysisIntroductionIn recent years, leadership at Virginia Tech have set strategic goals and initiatives 1 to increaseour national and international reputation, increasing institutional support for expanding existingresearch and galvanizing new research. The University Libraries at Virginia Tech havecontributed to many aspects of this effort, including: researcher metrics, collaboration support,and providing data and analyses for new research areas. One special effort, called “DestinationAreas2”, involved a call for internal proposals for seed funding from the Provost’s
innovative thinking.Quantitative data has been analyzed and published in an earlier paper. Here, we will discuss thefindings from the qualitative data collected and analyzed. Focus groups were conducted toinvestigate students’ perspectives regarding camp activities and content included in the program.Participants included lower and upper elementary students from 3rd to 6th grade, with a total ofsix focus groups held in Georgia and Ohio.This paper will address two key research questions: 1. How do participants define inventiveness and entrepreneurial thinking, and how do they apply these concepts both within Camp Invention and in real-world settings? 2. How do participants' favorite activities at Camp Invention foster inventiveness and
difference in a student’s experience. Again, the direct methodis the most visible technique to stop bad actions so, yet again, I am preaching visibility.My interest in using visibility (or “getting the ball rolling”) is to protect and support students thatare underrepresented, or feel less than for some reason. One person showing support can make alarge difference in the experience of a student.Below are some experiences from my department and school around visibility.ANECDOTE 1: RACIST EVENTS (Lack of protection)The lack of visible, swift and meaningful response by our school in response to, among otherthings, racist events, in many cases hurt students more than the events themselves. Theperpetrator of one of the events was removed from the school
of the TCP/IP, a mobile remote shake tablelaboratory is further proposed to meet the learning style of the new generation. In this paper, thedeveloped interactive remote shake table laboratories will be discussed in detail and acorresponding teaching module for the proposed mobile shake table laboratory is demonstrated.IntroductionHistory frequently reminds us how destructive earthquakes can be. For example, the Loma Prietaearthquake (magnitude 6.9) in 1989 caused an estimated $6 billion in property damage and tookaway 63 human lives.1 The Northridge earthquake (magnitude 6.7) in 1994 brought an estimatedof $20 billion property damage and claimed the lives of 57 people with more than 5,000 injured.2To design and build safer and more
of a structure; • conduct a simple analysis of risk; and • write a geotechnical report in standard format.To have students achieve these outcomes as well as the general course outcomes, the authordeveloped the schedule shown in Table 1. Week Topics Covered/Activities Conducted 1 Introduction to course; design thinking exercise developed by Stanford’s Design School (http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/) 2 Engineering communication (memos, reports, presentations); introduction to civil engineering and design/construction in the urban environment; graphics
laboratory with a last generation CMM, with characteristics identical tothose existing in the industry, where the student can develop the set of skills that the industrydemands and that can help them to integrate faster into this specific field of the industry. Thefirst generation of students has graduated recently; and has been able to quickly and successfullyenter the local industry.Detailed Design of Coordinate Measuring Machine TrainingThe modern industries have high demand for engineers and technologists with good qualitycontrol skills and knowledge in manufacturing. The CMM manufacturing companies, such as theHexagon Manufacturing Intelligence [1], have put together comprehensive training needs withthe help of major worldwide manufacturers
©2019 American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 535Changes to Criteria 3, 5, and Program Criteria Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 535 Criterion 3 – Associate DegreePrevious ETAC Criteria New ETAC Criteriaa. an ability to apply the knowledge, (1) an ability to apply knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools techniques, skills
, what shall be taught and researched, and what standards shall be set for which rewards”(p. 75).9 The authors interviewed 39 experienced, full-time teaching faculty to probe theirexperiences and sense of belonging to this collegium. The following themes emerged:1. While teaching faculty are hired primarily for teaching, there are often written or unwritten expectations for other responsibilities (e.g., service and research). In many cases, though, these other activities are controlled or restricted by the departments, with the sense that the tenure-track faculty must sanction such work.2. Many teaching faculty reported everyday interactions that led them to feel regarded as lower status, and marginalized from the tenure
Build a Prototype Test and evaluate prototype Implement Communication of Results System Analysis and Control Improve: Review and redesign as needed Table 1: Engineering Design Process10Our Capstone course is offered every semester. The students in the Computer Engineeringprogram take this course during their last semester. Students have the option of selecting theirown embedded project or to work on a project that is given to them by their advisors. During thefirst week of the semester, students write a proposal to define problems and identify solutionapproaches for
software. Atregular intervals throughout the course, theory-based instruction is followed by exploration ofthe same concepts in the context of commercial simulation software.The topics covered in each segment are summarized in Table 1. They are grouped into roughly1/3 increments, each of which is followed by a written exam that tests theoretical topics with “byhand” problems that are straightforward enough to be solved with a scientific calculator. Table 1 – Content Summary of Existing FEA Course Theory Based Instruction Commercial Software AugmentSpring elements, direct stiffness method, truss Analysis of trusses including: Initial set-up,elements, coordinate transformations, stress in
integration. “One of the biggest educational challenges for K-12 STEM education is that few general guidelines or models exist for teachers to followregarding how to teach using STEM integration approaches in their classroom4” (p. 32). This project explored how five elementary classroom teachers integrated scienceand engineering in their classrooms while piloting engineering curriculum. Our specificresearch questions were:1. How do teachers integrate science units with engineering design units? a. What aspects of the curriculum or content do they struggle with? b. What do teachers feel most influenced their implementation in terms of their instructional goals or learning outcomes?2. How does the instructional sequence